白左

Baizuo” — the greatest thing in 2017 so far.

Makes me think the world might pull through okay.

It’s all (amazingly) good, but this is probably the kernel:

The question has received more than 400 answers from Zhihu users, which include some of the most representative perceptions of the ‘white left’. Although the emphasis varies, baizuo is used generally to describe those who “only care about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment” and “have no sense of real problems in the real world”; they are hypocritical humanitarians who advocate for peace and equality only to “satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority”; they are “obsessed with political correctness” to the extent that they “tolerate backwards Islamic values for the sake of multiculturalism”; they believe in the welfare state that “benefits only the idle and the free riders”; they are the “ignorant and arrogant westerners” who “pity the rest of the world and think they are saviours”.

ADDED: Baizuo at Weimerica, and Spandrell’s place.

May 14, 2017admin 72 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Ideology

TAGGED WITH : , , , , ,

72 Responses to this entry

  • Angry Midwesterner MD Says:

    Someone once said, China is capitalist, lower case c. They are mocking the lower case communists

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 2:36 am Reply | Quote
  • ivvenalis Says:

    The total lack of awareness in that article is literally incredible. Is this guy engaged in some samizdat-style dance around the issue here or is he really that clueless?

    [Reply]

    DukeofQin Reply:

    Author is a woman with a PhD from a European university in Brussels who works in Copenhagen. So chances are they really are that clueless. Her CV reads like that of your typical Chinese comprador and white cock sucker. I mean that literally in that she is guaranteed to be sucking white dick. I’ll let you in on a ancient Chinese secret. There is actually no such thing as a modern Asian feminist-left. Asian women, or Chinese women at least simply aren’t wired to think that way. What they actually are, are ruthless social climbers and status accumulators gone wild. Their natural hypergamous instinct kicked into overdrive to the extent that status points among their kin are insufficient and they must have their status be validated by whites who presently sit at the apex of the global status hierarchy. This means whatever ideology spread by Western elites is theirs and this invariably comes with a White husband to boot. It’s the reason why the vast majority of “native” opinion in China that Western media references happens to be female and also why no one in China takes women like Chenchen Zhang seriously. I mean would you listen to the prattle of the sort of White women who chase after black athletes.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 4:28 am Reply | Quote
  • woods Says:

    Amen. And I’ll be using that description of baizuo anytime I have to explain to natives what I mean by ‘regressive left’.

    [Reply]

    Hegemonizing Swarm Reply:

    > Although the emphasis varies, baizuo is used generally to describe those who “only care about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment” and “have no sense of real problems in the real world”;

    What is the definition of “care” here? Does “baizuo” also include the regressive right? After all, a lot there are also obsessed about “topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT”, just on the other side of the fence.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Right. There’s definitely a regressive “Right.” Idiots who complain and campaign even about Gays, etc, while not having that many babies themselves. Who cares if a minority is LGBTwhatever if muh People is dying out?

    It’s not a frickin’ infectious disease. “Conservatives” who can’t even scramble back to the actual tradition that was what kept the west going for 5.000 years shouldn’t whine about homos.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    the actual tradition that was what kept the west going for 5.000 years

    If anyone is wondering about what this is, it’s what is alive in Conservative Asia still : use pussy to make babies.

    It’s the only way a new generation forms.

    Alrenous Reply:

    After all, a lot there are also obsessed about “topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT”, just on the other side of the fence

    If they’re obsessed about that, they’re on the left, even if they vote republicant.
    Fox is centre-left. There are no popular right-wing journalists in America. Populares are left-wing, so it’s basically impossible.

    [Reply]

    woods Reply:

    This.

    Anon Reply:

    Heuristic for spotting crypto-leftist accelerationists, like Hegemonizing Swarm, that are secretly pro-cathedral: they have no sense of proportionality or symmetry when it comes to “right” and “left” power and resort to muh hypocrisy.

    PS

    Rhett twitter is missing their nu-male gender studies grad student circle jerk.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Take some SSRIs, your serotonin is running low.

    Daniel Chieh Reply:

    No, its literally just “white left.” And yes, the Chinese have little patience with the uber conservatives but they do trend conservative: e.g. tolerance of gays, no promotion. No special employment protection.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 7:45 am Reply | Quote
  • merkur Says:

    Super excited that low information internet users in China also agree with us!

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    surprising indeed, especially considering the scale of it.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    nothing similar in India, same centuries old slaves attitude toward the west here.

    [Reply]

    Dharmaesthetics Reply:

    Dude, are you even aware of the Hindu Monarchy/Hindu Trad movements brewing in India? People who are fed up with cucked Modi and BJP.

    SVErshov Reply:

    I live in India, but you are righg my awarness level about social life , political trends ect very low. I dont see it as significant, because all of it contributes to the same end. and it going to end in biggest bloodbath India ever seen. good luck for those traditionalists snd monarchists to pass through.

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 8:41 am Reply | Quote
  • Artxell Knaphni Says:

    THAT CUNNINGLY MALEVOLENT GNONIAN AGENT, NICK LAND!

    China and the west? Oranges and apples!?
    It’s not that they’re incommensurable, in some kind of ‘absolute’ way, or whatever. But one has to patiently do the work of contextual comparison and not rush into hasty politicised or ideologised conclusions.
    The central point is that both ‘equality’and ‘inequality’ are constructed determinations, always contingent on an assumed, structural standardisation. But standard assumptions, no matter how seemingly ‘objective’ or ‘universal’, are nonetheless not immune to reflexivity and recontextualisation, when it comes to both theoretical and practical realisations. The very distinction between local and global conceptions, can only give rise to the conventionally counterintuitive in actual experiences simultaneously conditioned by both conceptions.
    The xenophobic impulse is everywhere, and the business of stimulating it with the entertaining simplicities of caricature, hostile exaggeration, and sensationalist misrepresentation, can always be quite profitable wherever ignorance prevails. The problem, in an era of mass societies and globalisation, is that ignorance is everywhere, too. You just can’t deal with all possibly pertinent global events at once.
    Robert Sheckley wrote a short story about it, back in the 1950s.

    More seriously, it seems obvious this blog’s nefarious host, Nick Land, has infiltrated and taken over, China! Obvious, too, is his alliance with the extraterrestrial ‘Gnonians’, whose cunning malevolence he is a blatant and self-admitted agent of! Do your own research!

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    CITY ZEN AND THE MECHANICAL ART OF URBAN REPRESENTATION

    Instead of saying, whilst brandishing its idealised conception: ‘There has never been a democracy!’; one can emphasise an operational, or functional, definition. That is, if democracy is supposed to function according to representation, why not observe its institutional mechanisms and their respective operations in a different way? Namely, instead of bemoaning its allegedly flawed nature, as reported by its dissatisfied participants; why not entertain the possibility that it is indeed representative, and truly so? That, at all times, it does actually depict truths about what it reflects?

    By viewing it, thus, the entirety of its operations as an object of system-theoretical analysis, rather than an institutional utility mediating a host of conscious expectations and producing allegedly faulty results; it becomes possible through such an analysis, to retrojectively triangulate, in a far more specific but albeit counter intuitive way, those forces and entities which are actually being represented, and quite perfectly at that.

    This may not satisfy at all, those who demand their insights and truths to be delivered according to rote languages of intention, conscious expectation, and ‘rational expediency’. Talking about “ratchets” and “reality” isn’t enough; mere observation of a couple of tendencies hardly constitutes an effective consideration.
    If freshness of thought is permitted, sustained consideration easily shows new and different formations at work.

    For those who cling to their category nostalgias, to those weltanschauungs on the wane, such novelties only constitute a pretext for the ardours of complexity and calculation, as they struggle to reduce conditions to the fixation of their worldly understanding. The irony of this great labour resides in the proliferating multiplication of fixations and understandings produced, whilst performing dramas of allegedly discriminating selection on disingenuous stages of relevance, in its theatrick simulation of understanding.

    [Reply]

    Bruce Arney Reply:

    Gay rights trumps a 20 trillion dollar debt. Baizuo is a valid word which describes insane leftist behavior. They are outside the corral and can objectively see the death of the West.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    http://i.imgur.com/w6F9N5D.png

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    Big W, you’re trying to turn my jokey dig at Nick Land into a meme, lol?
    To what degree, NL is an inciter of ‘hate’, or a channel of its safe and thoughtful release, is certainly a question worth asking. To what degree, ‘hate’ can be seen as a necessary and structural emotional component in any social system whose allegedly ‘healthy’ functioning might seem to require it. What ‘cash value’, as the pragmatists say, does ‘hate’ have? I guessed that suggests a ‘sentiment capitalism’, lol. Well, they use ‘sentiment engineering’, anyway.

    Interesting illustration of this concern: Brian Aldiss, on ‘hate-braces’; 1950s, SF short story; collected in “Galaxies Like Grains of Sand”.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Excellent spying, Wagner.

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    THE SHALLOW PSYCHOLOGY OF NEOREACTIVE NARCISSISM

    The irony being that India is a democracy, and China is a communist state supporting various Marxist movements in India.
    Is SVErshov right? Maybe, partially. He ought to know, if he’s in India.
    More to the point, though, is the implicit point right?
    As an observation, it is certainly compelling.
    It’s undeniable, that people differ from each other in all kinds of ways. And certainly, a Baudrillard, for instance, makes much of the spontaneous impulse towards status differentiation that humans seem to have.
    Again, though, it’s inordinate emphasis, as a countergesture in the face of a perceived homogenising ideology; or a reactive rebellion against the dangers of allegedly disingenuous democratic synthesis; seems to me, at least in terms of the Neoreactionary articulations I’ve seen, to be overly conditioned by contemporary surface contentions, at the level of which, they have become fixated.
    It is not the case, that those states purporting to characterise themselves as democracies, have actually instituted absolute egalitarianism, at all.
    Just as civilisations require specialisation and differentiation, they also require global protocols and standards, without which, differential structures of specification cannot be effectively harnessed. There is a cybernetic imperative, of sorts, involved.
    What Land’s Technocommercialism touts as ‘evolutionary necessity’, can only be that of a global discipline, as the governing context of all notions of ‘efficiency’ that he might appeal to. When a system gains global dominance, what happens? Does evolution stop? Is a global organism in operation? Does the system, or organism, ‘control’ evolution through localised distribution?
    These are first-level, simple questions; and so are their answers. Unfortunately, Neoreactive consideration always seems to fixate at that level. That is Land’s choice, as I did suggest, on his very first post on this blog; the speculative exploration of this theoretical field.
    The ‘homo sapien system’ is obviously global in extent; its effects are obviously global. To neglect global consideration; in favour of oscillating around the ‘humanistic/inhumanistic’ preoccupations, and species status concerns, of an anthropic narcissism; can only be the deepest and most moronic form of regression and incompetence.

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 9:30 am Reply | Quote
  • SydneyTrads Editors Says:

    Amazing how the writer refers to the white-left as “whatever it means” after spending no less than fourteen preceding paragraphs defining precisely what it means. The status signalling symptom of the liberal mind virus is chronic with that one.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 10:23 am Reply | Quote
  • atavisionary Says:

    I find it strange that the mainland Chinese would be that involved in understanding the ebbs and flows of American politics. Although, I will say that in travels it seems that US news is inordinately interesting to people from pretty much everywhere…

    That said, the truth is the truth and GNON prevails. No shit different races are different and accepting massive amounts of low IQ immigrants is a terrible idea. It is not much wonder that anyone absent western educational propaganda/social pressure would call a spade a spade. So, other than the high interest in issues not particularly relevant to them personally, it is quite sensible that they would come to a basically logical conclusion. Reality is as it is and anyone is free to notice it and come to pragmatic understanding.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 12:02 pm Reply | Quote
  • The Alien Says:

    I thought the take on the ideological aspect pertinent:

    “Pragmatism with an emphasis on self-responsibility seems to be the ideology of our post-ideological times. It is, in UK prime minister Theresa May’s words, ‘living within our means’. This is combined with a general indifference towards race issues, or even worth, with certain social Darwinist beliefs that some races are superior to others, leading many mainland Chinese netizens to dismiss struggles against structural discriminations as naïve, pretentious or demanding undeserved privileges.

    According to Baidu Trends, one of the most related keywords to baizuo was huimie: “to destroy”. Articles with titles such as ‘the white left are destroying Europe [and the U.S.A.]’ were widely circulated. (my italics)”

    [Reply]

    The Alien Reply:

    This is notable as well:

    “Ultimately, the more the ‘white left’ – whatever it means – represent the fatal weakness of democracy, the more institutional and normative security the Chinese regime enjoys. The grassroots campaign against the ‘white left’ thus echoes the officially-sanctioned campaign against ‘universal values’, providing a negative evidence for the superiority of the Chinese self.” …

    “The Chinese government has been known to hire a large number of ‘internet commentators’ to fabricate social media posts. According to recent research conducted by scholars at Harvard University, 29% of such posts they investigated fell into the category of ‘taunting of foreign countries’. It is nonetheless impossible to know whether these accused posts are indeed written by government employees. Similarly, it is hard to tell whether some of the criticisms of baizuo are coming from fabricated commentators-for-hire. However, given the strict censorship regime, criticizing democratic values such as pluralism, tolerance, and solidarity is certainly one of the safest ‘critical’ opinions ordinary citizens can express online.”

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    ‘white left’ – whatever it means

    AG • 3 hours ago
    ▬» 白 white is word of color. But such neutral word can carry either positive or negative meaning in specific context.

    For physical feature, white 白 can be positive as noble. clean, beauty.

    For mental feature, white 白 is downright derogatory. Here white means stupidity, poverty, emptiness. 白痴 (idiot),一穷二白(extreme poverty),白费(wasting),脑子空白(ignorant brain),白干(wasted effort),

    Baizuo 白左 (white left) is naturally registered negative in Chinese mind.

    [Reply]

    Daniel Chieh Reply:

    I think its also used for its multipurpose humor value: “white left” = “leftism, as understood by bored and overfed white people.”

    Chinese is a pretty fun language.

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 12:50 pm Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    The white left writes about the white left. Fairly hysterical. In any case, to the Chinese it is clear who the white left is: those who rationalize the decline of the West.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 12:52 pm Reply | Quote
  • mobius Says:

    @and celebrate it.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 1:25 pm Reply | Quote
  • The Alien Says:

    @Brett Stevens So are you saying Oswald Spengler was a ‘white leftist’? If as Nick in The Dark Enlightenment says, “Democracy and ‘progressive democracy’ are synonymous, and indistinguishable from the expansion of the state.” Then truly the decline of the West is this manifest destiny of democracy: it’s success would be its demise, the catastrophe that awaits it. It’s not capital that’s being accelerated, but progressive democracy; and, the faster the better. For as it finalizes its tendency it will resolve itself in the zero point intensity of nullity. Is this not the meaning of decline: decadence. The overabundance that uses itself up, the excess that must catastrophically perform the ‘gift’ of sacrifice, immolate itself on the bonfire of rational expediency? The only equivalence worth its name is the death of democracy, not through some process of external barbarization; but, rather at the implosive and apocalyptic, catastrophic immolation of its subtraction.

    [Reply]

    S.C. Hickman Reply:

    Added a more in depth post: https://socialecologies.wordpress.com/2017/05/14/the-decline-of-the-west/

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 3:12 pm Reply | Quote
  • Daniel Chieh Says:

    This has been a word since at least 2015. Cathedral observations running late.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 5:15 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    ▬» The white left writes about the white left. Fairly hysterical. In any case, to the Chinese it is clear who the white left is: those who rationalize the decline of the West. »
    ▬ Brett Stevens, May 14th, 2017 at 12:52 pm.

    One of your better posts Mr. Stevens.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 7:47 pm Reply | Quote
  • smg Says:

    I left a comment at Open Democracy (Free Thinking for the World!) attached to this article but was banned & more than half the comments by others were deleted, including a comment left by Steve Sailer. Someone has hurt feelings & doesn’t seem particularly into ‘free thinking’. lol

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    “Liberals.”

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 14th, 2017 at 7:50 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    DEus

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 12:24 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    @Artxell.

    The xenophobic impulse is everywhere

    Xenophobia is a misapplied concept. It’s not the alien we fear. It’s the regressive we fear. We’re degenophobes.

    [Reply]

    Anon Reply:

    I’m curious, does that include degenerate esoteric shitposters that spam and wreck comment sections?

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Yes, and frustrated cowardly—no contribution—nobodies that snipe from anonymity.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Actually, more like throw shit from the shadow. These losers don’t reach sniping.

    Anon Reply:

    Your “contributions” consist of the equivalent of leaving mentally ill exegeses of Revelation in tiny scribbly red writing on your apartment walls, then screaming from your window at the top of your lungs that there are secret messages on number plates in passing cars.

    I do wonder what fashionable totalitarian insanity you will latch onto next, though. My bet is some form of pro-active antinatalism.

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 12:32 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    I intended to post bout Chin-A yesterday. Evidently being a Dota 2 player there is a vector onto stardom.

    I’d reproduce the sentences from the movie, but it’s just a must-see.

    https://youtu.be/UjZYMI1zB9s

    ▬» Published on Mar 19, 2014
    FREE TO PLAY is a feature-length documentary that follows three professional gamers from around the world as they compete for a million dollar prize in the first Dota 2 International Tournament. In recent years, E Sports has surged in popularity to become one of the most widely-practiced forms of competitive sport today. A million dollar tournament changed the landscape of the gaming world and for those elite players at the top of their craft, nothing would ever be the same again. Produced by Valve, the film documents the challenges and sacrifices required of players to compete at the highest level. »

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 12:51 am Reply | Quote
  • Word Of The Day – waka waka waka Says:

    […] I was remiss not to give a hat-tip to Nick Land for […]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 1:44 am Reply | Quote
  • DukeofQin Says:

    Baizuo doesn’t actually mean White Left. It’s an abbreviation of Baichi Zuopai which is literally moronic leftist. Like how Beida is Beijing Daxue and Zhonggong is the Zhongguo Gongchandang.

    The alternative meaning though is a fitting double entendre.

    [Reply]

    Bruce Arney Reply:

    If we cannot form our own thought patterns, the Chinese will fill in the blanks. We are confined by the parameters of PC thought.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    We are not.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 6:27 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    @Anon

    muh hypocrisy.

    Go fuck yourself, no-skin-in-the-game irony hipsterbro.

    As if hypocrisy isn’t universally detested by the trans-Christian (this means something that goes through Christianity instead of ignoring it)*; Pagan; traditional Christian; and Chinese Right. Feigned morality or bad moralisms are not values in any Right—lest it be a Nihilist pseudo-“Right.” It is quite precisely hypocrisy that is one of the features of the political, and libtard, left that we rightly criticise.

    [* Catholicism itself is rather trans-Christian, in that it appropriates Pagan customs and doctrines and delivers them even unto the relatively post-Christian era.

    For example, universities/colleges; “Christmas” (which still has its pagan name in numerous European nations); and the common word ‘office’ are trans-Christian or trans-Catholic. In ancient Rome officium meant “service”, “(sense of) duty”, “courtesy”, and “ceremony” » while in Church Latin it means “church service”. By the 13th century it has transformed, to mean “a post, an employment to which certain duties are attached.”

    Rule-of-the-Father or patriarchy is also trans-Catholic, so far as it survives beyond the Catholic era. It was noticeably enough alive until the 90s. In ancient Rome it is formalized through the concept of pater familia, in our time it is that your daddy is normally not ruled by his woman.]

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Add to patriarchy paternal right over the daughter. Ie. daddy makes sure she don’t get knocked up by niggers and plebes. And that she has babies with a worthy man.

    Of course a healthy father who has his emotional circuitry functioning well enough has a daughter who simply will make these choices on her own, as her Phallocentrism will be functioning. (Ie. she has an healthy Image of the Male and his function in her psyche, so as to not be serially abused by fuckbois or a childless opinionated slut.)

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 9:56 am Reply | Quote
  • squf Says:

    https://twitter.com/squf_/status/864030214061412352

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    You, Mr. Land, and Mr. Chieh have made me more interested in learning Chinese.

    “When you put it glossy like that… With luster.”

    [Reply]

    squf Reply:

    I can’t really speak much on it since I don’t know a lick of it, but I have been slowly integrating mandarin into my life more.

    It’s certainly pleasing to the eyes.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 11:45 am Reply | Quote
  • Asher Says:

    I bothered leaving a couple comments over there. They were deleted within 24 hours.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    That’s why I tend to call these tards pseudo-liberals.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 1:51 pm Reply | Quote
  • Outliers (#52) « Amerika Says:

    […] 白左 (Nick Land, Outside In) […]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 3:33 pm Reply | Quote
  • Dharmaesthetics Says:

    @merkur In addition, similar terms we use are sullas, pretas, mlechha etc.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 3:44 pm Reply | Quote
  • Bruce Arney Says:

    I find it strange that the mainland Chinese would be that involved in understanding the ebbs and flows of American politics.
    [Reply]

    Why wouldn’t they watch the circus from abroad? It’s the sinking of the Titanic, afterall and they’re pretty secure in their life rafts.l

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 5:44 pm Reply | Quote
  • The White Left | Bloody shovel Says:

    […] don’t get too excited. Nick Land is excited.  But he lives in Shanghai. And he just found out about this. Which means it’s not anything […]

    Posted on May 15th, 2017 at 10:28 pm Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    (((white leftists)))

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 16th, 2017 at 12:16 pm Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    Still no mention of the JQ on this Kosher blog

    white leftists, instead, for fuck’s sake

    Quelle ennui

    where to begin

    7 million jews that russia inherited in 18th century from dismemberment of Poland ended up as the greatest power in Russia, highly antagonistic, with stranglehold on finance, economy, resources, academe,
    · these same jews utterly destroyed russia in october of 1917 – the same kabbalistic jews that engineered WWI and WWII

    these same jews raped russia from 1991 till 1999 (when putin took power)

    and guess what: today, Russia has fewer than 400 thousand jews.

    America has maybe 6 million?

    and you feel like a big winner, russia is a loser, right?

    The bouncing ball repeatedly smacks you in the face and still you don’t see it.

    jew has been striving to conquer and subjugate russia for over thousand years, concurrent with squelching Christianity, no objective comes ahead of the burning need for revenge against whoever interferes with the march of Talmud to its messianic fulfillment.

    G bush was 69ing chabad rabbi schnotson throughout his term and probably way back too, another kabbalah protestant of the slimiest sort.

    As long as jew cult exists and is allowed to thrive, the march to Russia will persist with the same unyielding urgency that you see now, as long as a true christian leader stands at its head, the overwhelming weight of 14 million strong jew hate will wash over him as steady as ocean surf.

    Thus, the clear and present danger of world ending war will be the damocles sword over us all.

    and here’s Andrew Joyce on the Jewish origin of the Open Borders movement

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/10/02/the-jewish-origins-of-the-open-borders-movement/

    but you still don’t see it, do you

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    You’ve just done an anti Semitic screed, using someone else’s name.
    Words like ‘fraud’ and ‘defamation’, are strongly suggested.

    It’s strange isn’t it, how those ethnicities and bloodlines actually responsible for most mass atrocities, so easily hallucinate and project that tendency to deliver the horrific, onto everyone else but themselves!

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Land doesn’t wax HBD on the JQ because he wants a distinguished CEO spot in the eminent “Jolly Wankers Incorporated” patch of the future.

    In a characteristic move and in one fell swoop adman upholds the Chinese, demonizes whites, and sweeps under the rug the chosen Jews. His gizmo-chimpian sinofetishism is a new-age suicide cult: in its deification of confuciusbloods and promise of the AI it hypnotically instills racial relativism into the growing new-right laity; a demagogue of the eternal slave-revolt, he subverts the hyperborean force whose smothered refrain is that the PEAK shall inherit the earth. One can choose to be either a Bruno or a Badiou, and Land has made his choice, which was emblazoned into his bones for him by centuries of Revelation. If one really were to go outside one would wax HBD on the EQ and wonder why an Englishman would bear such an egalitarian predisposition. Remember, the French took Anglo-America as its model for their revolution.

    Artxell on the other hand can’t admit to himself the laziness of his race and so will be reincarnated once again into the body of an Indian. Some never learn!

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    JQ is about as outdated as Nationalism.

    [Reply]

    Rohme Giuliano Reply:

    Bruno Latour..Giordano Bruno.. Bruno Mars?

    [Reply]

    Rohme Giuliano Reply:

    Wagner & Erik,

    Have either of you read Giovanni Gentile? Particularly, his reading of Hegel contra Marx?

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 16th, 2017 at 12:41 pm Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    Jews accused of ‘blackmailing’ Sweden with help of (((Barbara Spectre)))

    “When they were negotiating with the Swedish government, they told the government:

    ‘If you don’t give us this money, behind us we have the World Jewish Congress, and we will tell all the world that Sweden is an anti-Semitic country.’” — Ingrid Carlqvist, Swedish journalist.

    QUESTION 1. Why should Jews place themselves in the forefront of the movement to rescue Europe from certain extinction, given that Jews have never shown the slightest inclination for altruism throughout their history?—always striving to advance Jewish interests at the expense of everyone else’s interests, and above all, always doing what is “good for the Jews”.

    QUESTION 2. How is it possible to sing the praises of mass immigration to Europe, maintaining that this is necessary for European “survival”, when such mass immigration is bound to produce miscegenation and mongrelizaton of the indigenous white Europeans, leading to white genocide in 50-60 years? In short, how can white genocide be good for whites?

    QUESTION 3. Why is multiculturalism such a good idea for Europe and America and other white homelands but such a bad idea for Israel? Why are endless swarms of immigrants to be seen as blessings in Europe and America but as curses in Israel? (See video at end of article where Israeli officials and rabbis refer openly to all refugees as “infiltrators”.)

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2017/jews-accused-of-blackmailing-sweden-with-help-of-barbara-spectre/#comments

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 16th, 2017 at 7:18 pm Reply | Quote
  • TheDividualist Says:

    Someone translate that Mr. Liu article please!

    [Reply]

    spandrell Reply:

    What?

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 17th, 2017 at 8:42 am Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    @ Artxell Knaphni

    Don’t worry, Artxell.

    No anti-semites here.

    the name’s Abe RothSteinberg and I monitor online hate speech for the ADL

    I was just using a goy sounding pseudonyn above so I could PRETEND to be an anti-semite, “pour m’amuser et pour épater les bourgeois”. Like you.

    Leftists and their fucking morality. Always outraged over something.

    The problem is we’ve trained you TOO WELL (Frankfurt School, Deconstruction, anti-Oedipus, anti-White studies, etc)… it gets boring even for us sometimes.

    But on a serious note: We were conducting ADL’s routine annual test to give this blog a clean bill of health.

    And guess what, it passed with flying colors.

    Keep commenting, Artxell. We’re not worried about Leftists, we even encourage it.

    You have the ADL’s full stamp of approval to make unlimited Leftist comments on this blog for one more year.

    Carry on…

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    “@ Artxell Knaphni

    Don’t worry, Artxell. No anti-semites here.
    the name’s Abe RothSteinberg and I monitor online hate speech for the ADL
    I was just using a goy sounding pseudonyn above so I could PRETEND to be an anti-semite, “pour m’amuser et pour épater les bourgeois”. Like you.
    Leftists and their fucking morality. Always outraged over something.
    The problem is we’ve trained you TOO WELL (Frankfurt School, Deconstruction, anti-Oedipus, anti-White studies, etc)… it gets boring even for us sometimes.
    But on a serious note: We were conducting ADL’s routine annual test to give this blog a clean bill of health.
    And guess what, it passed with flying colors.
    Keep commenting, Artxell. We’re not worried about Leftists, we even encourage it.
    You have the ADL’s full stamp of approval to make unlimited Leftist comments on this blog for one more year.”

    {AK}: Your comparison is entirely of your own imaginative production. You can twist yourself up, all you like, around your bete noire binaries, don’t expect me to join you. One day, for you, ‘left’ and ‘right’ might coincide, in a synergy called ‘thought’. Until then, I guess, you’re too obviously condemned to mechanically circulate around the cesspit of your chosen clichés.
    The point is, you’re using a name, “Claire Colebrook”, that’s not your own.

    [Reply]

    Posted on May 17th, 2017 at 12:41 pm Reply | Quote

Leave a comment