5/11/2016

guy-fawkes-bonfire

Everything is on fire.

ADDED: Guy Fawkes’ signature before and after torture:
guy-fawkes-signature

November 5, 2016admin 34 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Images

TAGGED WITH : ,

34 Responses to this entry

  • Cryptogenic Says:

    Any cute bloodied urchins?

    [Reply]

    Anon Reply:

    Après nous le déluge, after my light, it comes to swallow up the flame of my identity; the house is all assuaged and waiting for its Lord…

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 5th, 2016 at 8:11 pm Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    Good, burn it all down. Equality and eusociality ( = altruism = egalitarianism ) must fall. The weak will be eaten.

    [Reply]

    pyrrhus Reply:

    Indeed, a victory for the one Party police State may only accelerate the process of devolution to a mixed bag of Brazils and Montenegros….

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    I love Brett but my gut is that his avatar is a providential sign.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    it sure is. everything is a providential sign.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    feminism is the direct consequence, aside from the feminine imperative, of technology and “liberalism” (deployed liberalism by the federalist-autocrats, you know DuPont, Rockefeller, and the rest).

    in fact, contraceptions, “freeing” women from motherhood, is a sales-product.

    is it sustainable? no, it will crumble as white people are replaced by brownies.

    so we want it to crash asap. better that it crash when there´s still some whities left, than when it will be numerically impossible for whites to stand the darkling femme hordes even in the most favorable crash.

    the Hill Binton beast would accelerate that. either way is fine, this is a most welcome apocalypse.

    De profundis mors advocat!
    The pact is sealed, crystallised
    Dark are the paths without return
    Ash and blood colour my world
    Ever downward winding steps spiraling to the utmost depths
    Where the sun is but a memory of a murdered dream

    As if emerged from the Abyss
    Evoked by his own tongue
    Antichrist, Devil’s child
    Possessed by the night

    As a flame within the heart
    Restlessly beckoning through
    The guilt and vanity of a world deaf to it’s call

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 5th, 2016 at 8:40 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    I don´t suppose you were doing a fire ritual Land.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 5th, 2016 at 9:09 pm Reply | Quote
  • Alex Says:

    Igne Natura Renovatur Integra

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 5th, 2016 at 9:12 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    >Dork Wagner
    >“Little Hans: Why would the Techno-commercialist want to get into a government with Ethno-nationalists or Theocrats instead of quietly pushing them out into the night?

    >admin: Push them out how?”
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬

    the answer would be to bully them out, of course — the same as in any tragically human group. forever. if you want a fancy D&D name for that, calle it « raining fire on them ».

    i´ll have to admit it was the altright that redpill’d me on that, or actually turned the nose of thise hounde on bloode againe. it´s always been there, of sorts.

    altho i had my go with Tombergian esoteric christianity and never felt as miserable. sacrificing onself for the world, go to hell.

    The fools scorn Me when I take on human form; My essence, supreme source of beings, escapes them.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Like I said in the beginning, a lack of agonism, a lack of fragmentationism, is boring. Many of my posts have been symptoms of the Political Correctness redivivus of Zenosystems. Your shitlord quivers are full of plastic monkey wrenches you bureaucrats. Just managing MOldbugisnm humbdiddydumb. Dionysus, it’s what’s for breakfast.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    do you know how many altrighters your age are posting daily thinking they´re Dionysus? you´re still on a nerd forum here with us, kiddo.

    i welcome agonism. if it has a point beyond pathos. or perhaps rather, anterior to pathos.

    so what do you think of Kaczynski? most edgelords are into him and Duarte.

    personally, i like Brzezinski better.

    #technocracy

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    The more Kaczynskis the merrier, cuz democracy. A short story Aeroguy linked here by Scott Bakker blew my mind more than anything I’d read for a few months at the time:
    https://www.academia.edu/19469409/Crash_Space

    Really worth reading, higher quality than Gibson IMPO (in my peasant opinion).

    We are far from that kind of technology but I believe it is possible. I find the idea that intelligence can be *enhanced* more plausible than the idea that it can be created from scratch. Indeed Heidegger did not think artificial intelligence was even possible but who was he?

    Does anyone care about the trichotomy anymore? Checks and balances ya know, cuz tyranny. If we take Intelligence Optimization as the Zeus of the pantheon and the three tentacles of the trichotomy as the lesser gods, I feel Zeus as squid-brain would be evolution’d out of existence without all his tentacles.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    funny, i had just DMed: « i don´t really read novels
    i started w/ the sequel to my favorite novel recently, made only 3 lines ».

    i´ve only read a few novels in my life. Neuromancer is my favorite. but i don´t have time to put my mind so much to fantasy anymore. altho novels contain philosophy, i prefer manu-o-manu. not merely occupy a headspace but a commu-nity.

    i agree with what you say about intelligence.

    subject sentient sapience cannot be created by lesser minds.

    imo nothing works for long if it leaves out one arm/head of the trichotomy.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    how about you work on your inner Grey Tribe, kid? Zizek is not your man for it.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    https://timespiralpress.net/2016/02/29/crypto-current-update/

    Posted on November 5th, 2016 at 9:43 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    It´s 1968 again
    https://youtu.be/vtz5Emyldwg

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 5th, 2016 at 10:01 pm Reply | Quote
  • FOAM Says:

    @G. Eiríksson

    kek does “Michael” like (((((, the shocking outcome of the blockchain is that it is now impossible to be “post-Kantian” because we now have artificial, absolute time . Relativity is succeeded by a distributed and secure time-stamping mechanism in tensed time. The blockchain is transcendental to humans, rendering ontology a monetary critique. The information on the blockchain is made real and irreversible; there is a construction of being. In this synthetic temporality there is a construction about the nature of reality and its previous states and humans do not have a transcendent criteria or tools to second-guess or critique the information on the blockchain. The blockchain means that we are post-space-time. The question is then; can architects design platforms for a city with a tempo in absolute time?

    https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video/CwikuaIXAAETql_.mp4

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 6th, 2016 at 5:57 am Reply | Quote
  • Uncle Saturday Says:

    Her, a clit, us?

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 6th, 2016 at 6:21 am Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    elites will resort to violence at any time, question of cost. African violence trap good example. cost of violence in deloped countries is very high. but seems like cost does no matter any more.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 6th, 2016 at 6:51 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    Simon Critchley is Hegel, admin is Schopenhauer

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/07/opinion/on-election-eve-a-brexistential-dread.html

    [Reply]

    Lucian Reply:

    “Novels like Sartre’s 1938 “Nausea” captured a feeling of disgust with the world and disgust with ourselves for going along with a world so seemingly blissfully happy with itself for so long. For Sartre, the dreadful had already happened, with the rise of National Socialism in the early 1930s, and it was a question of learning to face up to our fate.”

    Whoever wrote this is missing a lobe.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Sartre who advocated third-worldist violence, said Nazism was the dreadful, while himself advocating a nationalist socialism for brown people?

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 6th, 2016 at 7:02 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    i´ve been experimenting with throwing people out of chat rooms akin to letting people see heads fly in a french revolution. it´s terrifying how that works. inhumanity really is worse than a beast

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    i can´t go back to playing video games if i tried. i´m addicted to Internet conniving

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    The dust will settle after the mock-revolution election and we’ll be infused again with humdrum-consciousness.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    I saw the man at J.F.K.
    He took your ticket yesterday
    In the humdrum.

    i abhor pessimism!

    Posted on November 7th, 2016 at 2:06 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    burning effigy

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 7th, 2016 at 2:17 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    A. Giorgio Agamben in Homo Sacer argues that Aristotle conceives of human animal ‘life’ this sense (zoē), and distinguishes it from man’s political and ethical life (bios). Agamben interprets (zoē), as “simple natural life” [la semplice vita naturale] and explains that this kind of life “mere living was excluded from the polis and confined to the oikos or household, which was a sphere concerned exclusively with reproduction [riproduzione] and subsistence [sussistenza]. This is the meaning he subsequently assigns to “bare life” [la nuda vita].

    Zōon = man’s natural existence, or the social existence of the polis existence “by nature” where this expression does not refer to (but specifically) excludes the teleological meaning of nature.
    The instinctual basis of the polis – desire for companionship.
    The metaphysical/reproductive basis of the polis.
    The drive for self-preservation.
    The economic and material basis of the polis.
    B. Martin Heidegger interprets the phrase “politikon zōon” as a reference to man’s animal existence.

    Martin Heidegger, On Humanism, 1949, p13

    “We must be clear that human beings in the final analysis are enclosed in the sphere of animal being (animalitas), even if he is not equated with beasts, but is given a specific difference. In principle one must always think of the homo animalis…this positioning is a kind of metaphysics.”
    So Heidegger thinks that man’s status as a zōon, marks him out as an animal.

    However, zōon/zōē is not a pejorative designation. It means “ensouled being” or “living being” in a wide and non-pejorative sense, which excludes only plants, but includes animals and Gods. (Animal by contrast, in the Roman and Christian traditions is pejorative.)

    C. As Hans Jonas puts it  “does not mean animal ( = bestia), but every ensouled (= living) being, excluding plants but including demons, Gods, ensouled stars, indeed the ensouled universe as the greatest and most perfect living being itself.” (Hans Jonas, ‘Zwischen Nichts und Ewigkeit. Zur Lehre vom Menachen’ cited in Günther Bien, Die Grundlegung der Politischen Philosophie bei Aristoteles, Freiburg, Karl Alber, 1973, p. 123.)

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 7th, 2016 at 6:02 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    http://i.imgur.com/EvXXDMv.jpg

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    https://youtu.be/eEQomU6iFtw

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 7th, 2016 at 6:34 am Reply | Quote
  • TheDividualist Says:

    “The eye is burning, forms are burning, eye-consciousness is burning, eye-contact is burning (…) Burning with the fire of lust, with the fire of hate, with the fire of delusion. I say it is burning with birth, aging and death, with sorrows, with lamentations, with pains, with griefs, with despairs.

    “The ear is burning, sounds are burning…

    “The nose is burning, odors are burning…

    “The tongue is burning, flavors are burning…

    “The body is burning, tangibles are burning…

    “The mind is burning, ideas are burning, mind-consciousness is burning, mind-contact is burning”

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    sounds like hell.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 7th, 2016 at 8:40 am Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    The eternal return of 5/11/2016

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 9th, 2016 at 3:23 am Reply | Quote

Leave a comment