It took years and years of anti-White propaganda and conditioning, including hiding crimes by Blacks while scurrelously accusing Whites of those same types of crimes, in order to colonize her mind with that false consciousness according to which being raped by a Black becomes a chance to recite the usual whaargarbl about Whites.

I think that article, even though it was from 2010, really marks the culmination of the 20th century.

is that just the dark background?

I think radish is the right on-ramp for /pol/. Radish has lots of punchy propaganda images that work really well for dump threads. Plus his stuff is quite linkable.

The usual problem with radish is the heavy emphasis on race (being essentially unamusement park in a fancy suit), but /pol/ is at least an order of magnitude more racist, so it’s actually no problem.

>/pol/’s centrifugal core is its unconditional distrust of higher education

Sure, if by “higher eductaion” you mean more specifically the cathedralist parts and what “eductated” people believe.

The only person between the submissions account and the page is me, so the decision to publish Bryce (and now Wesley’s) article is entirely mine.

We get 9 million unique hits a month now, which is considerably more than the Examiner.

There are a variety of factors influencing my decision to publish self-identified neoreactionaries, the first among which is my editor’s complete lack of tolerance for politically correct pieties. Honestly, I’m probably more skittish than Tucker is.

The main reason I published Bryce is because I think he’s a capable writer and I wanted to set off the kind of cognitive dissonance Land addresses in the post above.

At present I’d say /pol/’s centrifugal core is its unconditional distrust of higher education, which potentially leads a few to the blogosphere and DE.

They haven’t quite discovered the full on Cathedral-aware Dark Enlightenment yet. At least, no one says “Cathedral” on /pol/. DE might be too high-brow; 4chan isn’t exactly intellectual.