Comments on: Castillo on Nrx

By: Xoth

Xoth — Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:23:15 +0000

Why are you here again?

By: Nick B. Steves

Nick B. Steves — Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:20:16 +0000

A would propose a Gentlemen’s Agreement to ban use of the term “entryist” when applied to Neoreaction until such time as there exists a thing to enter. By that time we should have a Formal Theory of Banning Entryism which may be simultaneously put into service and to an empirical test.

By: Scharlach

Scharlach — Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:49:53 +0000

The comments thread over there degenerated quickly. Stop replying to anyone who calls you a racist, people.

By: Anthony

Anthony — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:07:22 +0000

Sailer is a liberal who understands reality. Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman and John Kennedy wouldn’t have much of a beef with anything he advocates, if they were fully aware of, and willing to accept, the realities of HBD.

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:48:38 +0000

@Jason
i would say its the religious leg that’s not conservative yeah loved the Latin mass but seriously its Christianity [incidentally?] a Jewish heresy that our Jewish patron saint identifies as the root of the virus, So how and why exactly does it get a pass ? because we are sentimental romantic like old stuff then why not reboot the constitution as written and understood 225 years ago?- you know a republic of only propertied male gentlemen voting and all. And how does the self sacrificing advice of Christ work with our HBD and free market Ideas are we going to contain it in a glass box on Plum Island maybe forbid mass or any religious reading or discussion in other than Latin? How for that matter is this Gnonsense any different than when I say there is no good not subjective except replicating DNA in order of closest copy all else being subservient and derivative and knowing what we do about HBD how can anything but an ethnostate be the Ideal no matter how rude that seems cause GNON rejecting the neonazis for their socialist proclivities serves Gnon true Dat but prole whites are if nothing else good company and good high IQ breeders. the problem is not AI AI can never go rouge the problem is AG this could divide us cause there reboot to be messed up again or fall into the wrong hands

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:23:25 +0000

Seriously you guys are just figuring out Yarvins not Yahweh

By: Chris B

Chris B — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 01:48:07 +0000

I agree pretty much with every point you make. Capitalism is a vastly destructive force. You really have two choices 1) ludditism 2) intelligent agile compromise with the process. point 1 result in capitalist non luddites beating you over the head with advanced jets. Of course there is a third choice which involves stumbling around like a blind spastic which is the current strategy of the western world.
The options do not seem great. An intelligent analysis of capitalism would be great to get at some deeper points, I keep trying to set that one off, but the problem is all you get is “kill capitalism”!

By: admin

admin — Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:13:15 +0000

If we were clear about what DIDN’T have disastrous unintended consequences, it would be a whole different game.

By: admin

admin — Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:11:31 +0000

If you want to be banned, just say.

By: spandrell

spandrell — Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:11:08 +0000

Thing is my feeling is that this sort of smart yet unrequisite long term planning often has disastrous unintended consequences.

I can totally imagine Bryan Caplan coming out as transexual in 10 years, Umlaut becoming an antinatalist rag, and Tabarok being elected to president in a platform of nuclear war with Russia; all while Cowen himself keeps linking to Matthew Yglesias while wondering why his dear daughter feels the need to buy a 7th cat.