Here we see competition for spoils in its earliest stages.

The crucial factor that determines the success or failure of each player is the choices made by the other participants in the game, that is, the other parents. Everyone therefore watches carefully what the neighbours are doing. If most people make the same choice it will produce a self-reinforcing process, or a ‘cascade’ in Laitin’s terminology. This will create a critical mass behind the one or the other language which in its turn may decisively influence the outcome of the power struggle at the elite level.

Was it like this during the formation of the Cathedral, with everyone watching carefully what the neighbors are doing? Maybe, maybe not — or maybe not consciously…

_The Once and Future King: The Rise of Crown Government in America_

“This remarkable new book shatters just about every myth surrounding American government, the Constitution, and the Founding Fathers, and offers the clearest warning about the alarming rise of one-man rule in the age of Obama.

Most Americans believe that this country uniquely protects liberty, that it does so because of its Constitution, and that for this our thanks must go to the Founders, at their Convention in Philadelphia in 1787.

F. H. Buckley’s book debunks all these myths….

What we have is what Founder George Mason called an “elective monarchy,” which he thought would be worse than the real thing.

Much of this is irreversible.”
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594037191/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1594037191&linkCode=as2&tag=wwwviolentkicom

The Schlichter / Graeber thing is interesting: I think it closely relates to the question of economics / politics and which one ultimately subordinates the other. I have seen them both talk in the past and I would love to see them debate in person.

Related to that, If we had stronger NRx groups set up in meat-space it might be easier to organise things like talks / debates. Would you be able to drop a post sometime to help figure out if there are enough London based people make a meet up worthwhile? I know the DC crowd get together every once in a while and it sounds productive.

Thanks for the Schlichter on Graeber refs — will pursue with gusto.

“Prince Charming’s Castle is architecturally identical to the Tower of London. And tolerance of the right sort of intolerance is of course, tolerance.”

http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2014/04/05/eich/?singlepage=true

http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/6470

‘Lacking any sense of purpose, Delsol asserts, modern man enshrouds himself in technological and physical comfort, leading a life that is at once free of risk and mediocre, mouthing vapid, unexamined clichés. These she calls “the clandestine ideology of our time” — clandestine because no overt adherence to ideology is now socially permissible. Yet the banishment of the economy of ideology, she astutely remarks, has encouraged a black market to flourish in its place: “This underground moral code is saturated with sentimentality yet arbitrarily intolerant.”’

Firefox feedback graph (programmed by some subcompetent faggot who insists on adding a 0 data point for tomorrow) suddenly spikes with massive amounts of negative comments, to the great surprise of SWPLs who extrapolate from 25% of their TV programs being gay to 25% of the population being gay. Compare to the failed boycott of Chick-Fil-A. Conservatives are very, very good at dragging their feet and terrible at pushing back. Maybe there will be a saxoning at some point?

Chakra balancing
Cranial-sacral treatment
Muscle testing
Pendulum diagnostics.

I have seen all this stuff in action many times ….