<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chaos Patch (#35)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/</link>
	<description>Involvements with reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spandrell</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-137006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spandrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-137006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Fixed glitch] My brain&#039;s autocomplete is worse than some smartphones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Fixed glitch] My brain&#8217;s autocomplete is worse than some smartphones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spandrell</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-137005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spandrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-137005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ancestor worship precedes Confucius by millennia. 

The earliest writings in China are the Shang Dynasty oracle bones, where the kings of then asked his ancestors (presumably in heaven) whether rain would fall, or how the harvest was gonna turn out, or whether it was advisable to go to war.
Lavish tombs also go back to the neolithic; so it&#039;s not like people starting worshipping the ancestors because Confucius said so. If anything Confucius just said that it was a nice thing to do, and kids these days don&#039;t respect their ancestors like we used to. 

There&#039;s also an interesting side in how southern China&#039;s society evolved through colonization by northerners, who organized themselves in patriarchal clans which formed larger &quot;surname associations&quot; as a sort of fictitious kin groups who cultivated their cohesiveness by joint ancestor worship (although they had no actual ancestors in common for the most part). 

At any rate this is all the realm of folk religion, and it&#039;s usually just called that. It is not an outgrowth of Confucianism which was explicitly the state philosophy for the bureaucracy; not a bottom-up movement like Taoism or Buddhism was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ancestor worship precedes Confucius by millennia. </p>
<p>The earliest writings in China are the Shang Dynasty oracle bones, where the kings of then asked his ancestors (presumably in heaven) whether rain would fall, or how the harvest was gonna turn out, or whether it was advisable to go to war.<br />
Lavish tombs also go back to the neolithic; so it&#8217;s not like people starting worshipping the ancestors because Confucius said so. If anything Confucius just said that it was a nice thing to do, and kids these days don&#8217;t respect their ancestors like we used to. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also an interesting side in how southern China&#8217;s society evolved through colonization by northerners, who organized themselves in patriarchal clans which formed larger &#8220;surname associations&#8221; as a sort of fictitious kin groups who cultivated their cohesiveness by joint ancestor worship (although they had no actual ancestors in common for the most part). </p>
<p>At any rate this is all the realm of folk religion, and it&#8217;s usually just called that. It is not an outgrowth of Confucianism which was explicitly the state philosophy for the bureaucracy; not a bottom-up movement like Taoism or Buddhism was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter A. Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-136702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter A. Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-136702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks.  It&#039;s interesting that they have separate words for the two Taoisms.  Makes sense.

I associate Confucianism with ancestor worship, which I find attractive, and which I think makes sense in terms of Jungian psychology.  Is there also a separate term in Chinese for mystical stuff that has grown up in loose association with Confucianism?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  It&#8217;s interesting that they have separate words for the two Taoisms.  Makes sense.</p>
<p>I associate Confucianism with ancestor worship, which I find attractive, and which I think makes sense in terms of Jungian psychology.  Is there also a separate term in Chinese for mystical stuff that has grown up in loose association with Confucianism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spandrell</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-136647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spandrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-136647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It can get very complicated (Chinese culture can be very weird), but to put it in simple terms:

Confucianism is obviously not a religion; in its most basic form it&#039;s a theory of government, and it became the basic ethos of government in China. Making it into a religion would be quite fallacious; and it would mean the Chinese government is choosing sides when it gets around to promote it officially.

Mandarins had this ritual about visiting the Confucius temple every year; but it&#039;s not like people prayed to the guy or did miracles in his name. There&#039;s nothing supernatural or mystical about Confucian ideas.

Of course his ideas used to be taken with as much faith as the Bible in Europe; but that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s equivalent. People didn&#039;t obey their parents *because* Confucius said so; they praised Confucius for making such a good point.

Also people tend to confuse Taoism the religion with Taoism the teachings of Laozi. Those are separate words in Chinese; the original philosophical school of Laozi-Zhuangzi, centuries later sorta evolved into a countryside animistic religion, with plenty of gods, alchemy, ghosts, and strange rituals with had little to do with the original Laozi. But they claim to be Taoists, and have been doing their thing to this day, although it&#039;s much weaker than Buddhism or the other foreign imports.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can get very complicated (Chinese culture can be very weird), but to put it in simple terms:</p>
<p>Confucianism is obviously not a religion; in its most basic form it&#8217;s a theory of government, and it became the basic ethos of government in China. Making it into a religion would be quite fallacious; and it would mean the Chinese government is choosing sides when it gets around to promote it officially.</p>
<p>Mandarins had this ritual about visiting the Confucius temple every year; but it&#8217;s not like people prayed to the guy or did miracles in his name. There&#8217;s nothing supernatural or mystical about Confucian ideas.</p>
<p>Of course his ideas used to be taken with as much faith as the Bible in Europe; but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s equivalent. People didn&#8217;t obey their parents *because* Confucius said so; they praised Confucius for making such a good point.</p>
<p>Also people tend to confuse Taoism the religion with Taoism the teachings of Laozi. Those are separate words in Chinese; the original philosophical school of Laozi-Zhuangzi, centuries later sorta evolved into a countryside animistic religion, with plenty of gods, alchemy, ghosts, and strange rituals with had little to do with the original Laozi. But they claim to be Taoists, and have been doing their thing to this day, although it&#8217;s much weaker than Buddhism or the other foreign imports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter A. Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-136624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter A. Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-136624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Admin, @Spandrell:

This is a follow-up to some comments on the Morality post regarding Confucianism.

I&#039;m confused by an early Research on Religion podcast (confirmed by the Wikipedia page on &quot;Religion in China&quot;) that China has five officially recognized religions: Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Protestantism, and Catholicism.

http://www.researchonreligion.org/christianity/koesel-on-religion-politics-in-china

What&#039;s up with that?  Why doesn&#039;t Confucianism make the cut?  Is it considered a &quot;philosophy&quot; rather than a &quot;religion&quot;?  Or is it too tainted by association with Chiang Kai-shek?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Admin, @Spandrell:</p>
<p>This is a follow-up to some comments on the Morality post regarding Confucianism.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused by an early Research on Religion podcast (confirmed by the Wikipedia page on &#8220;Religion in China&#8221;) that China has five officially recognized religions: Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Protestantism, and Catholicism.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.researchonreligion.org/christianity/koesel-on-religion-politics-in-china" rel="nofollow">http://www.researchonreligion.org/christianity/koesel-on-religion-politics-in-china</a></p>
<p>What&#8217;s up with that?  Why doesn&#8217;t Confucianism make the cut?  Is it considered a &#8220;philosophy&#8221; rather than a &#8220;religion&#8221;?  Or is it too tainted by association with Chiang Kai-shek?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesser Bull</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-136027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lesser Bull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-136027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Left is consciously evil.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/duped-by-innocence-project-milwaukee-man-now-free-b99386015z1-281852841.html?ipad=y]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left is consciously evil.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/duped-by-innocence-project-milwaukee-man-now-free-b99386015z1-281852841.html?ipad=y" rel="nofollow">http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/duped-by-innocence-project-milwaukee-man-now-free-b99386015z1-281852841.html?ipad=y</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanguineEmpiricist</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-135804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SanguineEmpiricist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 05:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-135804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just against this particular example, but yeah I agree &amp; plan to do a write up and such of potential avenues we all could take and have every one tear it down. However making a financial account could easily let the left&#039;s political friends declare us as a &#039;hate group&#039; and point to it.

But how to make this robust to it seems smart, a starting point I would say would be grugq&#039;s work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just against this particular example, but yeah I agree &amp; plan to do a write up and such of potential avenues we all could take and have every one tear it down. However making a financial account could easily let the left&#8217;s political friends declare us as a &#8216;hate group&#8217; and point to it.</p>
<p>But how to make this robust to it seems smart, a starting point I would say would be grugq&#8217;s work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeroguy</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-135784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aeroguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 04:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-135784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The many things that can go horribly wrong with the idea is part of why its fun to think about.  The challenge of overcoming those types of problems could be a good test for the new tech admin mentioned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The many things that can go horribly wrong with the idea is part of why its fun to think about.  The challenge of overcoming those types of problems could be a good test for the new tech admin mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanguineEmpiricist</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-135751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SanguineEmpiricist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 03:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-135751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aka  the &#039;how we lose in 5 minutes plan&#039;

a) revealing every one
b) giving the media something to rally around for destruction
c-z) everything else

this is not effective risk management]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aka  the &#8216;how we lose in 5 minutes plan&#8217;</p>
<p>a) revealing every one<br />
b) giving the media something to rally around for destruction<br />
c-z) everything else</p>
<p>this is not effective risk management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Izak</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/chaos-patch-35/#comment-135693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Izak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4064#comment-135693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, now that Nick Land is linking to Hanatarash, he might have just outdone everyone on the dissident right.

Everyone.

Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joSbg5pY6ag

Go&#039;mint sound!!!

You can&#039;t go wrong with the first Hanatarash album, because the word &#039;cock&#039; is in every song!!

And let&#039;s also not forget the Incapacitants, who were making economics cool for the kids LONG before NRx:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKCBNtSYSmY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=occ1rdivxto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zun9qvggJoE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, now that Nick Land is linking to Hanatarash, he might have just outdone everyone on the dissident right.</p>
<p>Everyone.</p>
<p>Also: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joSbg5pY6ag" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joSbg5pY6ag</a></p>
<p>Go&#8217;mint sound!!!</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t go wrong with the first Hanatarash album, because the word &#8216;cock&#8217; is in every song!!</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s also not forget the Incapacitants, who were making economics cool for the kids LONG before NRx:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKCBNtSYSmY" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKCBNtSYSmY</a><br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=occ1rdivxto" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=occ1rdivxto</a><br />
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/zun9qvggJoE?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0' allowfullscreen='true'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
