Two decades into the Roosevelt coup and bureaucratic statism. Normal.
Two centuries deep into the failed experiment of revolution and democracy. Healthy.
The elites divorce their State Department pet Stalin, true, but only after having made the world safe for communism. Sane.

Is this NRx or NRO?

You should specify what you actually mean by “sacredness”, “natural”, and “traditional”. You seem to be just using them as emotive terms roughly meaning “good”and opposing them to “the elites” who are “bad” and “evil”. Which is fine as it goes, but there’s just nothing really to address in an emotional narrative. If there’s more to it, it’d be good if you could clarify.

It’s not important but I don’t see Transgressive Freak shows as being the cultural norms of the 1950s. Maybe I missed gay/transgendered marriage as an issue in the Adlai Stevenson vs Ike races, or coming up during the Suez Crisis. Certainly the History books can’t be trusted.

And less sarc what is normal now was pretty much past the Transgressive Urban freaks of the 1970s. The Freak show was on TV. Porn was a vice in a paper bag. Divorce shot up, crime was actually higher. But the Freak show was regarded as exactly that.

My main point is the 1950s are regarded and presented as the Height of Injustice and Repression when in fact they were normal and that was the last normal decade.

In fact [as they have admitted it] the 1950s were just too damn boring for the Boomers. So they decided to burn down their Parents boring civilization and destroy their lives work. In this they have succeeded.

Meanwhile in 2014 we are here and have work to do.

I do understand you think the economic situation requires state or elite [ruling class] push towards
the traditional family. I am saying it is natural and does not. The Africanization as some put it required enormous expenditures, malice and effort to accomplish. It may be natural to west Africa, it is unnatural elsewhere. I don’t care what happens to West Africa in the slightest.

I am saying the natural course of any state is towards more power and hence tyranny.

I am saying these elites in particular are evil, insane, rapacious, genocidal hostile towards western Civ, and sociopathic in their policies. Nothing can be done that is good while they have power. They must go and until they do all is frankly fantasist nonsense.

Further now that the tools in the tyrants toolbox include breaking the family to make it dependent on the tyrant the notion that giving any state extant now, or existing in the future powers over family structure is an exercise of insanity. This will now happen again and again.

But it not need be suffered further now.

If they are ever gone which certainly won’t happen because of blogging then the family should be left alone above all. To restore the sacredness of family which means hands off is more important than even restoring property rights by an order of magnitude.

I can go on but you get the point.

I don’t get your point. I’m not sure what you’re saying. Can you clarify?

I don’t think you understood my comments either.

“Economics defines housework and everything else as ‘economic’.” — this is nonsense.

It’s true. Economics defines everything as “economic” activity. Not just mainstream economics, which often notes that things like homemaking are economic activities that aren’t formally counted by GDP statistics but nevertheless are economic activities, but even less mainstream economics like the Austrian school, which I gather you’re favorable towards. Von Mises says this in Human Action.

Further..
6] Moldbug apparently realized the Dire Problem is intellectuals
7] so moldbug then invents a more perfect Internet, to firewall them forever.

I can go on but you get the point.

No. If someone wants social engineering they can Exit to China or India as they have been doing it for 2000 years.