What SHWAT misses is this idea that the elites have to either believe in or like the products they are selling – that is, communities dedicated to particular visions of life (which I call ‘zions’). As if when neocameralist managers get control, they will just obey their own progressive preferences even if those are at odds with the needs and wants of their residents. It’s not true, every deviation is money they are leaving on the table for a competitor to pick up. It’s the race to the bottom of ideological distortions.

The management of most mass-market consumer products companies never partake in their own output, and may even find it disgusting and revolting, but who cares? Their job is to satisfy their customers, and at doing that, they are demonstrably excellent even when they have zero appreciation for what they are producing, or zero similarity between themselves and their typical consumer.

We haven’t fully entered the final act of “Enlightenment” civilization, although the curtain may be half raised.

Instead of Neo-Cameralism emerging from the ashes of modernity to usher in a new beginning, it most likely would be consumed as a halmark of a Neo-Ceaserism to reign over the dying empire, before the whole thing sinks into the abyss.

Lesser Bull raises a very good point:

1. The only way to save liberal modernity is to acknowledge HBD.
2. The only way to save HBD is to make sure that it’s not solely the province of WNs.

Thank you so very much for taking the time to write out pretty much my exact viewpoint on neocameralism to a tee. And with far better wording and argumentation than I could be bothered to provide.

Why don’t we all become women so we can do better in this economy? Everyone loves a woman who knows how to code. It’s instant millionaire status.

That’s probably why Justine did it. We should follow her lead.