Comments on: Cthulhu, leftist?

By: Outside in - Involvements with reality » Blog Archive » On Chaos

Outside in - Involvements with reality » Blog Archive » On Chaos — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:22:06 +0000

[…] bad government, which is to say with defective mechanisms of selection, is an inability to follow Cthulhu far enough. It is from turbulence that all things […]

By: admin

admin — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 02:58:40 +0000

That paper looks fascinating, but it’s going to take a few hours of devoted attention.

By: ( )

( ) — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 00:37:46 +0000

Input a sample X—econometric distribution, probability space, etc.—from a simulated (or replication of, to invert extropic ‘phenomena’) model of e.g. (local? to stay on ‘our scale’, for now) heat-death, population extinction, inert atmospheres, etc. Once input, Sample X, following Gotelli & Graves/McGill, may generate Y stochastic variance (or none at all) *in/from the absence of* e.g. utility valuation, energy conservation, temporal/dynamic fluctuation, etc. In other words, X distributed from the modeling of dynamical (or whatever) foreclosure—which would dissipate scaling mechanisms commensurable w/ ‘us’—while sampling from systems which participate with “our stratum”.

Such modeling may have trivial effects on these systems, but this triviality may be very apt, ‘in light of’ events which promise/d, on the level of numeracy etc, where the end has nothing else to conserve, and “we” have ‘been there’ for awhile…

Also rather apt considering your recent post on “inaction” (without the logos)?

By: admin

admin — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:43:01 +0000

Thanks.

By: r

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:03:37 +0000

http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/manuscriptpdfs/gotelli_mcgill_ecography.pdf

Gotelli, N. J. and Graves, G. R. 1996. Null models in ecology.

By: admin

admin — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:04:00 +0000

@ Tic(k)
Any chance of a few more clues?

By: tic(k)

tic(k) — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:04:31 +0000

@admin okay, agreed on a commensurability criterion for terminal engagement. I personally remain unsure with regard to ‘insurrection’ as a plot-point for the modeling of (ontological, anthropogenic, etc) foreclosure, insofar as *utility* may remain a confounding variable when it comes to effectuating noise on a stratum dependent on such valuation (unless it isn’t, of course, and I’m oversimplifying). Perhaps such a terminal model would contingency model inputs—quantities—from a sample of utility functions, in order to simulate the sample ‘under’ radically depleted energy conditions. A simple example would be a simple heat-death modelling of econometric probability sets, if we’re still on thermodynamics. Null results, maybe, but without determinism insofar as the model has no end (since it may pattern from ‘end’)? I don’t know. Also the ‘dynamics’ of the inputs could be retained, maybe. ‘no problem’. cf. a radicalization of Gotelli & Graves, et al. “The set of all ordinals doesn’t exist.” also remember the nietzschean/deleuzean polemics of quantitative analysis without qualitative differentiation (“lifeless, dead”)? If the ‘hype’ of “the end of the end …” has already ‘maxed out’, what do we do next? there’s nothing for us to do… that’s where we may start? maybe not…

By: admin

admin — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:37:40 +0000

@ Tic(k)
Unless ‘something’ is commensurable with ‘our’ stratum, it has no relevance to the question of terminal insurgency (which K-virus was raising (brewing?)).
“installed by whom?” — wrong question. The (time-travel) Bootstrap Paradox is the route to the right ones.

@ K-virus
If you want to scramble the anthropomorphic stratum, you need something that gets down and dirty with us. If not, enjoy your gnostic religion.
‘Entropy’ — sure — but that category is a little too general for our purposes here, isn’t it? How does the machine work? How does it engage?

IMHO, you insurrectionary nihilist religion cats need more economics. Go Austrian. You can always twist it into something acceptably blasphemous later.

By: k-virus

k-virus — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:22:43 +0000

Perhaps that poster on alt.horror.cthulhu was wrong, then, because to think Azathoth would need such anthropocentric structure to spread chaos (even inside human-security-systems) seems ludicrous to me.

Maybe entropy is tied to Azathoth, then, as that motor-towards-chaos.

By: tic(k)

tic(k) — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:20:52 +0000

@adminaw, man. since when is the noumenal strata of the Outside commensurable w/ the causal framework of ‘techno-commercialism’? if the material base of the Outside is “beyond insurrectionary group dynamics”, and thus operates on a level that no temporality (or scale of momentum) can assess, how can such a motor (a quantity) engage w/ that which remains foreclosed to magnitude, desisting from ‘our’ cosmology? what does this have to do with us? installed by whom? once magnitude is depleted or stripped, X may be closer, on a ‘singular’ level, to that which claims the strata ‘we’ are operating from…