Days of Rage

An instant Twitter-format classic, by David Hines, on the Leftist political violence to come. Storified here.

Among the critical points:

Righties tell themselves that *of course* they’d win a war against Lefties. Tactical Deathbeast vs. Pajama Boy? No contest. … Why, Righties have thought about what an effective domestic insurrection would look like. Righties have written books and manifestos! … It’s horseshit. … The truth: Left is a lot more organized & prepared for violence than Right is, and has the advantage of a mainstream more supportive of it.

ADDED: Spandrell’s take.

January 16, 2017admin 50 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Political economy

TAGGED WITH : , , ,

50 Responses to this entry

  • Paul Ennis Says:

    Interesting, but as an ex-leftist (including anti-fa) I think perhaps the mettle of the left is overestimated here. They can certainly be disruptive and certainly have excellent rhetorical defenses of violence (direct action), but their organization has become so all-inclusive as to be organised disorganisation. One needs only to look at Occupy to see how their horizontal model allowed them to be defused through ye olde right streetfighters (the cops). This is not the era of the Weather Underground nor even Baader-Meinhot. No drafts (WU) to radicalise. No guns from the East (BM).

    The only real leftist core that is likely to cause chaos is BLM lone-wolves. We’ve seen this a few times already. But that’s basically jihadism for depressive black guys who reach for meaning in the movement.

    I have a hard time envisioning an alliance of vegans, youtube radicals and assorted fantasists pulling off more than the one leftie group who does do stuff, eco-terrorists. In that case maybe arsons here and there. Before being broken up by infiltrators.

    [Reply]

    Daniel Chieh Reply:

    This is very true. I’ve actually organized against such groups before. Their inclusiveness makes them extremely vulnerable to infiltration and they are ultimately brittle structures that fall easily to infighting after any reversals because they don’t really have a martial mindset at all.

    [Reply]

    Wally D. Reply:

    BLM lone wolves are very effective in creating chaos and quite unpredictable, it would appear, because they are flying under the radar of the powers that be. They have been relegated to the dust heaps of irrelevance, but as the D.C. sniper proved, there are lots of potential lone wolves who understand urban warfare and have military training, too. To look too closely, is racist, though…

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 1:20 pm Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    The Left are sadists and fanatics, but that is why they can be beaten. They are almost all nerve reflex and almost zero thought.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    That makes them perfect soldiers. As long as they have Badious and Zizeks to set them marching they’d overwhelm us at this point in time. Their men are effete and their women are deficiently masculine but they have sheer bulk on their side.

    [Reply]

    vxxc2014 Reply:

    On your planet perhaps but not in America are they going to overwhelm us.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    *guy sweating over which button to push meme*

    “the Cathedral is hegemonic”

    “reactionaries would win a war against it”

    Paul Ennis Reply:

    reply to wagner:

    The meme side of all this is obviously not the street type. But the average Joe Trump fan, the ‘chad nationalist,’ is much different. This is basically college aged men, gym rats, norm dads and so on. Ain’t nobody ever gonna win anything with these on-side. Also the cops are loosely in there too.

    Paul Ennis Reply:

    *without, of course.

    collen ryan Reply:

    I disagree in the US at least the vast majority [of whites, because browns are of no consequence] or structurally conservative even after generations of indoctrination. granted it a confused situation, but unless the left can keep it confused they are vastly out numbered. even most “leftists” have no idea what it is they are really supporting, if they actually understood the real choices they too would be more right than left. Left ideology like left economics is completely dependent believing in the impossible in being able to choose something thats not actually a choice or at least not a sustainable choice.Any brand of leftism thats actually sustainable is actually a form of rightism

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    “if they actually understood the real choices”

    That’s what separates fantasy from reality. *If* they understood, but they simply don’t and many are probably too far gone at this point to reverse. What was the age of people Socrates proposed to cast out of Athens lol? People get indoctrinated at an early age, and that’s who they are the rest of their life, programmed as it were like machines.

    collen ryan Reply:

    Admittedly simply trying to argue them into seeing the actual choices is like herding cats and pointless. But thats because they dont actually hold their choices rationally, so cant lose them rationally. But they have beleifs they hold at much deeper levels. Put it this way you cant in 100 years convince a leftists that say blacks are inherently violent and less intelligent. So on that level they are leftists.But you can tell by their actions that they know both to be true, so structurally they are realists.
    It takes 166 police at a cost of 16 million per year per square mile to maintain the illusion of racial equality in NYC, this doesnt count all the other armed forces deployed by other agencies from the FBi to prison system. Thats a really fragile system without which 99% percent of those liberal whites would instantly lose their leftist views within a week.

    You cant convince a liberal that a social welfare system worth 100,000 a year per citizen is not a basic human right. However take away the ability of that liberal to print fiat money backed by the worlds largest nuclear arsenal and watch his true values emerge as he has to choose between things actually affordable and basic human rights.Trust me it wont take decades of economic study to unlarn his leftist economic indoctrination because he doesnt actually believe it he will change instantly.

    what he really believes about leftism is that he can sustainably shift the cost onto others. He can make other whites pawns in his racial social projects while he occasionally simply does photo ops with well trained pavement apes. that he can tax other rich badwhites he doesnt like to pay for his socialism.

    Its not racial equality and socialism he believes in its his own security he believes in; he believes he can safely social signal support for these things to increase his own security the minute these things threaten his own personal security he will abandon them. Leftists may have figured out how to hack human psychology they have not however actually rewired it fundamentally.

    [Reply]

    Alfred Reply:

    They will learn.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Scapegoat “They” all you want but progs are actually part of the divine plan. Without “progressivism” we never would have had Mozart, we never would have had fire.

    [Reply]

    Alfred Reply:

    Yes yes, everything in its right place, yin and yang, God’s Great Divine Plan. I’d still rather not get Pablo Escobar’d.

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 1:27 pm Reply | Quote
  • Alfred Says:

    That was really good.

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 1:50 pm Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    there is circulating opinion that nowadays people are weak and uncapable of sustained actions – it is wrong. it is not people who become weak, but police who become strong. after 1999 Seatle police doctrine completely changed and proved of been working very well.

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 2:25 pm Reply | Quote
  • collen ryan Says:

    You cant get into this question without having probed the cathedral, maybe trump is probing them,we will see. Are BLM and NSA the same team.We dont know if FBI CIA are the same team, or If FBI has red/blue factions.
    We do know a lot of rank and file military and law enforcement are angry white dudes not sympathetic but with families to support. We know since Clintons 94 gun ban Americans have been arming for civil war, its such an astounding amount of fire power and ordinance the feds have responded with their own militarization.

    We assume the cathedral could crush the insurrection, but at the same time we see unfettered by the constraints they would have doing that here, they cant seem to crush bronze age villages in the Mideast and Africa.

    Its not even worth speculating, this question depends on so many variables we dont have answers for. How does it start, who are the players.It could be a hundred different things, and any one of them could start, develop, and play out many ways.

    If the question is, imagine something develops that causes all the parties on both sides to declare and go full hot war by any means necessary. Then the answer is, the more right side wins hands down and very quickly. But that could be a war between the far left and center left.Yeah that might upset the balance and things proceed.

    The lefts a mind fuck organization, very few leftists understand who and what they support, and most fairly liberal leftists would not support the left if they understood, Certainly they would not do violence to support it. Military and law would support what they believed to be a law and order situation they would not support a leftist revolution, They understand they are employed by the enemy like most citizens they hope this all works out.

    The cathedral knows their interest is boil the frog longer. If trump can help them keep the game going by keeping the casino solvent a bit longer he can live if he goes around wrecking the new world order they will take him out somehow. BLM type violence is simply theatre to them. They may instigate it but they also shoot the actors as part of the script. They wont allow it to veer off script because they do lose a civil war.

    You think things get heated up when a phone video of cops shooting a black thug emerge, imagine US marines shooting white american families, Maybe because youre basically a British pajama boy you cant imagine this, but ill tell you it would be instant massive civil war and most politicians and ruling class and minorities would be killed.

    Because of this they will not let it happen while its still possible they will lose. Anything that could incite that will be covered up as law enforcement and racist terrorism situation. The frame will be tightly controlled, the doubters will be framed as nuts and racists etc. They now realize they are going to have to be able to control speech and the internet to continue to be able to maintain the frame so they are moving to do this quickly, blogs like this will be eliminated as they are in the rest of the world.

    What this breaks down to is they will not let the situation you inquire about happen, they will go to extreme lengths to prevent, and will reframe any flare ups at any cost.

    Its worth wondering whether they are really worth fighting. While They are detestable in many ways what could really replace them that would be significantly different? The answer to that depends on what you are willing to do. Do you have the determination of Ghengis Khan Adolf Hitler Stalin, because that the level it would now take to make change significant enough to be worth while.

    Back when the panthers and the underground were murdering, either side could have radically changed the world by killing mere thousands. The left has been busy and hundreds of millions would most likely have to die for much to change today. The left figured no one would go that far, and if they tried it would be difficult, thus demographic warfare. Sure far fetched less violent paths can be imagined, black swans exist. black swans could be engineered by clever enough people, But they wont be, the right doesnt have the stomach for war, ironically because the left mind fuck has made them feel guilty about such ideas.They would rather die than be a bad person.So they wouldn’t even try something that might accidentally end up in war.

    At this point war only happens by freak accident against great odds, Collapse that cant be used as an opportunity for more control, Or some evil genius emerges and orchestrate the impossible against all odds. slim to none.

    [Reply]

    Wally D. Reply:

    .
    “We do know a lot of rank and file military and law enforcement are angry white dudes not sympathetic but with families to support.”

    Chicago is a great place to see the police refusing to put themselves in the line of fire, as they want to go home at the end of their shift after watching the ghetto erupt in violence. As in Iraq, there is no honor in dying for a lost cause.

    [Reply]

    Wally D. Reply:

    “You think things get heated up when a phone video of cops shooting a black thug emerge, imagine US marines shooting white american families, Maybe because youre basically a British pajama boy you cant imagine this, but ill tell you it would be instant massive civil war and most politicians and ruling class and minorities would be killed.”

    Assuming we are allowed to see this “reality” rather than being fed some other fabricated false news. We are a herd animal, afterall. A few of us have left the herd, certainly, but the unenlightened herd could easily be stampeded into trampling us. To death.

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 2:30 pm Reply | Quote
  • Paul Ennis Says:

    @ If the police are so strong, why are there left wing protests at all?

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    For narrative.
    And the police and military were being transferred to the lefts side by browning and feminizing, but the process destroys their value to the same degree the left succeeds it would be Pyrrhic victory. So they are rethinking strategy, as they rethought the economic communism strategy. They are stuck with the reality that white men are the engine of the world they want to own. The left is a false choice, a false narrative can be sustained to conquered the world but as the left nears victory a reality emerges that the left cant disown. At a certain point they must use brute force to go any farther. Until recently one could simply wait technology may have solved the problems that brute force regimes faced.It would be foolish to find out the boot stomping on a human face really is forever this time

    [Reply]

    Wally D. Reply:

    “They are stuck with the reality that white men are the engine of the world they want to own.”

    A good point. East Indians make great computer programmers, but terrible cops.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    They make adequate programmers, at least some castes do.

    Wally D. Reply:

    Technology is a double-edged sword. Security around the swearing in of Trump is concerned with weaponized drones, which are becoming widely available. They may be able to jam the radio waves, now, but what happens when the jammers get jammed?

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    not sure about left, but how police become strong very well demonstrated on examples in this book.

    Policing Dissent
    Social Control
    and the Anti-Globalization Movement
    Luis A. Fernandez

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 2:30 pm Reply | Quote
  • Paul Ennis Says:

    @You think Zizek or Badiou will give orders. This is totally absurd. Go to one of their shows next time. You could not find two more deep cover conservatives imaginable.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Directly? Probably not. But I can see them, as beacons of Marxist intellectualism, giving the green light to the half-commie, prog masses to descend into war, commanded by Matthew McConohay or some other shitgargling shitlib celebrity. No, but they would find intellectuals to command them, and Badiou and Zizek would serve as a seal of approval confidence boost.

    [Reply]

    Zimriel Reply:

    I think his point with Zhizhek is that he could be closet alt-right. Or he might just enjoy the chaos (my personal theory), so will egg on either side based on his mood any given moment.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Funny that Zizek probably sees Moldbug as the antithesis of a greater synthesis and he’s trying to make sure (all the while tip-toeing between the lines) that the synthesis falls in the left’s favor. Also funny that Lacan got Bataille’s sloppy seconds (speaking of Synchronicities). And no I’m not a void-dryhumper, my M.O. is I see chaos and make chaos chaotic to turn it into order (Nietzschean accelerationism 101).

    Wagner Reply:

    If Mildbug and Landenberg were trve juggernauts of intellect they would have curb-stomped Badiou the Pooh and Zizspeck with Das Kapital instead of a curb. They had to go their own way (exit) because they couldn’t beat them on their own grounds. So the ladder of rank is creaky, we have these philosophers 2 v. 2-ing and we’re too minuscule to grasp the grand game they’re playing.

    Without the spirit of Land I doubt the alt-right would be where it is right now; he was able to use his status as an academic – however fallen – as a mystical bellows to send a current of air underneath the baby bird of rightism just leaving the nest. He *qualified* Unqualified Reservations, and that (implicitly) matters to a lot of our young Aryan men. He’s the one pulling the chaos shit you’re accusing me of by dividing Aryans into Atlandeans and hyperboreans. How about we stick together and have a civil war *after* the Cathedral falls? [insert racist joke about brits and jews here]

    Wagner Reply:

    Land went from BITE THE CURB in the 90s to a limp-wristed bite the derb; I’ll send the hounds of Hell after him until he goes back. Land, you have to go back!

    brainwashed idiot Reply:

    Zizeks recent videos give off the impression of a guy who never realized he wasn’t a leftist. Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7JgfB8PaAk, this guy isn’t going to be part of whatever the left’s next move is.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    In the spirit of Zizek I have to say that his mannerisms are ideological. Particularly the pinching of the nose, but in a more background way, his accent and “exotic” demeanor. He is a complete company man. He is an excellent puppet boy that is his great advantage. If you read what he says in that interview without the ZIZEK with squiggly things above the Z’s and without his idiosyncrasies you’d think he was on the borderline of intellectual and moron. Especially the nose-wiping, this is ideological *wipes nose* he ish tryink to distrack you from your slavery to future-communism.

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 2:57 pm Reply | Quote
  • collen ryan Says:

    Ultimately leftism is globalism or its one and done. Leftism can only work if it can eliminate all competition and there fore control reality by any means, in other words if starving 200 million people is what it takes you do that if killing another million who object you do that if after that you must keep the entire planet in abject terror paralysis then you do that. To sustain that you need to control the world thus the new world order. And globalism is having significant setbacks.Its hard to tell whether these are rivals or opponents or chaos setting in.Its not even clear if the cathedral is focused moldbug thought not.And yet some grpoup is certainly focused on globalism and using leftism at times to further globalism. Thats not to say they are conspired.Leftism could be pwnd just as rightism is cucked

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 3:54 pm Reply | Quote
  • vxxc2014 Says:

    The same tweet storm while outlining historical weaknesses of the Right that require correction: namely organization – and this is changing – also has as it’s Coda:

    “YOU DO NOT WANT WHITE PEOPLE TO RIOT.
    YOU DO.NOT.WANT. WHITE PEOPLE TO RIOT. ”

    The Left is capable of subsidized and state sanctioned NGO organized violence.
    Their sanction has 97 hours remaining. Their subsidies w/o sanction not enough.

    Trump has not only the people he has the warrior class [police, mil, vets and BTW enormous numbers of American Biker clubs] on his side. Trump got the warrior class behind him as no President has since Jackson before he won over his 61 million voters.

    Hines input is valuable but it’s from 70s POV to now which he admits.

    The tide is turning against the Left. Why if MAGA merely glanced and nodded at his supporters direction the pent up fury of decades would unleash in a tidal wave. Now that’s not good governance or order and he’s not likely to do it. Unless of course he must.

    In which case all of the above are already waiting for the word. That’s America.
    As for Europe that’s their business. The two don’t match up at all.

    [Reply]

    brainwashed idiot Reply:

    The right can’t get into a gang war with the left and expect to win unless it has powerful parties willing to assist like the left has. This is basically the point Mencius makes about left vs right terrorism in http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.ca/2011/07/right-wing-terrorism-as-folk-activism.html

    We need the Warrior Class, the military and the police, to side with Trump. Two narratives will then emerge, one of Freedom Fighters vs Tyrants and the other of Criminals vs Guardians. You know which side the Press will be on, but this may be just the thing to consolidate their collapse. Decent odds their narrative gets rejected en masse. They want to frame it as backing Freedom Fighters, but if they fail they’re stuck as the guys who backed Criminals. At which point there’s an opportunity to do some serious uprooting in the Press and the Academy.

    The right and left have different tactics, different victory conditions, I’m not sure the right taking to the streets needs to be part of this. In terms of thugs vs thugs we can’t win currently (we might be able to eventually), but why should we accept the fight in those terms?

    [Reply]

    anomalyuk Reply:

    This is the real point Hines makes. The left is better organised, *because* it’s organisations have respectable moneyed support. Also, as he points out but does not dwell on, but Moldbug puts more clearly, sympathy from the prosecutors and courts.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    VXXC

    Its a good question in a sense the warrior class was far more uniformly supportive of far more rightist ideas back in the 60s-70s, and the left was not only far smaller but more overtly what was considered anti social then, and yet they walked right in and took over.Is the right simply too civilized? One reason NRX fails to convince me history repeats when history is confronted by similar circumstances is we learn. As you allude, a right is emerging that has studied and learned from the left, Not only are they using the lefts tactics they now understand what is happening when the left does things that they didnt see the significance of back then.

    But I think the worst thing for the left is they no longer have history on their side, The civil rights movement for instance,seemed worth trying in 64 to reasonable people. Yes in hindsight its possible to make a case why, even then it was a bad idea and Goldwater should have been elected, Nevertheless history was weighted to the lefts side.

    Thats no longer true, but the left is hegemonic in the halls of power. The question is are we as good as they were, they have also learned a lot and they have tools undreamed of by the right back then.And many former right allies like capital have if not converted, at least come to understand they can make money either way so they are less likely to risk taking a side for strategy, and quite likely to not want to risk disruption.

    It seems like you I have imagined I see trumps glee in the support he get from tough guys but Im not convinced he would use them under any circumstances.I dont think his black sheep generals would ever advise martial order, But I like to imagine its possible because its going to take something along those lines to win without civil war which is even more far fetched.

    But I suppose things have shifted enough that there are possibilities regardless how far fetched are orders of magnitude more possible than 2 years ago.America [and now possibly europe too] is moving closer to the possibility of civil war. Im not sure we know whos really running the world though. And i dont even feel confident i understand their motivation. Our last choice was between McCain and Obama both of whom the deep state had to know things about that effectively make them marionettes. before that we had the Bushes again deep state. This election deep state involvement like never before.

    [Reply]

    Wally D. Reply:

    “The warrior class” would fall in behind Trump should the shit hit the fan much more readily than behind Hillary.

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 4:01 pm Reply | Quote
  • GC Says:

    The truth: Left is a lot more organized & prepared for violence than Right is, and has the advantage of a mainstream more supportive of it.

    Ask yourself this: Violence at what level? We’ve got a recent example we can use: The Trumpenfuhrer tantrum protests. Car burning, window smashing, chanting nonsensical slogans, assaulting a few individuals in the street they didn’t like the look of. That doesn’t sound very formidable to me.

    Violent thought they may be, they’re used to being ignored or at worst slapped on the wrist or pepper sprayed by the police for their behaviour (so they can capture the action on camera and signal their virtue on Twitter and whine about muh police brutality to the rest of the fold.)
    The only reason they’re there in the first place is because there are little to no consequences to being violent-while-leftist. Now image if, instead of just standing there, the police produced guns and started hosing down the crowds with lead. Morally wrong? Sure. Media outrage? You bet. Retaliatory violence and more rioting? Nope. Because now the price of virtue-signalling-through-rioting has just skyrocketed and most won’t be willing to pay the bill. TL;DR: Just because they get away with it doesn’t mean the left are prepared for violence except for petty, low-level stuff (most of them hate guns) – the type that doesn’t expose them to any real risk of harm.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    good point, violence has it cost and when cost is low it become violence trap. the whole Africa is example. Definitely not going to be the case in US.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    Youre assuming the left is the OWS BLM crowd, but if the left is the people who give the police and the military and the banks and media their orders then its much different. Then hose leftists decided what was needed was some street theatre and Soros who handles that deployed those actors and another arm of the left deployed the police to play their part and the media arm filmed and edited it.Meanwhile in other theatres the left was deploying shock and awe in syria and who knows maybe hacking Clinton because she got to be too much of a liability. There is no liability to be being violent while leftist means the people with the highest level of violence potential have sanctioned some low violence people because it suits their purposes, we dont know what their purpose is only that some riots worked for them at that time. we do know they control the police and military and media which are capable of much more violence than BLM.But thats not the same thing as being BLM, BLM even leftism may simply be a means to another end.

    [Reply]

    Aeroguy Reply:

    I concur, it’s guys like McCain who are the left’s MVPs. There are many who look like they’re right-wing who are actually just pro status quo and know the left butters their bread. Their story is like the HR stooge who has to lay off most of the employees only to get laid off themselves when they finish. Orders come from the top and many superficial rightists will obey their leftist overlords to turn on their own. When the left owns the narrative it’s very easy to rationalize. Be wary of he who isn’t based.

    The existing institutions belong to the left (the whole of American institutions were always leftist, the difference being the left has grown so malignant that they’re doing our own work by eating themselves), Trump might help gut parts of it from the inside, but it’s up to us to build our own reactionary institutions.

    [Reply]

    Wally D. Reply:

    I agree with your appraisal of McCain, who better to plunge the golden shower dagger into Trump’s chest?

    Wally D. Reply:

    You have to be “all in” or you are merely a spectator. There are those in the BLM who are all in and willing to up the ante to include dying for the racial BLM cause. When there exist whites willing to die for the cause, things will get interesting.

    [Reply]

    A.B. Prosper Reply:

    The Left is capable of violence and in numbers can be dangerous but I’ll not there were two Anti Fa attacks in the US recently, Chicago and Sacremento

    The first was young guys with bats vs old White Nationalist . The young guys got 3-5 in prison each

    The second was Anti Fa’s vs Christian Workers Party 5-10 Anti Fa per CWP member and the Anti Fas lost badly, 7 went to the hospital apparently taken out with their own weapons , in California. In states with better gun laws, they would nto have tired it or would have been dead.

    Also a lot of scenarios assume that the Right can’t adapt (it can) can’t organize but its too heavily infiltrated , it can adapt and I’ll not a couple of years ago the entire Federal background check database got leaked , it can happen again, oh and that they’ll play nice.

    At first they’ll try but if it goes bad, it will be an atrocity spiral and a White Riot will end up being targeted attacks on food, water and power in Leftist held areas with apocalyptic results . The Right understand that if they lose, they die in a camp and will fight accordingly . Our civilization is brittle, infrastructure poorly maintained and 3 meals away from a famine

    In the end no one Left or Right wins this which is why I think that even the Cathedral won’t allow things to get too far out of hand. You can socially signal or loot on too much chaos.

    lastly , the media is not a threat or an issue. They’ll be treated to the same medicine Clinton gave them only from both sides. The revolution will not be televised and it will be Kardassians 24-7

    Censoring the Internet will be tried but it can be worked around and more importantly, that won’t work in the Cathedral’s favor . They’ve already lost all trust and even the normies regard the media is Tass or Pravda 1982

    You can’t lie if people won’t listen

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 4:45 pm Reply | Quote
  • Uriel Alexis Says:

    World War Z all of a sudden has got too real….

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 16th, 2017 at 7:46 pm Reply | Quote
  • John Hannon Says:

    “… Left is a lot more organized & prepared for violence than Right is, and has the advantage of a mainstream more supportive of it.”

    And they know how to rock too (or at least they used to) –

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo35O1AJOfg

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 18th, 2017 at 12:28 am Reply | Quote
  • Seth Largo Says:

    “Cops and Marines on our side yeeaaahh!!”

    You guys are delusional. Police and military value law and order, dispensed by them. Insofar as one can ascribe an ideology to these occupations, it would be a neoliberal one that attempts to maximize social stability so the banks can stay open. The police/military will fight against whichever “side” is currently being the most violent and unstable.

    /military family
    //good friends with urban police

    [Reply]

    Posted on January 18th, 2017 at 9:25 pm Reply | Quote

Leave a comment