Deep Heritage
Nick B. Steves’ understanding of deep heritage (the one-line version) could be aptly extended to the neoreaction quite generally: Burkean with Darwinian commentary.
15
May
Nick B. Steves’ understanding of deep heritage (the one-line version) could be aptly extended to the neoreaction quite generally: Burkean with Darwinian commentary.
Programming The Z80 by Rodnay Zaks, 1982
http://www.z80.info/zip/zaks_book.pdf
[Reply]
Posted on May 15th, 2013 at 6:16 am | QuoteYou lot ought to appreciate the timing and the deep, dark irony–NY Times today: Dark Heritage.
[Reply]
admin Reply:
May 15th, 2013 at 9:07 am
NYT is an exclusive club — I’d ask what it’s saying, but it’s the NYT, so I’m assuming it’s roughly “evil Heritage, burn the witch — hisssss.”
[Reply]
@ N.B Stevens: Where does ‘tradition’ fit in relation to your concept of deep heritage? Is it a subset of it, or does it occupy some other position of relationality?
I am looking forward to then next installment in the series…
[Reply]
Posted on May 15th, 2013 at 7:58 pm | QuoteI’ll be doing a short sequence soon on the work of Larry Arnhart so I’m just going to leave this here: http://darwinianconservatism.blogspot.com/
[Reply]
admin Reply:
May 17th, 2013 at 2:05 am
Looking forward to it, thanks.
[Reply]
I recommend his multiple part series on middle Nietzsche (books like “Human, All Too Human”) and Darwinian Conservatism. Some of his more fascinating posts.
[Reply]
Posted on May 17th, 2013 at 3:40 am | Quote