Comments on: Deracination

By: admin

admin — Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:07:48 +0000

Is there any data, I wonder? It would be interested to know the size and population dynamics of the ex-Western world. Freed from the degenerate political ‘rights’ that have silted up in its native societies, it’s a pathfinder for a post-Cathedral social order. My guess is that it’s more productive (and reproductive) in consequence.

By: spandrell

spandrell — Sun, 14 Apr 2013 07:14:51 +0000

Well it would be good to have some data. My guess is for every fertile expat couple there are two singles with no children or prospects.

How many expats are “post-nationalized”? Most hate it where they are and eventually go back. They miss the idiocracy-overlorded ethno-nationalist slave camps.

By: admin

admin — Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:48:20 +0000

That’s basically true, for sure. Anecdotally, however, the post-nationalized expat fringe seems to be markedly more fertile than its domesticated counterpart, still pinned down in idiocracy-overlorded ethno-nationalist slave camps. Among my partially liberated acquaintances two-child families seem more like a bottom-line than a demographic goal slipping out of reach.

By: spandrell

spandrell — Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:54:12 +0000

I’d say that right now it’s the smart people, outsiders or not, who are demoralized and not breeding.

Remember Singapore’s 0.78

By: Nick B. Steves

Nick B. Steves — Sat, 13 Apr 2013 02:20:05 +0000

Well, the normal dialog is not displaying on the page load or when I hit “Reply” or “Quote” buttons. This behavior happens in Safari 5.1.8 on Mac and in Firefox (not terribly new) on Linux…

Maybe someone () forgot to close an html code.

By: Mark Warburton

Mark Warburton — Sat, 13 Apr 2013 00:41:11 +0000

“The women who said you were fucking retarded if you endorsed diversity.”

You’ve lost me.

By: admin

admin — Fri, 12 Apr 2013 23:06:00 +0000

You’d admit that’s the retarded (‘sons-of-the-soil’) perspective on the book?

By: admin

admin — Fri, 12 Apr 2013 23:00:59 +0000

“Comment dialog seem screwed up on the It’s On post” — I’m not yet grokking the problem (what’s going wrong?).

By: admin

admin — Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:56:50 +0000

@ Vimothy
“As a potentially stupid insider, why should I feel any loyalty to a society that is willing to privilege smarter outsiders over me?” — In the best (eugenic) case, stupid insiders will be demoralized enough not to breed, or to emigrate, but that’s probably over-optimistic. Most likely they’ll vote ethno-nationalist and try to drag society down to their level. (The smart people will then hunt for the exit).

By: vimothy

vimothy — Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:53:13 +0000

“When racial solidarity lowers efficiency (which is typically) it’s objectively idiotic and dysfunctional in a competitive environment.”

Doesn’t this result presuppose a particular view of human society? If we think if society as a piece of technology, then it’s natural to think in terms of efficiency and maximising welfare or output over inputs and so on. I think it also provides the starting point (or the ground-zero) for arguments for “social engineering”–which can then become a series of purely technical questions about what allocations or institutional processes take us to the efficient optimum.

“Racial solidarity privileges stupid insiders over smart outsiders. It’s hardly a model to emulate.”

As a potentially stupid insider, why should I feel any loyalty to a society that is willing to privilege smarter outsiders over me?