<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Predestination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/</link>
	<description>Involvements with reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter A. Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-30243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter A. Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-30243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-30240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 13:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-30240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Rhizomes&#039; was a Deleuze &amp; Guattari reference. Their Rhizomatic / Arborescent distinction quite exactly describes lateral / cladistic difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Rhizomes&#8217; was a Deleuze &#038; Guattari reference. Their Rhizomatic / Arborescent distinction quite exactly describes lateral / cladistic difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter A. Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-30236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter A. Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-30236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rhizomes?  Don&#039;t you mean grafting? (Inosculation?)

But from what I see on wikipedia of either rhizomes or grafting, neither one of them actually produces cross-species DNA combinations.  To the degree that this happens, the cladistics analogy misleads us.

What about breeding hogs and ducks on the same farm and generating new flu viruses that way?  I don&#039;t know what the technical term for this is.

We seem to be arguing about how much different religions steal from each other (or infect one another).  Maybe we are using the wrong unit of analysis, and should be looking at individual beliefs or behavior patterns rather than religions.  A religion is like a pond with many different types of plants, animals, and bacteria growing in it.  Boaters can easily spread zebra mussels from one pond to another.

I&#039;m also toying with a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, or alcoholism analogy.  A man may be a decent citizen, husband and father most of the time, but every once in a while he goes on a drinking binge and beats his wife.  Christian sects keep vacillating between tragic and utopian views of human nature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhizomes?  Don&#8217;t you mean grafting? (Inosculation?)</p>
<p>But from what I see on wikipedia of either rhizomes or grafting, neither one of them actually produces cross-species DNA combinations.  To the degree that this happens, the cladistics analogy misleads us.</p>
<p>What about breeding hogs and ducks on the same farm and generating new flu viruses that way?  I don&#8217;t know what the technical term for this is.</p>
<p>We seem to be arguing about how much different religions steal from each other (or infect one another).  Maybe we are using the wrong unit of analysis, and should be looking at individual beliefs or behavior patterns rather than religions.  A religion is like a pond with many different types of plants, animals, and bacteria growing in it.  Boaters can easily spread zebra mussels from one pond to another.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also toying with a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, or alcoholism analogy.  A man may be a decent citizen, husband and father most of the time, but every once in a while he goes on a drinking binge and beats his wife.  Christian sects keep vacillating between tragic and utopian views of human nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesser Bull</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-29927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lesser Bull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-29927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Afrikaner could be a special case like the Mormons, the Amish, and even in a way the Americans.  At any given point, progressivism consists of a set of beliefs and also of an orientation towards moving on to an even lefter set of beliefs (in math terms, a point and a derivative of that point).  People who adhere to the set of progressive beliefs more than to the orientation get left behind and become unprogressive.  But their obvious lack of progressivity doesn&#039;t mean that their belief set didn&#039;t spin off from progressivism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Afrikaner could be a special case like the Mormons, the Amish, and even in a way the Americans.  At any given point, progressivism consists of a set of beliefs and also of an orientation towards moving on to an even lefter set of beliefs (in math terms, a point and a derivative of that point).  People who adhere to the set of progressive beliefs more than to the orientation get left behind and become unprogressive.  But their obvious lack of progressivity doesn&#8217;t mean that their belief set didn&#8217;t spin off from progressivism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-29895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 07:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-29895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) Ssshh
2) Thanks, appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Ssshh<br />
2) Thanks, appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nydwracu</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-29894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nydwracu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 07:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-29894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Positioning the Dark Enlightenment as the legitimate heir to the Scottish Enlightenment would be an excellent way to troll David Brin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positioning the Dark Enlightenment as the legitimate heir to the Scottish Enlightenment would be an excellent way to troll David Brin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James A. Donald</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-29876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James A. Donald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 23:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-29876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was my argument, but on reflection, I see that the dark enlightenment best described cladistically rather than by hybridization.

Enlightenment:  &lt;blockquote&gt;Primacy of reason.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dark Enlightenment: &lt;blockquote&gt; Reason from observation, stupid!&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my argument, but on reflection, I see that the dark enlightenment best described cladistically rather than by hybridization.</p>
<p>Enlightenment:<br />
<blockquote>Primacy of reason.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dark Enlightenment:<br />
<blockquote> Reason from observation, stupid!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-29870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 19:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-29870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The God Whose followers will not kill in His name is dead indeed.&quot; - Cioran]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The God Whose followers will not kill in His name is dead indeed.&#8221; &#8211; Cioran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VXXC</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-29865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VXXC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-29865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee.  Could we call them American rhizomes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee.  Could we call them American rhizomes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thales</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/double-predestination/#comment-29862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1665#comment-29862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They also have lightsabers...or &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.evtrib.com/nerdvana/files/2010/05/botw59.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;something&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also have lightsabers&#8230;or <a href="http://blogs.evtrib.com/nerdvana/files/2010/05/botw59.jpg" rel="nofollow">something</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
