Enablers

The BBC fog-machine at work on the UK child-predation story:

Child sexual exploitation is happening in a “number of towns” in different parts of the country, according to the author of a damning report into abuse in Rotherham. … According to an estimate from the Children’s Commissioner for England three years ago, 2,409 children were identified as victims of exploitation by gangs over a 14-month period from 2010-11

OxfordSeven men were sentenced to a total of 95 years in June 2013, for offences including rape, facilitating child prostitution and trafficking. [Follow the link for ethnic details censored by the BBC]

Derby … Nine men were convicted over three trials of systematically grooming and sexually abusing teenage girls in 2010. … [Oh look, a clue –] Speaking in 2011 after the jailing of two of the men, former Home Secretary Jack Straw suggested some men of Pakistani origin saw white girls as “easy meat”. The judge in the case said the race of the victims and their abusers was “coincidental”. …

Rochdale … In May 2012, nine men were given sentences ranging from four to 19 years after being found guilty of offences including rape and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child.

Telford … Seven men were jailed after a series of court cases related to a child prostitution ring. The charges included rape, trafficking and prostitution, sometimes involving girls as young as 13. …

Peterborough … A gang of five males was jailed in February after being found guilty of raping and sexually assaulting five vulnerable girls.

I’m going to assume that all the fanatically unspecified “men” (or “males”) involved are Muslims of Pakistani origin (abusing white children), unless presented with definite evidence to the contrary. Any other default would be an act of cognitive collaboration with Britain’s sordid little branch-operation of the Cathedral, and we’ve now seen with stark clarity what that enables.

ADDED: Rotherham commentary from hbd chick, Breitbart and Spiked.

ADDED: Commentary, context, and links from TNIO.

ADDED: “… these children were victims of ‘anti-racism'” — Hard for me to see how that could possibly be controversial at this point.

ADDED: Anarcho-Tyranny in the UK.

August 28, 2014admin 73 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Discriminations

TAGGED WITH : , , , , , , ,

73 Responses to this entry

  • Orthodox Says:

    You can trust the BBC to cover this. They need to cover up their pedophilia.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 10:27 am Reply | Quote
  • Solex Says:

    This is where your fondness for stereotypes becomes part of the fog, not the clarity. Men working late exploit women out late, end of story. In these towns, the men working late are Pakistani, and the girls out late are homeless and white. Any racial issue is epiphenomenal.

    [Reply]

    admin Reply:

    So, actually you’re not disagreeing with anything suggested here (merely placing the now-liberated facts in a maximally-apologetic context).

    [Reply]

    Solex Reply:

    There’s no apologetic here, just rational analysis. There is no end to the factors one could throw in here (men living above a certain altitude, men who can drive, men who have British passports – in fact come to think of it they do seem to be the worst when it comes to weird sexploitation) but I would have thought than an ability to discern the relevant facts was pretty fundamental to intelligent thought. Or perhaps this is the point at which ideology really does trump the NRx pretentions to objectivity. Which is fine, of course, but not interesting.

    Orthodox: are the BBC paedophiles Muslim too? If not, Chris B: who exactly are you running from?

    [Reply]

    Chris B Reply:

    People like you, that sit there and perform all sorts of logical contortions to excuse your position. There is no discusion to be made with you. Application of a priori reasoning and empirical reasoning both come to the same point – filling your country with Pakistani is psychotic. You operate off neither, you operate from a religious principle of equality. Your’re beyond help. 1400 so far in one town with clear proof of politcal and police interference, racial targeting by Muslims and clear media assistance in the forms of constant racial propaganda and you still try and pull this crap? You really think all of these Pakistanis are taxi drivers? Have you met Pakistanis?

    Antisthenes Reply:

    So we’re meant to attribute the explicit admission by Pakistani men that they prey on white girls specifically because the latter are ‘easy meat’ to any number of factors, as long as those factors don’t include race, right?

    Michael Reply:

    Its worth thinking about what ethnicity the men pimping white girls in the US are. And we know the inter racial rape statistics from Holders DOJ [ 32,000- 0 annually ] and we have the fact that men are raped more than women in the US because certain ethnic groups do this to other ethnic groups in the prisons. We see the Cathedral likes to use this oversight of their institutional maintenance to keep white men in line because its a running joke on every crime drama and sitcom. [apparently some rape is funny ] Anarcho Tyranny ?
    I am not even surprised at any of this I am surprised white men keep their heads down and pretend not to notice I know a lot of the others ,and I promise you they notice the not noticing.
    And I am curious what the DENRX response is, exactly at what point is the anarchy actually going on for decades to be feared more than the Anarchy we fear might ensue with a counter revolution, Does the DENRX HAL9000 have the point at which no successful counter is possible calculated?

    [Reply]

    MLR Reply:

    @Solex

    I get the sense that Solex is making a fair point here. NRx can and needs to do better at explaining this as a function of more than just throwing chimp poop at the perps /as/ immigrants. There has to be more to the story, and it starts at home.

    I was homeschooled by parents who took parental control very, very seriously, and I can’t imagine how lax, irresponsible, shiftless, (*No! Don’t reach for the thesaurus! Don’t do it!!*) … *ahem* the parents in each of these thousands of cases (and the tens of thousands more where the same degree of negligence is present) would have to have been for this to even be possible, barring home invasions.

    Any explanation that does not wish the very WORST sort of punishment on the (no doubt XBox’ing, boozing, or just plain modern-working-outside-the-home-ergo-can’t-look-my-spouse-or-kids-in-the-eye-ever-over-a-family-meal-so-I’ll-jerk-off-to-porn-in-a-separate-room) parents is apologizing.

    Is it too high to set the bar there? If it is, then Nemesis is going to punish us for our narcissism just as much as she’ll punish the rest of modernity.

    [Reply]

    admin Reply:

    “NRx can and needs to do better at explaining this as a function of more than just throwing chimp poop at the perps /as/ immigrants.” — Did you read the title of this post?

    [Reply]

    James A. Donald Reply:

    Reading between the lines, looks like every single women attacked was fatherless and husbandless, sometimes fatherless due to the forced removal of the father from his home and children.

    Looks like Muslims had a conscious policy of not attacking women with fathers or husbands present, probably for fear of eliciting a vigilante response.

    [Reply]

    Alrenous Reply:

    First stages.
    As the cops sided with the ‘Asians,’ they will likely become emboldened soon enough and start attacking less defenseless targets. Most likely ‘Asians’ have the de facto civil right to carry guns, whereas British men don’t.

    scientism Reply:

    Yes, it’s pure coincidence that these men from a culture notorious for abusing women are abusing women. If they hadn’t been around, it would’ve been white men doing it. Everybody remembers the notorious white male rape gangs that prowled the streets prior to immigration. If anything, these girls were fortunate to be raped by Pakistanis rather than those awful white men. They got to experience Britain’s greatest strength: it’s diversity.

    [Reply]

    Lesser Bull Reply:

    Acquired stupidity is still stupidity. (I am assuming, in your case, that it isn’t congenital).

    Hint: it’s not the crime, it’s the coverup.

    [Reply]

    MLR Reply:

    I’m saying that the neglect of ones own children would still have been there absent immigration (AND its “enabling” coverup), and that if this sort of social decay is not something NRx addresses, we’re missing where the rubber hits the road.

    Crime is crime, and coverups are coverups (and honestly, who would hold the parties in either of those categories to higher standards? Not me.) and staring into a blue screen while your child is out getting “groomed” is where NRx has something to say.

    Would someone please explain how/where this is off?

    [Reply]

    Lesser Bull Reply:

    Not really clear what your argument is. Are you saying that the social decay that lets daughters wander around without family guidance and protection is a problem? If so, no one disagrees with you. Or are you saying that NRx for some reason shouldn’t care that the elites are enabling evil because stopping it would be “racist”? If so, everyone sane with you.

    Michael Reply:

    i think you are new around these parts social decay is all we talk about maybe you should visit some of the other blogs this ones a bit obscured by clouds. try the HBD crowd and the work out from there careful there be dragons

    Lesser Bull Reply:

    ‘If so, everyone sane *disagrees* with you’

    vimothy Reply:

    This is a generic establishment trope, trotted out whenever anyone tries to call this what it is. You can find examples of it all over the Guardian’s comment site. A popular variant is that taxi drivers abuse whoever they can get their hands on; in the North West, they “just happen” to be of Pakistani descent, whereas their victims “just happen” to be white British.

    Even if it were true that working late somehow causes people to form sex-trafficking rape gangs and terrorise vulnerable white children, it’s not at all obvious why this should only affect Pakistanis (a grand total of 3% of the population in Rotherham). More importantly, it doesn’t explain why the authorities, who knew about it, turned a blind eye for years. For that you need to consider their ideological commitments.

    [Reply]

    MLR Reply:

    I don’t care about or expect much from late working taxi drivers from Pakistan; I expect considerably less from soulless bureaucrats who would put Brezhnevian-era functionaries to shame.

    I expect parents to look after their damn kids better than that. I’m pointing out that the Cathedral we’re up against is one that has lied to parents so thoroughly as to convince them to indulge whatever lifestyle allowed their own offspring to be so thoroughly out of their control. That is a much tougher nut to crack than chimping at either or both of the groups in the former paragraph of whom little ought be expected.

    Nemesis is watching, and wants to know if we’re up to THAT particular challenge.

    Because you can replace the bureaucrats with other paper-shufflers who are more nationalistic, in theory, and you can also arrange different accommodations for taxi drivers of whatever nationality. Riddle me this: how does one put the nuclear family back together again?

    When you’ve squared that circle, get back to me about coverups getting your culottes in a bunch.

    [Reply]

    Michael Reply:

    you expect too much and this is the fatal conceit of the cathedral they too expect every 85 IQ minority will behave as they and their grad school chums do. but this is not reality.Shame and guilt Patriarchy is how we put the nuclear family back. But we can not enforce our old standards when half our population is utterly genetically incapable of those standards, we can not re institute a patriarchy when half our population votes with cultural marxists bent on deconstructing every facet of civilization. There are all sorts of things a socially [ethnically] cohesive and confident society can accomplish. The Scot’s were some of the hardest working brightest people utterly destroyed by welfare. This we know can be reversed because we have seen the reality of it once reversed , we have no example in history of civilized NAMs

    MLR Reply:

    @Michael

    I’m not new around these parts – if that’s an invitation to talk more like the “in crowd” here/somewhere, I decline.

    You say, “You expect too much.”

    My observation is that if your message to the young and vulnerable in front of you, actually IN your care/charge, is to express disappointment in the degeneracy of groups from whom one need not reasonably expect much else, then you have failed the only people that matter. NRx needs to mean looking the daughters and sons in front of you and actually letting them know that you won’t let this … thing… swallow their soul.

    I had a class that included 8 young women this morning, and we discussed how the message for success to young women is that you can have everything. When I showed them the TLP article where he points out how the Lean In lady from FB covers her ring on her Time cover, they were agog.

    http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2013/03/dont_hate_her_because_shes_suc.html

    They said it gave them chills how the message that they were supposed to want family and career was so insidiously presented, snuck in, in places you’d least expect and not really notice unless you looked. They said they’d look for covered rings everywhere, now. They agreed they needed to think hard just who was giving them ideas about what success means, and who benefits.

    I hope it helped, but whatever little it did, for them or perhaps their children one day, it is all that can reasonably be asked of me.

    If more of us start looking into the eyes of actual people in front of us and PUSHING patriarchy and exposing the lies of modernity, and all the empty promises it makes, perhaps Divine Providence can be trusted to take care of the rest.

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 10:29 am Reply | Quote
  • Chris B Says:

    Hopefully this is a wake up call for WNers. White people are done. It’s over. If you can see whats going on – flee, exit. Exit the country or exit the systems within the country. No discussion, no persuading people or the media. Exit. If you want a fight – just wait for the coming anarchy, and you will get all the fighting you want, only without 100% guaranteed Cathedral punishment/ enforced defeat, because by the the Cathedral will not be able to keep a lid on this sh*tstorm.

    [Reply]

    Michael Reply:

    HERE HERE
    However I think the CATHEDRAL aint all that , it could be took

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 10:48 am Reply | Quote
  • AC Says:

    Note that without the subtext, the most reasonable reading from the nice liberal perspective is that generic male sexual predation is out of control, and that we need more control and consciousness raising around the male sex predator epidemic. In practice, bad behavior at Rotherham results in more punishment of educated white males.

    Don’t think nobody has thought all this through.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 1:21 pm Reply | Quote
  • Stirner (@heresiologist) Says:

    @Solex

    You say “parents” but I doubt that in most cases there are conventional middle class parents at fault in this situation.

    More likely these kids are coming from a “Life at the Bottom” council housing situation with a white “baby momma” and a succession of male sexual partners coming through the household. The UK has managed to generate welfare state pathologies to rival those in the ghettos and trailer parks of the US. The few fathers on the scene who tried to intervene were branded as racist troublemakers for their efforts. In the rest of the cases, there was no father figure to give a shit, so a blind eye was turned to the ongoing abuse.

    The “Asians” involved in the ongoing sexual abuse are just garden variety sexual degenerates taking advantage of easy pickings. They should of course get the justice they deserve, but alas, no death penalty in the UK.

    The Englishmen and Englishwomen who aided and abetted these crimes are the true monsters. This is a civilizational Fail on a fundamental level. It is a testament to how deep and how dangerous the prog programming is, and how it manages to short-circuit basic in-group survival instincts.

    [Reply]

    darius Reply:

    No, these Asians are not merely sexual degenerates. This fails to understand that there is a different system of values operating here, with degeneracy being used by the establishment to pull the wool over the eyes of that very difference. We are talking about an Islamic culture in which women and girls are doctrinally and practically worth less than men and boys, who are seen and treated as owned objects. Especially infidel women and girls. Yes, its also a civilisational fail, but your view of the perpetrators of these crimes as mere degenerates and not as people carrying out what for them is totally within their (Islamic) legal rights is part of that fail. It is a fail to acknowledge the reality of a clash of values, perceptions and aspirations, a challenge to the very bedrock of democracy, yes, but more importantly to liberalism in the classical sense. Even the fact that these Muslims were operating in groups shows how little this was an individual affair. This is a cultural affair but one in which the culture in question places the group way way above the individual.

    [Reply]

    Lesser Bull Reply:

    You’re wrong too. It’s neither degeneracy nor is it something particularly Islamic. Rape and predation across ethnic lines is a standard tactic for low level tribal aggression. Islam matters only to the extent that it has encouraged Islamic tribalism and aggression against those outside the tribe.

    [Reply]

    darius Reply:

    No, I’m not wrong. If you want to explain this phenomenon in terms of an abstract “low level tribal aggression”, then you will have to admit that Islam is its specific vehicle. Islam is what provides such aggression its acceptability in terms of doctrine – the formalisation of women’s inferiority and the baseness of the infidel – and its unconscious acceptance in attitudes etc. It just happens to be that the “tribe” doing this in Western cities is only of one kind.

    Aeroguy Reply:

    Darius,

    Your descriptions and objections to Islam are crafted just such as to almost pass muster with progs. They don’t have problems objecting to Islam so long as you also add fundamentalist or extremist to the description (because they conflate the flexible interpretability of Christianity with Islam which is doctrinally rigid) so they can still be seen as tolerant. Islamic society is hardly sunshine and rainbows for it’s young men either. They are involuntarily celibate and if they so much as look an unrelated woman cross eyed they face severe consequences. In some ways Islamic society is the reductio ad absurdum of progressive cultural trends.

    The men and women of every culture and era deserve and mold each other. The ugly dynamic seen between Islamic men and women is the result of peak hypergamy. Harems are what happens when hypergamy runs amok. Islamic women are legally restrained but far from powerless, they have significant influence and tend to be ruthless (and successful) gold diggers. Relationships are transactional and negotiated, a husband there appeases his wives with monetary favors rather than exercising leadership and building desire.

    I agree that Islam is probably a better predictor for tribal aggression than race but that doesn’t exclude race as a factor, rather it probably exacerbates it. Islam is hardly unique in creating disproportionate incidences of out group rape. In your defense the Hispanic invasion of the US is less rapey than the Islamic invasion of Europe (if we point to race for Hispanic rapes I’m sure you’ll tell us to redirect our ire to their machismo culture). Islam exacerbates the root problem which is a culture clash, and progressivism is like the AIDS virus destroying the immune system’s ability to tag foreign invaders as such, what should be minor problems become fatal problems.

    Lesser Bull Reply:

    The doctrine is epiphenomenal. As long as the tribal spirit isn’t rooted out and actively attacked, tribalism will occur, and justifications for tribalism will follow.

    If Islam is causative at all, its that it promotes aggression against outside tribes.

    There is hardly any sense in which Islam itself is important. If the West were functional, Islam would blow away with one gust of wind. Islam is an effect, not a cause.

    nydwracu Reply:

    No, Darius is right: liberalism fails because some value systems are incompatible in ways that make neutrality impossible.

    Liberalism was designed for the very specific condition of an urbanizing Britain, divided between Christian sects. It was possible because the value conflicts were minor and the religious divisions could become less thedishly important over time.

    In cases of major value conflicts and divisions that demonstrably have become more thedishly important over time and show no sign of slowing down, the failure of liberalism is obvious.

    Maybe it was a useful tool for a few very strange decades, but…

    The sage does not [necessarily] seek to follow the ways of the ancients, nor does he establish any fixed standards for all times. He examines things in his age and prepares to deal with them.

    A farmer from Sung was cultivating his field and came across a stump. One day, he noticed a rabbit running on the field that accidentally ran into the stump, causing it to break its neck and die. After seeing that, the farmer just put away his tools and observed the stump, expecting that he would get another rabbit through the same method. But he got no more rabbits that way, and was soon regarded with ridicule by the people of Sung.

    People who expect to effectively govern people in modern times through the methods of ancient kings are acting like those people who are observing stumps.

    [Reply]

    nydwracu Reply:

    That all can be compressed to: liberalism breaks violently under all but the most illiberal conditions.

    vxxc2014 Reply:

    You are correct.

    Except that England may well be beating us in all matches in the race to the bottom.

    What is interesting about England is that welfare or social justice works it’s dark evils regardless of race, color, perhaps even creed. The 2012 rioters in the media appeared quite white.

    [Reply]

    Michael Reply:

    white rioters are anarcho marxists they show up at any sort of street theatre hoping it will be the big one
    but its true British welfare as i just pointed out regarding Scots seems particularly lethal to whites but of course it had a 25 year head start

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 1:44 pm Reply | Quote
  • Funeral Mongoloid Says:

    The link between NRx and Richard Littlejohn finally gets made explicit.

    [Reply]

    Funeral Mongoloid Reply:

    Next post: TO HELL IN A HANDCART.

    [Reply]

    admin Reply:

    That’s every post.

    [Reply]

    Michael Reply:

    ADMIN
    This post touches on a subject I would like explored . We speak about restoring the Patriarchy, and this reflects well on us. But Islam and the Afro have a patriarchy. We would have a hard sell of a patriarchy to the womanchild unyoked for so long. Has anyone developed systematized the neo Patriarchy or do we intend to restore the Ancien regime. I think we have a similar problem in many areas liberalism responded to some legitimate injustices the old regime was ill defined abuses happened is this simply a cost of civilization- Yeah Hester Prinn got a raw deal but would you rather have 70% illegitimacy and its costs? or is their a more Darkly enlightened approach.The world would be a much Darker place if women didnt vote how can we get them to vote to rescind suffrage.How is Euro Patriarchy different

    Lesser Bull Reply:

    Repeat after me.

    Necessary but not sufficient.

    Necessary but not sufficient.

    Necessary but not sufficient.

    Funeral Mongoloid Reply:

    A link to a piece by Daniel Hannan! What a god-awful Tory c*nt. From a recent piece in the Daily Fail:

    “I swelled with patriotic pride in 2007 when John Smeaton, a baggage handler at Glasgow Airport, beat up some hapless terrorists. A gang of jihadis had driven into the building, evidently under the impression that a car filled with bombs could set a glass-and-concrete structure alight.

    According to witnesses, Smeaton rushed at the car shouting ‘****ing c’mon then!’ and kicked one of the terrorists between the legs. Afterwards, in an interview, he said simply: ‘This is Glasgow; we’ll set aboot ye.’

    When I say ‘swelled with patriotic pride’, I mean I swelled with British patriotic pride. As far as I’m concerned, the episode was a textbook example of what we hold up in every part of this island as admirable behaviour: brisk, brave, unfussy, cool under fire.”

    Parp!

    [Reply]

    vxxc2014 Reply:

    Smeaton did the right thing.

    The governments can’t.

    Smeaton for Lord Protector. By acclaim.

    Any random BNP ABSO for Master of Horse. It’s not rocket science.

    [Reply]

    darius Reply:

    Hannan is sharp and right about the Anglosphere’s exceptionalism. There is a lot you can learn from him. If you can’t stomach reading and learning from a Tory – how difficult it is for some to see beyond the colours – then try James Bennett, for much of Hannan’s work derives from him.

    [Reply]

    admin Reply:

    @ Funeral — It’s all about small-group cultural hygiene for you guys. That’s a luxury you only get to afford if you’re tucked up in bed comfortably with the ruling class. We have to spend 90% of our time reading stuff that revolts us, because that’s the (= your) dominant culture. So I’m not interested in hearing any more “Ewww a link to X, cooties” -type remarks. They’re pampered, pathetic, and treat the infosphere like a high-school playground.

    [Reply]

    Funeral Mongoloid Reply:

    Well, when I read articles by Hannan and his Tory ilk, the following lines from George Bataille usually spring to mind:

    ‘For the bourgeois are incapable of concealing a sordid face, a face so rapacious and lacking in nobility, a face so frighteningly small, that all human life upon seeing it seems degraded.’

    SORDID, RAPACIOUS AND FRIGHTENINGLY SMALL – pretty much sums up the political right.

    Funeral Mongoloid Reply:

    @ Admin

    When did you last ‘swell with patriotic pride’ by the way? Must be a requirement for cosying up to Hannan.

    Aeroguy Reply:

    Michael,

    “We would have a hard sell of a patriarchy to the womanchild”
    You make it sound like they get an opinion. We don’t sell patriarchy, we build it, institution by institution, from scratch, because the existing institutions are zombies. Women will do what they have always done, follow the leader. As the culture collapses we build our counter culture.

    “how can we get them to vote to rescind suffrage”
    Go read up about the ratchet and accelerationism, we’re not turning this thing around, we’re accelerating it forward over the cliff while we build a new one, one that does away entirely with the voting nonsense.

    Today we live as model men and prepare for the coming fiscal collapse. We arm ourselves with self sufficiency, and develop our underground counter culture. When the collapse comes, that’s our opening to build. If we started building now they’d crush us. Progressives will live on but hopefully weakened enough that we will be able hold sovereign territory of our own.

    That’s my take on it anyway.

    [Reply]

    darius Reply:

    Seems to be a an issue of “we”s here. Seem to be conflicting desires to form a collective bond, but over very different things, some naive and bigoted. No wonder Nick, you are being associated with bigots.

    [Reply]

    admin Reply:

    There is an “issue of ‘we”” for sure. Might as well get it out into the open.

    Aeroguy Reply:

    There’s a link over to Heartiste but I get the attention, I’m flattered.
    I suppose military command structure is bigoted too since it concerns itself with leadership rather than catering to opinions. There is a lot of similarity comparing the dynamic between officer/enlisted and men/women. I have a great deal of respect for both young women and privates, they both serve difficult essential roles, however expecting their opinions to be catered to isn’t one of them, while a dedicated wife and mother under the right circumstances becomes more like a chief and provide wise council.

    Michael Reply:

    meaning “we” all dont buy HBD concerning gender? it seems theres something im missing its reminiscent of the NRO crowd translating HBD as culture as in if not for the welfare culture the counter culture etc all would be fine . but it turns out its not culture at all its really starkly incompatible difference because if it were noy for this we would trying to fix the liberal project there would be hope but hbd dashes all hope. its not bigotry i dont hate anyone i dont even like anyone i live and work and have found non profits most of my life in majority minority environments. I get along and am accepted respected like few white men.And as much as i dearly love a lot of these men and women I can see we are doomed if this does not stop soon i can see no way for this to end amicably and am deeply saddened by that. but i swear not only is it us or them but that it should be us. if that makes me a bigot so be it 40 years before moldbug i said to anyone who dared pretend otherwise zulu tribal rhythms are not equatable to mozart , teepees are not subjectively better than gothic cathedrals they are objectively better,I dont know if we can pick up where our culture left off but i think for humanities sake we must try if that means throwing 80% of the human race out of the lifeboat im cool with that.
    But my post was of a liberal nature it was what exactly is our patriarchy and how does it differ with afro and muslim patriarchy or does it. how or can we have a kinder gentler patriarchy or does that inevitably lead back to hear. And this makes me a bigot? Or was that directed at other posts close to what is said above. if so heres the thing.no one want to face reversion to the mean makes any sort of assimilation test futile it means we always end up here with the facts and figures all over the dark side.
    do you guys seriously think we can reinstate Jim crow have separate rules and outcomes for different citizens thats not going to happen its not even right or just. so it collapses and the cathedral cant support the nams and we just let them die off. they should be humanely repatriated to the environments they were adapted for and those environments restored as much as possible to pre colonial conditions at least the ak47s should be confiscated
    and BTW this Brecht routine of waiting for the collapse that never comes while lamenting the population election is stupid, they are not going to roll over when their economy collapses they are going to put Gurkhas in tanks on the streets now is the time to take out the cathedral, they aint all that ,once they have 100k drones in the air and that server farm up and running it will be problematic

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 2:32 pm Reply | Quote
  • darius Says:

    This is satirical but on point: http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2014/03/15/comment/coucil-of-islamic-ideology-declares-womens-existence-anti-islamic/.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 4:07 pm Reply | Quote
  • nobody Says:

    Here’s a post I did where I calculated the likelihood of abuse in Rotherham.

    http://unreadmag.blogspot.com

    It came out to 1 in 20 if you were a white teenage girl.

    [Reply]

    Funeral Mongoloid Reply:

    ‘Why are these men, who are fed and clothed by the British government, targeting white girls over Muslim ones? You all know why.’

    No, I don’t – please explain further.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 4:50 pm Reply | Quote
  • let it burn Says:

    this is the same rotherham council that removed 3 children from a foster home because the parents voted ukip.

    the raping of white women by vibrant enrichers isn’t just happening in rotherham. it’s happening in other towns in england. and in malmo sweden. and france. all over europe. that’s a lot of light night work alright.

    but don’t notice any patterns that would be bad, m’kay?

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 5:41 pm Reply | Quote
  • Alrenous Says:

    The election showed the racist card trumped the sexist card. Why is that? Anti-sexism gets women raped, while anti-racism gets teenagers raped. Clearly it’s ranked by heinousness.

    Calling a spade a spade we can now definitely call feminist pro-rapists and anti-sexists pro-child-rapists. In analogy to pro-life.

    [Reply]

    Alrenous Reply:

    I should say explicitly: ‘rape culture’ is real. It’s just projection. Feminists love rape.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 7:16 pm Reply | Quote
  • Erik Says:

    ROPE!
    (With apologies to @MorlockP.)

    If you live in the West, I would escalate the preparations for shadow government. Find men in your neighborhood you can form a gang with. The ruling structure is bleeding legitimacy from every pore when it ignores sex trafficking child rapists for a decades and arrests fathers trying to rescue their daughters. One day people are likely to say “You can’t be the police, you’re not doing the job of the police, we need some police here” and reinvent the police out of a local gang. Rewriting from scratch is likely to be necessary – I still hold out hope for reform (despair is a sin) – but I expect reform isn’t going to fix the problem.

    I’m trying to come up with a catchy name for the unholy alliance of pakistanis, policemen and politicians required to make this sort of thing happen. Molesters, Arresters and Self-Detesters?

    [Reply]

    vxxc2014 Reply:

    Well there’s no reform. You don’t cure syphilis by going to the same whores who ruined you.

    Action on the other hand requires minimum talk, and blood quite clears up the rhetoric.

    I’d start with my own before the unholy alliance. When you get pinched stand up no matter what [I mean don’t talk, squeal]. Please don’t just forget but unremember all this nonsense about game theory and prisoners dilemma. There’s no dilemma. You’re a man or you’re the most wretched thing on earth.

    [Reply]

    Michael Reply:

    I agree basic need to be worked out now while it still can be soon even a conversation like this will not be possible. a movement of local tribes or whatever you want to call them that are planning to step in at the collapse laws strategies and policies all need hammering out

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 7:59 pm Reply | Quote
  • vxxc2014 Says:

    In Heaven my Fenian Grandfather weeps for England.

    And he hated you, sorry.

    [Reply]

    admin Reply:

    I thought the appropriate behavior at a wake was laughter and inebriation?

    [Reply]

    vxxc2014 Reply:

    No that’s us below. At the wake. Grandpa’s long in Heaven.

    But yes that’s the Irish Wake you’re describing.

    [Reply]

    vxxc2014 Reply:

    Oh sorry Fighting as well as Drinking, Laughter. Drinking, Fighting, Joking, Laughter at solemn occasions.

    This has been known to not mix well with the Italian style of mourning for instance.

    Posted on August 28th, 2014 at 11:18 pm Reply | Quote
  • Oy vey, dats racist Says:

    Remember when the Guardian said it was racist to report on these crimes:

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/jan/07/grooming-racialising-crime-tradition

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 29th, 2014 at 3:48 am Reply | Quote
  • pjebleak Says:

    I didn’t read all the comments but I have followed the story pondering whether it would ever hit the mainstream.

    Regarding the taxi driver and late night angle this is true in some places (fast food and taxis, etc.), but not in others and not in the 1,400 case where we are dealing with *gang* members who not only abused ‘easy meat’ but *trafficked* them across the UK (this is also true in many previous cases). Which is to say there was a general culture of passing around white girls amongst Pakistani males going back to the early 1990s. It’s pretty grim stuff and I’m not all that drawn to race here (what about the other Asians or we know about the celebrity white pedophiles now too). However it is clear that political correctness played a massive role in keeping everyone quiet and that is outright cognitive madness.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 29th, 2014 at 11:51 am Reply | Quote
  • pjebleak Says:

    Also I cannot recommend this enough: http://lawandfreedomfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Easy-Meat-Multiculturalism-Islam-and-Child-Sex-Slavery-05-03-2014.pdf (already linked perhaps).

    Notably *Sikh* girls were the first targets and then white girls which speaks to the hostility and opportunism operative here.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 29th, 2014 at 12:09 pm Reply | Quote
  • Hattori Says:

    Probably worth linking

    “Scandal hit Rotherham ‘deleted abuse files’
    Senior staff from Rotherham Council ordered a raid on offices to delete and remove case files of abused girls ”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11062758/Scandal-hit-Rotherham-deleted-abuse-files.html

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 29th, 2014 at 12:50 pm Reply | Quote
  • pjebleak Says:

    Deleting of files is routine in the UK. They did the same to the dossier about Tory abusers back in the 80s.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 29th, 2014 at 12:55 pm Reply | Quote
  • Michael Says:

    @Solex
    sorry if that sounded condescending it wasn’t meant that way i really thought you must have happened upon this site accidentally because the “alt right is absolutely nothing but talk of social decline but there are now hundreds of blogs now and many of the best are no longer even active.
    Im glad you had a little victory i still try though its a losing battle im a parent and very old school its an impossible stance in todays world unless you live somewhere like north Idaho. You spend far less time with your child than they do unless you are wealthy.Have you read the nurture assumption i can tell you as a parent thay really do come out of the womb with a formed personality habits etc that are next to impossible to overcome.

    [Reply]

    MLR Reply:

    It’s MLR, not Solex.

    I have not read about the nurture assumption. I have looked into people’s eyes and seen a response when you help them identify how soul destroying modernity is, and that you care enough to tell them that the hole they feel inside – the one that Purina Cat Chow commercials and Lean In covers try to fill if you’re a woman, or that baldness commercials and fancy cars try to fill if you’re a man, or that only a college degree will let them be “smart,” lies lies lies – that that hole isn’t going to be filled by modernity’s baubles, but that they can DO something, get a little better at something, and that THAT will be enough, that that message, delivered sincerely, is more love and care than they get in the average day.

    Your job is not to construct or alter the personality of a young person, and not being able to live in north Idaho is an excuse. Do you love them? I know you do: so look them in the EYE and have an honest conversation with them. Yes, it’s hard. Get over it.

    You are all they have – don’t abandon them to a world that is cold as ice and offers noting but death and betrayal.

    [Reply]

    MLR Reply:

    Yesterday, my reading class was doing TLP’s “The Second Story of Echo and Narcissus.” A student, “R” from Portugal (who wants to be a kindergarten teacher) came in a bit late, but had already covered the story (she’s been in my class awhile). While she worked on a different task, the students had some reading comprehension questions about the text to answer. The third one was ” How does the writer connect the actions of Narcissus’ parents to events in modern times, with modern parents, and modern social factors?” As we took up the answers, the students got a bit stuck on this (they answered “media sends alot of messages that parents listen to, to sell us stuff”). I said that was a good start and directed them to the paragraph that says:

    “Narcissus’s parents were demi-gods– didn’t they know how to raise a good son, what a proper parent needs to do? Yet they listened to a charlatan anyway. They were given meaningless information by a supposed expert and abandoned all common sense, and so created a monster who brought death to at least one person and misery to all.”

    R helpfully looked up and helped them out, saying, “It’s media, but it’s also the university’s, too, that are charlatans who convince parents that they’re experts, and that the only way to success is through university.”

    No excuses: Look people in the eye and TALK. TO. THEM.

    😀

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 29th, 2014 at 8:40 pm Reply | Quote
  • Michael Says:

    @Oy vey, dats racist
    i notice that articles authoress has some priceless comments in her own comment section that someone who knows how ought to put on twitter

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 30th, 2014 at 12:15 pm Reply | Quote
  • Lightning Round – 2014/09/03 | Free Northerner Says:

    […] fosters rape and child abuse. Related: It’s anti-racist’s fault . Related: The BBC is a rape enabler. Related: Revolutionary racial terror. Related: Rot Britannia. Related: Enoch Powell is still […]

    Posted on September 3rd, 2014 at 5:01 am Reply | Quote

Leave a comment