<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hayek and Pinochet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/</link>
	<description>Involvements with reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vimothy</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/#comment-7030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vimothy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=676#comment-7030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we&#039;re on the CT tip, did anyone notice the latest post up there?

&lt;i&gt;[Trende&#039;s recent series of posts at RCP is] the first time I’ve seen a ‘wonky’ Republican suggest maybe extreme racial polarization should be on the table as a strategic option. It’s so obvious it would be a bad thing for the whole country that I find it dismaying.&lt;/i&gt;

-- Holbo

Dismaying, eh. Boo-hoo. Of course, extreme racial polarisation is not only on the table as a strategic option for progressives, but it&#039;s been the central plank of their strategy for decades now. &lt;i&gt;Viva la Raza!&lt;/i&gt;

On the other hand, interesting that there are signs of life among Republican political types. Who knew ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re on the CT tip, did anyone notice the latest post up there?</p>
<p><i>[Trende&#8217;s recent series of posts at RCP is] the first time I’ve seen a ‘wonky’ Republican suggest maybe extreme racial polarization should be on the table as a strategic option. It’s so obvious it would be a bad thing for the whole country that I find it dismaying.</i></p>
<p>&#8212; Holbo</p>
<p>Dismaying, eh. Boo-hoo. Of course, extreme racial polarisation is not only on the table as a strategic option for progressives, but it&#8217;s been the central plank of their strategy for decades now. <i>Viva la Raza!</i></p>
<p>On the other hand, interesting that there are signs of life among Republican political types. Who knew &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/#comment-7023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=676#comment-7023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True. The comment thread at Crooked Timber, on the other hand ....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. The comment thread at Crooked Timber, on the other hand &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contemplationist</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/#comment-7020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contemplationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 06:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=676#comment-7020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comments @ MarginalRev are awesome. Good to see a whole host of people defend Pinochet. The leftists are down to name-calling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments @ MarginalRev are awesome. Good to see a whole host of people defend Pinochet. The leftists are down to name-calling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/#comment-6946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=676#comment-6946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not much push-back so far then ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much push-back so far then &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contemplationist</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/#comment-6944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contemplationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=676#comment-6944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian Smith is an even easier case. No apartheid/segregation.
No internal repression. As close to a perfect state as possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Smith is an even easier case. No apartheid/segregation.<br />
No internal repression. As close to a perfect state as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/#comment-6943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=676#comment-6943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely. You can add Ian Smith as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. You can add Ian Smith as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contemplationist</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/hayek-and-pinochet/#comment-6940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contemplationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=676#comment-6940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pre-requisite for being a neoreactionary must include unreservedly being in favor of Pinochet. There is no alternative. A clearly brewing Marxist revolution vs a relatively peaceful military dictatorship. Easy choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pre-requisite for being a neoreactionary must include unreservedly being in favor of Pinochet. There is no alternative. A clearly brewing Marxist revolution vs a relatively peaceful military dictatorship. Easy choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
