Merkel’s Mess

Damon Linker paints the gruesome picture almost perfectly. (Read the whole thing — it’s not long.)

In the course of a few months, Angela Merkel was transmogrified from a moderately talented German politician, into one of the most destructive leaders in world history. If that sounds like an exaggeration, it’s only because her responsibility for dragging the European continent back into a new 1930s still awaits the unfolding of events. Even without complete relapse into a dark age of authoritarian anti-capitalism, the wave of rape, pillage, and terror she has unleashed will now — inevitably — devastate millions of lives, and structurally degrade the quality of life for tens of millions more as they seek to protect themselves in markedly more adverse social circumstances. It will all get extremely ugly. As Linker dryly remarks, “let’s just say it’s unlikely to end well. … And the storm has only just begun to gather.”

What was she thinking? Assuming — as seems fair — that she doesn’t positively want to usher in Hitler 2.0, her catastrophic policy decisions have to be misguided. It’s probably no easier for the readers of this blog than it is for me to cognitively sympathize with the deranged path she has taken. One can only infer that she genuinely believed a vast flood of predominantly young, male, Islamic, tribalistic, and historically-traumatized incomers, with a hallucinatory sense of (unrealizable) cultural and material entitlement, would immediately transmute into fungible production units and contribute to European pensions financing. The Economist pretends to believe the same thing. I’m forced to accept it’s possible to believe it, despite finding the flying spaghetti monster significantly more plausible. If this depth of delusion really has a grip on the minds of Western elites, any outcome other than utter disaster is most probably unobtainable. A cynical lie would be far less dangerous.

In a single stroke, Merkel has converted the Raspail and Houellebecq scenarios into vivid contemporary predicaments. European collapse has been radically accelerated. For that, a certain dark gratitude is due.

August 6, 2016admin 95 Comments »

TAGGED WITH : , , , ,

95 Responses to this entry

  • anonyme Says:

    Reuters, 07 October 2015

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned fellow leaders of European Union countries on Wednesday against succumbing to NATIONALISM in tackling the bloc’s migrant crisis.

    “In the refugee crisis we must not succumb to the temptation of falling back into acting in NATIONALISTIC terms,” said Merkel…

    Jerusalem Post, 15 September 2013

    “For those who share my view that the Jews as a people have a right to self-determination, Zionism (JEWISH NATIONALISM) as a national movement of the Jewish people is the embodiment of this very right which its opponents want to deny.” – German Chancellor Angela Merkel


    michael Reply:

    If it makes you feel any better one day they will turn on the niggers too, but today jew niggers and sand niggers are useful


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 2:01 pm Reply | Quote
  • Aristocles Invictvs Says:

    Dark gratitude indeed, I think I need to get out of Germany sooner rather than later however… exit is the only option after all.


    Alien Megacorp Reply:

    True exit is a state within the state.


    Cryptogenic Reply:

    κράτος εν κράτει is false exit. Obviously.


    Apotheotic Monkey Business Ltd. Reply:

    Exit out of the cathedral? The state I referred to would recapture the Cathedral. It´s ours to begin with, after all. So no, it´s not false but right.

    But we´ve entered the dialectic of what ‘state’ is here.

    There is always unavoidably a deep state within.


    vxxc2014 Reply:

    Oh by all means do capture it.

    It’s what NRx has always wanted.

    a Reply:

    Some folks are already on it.

    michael Reply:

    Dont listen to these faggots their is no exit there is nowhere to run the US is 40 nigger now, Even if you go to russia or poland or something they will be crushed eventually you must fight. there is voice exit and war, voice ended when they seized the cathedral exit ended when the world was fully occupied and known and reachable by dronestrike. there is war or die a coward


    Apotheotic Monkey Business Ltd. Reply:

    There certainly is war. But it´s a war for the truth. Which is on our side.

    their is no exit there is nowhere to run the US is 40 nigger now, Even if you go to russia or poland or something they will be crushed eventually you must fight.

    You´re describing fighting as (an attempt at) exit. ‘Exit’ is what changes the situation so that the rising tide of hostile third-worlders cease their flooding of the Atlantic islands and of middle-earth.

    I don´t doubt that there are elements within Western security forces which are getting tired of this new play.

    It´s a spiritual malaise, that changed us from an expanding colonizing culture to one being colonized in turn.

    ▬ »They cannot understand as yet that we are not fighting a political party but a sect of murderers of all contemporary spiritual culture.«

    This happened in Italy, so Roman imperium became a brown democratic morass, it happened with ancient Greece, it happened in India, Persia, Macedonia, Cyprus, Constantinople, Malta, South-Africa, Egypt, China (Tocharians) etc. etc.

    This isn´t something new. It´s a cycle as old as history and it has gotten to the root now.!/category/sample-chapters/


    michael Reply:

    The problem with truth as a weapon is it doesn’t kill people fast enough so they have time to multiply and overwhelm and kill you first.

    Unless you’re actually thinking you can persuade a commie of the error of their ways then god help you

    Apotheotic Monkey Business Ltd. Reply:

    Actually you can morally defeat a commie.

    Truth is moral. An army is morally defeated before it is materially defeated.

    Arian war arts Reply:

    Typically battalions are not completely eliminated, but when their esprit de corps runs out they surrender.

    This is the vector of ideal (spirit, motivation, flow, etc) vs. the opposing vector of material circumstance (ammo, weapon conditions, numerosity, etc).

    As has been cited here recently (through other terms), incidentally, by one commentator Melanie L’Heuremaudit, as well as others.

    For a parabrahman such as myself, things do not get really interesting until your are in the territory of magical idealism; which I would associate with top tier genius of the spirit, in which you can change virtually any circumstance to your favor, as seen with Alexander the Great and Napoleon, so far as that goes (there is more).

    vxxc2014 Reply:

    “I don´t doubt that there are elements within Western security forces which are getting tired of this new play.”

    You can’t count on them without a national leader and believe me it’s not coming from either the very Prog Intel side or these hapless bureaucrat generals.

    They’ll need permission from either the people or the people’s leader.

    Now as to earlier point….War for the truth?

    HA HAH HAH HAH HAH says the grey veteran.

    a Reply:

    There are always opposing forces within a system. Uncounted nodes, waiting to go rogue.

    The recent example of Turkey, would seem to shew that.

    Things coincide oppositorum.

    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 2:33 pm Reply | Quote
  • pyrrhus Says:

    Linker calls Merkel’s actions “well meant.” Hardly. Merkel is a former Communist Youth leader, and her aim is nothing short of destroying the bourgeois nation of Germany and replacing it with a 3d world hellhole, ruled over by a communist leader.


    Alrenous Reply:

    Base rate: would mass immigration happened if not-Merkel had been elected instead? Of course. Obviously.

    Merkel’s job, just like POTUS, is to have a human face voters can blame when things go wrong. They were going to happen anyway, but monkeybrains aren’t interested in the true causes of things.


    Alien Megacorp Reply:

    Yeah, +A, Alrenous.

    These people meet in committees. Decide on. Plan years ahead. Then they play political drama for the public. It´s an ancient art.

    ▬„Soviets (literally “council” in English) are political organizations and governmental bodies…”


    michael Reply:

    The crazy shit is its not even top secret they publish their plans write white papers have conferences but no one believes alex jones ;]

    Apotheotic Monkey Business Ltd. Reply:

    These things are indeed published. But A.J. is a stooge. He makes a lot of money from his acting career.

    Alrenous Reply:

    Does this mean Australia’s anti-immigration was also done this way? Tony Abbot should have been equally powerless. He was just there as a PR lightning rod if anything went wrong….only nothing went wrong. But this means Australia’s army had been planning to seal the borders years and years ago?

    I guess north america’s obsession with defanging their generals isn’t entirely misguided, eh?

    Apotheotic Monkey Business Ltd. Reply:

    If you want to make it seem like not-a-plan you ‘randomize’ it. You let this guy play opposition, and you push for these countries to go the opposite direction, e.g. because you know that the demographic situation is different there, and to make the pattern not too obvious. Then you simply wait 4-24 years and let that country also join the fray. It´s a game of sacrifice. Chess. You sacrifice as needed.

    There´s nothing mysterious about it. But it´s mysterious to the common man, because the common man infers that everyone must be like him. So he thinks “naaah, they wouldn´t have the patience to do that.”

    Well how the fuck did they have to patience & discipline to run the Most Serene Republic of Venice as a merchant empire for a thousand years, from 697–1797?

    They did because it´s in their blood. I know because it´s in mine.

    This shit´s all over history. It´s what history is about.


    michael Reply:

    that would be funny if the nuts were right all along.

    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 2:46 pm Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    Acting on feelings alone always produces bad results. Merkel was like all democratic politicians a manipulator of mass feeling, but that is the opposite of reality, so results were (predictably) bad.


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 3:26 pm Reply | Quote
  • Erebus Says:

    >”One can only infer that she genuinely believed a vast flood of predominantly young, male, Islamic, tribalistic, and historically-traumatized incomers, with a hallucinatory sense of (unrealizable) cultural and material entitlement, would immediately transmute into fungible production units and contribute to European pensions financing. The Economist pretends to believe the same thing.”

    The Economist is damnably stupid, wantonly evil, or both. Any suggestion that these migrants might “contribute to European pensions financing” is demonstrably false. Surely The Economist cannot be ignorant of these headlines out of Sweden:

    Six in ten jobless will be foreigners by 2017
    Published: 09 Dec 2015 10:47 GMT+01:00

    UPDATED: Sweden’s Employment Agency (Arbetsförmedlingen) has predicted that 60 percent of unemployed people living in Sweden will be foreign-born by 2017, while the jobless rate for Swedes is set to shrink.

    Half of all jobless in Sweden are foreigners
    Published: 12 Apr 2016 14:11 GMT+02:00

    Unemployment is falling overall, but rising among foreign-born citizens, the latest figures by Swedish number-crunching agency Statistics Sweden reveal.

    Foreigners in Sweden still more likely to be unemployed
    Published: 24 May 2016 16:23 GMT+02:00

    The employment gap between Swedish citizens born in the country and those born abroad will soon widen, according to the country’s employment agency, Arbetsförmedlingen.

    Fewer than 500 of 163,000 asylum seekers found jobs
    Published: 31 May 2016 07:49 GMT+02:00

    Of almost 163,000 people who applied for asylum in Sweden last year, less than 500 landed a job, according to a report by a Swedish public broadcaster.

    …Does anybody truly think that it’s going to be different in Germany? This is more than mere delusion — it is madness. It should be abundantly clear, to all people in their right minds, that these refugees are not going to contribute economically to their host nations. Instead, precisely to the contrary, they’re going to further strain social and welfare services, very much to the detriment of the aging native population and the working and middle classes. (To say nothing of the Islam, crime, etc., that they bring along with them, and their markedly dysgenic effects upon their host populations.)

    It won’t be too long before that collapse. Seems to me that the folks in charge are doing everything they can to hasten it, and ensure that it does indeed come about. There are only two possible motives: Malice or stupidity. Neither can be forgiven, whatever dark gratitude we owe them for their services to Right Accelerationism.


    Malignant machinations Reply:

    People say malice is attributed when stupidity is the cause, but I say they are the same.


    michael Reply:

    This has been my whole critique of the non aggression policy of denrx these are not religious idiots these are cunning marxist thugs that want you dead they are not naive maybe the average leftist is not Soros Obama Clinton that fucking irish cocker who works for the imf and jpm or something these are evil people they are not collapsing they are wiping up and this is the last opportunity to fucking kill them


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 4:40 pm Reply | Quote
  • Etiq Says:

    I doubt she is deluded. She just took the path of least resistance. Note that she never explicitly *did* anything. Rather, the horde came and she failed to stop them. Put that down to cowardice, ineptitude or indifference.

    Then she spun her inaction as deliberate policy, which worked well enough: after welcoming the refugees, this evil ordoliberal who crushed the poor Greeks beneath her jackboots only a few months prior was basically canonised by the Cathedral.

    Polls have her easily winning a fourth term next year.


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 5:31 pm Reply | Quote
  • Alrenous Says:

    I don’t find it hard to explain.

    Merkel cares about Merkel. Merkel’s sponsors would withdraw if she didn’t push immigration to the hilt. Merkel’s sponsors want immigration precisely because it’s a bad idea and the people don’t want it. The more vehemently it’s opposed, and yet occurs anyway, the more they can show off how dominant they are.

    “Moderately talented politician.” A politician is a PR flack. She took a particularly inflammatory gig, that’s all.


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 6:22 pm Reply | Quote
  • Dedicating Ruckus Says:

    If you take Moldbug’s concept of the BDH/OV concept seriously (and translate it into European terms, since the categories don’t quite match up), there’s another option other than “genuinely believes in universalism” (insane) and “actually Satan” (probably not the case). Merkel (or her puppetmasters) is importing hordes of Third-worlders to use as a political and/or military counterweight against resurgent nationalism itself. (nydwracu’s idea about kill switches may be relevant here.)

    This, of course, has several other problems, but I think they’re more explicable than either of the above options. For one, there’s the fact that resurgent nationalism likely wouldn’t have done much resurging at all, in Western Europe at least, absent this policy itself; it’s probably pushed the timeline on Hitler v2.0 up at least twenty years, assuming it does end there. Then, of course, the whole plan is contingent on the Third-worlders 1. actually being able to defeat the nationalists in combat, once they’ve fully begun to hate (dubious), and 2. not immediately turning around and devouring Merkel and co. in turn (impossible). But these oversights all seem more likely than either genuinely believing that the Syrians would make the best possible next generation of Germans, or actively plotting for German natives to be raped and killed.


    The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel Reply:

    Yeah, this gets right to it. By pumping in (now) relatively rootless luxury desirers — hungry ghosts of past Mesopotamian civilizations, hungry for First World goods, and who are alien to the locals, to local custom and right — the Empire of Merchants & Miscegenation gets a new column of voters, of anti-racists, of anti-nationalists, of consumers, of will-work-for-less workers — but most importantly all of the goyim nation-states get weakened (revenge), the locals get affected by further rootlessness themselves, shops are replaced with kebab, and White manbeast gets to see and feel firsthand how its to be under constant Muslim threat & attack, like Israel´s been under for half a century.

    There´s a lot of sweatshops in Europe by now.

    Though these people may not have official jobs….

    Moves like these are Deep State materials, strategies.

    The sillier or the crazier they may be, the truer they may be.


    michael Reply:

    Yes they are much more plausible than assuming the elites are naive, I would even disagree that the nationalism wasn’t already noticeable before Merkel opened the gate and i doubt these faggots have a very good idea who wins fights so its quite possible it was to have an army to protect them while they furthered their progress they thought was threatened by reaction to it thus far.,
    It more likely they always intended to do this since they have been saying so for 100 years and finally felt strong enough and we shall find if if they are strong enough if the entire white race has gone full faggot or not.


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 7:13 pm Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    Merkel and her party can benefite in munber of ways from migrants crisys and distabilisation of Europe as well. Enemy within, as sitting duck. Any one unhappy divert them on migrants. Economy bad – some many migrants. Banks collapsing – migrants eat all money and so one …
    By having migrants they are getting grip on situation and control over termostate.


    Arian´s Apothecary Reply:

    Political science at top-tier is virtually the same as physics & chemistry.

    It´s not through pure fancy that they called alchemy the royal art.


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 7:24 pm Reply | Quote
  • S.C. Hickman Says:

    Oh, well tried to include image… go here:


    michael Reply:

    ;] got the crab in there i see


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 7:32 pm Reply | Quote
  • Melanie l'Heuremaudit Says:

    Merkel and Manuel Valls (who informed the French people after the Nice attack that they’d better get used to terrorism) working on behalf of their sponsors (who with the exception of George Soros remain mostly nameless) are importing millions of Muslims to rape your daughters, loot your towns, kill you, blow stuff up and terrorize everyone.

    But if you don’t get used to terrorism and welcome the refugees with open arms, then you’re a right wing, xenophobic neo-Nazi extremist, and we’ll charge you with hate speech and lock you up in prison.

    Malice or stupidity?

    Hmm…most politicians are intelligent enough to have succeeded in academics at the highest levels, and most have also been very successful in business, so clearly we must be dealing with stupidity here.

    How could anyone suspect them of malice?


    michael Reply:

    Exactly Melanie ADMIN can continue to believe the most intelligent educated highly informed ruthlessly ambitious,opportunists in the world people with entire governments, parties, universities, think tanks,NGOs etc at their command to inform them of the minutest detail of reality do not know what a nigger is like. These are the people that have murdered hundreds of million inthe last 150 years but we should “infer” they are sincere but naive hippies.


    Arian Machinechrist Reply:

    that´s a very good summary, both of you.

    admin is signaling he´s not a conspiracy theorist. a concept in an advanced degree of bogus.

    firstly, for someone who really knows words beyond the mechanical thinking of homo commonus — conspiracy means ‘what comes together (to form an effect).’

    especially, it´s something that transpires but with a human co operation (opus, work).

    humans conspire to have things transpire.

    commoners however are very unconscious about themselves, and others. they don´t have historical consciousness, but they do have a trend & hope consciousness.

    still, commoner humans conspire a lot. they just don´t recognize it as such because it´s something too conscious. their brain/soul cannot handle such consciousness. the idea that there are people who actually can machinate at such high levels is too burdensome. “best leave it for the mafia & spy movies.”

    the image of the world that people can carry varies amazingly.

    the real requires hard feelings. anti-hope. staring fear.

    so when they conspire to bully someone at work, or against someone who´s a fit target for Feminism (we´ve had many examples in the recent past). they will use the para-Leftist method of euphemizing.

    these are all methods to replace the real with less burdensome narrative.

    people´s most significant differences are in their access to the real, how honest they are or not, and thus honorable, and that includes seeing thru concepts.

    ‘con-cept’ is very related to ‘per-ception’.

    we see through our ideas, “through a glass darkly,” but not equally.


    vxxc2014 Reply:

    For some reason NRx never looks at the money.

    They began losing their grip in 2008 when the Western World went bankrupt and they papered it over with tens of Trillions $$.

    In the USA in 2008/2009 the bankruptcy ended the delirium and the American people and their elites looked at each other and to their mutual horror realized neither had the purchase on the other they thought they did nor did they have the same interests.

    The elites then made their choices and at least in America we’ve decided we’re not along for the ride.


    Erebus Reply:

    >Hmm…most politicians are intelligent enough to have succeeded in academics at the highest levels, and most have also been very successful in business, so clearly we must be dealing with stupidity here.

    So people who have “succeeded in academics” are incapable of subscribing to stupid and destructive ideologies? Are incapable of making stupid decisions? Are incapable, in short, of acting in a manner that is less than perfectly intelligent, rational, and self-interested?

    If that’s your position, I think that a cursory glance at history should disavow you of it. Besides, extremely smart and very good-natured people like Terry Tao are quite obviously capable of downright appalling stupidity when they speak of politics. (I’m no Trump supporter, but Tao says “isn’t qualified” when what he clearly means is “isn’t suitable.” There are, after all, few real qualifications for the office, and Trump meets them all. Tao’s statement is therefore wholly subjective, and not amenable to axiomatization.)

    To be sure, we have more of a problem with stupidity than with evil. I don’t deny that the latter exists, but I am certain that the average European bureaucrat/politician believes that, in importing migrants, he’s lifting poor souls out of despair, that the economy of his country may benefit for it, that he acts virtuously to save the lives of those wretched and poor minorities, that any inconvenience to the native population is a noble sacrifice that cannot be helped, as those poor lives must be saved, etc., etc…

    Valls, in particular, is the delusional idiot par excellence.


    a Reply:

    I think no one can have a long powerful political career without being machiavellian or having machiavellian advisors. This requires feigning weakness & ignorance, even a sort of dumbfoundedness, all the time. Bill Clinton & George Bush observably do this.

    But, yes, of course, they can subscribe to stupid ideas or ideologies. But not too stupid, for the spiral of power is a shark game.

    ▬ „Counterintelligence state (sometimes also called intelligence state, securocracy or spookocracy) is a state where state security service penetrates and permeates all societal institutions including the military.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] The term has been applied by historians and political commentators to the former Soviet Union, the former German Democratic Republic, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, the United States, especially after the Global surveillance disclosures and post-Soviet Russia under Vladimir Putin.

    According to a definition, “The counterintelligence state is characterized by the presence of a large, elite force acting as a watchdog of a security defined as broadly that the state must maintain an enormous vigilance and enforcement apparatus… This apparatus is not accountable to the public and enjoys immense police powers… Whether the civilian government is able to control the security bodies is an open question …”

    America certainly is a counterintelligence state, if examined.

    This requires intelligence, and doing things under the pretense of ideology.

    The political public show is, just that, mostly a political public show.

    The reality mixes in with crime and shadow departments.

    And dark devices. Many, many a dark device.

    * Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States.

    * An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.

    * In Washington and the surrounding area, 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001 alone. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings – about 17 million square feet of space.

    * Many security and intelligence agencies do the same work, creating redundancy and waste. For example, 51 federal organizations and military commands, operating in 15 U.S. cities, track the flow of money to and from terrorist networks.

    * Analysts who make sense of documents and conversations obtained by foreign and domestic spying share their judgment by publishing 50,000 intelligence reports each year – a volume so large that many are routinely ignored.”

    Galaxy spanning imperial bureaucracy, anyone?

    This isn´t even all.


    Sinistro stradale, morte, spatium vivendi Reply:

    ▬ „a company known simply by the nondescript initials SAIC (for Science Applications International Corporation), initials that are always spoken letter by letter rather than formed into a pronounceable acronym. SAIC maintains its headquarters in San Diego, but its center of gravity is in Washington, D.C. With a workforce of 44,000, it is the size of a full-fledged government agency—in fact, it is larger than the departments of Labor, Energy, and Housing and Urban Development combined.

    The unhappy business practices of the past few years in Iraq—cost overruns, incompetence, and corruption on a pharaonic scale—have made the American public keenly aware of the activities of mega-contractors such as Halliburton and Bechtel. Although SAIC takes on government projects such as those pursued by contractors like these, it does not belong in exactly the same category. Halliburton and Bechtel supply the government’s brawn. They pour concrete, roll out concertina wire, build infrastructure. They call on bullnecked men to provide protection.

    In contrast, SAIC is a body shop in the brain business. It sells human beings who have a particular expertise—expertise about weapons, about homeland security, about surveillance, about computer systems, about “information dominance” and “information warfare.” If the C.I.A. needs an outside expert to quietly check whether its employees are using their computers for personal business, it calls on SAIC. If the Immigration and Naturalization Service needs new record-keeping software, it calls on SAIC. Indeed, SAIC is willing to provide expertise about almost anything at all, if there happens to be a government contract out there to pay for it—as there almost always is. Whether SAIC actually possesses all the expertise that it sells is another story.

    What everyone agrees on is this: No Washington contractor pursues government money with more ingenuity and perseverance than SAIC. No contractor seems to exploit conflicts of interest in Washington with more zeal. And no contractor cloaks its operations in greater secrecy. SAIC almost never touts its activities in public, preferring to stay well below the radar. An SAIC executive once gave a press interview and referred to the enterprise as a “stealth company,” a characterization that is accurate and that has stuck. “Nobody knows who they are,” says Glenn Grossenbacher, a Texas lawyer who has battled SAIC in court on a whistle-blowing case. “Everybody knows Northrop Grumman and G.E., but if you went out on the street and asked who the top 10 [defense] contractors are, I can guarantee you that SAIC would not be one of them.””

    There be ghosts among us.

    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 9:48 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    “Normally a political leader who acts without regard for practical consequences is guilty of flagrant irresponsibility. But, to be fair, it’s actually not entirely clear that Merkel failed to think about consequences when she decided last year to allow (so far) upwards of 1.3 million Middle Eastern, North African, and South Asian refugees and migrants to settle in Europe. On the contrary, it may well be that she did consider the consequences and simply refused to take seriously the possibility that any of them could be negative.”

    There’s another possibility or two. It could be that she did consider the consequences and thoroughly understood they would be negative to whites and thats why she did it.
    You have to understand we are talking about people who have routinely sacrificed tens of millions of people at a clip to their schemes. They are very clear they think whites are the evil of the world why would they not opt for a plan that solves their problem from both ends at one more niggers in less whites alive, whats not to like?

    Or maybe its the head nigger obama who has some NSA tapes on mekel that would put her in prison for the rest of her life. But lefty wouldnt stoop so low


    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 9:49 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:


    dont forget if the torches and pitchforks come out they can call on their nigger praetorian guard to kill the evil white racists


    SVErshov Reply:

    Michael, just wrong juice, is not we schould love and not hate each other. love can save the world, I’m pretty sure, what do you think?


    Arian´s Apothecary Reply:

    Depends on what for that love is.


    SVErshov Reply:

    let define it in more broad sence as emotional bonds.

    a Reply:

    Love for the good (innovation, creativity, order, beauty, truth, justice) certainly has inspired many a man to works, and to sacrifice.

    But emotion alone doth naught but feel.

    Thus any man´s life is a balance of acting in utilitarianism and ideal.

    As for romantic love, I have often read that it is somewhat an import from the east.

    So we see that ideals can be imported (the spirit of this or that), and have material effects. (So much for the confused spirit vs. matter debate, which only resulted from fundamental misunderstandings of concepts — on both ‘sides’, the sides of ‘fundamentalist’ religious and the ‘fundamentalist’ atheist).

    Any way, a poster at the amusing web-site Wizardchan (which has some respectable memberhood I think is the type that would be in monastic societies, if we had a functioning enough Church anymore, instead of being virgin NEETs — the latter which I personally find nothing wrong with, considering the former) he did abstract the regarding history relatively well enough:

    ▬ „the 12th century renaissance, which is only just now being seen as a distinctly important period in europe, some even arguing that is was more important than the later renaissance because it was not just a rediscovering of the greeks but a great questioning by western man.
    but i digress the 12th century saw the birth of the whole courtly love culture, chivalry and adulation of women. you had cults of mary, etc. from this time western women were uniquely pedistalized (tacitus notes that the ancients were careful not to do that) fast forward to the 19th century with mass wealth and utilitarianism and other “scientific” social movements and you have a race of “demi-goddesses” puritanically obsessed with the “christian mission” and as feminism emerged this messianic narcissism was divorced from the white man and viola: the untouchable belching, drunken, fouled mouthed, cum stained modern white woman.”

    michael Reply:

    Im afraid I lost my faith If I ever really had it i was expelled from catholic school in second grade because i wouldnt shut up about evolution I loved dinosaurs and egyptians you see.
    Then for a long while I, as churchill said supported the church from without like a flying buttress. Maybe to some extent im still a cultural catholic Im a romantic but nothing turns me off lie actually going to mass unless its in latin.
    Lately I have been thinking Christianity is inherently a cucked theology and despair of any alt right plans for reinvigorating it . I also fail to see how any religion can actually be one of three legs of a thought system based on reality.That said i am fully aware there is no civilization without culture and religion sure is a powerful cultural bond so i understand the temptation there and the temptation the GOP succumbs to, that some christians are ready made conservatives.I think race at as granular a level as possible and macular as need be has a better shot.

    But love? No I dont think it can save the world it might actually be its undoing, i think love is a chemical reaction in the brain that served some use in some environment one perhaps still but like most traits and instincts is lagging our synthetic environments and may be counterproductive in the aggregate or at least causing false signals in current environment.
    Does that mean i have to hate all the different nigger types forever, absolutely not once they are safely in their menageries i will love them again like all the other fauna, i will study them appreciate their cultures trade with those that can handle western products, I will even relieve their suffering to the extent it does not upset their balance in the ecosystem.But right now they are like dogs my enemy raised to kill and has unleashed on me and Im thinking about their teeth not how cute and lovable they are.


    Jefferson Reply:

    Love order, and still your rage.

    Posted on August 6th, 2016 at 10:03 pm Reply | Quote
  • Apatheos Says:

    Merkel could be working from a deep environmentalist position. I think of how The Dalai Lama speaks of forgetting about Tibet and focusing on climate change. (Too bad, because I hoped someone would buy North Korea and install The Dalai Lama there). And Chinese control over Tibet seems to be primarily for transporting minerals. There seems to be a deep strategy there that leads them inland, as opposed to focusing on open seas. As the meme posted here a few days ago the relationship between climate change and Islamic fundamentalists seems key.


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 1:00 am Reply | Quote
  • illegal Says:

    I feel a strong temptation to turn this all into some big moment in history which – afterward – we will all find some kind of solution. The truth is that this interpretation of events will always lead to a mistaken and overly hopeful view. The truth is that life is soul crushingly difficult, and that the “realities” of nihilism and life itself are actually without much respite. There isn’t much to look forward to, frankly. This is all just another dissonant modifier on the motif of human stupidity. It has always been here. It’s hardly even political. It’s more biological than anything else. Human error in thinking and the inability to critically and realistically look at things has always been the case.

    It only seems that due to the internet, this thing we call “The Red Pill” has been able to spread with a certain vigilance that we’ve never seen before in history. There is so much less real incentive to go back to the “socially comfortable lies” which in other ages we would have more willingly gone back to. Today we can simply go online and immediately find solace in a group of people who are as intelligent as we are. And it all becomes far more clear that which we are dealing with. There is a certain misery to clarity, and of course like all points in history, our technology is having effects which we were – as a matter of physical reality – were unable to predict. One of these is a sort of psychological effect that is taking place to us as people and a species.

    In prior ages, we would have slowly simply gone back to what the people in our vicinity wanted us to believe. Today with a sort of relentless access and exposure to all sorts of information, we find that it is easier to tell the difference between those who “keep going” and those who do not. By keep going, I mean those who truly think critically, and truly do not “stop” when their tummy starts to hurt, or they get a little bit emotionally upset. That is what has happened. What we are actually going through is a revolution of intellect. The internet has a way of making it very clear who can and cannot handle reality, and who can and cannot treat reality with the respect and reverence, and seriousness, that it requires.

    This pill goes deeper than even I have been willing to treat it. This new nihilism of the internet has given us great wonder. Great excitement and joy. At the same time it has exposed us to a sort of soul shaking emptiness which has really never been seen in the entire span of human history. We are certainly facing something new. And I am not just saying this because I like new things. The internet is having an effect on our minds, and our concepts. It is also changing our culture and our society in a way that simply has not been seen before, and therefor it is not something which can be really easily understood. Even great minds hardly even seem to be aware of us. And in that lies the strange sense that things are running out of control. The internet is a very “free” place. More free than the greatest libraries and greatest institutions which have ever existed. In terms of “thought” – and thought being that which is the CENTRE of the value we call freedom, the thing which inspires it as a virtue… this makes the internet inherently virtuous.

    I personally get the sense that there is this “real” world, and then there is the Real world. The real world is what we talk about online. the “real” world is what takes place at work. I think this feeling is shared across the entire globe. By a niche group of people. I like the online culture more than the “Cathedral” culture. The Cathedral is essentially just “reality.” And the Internet is Reality. It is not “more real than reality.” It is simply realism, reason. It does not undermine.

    In this sense, in this day and age one can’t simply think. I think of Houllebecq in his book “The Map and the Territory.” The description is truly apt as to what our modern man looks like. I have always felt this was the greatest sort of depiction of what life in 2014-2016 has really been like. Drunk, not even depressed. In a haze, but not down about it. It is as though we are so hopeless that our hopelessness has become a sort of joke even to us. Is there an emotion that sums it up? We are numb without being numb. We are sad, but are we really? There was a movement in art called “Post Irony” or “The New Sincerity” in the early 2000s, I believe. What we actually have now is a sort of Post-Post. The very idea of something being “post” has become to us puzzling. History was supposed to have ended. Yet we find ourselves confusedly entering back into the maelstrom, more or less confounded as to why any of this is still taking place. How is this possible? There is the sense that we are all hyper-mental, writing our own histories. The Facebook was a way to fuck around for a while, and then it became a literal structure for how we think about life – much as theater and film were things which structured our minds and concepts of our relationships. Facebook is a terrifying thing, and a very sad thing. What should have been radical and exciting quickly exposed itself as alienating and destructive for anyone who had any sort of real skepticism or urge to be critical about the world. The degree to which isolation and alienation can happen to someone these days may well be more severe than ever before. Because not only is one isolated, but he is also constantly exposed to the world itself through the internet, and reminded. Sooner or later this “history” becomes a sort of boring reminder of how one is merely isolated in physical space, yet at the same time totally incapable of truly isolating any other time. We are not able to do so anymore. Isolation as a real effect has been genuinely taken away from us by Facebook and this culture which is now being sort of hysterically supported by those who benefit most from it – the types of people who love themselves so much that they are willing to force their views and the picture of their face onto the world daily without the sense that such a thing is, perhaps, self-centered or strange. There is no “critique” in their lives, no concern for thinking about things all that much. Thus those who dare think, and consider, are slowly driven to the outside, and such thoughts become increasingly taboo. Such has really always been the way in human history…

    …yet again, the internet has changed things for the new era. The problem is that in prior eras, human beings were more prone to break free and to think differently. Today we see that there is something quite odd about how the internet seems to affect the human mind when it is less capable. I think for many of us, we have the primal sort of respect for the truth. Yet for those who do not have this, the internet seems to be having the opposite effect. And this in and of itself is quite sad. There is the sense that we are in a sort of direct and invisible ego relation to the beings around us, and there is a shroud to the relations which has become almost infinitely present in all of our relationships. We no longer see other people as simply “people,” but we see them as a potential poster in an online forum, someone who we may have despised on the internet. Therefor there is a secondary element now in human relations: we hate one another. The old sense that everyone could get along and that society was, generally amicable, has been inverted. This political correctness which essentially emerged as a serious and violent force in human affairs during the last few years, is a sort of reaction to the internet. I’m just saying that people can basically see what’s really going on when they use their computers. Yet most people don’t “identify” which is why they have these moronic ideas of “the online world” as somewhat embarrassing, or different from real life. They don’t have that part of themselves that says, “that’s cool and new.” To them it is like, just this weird tool that you use and then you log off. And you don’t talk about it in real life. For most “normal” people of average intelligence, Facebook is basically the only part of the internet that is “social” in any way – social as in, human… relational… Their ideas of social and thinking are very primitive.

    That is why Facebook is completely sterile compared to everywhere else online. It has to be. The point is that this SJW “thing” which emerged in human society actually emerged as a reaction to the development of the internet. It was a primal reaction of frightened people to a world which they saw was outside of their control. People would see these things online, and instead of trying to understand them, they developed a sort of superstitious reaction. In prior ages, can you EVER imagine people being exposed to the things they might be today, just by scrolling in the wrong direction! NO! It would never, ever happen. They could live their whole lives without ever seeing a racist or “offensive” word written, even on a piece of paper. Not to mention the sort of information which is readily present.

    So for that reason, I believe that these sort of casual users of the internet became the backbone of political correctness in human society. They’re basically just illiterate people who never really understood the purpose of critical thinking. And the funny thing is that people like Jon Stewart or Stephen King… these people are genuinely not keyed into the internet. They don’t understand it. They’re far from technically literate people, and I really don’t think they understand how far behind the zeitgeist they really are at this point. They’re basically dinosaurs in the scheme of the last 5-10 years.


    alien apotheosis Reply:

    As one man said, » at least the times of provincialism are over. «


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 1:40 am Reply | Quote
  • cyborg_nomade Says:

    if a simple policy was followed (letting local proprietors decide over whom to take, including private refugee centers completely responsible for the behavior of those they brought in), this could’ve been avoided, without much distress to the Cathedral, in general.

    but then again, maybe it was for the best (Brazil gladly awaits a massive income of Europeans to its ranks)


    Arian´s Apothecary Reply:

    This will test the adaptive ability of White ingroups.

    Will there, e.g., be a mass migration to China?

    Probably for some time there will be white flight and other assorted associated phenomena of configuration. After having spent time in Muslim neoighbourhoods (sic) in Berlin, I don´t fret too much.


    vxxc2014 Reply:

    Why are you all so eager to run when fighting is actually easier?

    Not to mention a better solution, probably the only solution at all.

    Brazil? Not much room for pussies in Brazil. And you’d be running to a worse version of what you’re running from.

    China? Delusional. They’d kill you and rightly so. China doesn’t like immigrants from North Korea. 800 million whites?

    Fighting is actually easier especially Europeans and Americans fighting on their own turf.

    It will happen anyway so you might as well join in and get some status.


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 1:40 am Reply | Quote
  • Crypt Says:

    > What was she thinking?

    None of these people believe in the material origins of human social behavior. Everything is understood in the lens of a quasi-spiritual “inner light” that is evenly distributed from high to low throughout even the dimmest human populations.


    Arian´s Apothecary Reply:

    Very accurately summarized.


    John Hannon Reply:

    And photographs like this have a lot to answer for –


    John Hannon Reply:

    Understanding everything “in the lens of a quasi-spiritual ‘inner light’ that is evenly distributed from hight to low” is consequent on material perceptions being “disidentified” with, as here elucidated by Peter Russell –

    “What exactly is this sense of ‘I-ness’? I use the word ‘I’ hundreds of times a day without hesitation. I say that I am thinking or seeing something, that I have a feeling or desire, that I know or remember something. It is the most familiar, most intimate, most obvious aspect of myself. I know exactly what I mean by ‘I’ – until I try to describe it or define it. Then I run into trouble.
    Looking for the self is rather like being in a dark room with a flashlight, shinning it around trying to find the source of the light. All one would find are the various objects in the room the light falls upon. It is the same when I try to look for the subject of all experience. All I find are the various ideas, images, and feelings that the attention falls upon. But these are all objects of experience; they cannot therefore be the subject of experience.
    Although the self may never be known as an object of experience, it can be known in another, more intimate and immediate, way. When the mind is silent, when all the thoughts, perceptions, and memories with which we habitually identify have fallen away, then what remains is the essence of self, the pure subject without an object. What we then find is not a sense of ‘I am this’ or ‘I am that,’ but just ‘I am’ (though even to say ‘I am’ can be misleading as the word ‘I’ already has so many associations with an individual self. It might be more accurate to say there is ‘amness’ or pure being).
    In this state, you know the essence of self, and you know that essence to be pure consciousness. You know this to be your true identity. You are not a being who is conscious. You are consciousness.
    This core identity has none of the uniqueness of the individual self; it is the same for all of us. Being beyond all attributes and identifying characteristics, your sense of I-ness is indistinguishable from mine. The light of consciousness shining in you, which you label ‘I,’ is the same light that I label ‘I.’ In this we are one.”

    Likewise Wilber –

    “There is something within you – that deep sense of I-ness – that is not memory, thoughts, mind, body, experience, feelings, or sensations. For all of these have changed and can change without substantially affecting that inner I-ness.
    Is it then so very difficult to realize that every conscious being has that same inner I-ness? And that therefore the overall number of transcendent I’s is but one? We have already surmised that if you had a different body you would still basically feel the same i-ness – but that is already the same way every other person feels right now. Isn’t it just as easy to say there is but one single I-ness or Self taking on different views, different memories, different feelings and sensations?”

    The possibility of experiencing this transpersonal unity seems to arise from some sort of quirk in the very nature of consciousness, and as it’s always going to be there, the question then is to what extent is it best to ignore it.


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 2:30 am Reply | Quote
  • Melanie L'Heuremaudit Says:

    I agree with Michael & Apotheotic Monkey Business Ltd

    This is war.

    The authorities have made it clear that they want us dead (us, meaning white Europeans)

    Next move is up to us. Or as Michael put it, “we shall find ….if the entire white race has gone full faggot or not.”

    “Yet your bones will waste away, buried in the fields of Troy, your mission unfulfilled.”

    On a battlefield King Frederick II of Prussia rebuked a hesitant young officer: “Dog! Were you hoping to live forever?”

    And Sarpedon says to Glaukos in the Twelfth Book of The Iliad: “My friend, if you and I could escape this battle and live forever, ageless and immortal, I myself would never fight again. . . . But a thousand deaths surround us and no man can escape them. So let us move in for the attack.”


    Arian megagod Reply:

    These values/virtues (virtue is a comparatively good value, especially if acted upon/from) are alive still. But most White men live them through video games now, fantasy worlds & movies.

    Their mind is split. Schizophrenic.

    They think “there´s the world of the good, action, spiritual [or] cool things in media [thinks of his favorite game or movie scene]” while their life is mundane.

    The sense of adventure has gone from daily life. Except for a few of us. Go crazy, believe in that stuff, see what happens.

    I´d rather be a cult leader than some Twitter or scenester faggot. “Better a delinquent than a bourgeois.” said WW1 veteran & philosopher Ernst Junger.

    But those are not the only choices. Cultural Marxism did us in?

    Are we really so pathetic that we can´t both charm people *and* tell the truth?

    I believe we can do it better. “Cultural Libertarianism” is just the start.


    michael Reply:

    May Gnon deny us peace but grant us glory


    vxxc2014 Reply:

    NRx is looking up.


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 2:31 am Reply | Quote
  • Hawk Spitui Says:

    I suspect Europe will be cursing Merkel long after Hitler is a forgotten man.


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 3:35 am Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:


    No altrenous i think it means they are not all powerful they dont control every last thing are not quite the illuminati but they are in a position to exploit almost anything that happens they like and dampen what they dont. as moldbug say a lot is generated by zeitgeist but they do have plans meetings papers strategies and they have been clear for a very long time they intend to niggerize white countries and eradicate western civilization


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 1:19 pm Reply | Quote
  • Melanie l'Heuremaudit Says:

    A Day in the Life

    A Parisian friend told me not long ago that she had a nightmare experience in the emergency room of a third world hospital. Right in the suburbs of Paris. The waiting room was filled with veiled Afro-Islamic patients and the TV was blasting away at full volume. Outside she noticed several ambulances marked “Pédiatrie CHU Avicenne” (a Muslim hospital)

    When she was finally seen, her African doctor was smoking a cigarette, surrounded by Afro-Islamic nurses and attendants, some of them were also smoking

    She walked out of the hospital after midnight just to escape, and to look for a Taxi

    Leaving the hospital she saw two “Syrian refugees” attacking a car in which a woman was waiting for her husband.

    They smashed her side window and tried to grab her purse, but the woman resisted. My friend was trying to help her when fortunately some police passed by, but to her dismay they let the assailants go, giving them only a warning

    My friend told the police that she would make a complaint, but they advised against wasting her time. They told her there would be no one to complain to at that time of night in the local commissariat. That she would have to go the following day and wait on line for three or four hours. That she would have to return several times, with a long wait each time. And in the end, nothing would be done anyway.

    As for the police, she added, they didn’t want to make an arrest in a case like this. There would be too much paperwork.

    And even if the case came to court, the judge would not punish the criminals. Moreover, such an arrest would hurt their careers. The local police chiefs were paid by results – based on the crime rates in their areas of jurisdiction.

    The last thing they wanted was for policemen to go around finding and recording crime.


    a Reply:

    The futuristic dystopia is already her, eh?
    All about the money. C.R.E.A.M.
    You got big $ you get better service. A proletariat in dystopia. Hustlers. Just add the neural implants & cyborgs.
    Turf wars. Stealing loot. Zero-europe. Anti-europe. Neon jungle of kebabs. Smell. Blast.
    Ring tones. VR freaks. Junkies. Afro-Hop. Dreads on skateboards. Uzis & microradios.
    Drunks. Ecstasy norm. Download drugs into your veins. 4D hallucinations. Helicopter ambulances for the rich. Armed guards. Auto-snipers. Defense technologies.
    Hack a Coke can. Sniff a book. Sell your mind. Sort your surge. Press analysis. No politicians. Data factories. Doom drone, noia drone. Decide.


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 2:41 pm Reply | Quote
  • Nxx Says:

    It’s not rocket science.

    One half of society (left) want mass immigration in order to shut out of democracy the other half (right). This is because the leftist half considers the rightist half to be stupid, ignorant, racist and basically undeserving of having any say.

    That’s all there is to it. One half of society trying to shut out of democracy the other half.

    The right must mirror the left by developing a counter ideology whose objective is leftist eradication by any means necessary. That’s what the new us vs them paradigm demands.


    SVErshov Reply:

    that would imply that left and right have some kind of collective intelligence, do they realy have it. not a trivial question at all.


    a Reply:

    I never saw this as clearly before, that which you say „One half of society (left) want mass immigration in order to shut out of democracy the other half (right).”

    Jesus god, this is so right. Get many enough immigrants with voting rights and you´ll eventually destroy virtually any nationalist or conservative movement´s chances of becoming a very large part of the voterbase percentagewise.

    However, there´s the phenomena of some immigrants voting for conservative or even nationalist parties. How significant is that phenomenon for each country, I wonder, in percentage. There´s one interviewed in a documentary about the Swedish nationaldemocrats, one who´s working for the municipal government or something (whatever it was, a respected member of society). Understandably if you´ve been living in a host country successfully as a brown person, you wouldn´t necessarily jump for joy if all sorts of different poor & horny people were coming in, in loads.

    But fuck that anyway, I believe the committee-bureau horde has planned many deep state moves to deal with democratic parties & movements, no matter how popular they become.

    They´re intent on making cappuccino planet.

    I just don´t get why that´s so exiting, it´d just be like Italy, Greece, and all other brown places with some white ancestry. I´m pretty sure they don´t figure that out, or if they do they don´t care, “to end racism comes before all” (this won´t end racism, people will find other differences which will become more salient. They always do. Height, hair texture, curls vs. straight, ectomorphy, leptomorphy, lips, nose, etc, etc).


    michael Reply:

    I dont think on that level they really give a shit about racism except as a tool or obstacle to their goals.They want to rule the world who knows why power ideology money. But they know they have competition china russia islam and white men. they see white men as the low hanging fruit.

    Its insignificant very few browns are going to vote for level playing field etc. it was a ruse we all bought for a while that east asians or outlier browns would side with civilization and white men its been proved completely false not even 1 percent and its getting worse. they see the left as the surer thing even though they know black niggers are animals they side with them. Hard to tell if they are seeing the future clearer or forcing the future but thats their choice and it makes things clearer on our side. i dont think we are nazi and exception will be made but it will be a white against all at some point.


    a Reply:

    Yes, conservative support from 2nd generation immigrants is not to be counted on or not even relied on. It´s a false hope.

    Indeed, racism / anti-racism is secondary and a tool to weaken the goy nations. A portent dialectic of divide & conquer. Classic.

    War against federal governments?

    Most (all) revolutions don´t succeed unless you get enough of the army to your side, and white people are content with playing XBox anyway.

    And the army* is pretty mixed and vibrant, so good luck with that.

    *armed forces.

    michael Reply:

    @A while I do advocate for war I wasnt doing it then simply stating what coming. War is never easy or certain and some militia types going head to head with USG would not work. That not how it will happen, well it might me how it starts or part of it but Its a big country really smart guys really angry guys. Consider this Washington’s troops had to eat their shoes that winter, very few wanted a war against the king it was suicide. He understood if he could avoid fighting them as much as possible the british would turn the entire population against themselves which they did. USG is great when its going after lone wolves and when its using media to alienate and isolate but once it starts killing its own people the propaganda is going to sound real hollow real quick. They will try to say its evil racists yada yada but cellphone images of dead women and children will be uncontrollable and that is just the weakest part of how they will be defeated because there will be very little fighting like that. And yes the military and police will be on our side in fact they will be the ones organizing this they already are. They know what they are doing have been trained to do it by USG, they know it needs doing and are only waiting for the event the denouement

    a Reply:

    evil racists yada yada but cellphone images of dead women and children will be uncontrollable

    Would they not just shut down cellphone & Internet WANs for the escalated areas?

    michael Reply:

    Then how do you explain even a leftist can see a nigger is even more stupid, ignorant, racist and basically undeserving of having any say. No they fear us they know despite their feigning we are as intelligent as they and we are armed and more aggressive, the niggers are their brownshirts.


    michael Reply:

    like i said they will be uncontrollable. If they put tanks on every streetcorner and start searching and interrogating they have lost,they can not win a total war against the american people [not even against afghans] if you dont know how well armed and prepared we are you haven’t travelled much outside the urban cafes.If they can keep it at a small level they win which is why no ones stupid enough to go head to head it will be guerilla. But as soon as they start with martial law they start losing the average citizen and knowing that they are not going to shut down the net or cell phones which if they tried would only be smuggled out


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 4:59 pm Reply | Quote
  • Ahote Says:

    Can someone please explain to me the benefits of Reactionary Restoration over the old-school Communist Revolution?


    SVErshov Reply:

    not sure about restoration, but in case if it is about overcoming certaing set of consrains (moral, causal, rational, intuitive) then difference began, when those constrains are overcomed. what to do next, or how to interpret emerging sytuation. comi’s interpretation can be as: welcome to our finitude, please come and sit here on our capret quaietly (discontinuity). and reactionary aproach would be in converting momentum into further transgression/restoration (continuity). practically that can be confusing, as these phases can occure in sequence even overlaping each other and difficulty would be in identifying character of dynamics of each phase. discontinuity/continuity can be used shizomarkrs. revolution? – discontinuity (comi), and so one.


    Ahote Reply:

    In both cases millions starve to death, and you get your much vaunted national sovereignty. DPRK is independent from the Cathedral, but it is worse than any Cathedral-controlled place. Juche France would be no different.


    SVErshov Reply:

    future been canceled, then

    michael Reply:

    Read the above comment i quote below for an idea of a marxist revolution in practice, then think for a moment how Jim might handle things differently for a reactionary restoration

    Melanie L’Heuremaudit Says:
    A Day in the Life


    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 7:06 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:


    Listen kid youre being sold a faggot pill you want this to change cowboy up if not get ready to die.War is what brings order.


    vxxc2014 Reply:



    Posted on August 7th, 2016 at 10:08 pm Reply | Quote
  • Equality Motivates The Refugee Crisis – William M. Briggs Says:

    […] Nick Land, about whose views more in a moment, points us to Damon Linker about how Angela Merkel’s German airplane has imperiled Europe. A real Messerschmitt. […]

    Posted on August 8th, 2016 at 11:30 am Reply | Quote
  • This Week in Reaction (2016/08/07) - Social Matter Says:

    […] Land condemns Merkel’s Mess, but cannot quite bring himself to not say “Thank you!” Also, Machine Poetry, which […]

    Posted on August 10th, 2016 at 9:52 am Reply | Quote
  • anonyme Says:

    To the authorities, white Europeans themselves represent a terrorist threat….

    “And what if the world were only now beginning to the full extent – whose limits will always remain incalculable – to unfold its origins from a principle essentially opposed to that of Good, a principle of Evil?

    This great tribulation manifests itself as an inexplicable war, of which historical wars have merely been vague exemplars.”

    (Ceronetti, Pensieri del Tè)


    Arian Cryptochrist Reply:

    > This great tribulation manifests itself as an inexplicable war, of which historical wars have merely been vague exemplars.”

    This nails it.


    vvectrchrst Reply:

    vvar ov the vvalvs

    > Rotherham, UK, ‘Industrial Scale’ Sexual Abuse of White Schoolgirls Continues

    The caustic strength of nihilism is ‘absolute’, Nietzsche argues, and under its withering scrutiny { the highest values devalue themselves }. The aim is lacking, and ‘Why’ finds no answer”. Inevitably, nihilism will expose all cherished beliefs and sacrosanct truths as symptoms of a defective Western mythos. This collapse of meaning, relevance, and purpose will be the most destructive force in history, constituting a total assault on reality and nothing less than the greatest crisis of humanity:

    What I relate is the history of the next two centuries. I describe what is coming, what can no longer come differently: the advent of nihilism. . . . For some time now our whole European culture has been moving as toward a catastrophe, with a tortured tension that is growing from decade to decade: restlessly, violently, headlong, like a river that wants to reach the. . . . (WTP)


    Posted on August 11th, 2016 at 3:58 pm Reply | Quote
  • anonyme Says:

    “In the abysses of Evil that make up humanity’s past – plague, torture, war, famine and disease – Evil was nonetheless not a determinant reality. Access to a higher idea of humanity, to a contrary reality, was forbidden to it, and something, passing through the ocean of flames, remained intact….

    Jung adds: “A so-called good to which we succumb loses its ethical character” (a marvelous formula this: it is not to Evil that we have succumbed but to Good). And what is Good without ethical character other than an aspect of the legislation of Evil?

    Now, with radio, telephones and excellent hospitals, hot baths, religious tolerance, moderate laws, an absence of war (in the most powerful parts of the planet*)….

    An inundation of amoral Good, unstintingly produced by the entity Evil, by the powers of darkness, enthroned in power, a terrifying contemporary innovation.”

    (Ceronetti, Pensieri del Tè)

    *this was written in 1987


    Arian Cryptochrist Reply:

    > An inundation of amoral Good, unstintingly produced by the entity Evil, by the powers of darkness, enthroned in power, a terrifying contemporary innovation.”

    Seems to me guy is referring to capitalism.

    > Jung adds: “A so-called good to which we succumb loses its ethical character” (a marvelous formula this: it is not to Evil that we have succumbed but to Good).

    That´s one way of phrasing it. Altho — more correctly — it simply isn´t good but bad. They´ve succumbed to an imitation good. An imitation, a false good, that thinks the evil that is forcing third-world violence on the deep north and the west is “good”!

    I do my best following Platón, Socrates, Aristóteles, Confuscius, et al, in naming things rightly.


    Posted on August 11th, 2016 at 11:35 pm Reply | Quote
  • Melanie l'Heuremaudit Says:

    @ vvectrchrst

    The purpose of mass sexual assaults (such as Rotherham or Cologne on New Year’s Eve) is to humiliate European males…with the attackers daring European men to fight back, knowing they’ll only shit their pants out of fear….

    Considering that European men are mostly faggots, what the Afro-Islamic invasion calls for is a new kind of woman.

    A woman such as Lola Stone could serve as their role model…


    Arian´s apo-logia Reply:

    lol. a femme fatale, eh.

    a muse.

    incidentally, there´s one such French lady. the ones with Christian morality will be horrified too.
    but this bitch would stab a muslim nigger.


    Posted on August 12th, 2016 at 4:41 am Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    ▬ „…what France is doing today is like the last throes or the last frantic outburst of a declining nation, a nation that is fading out of earth evolution, only in history these last throes last a long time. A spiritual view of European history shows this aspect very clearly, of course. The French character is the first vanguard of decadent Rome, the declining Romanic nations of Europe…”
    — Rudolf Steiner, Wednesday 14th February 1923


    Posted on August 15th, 2016 at 4:18 am Reply | Quote

Leave a comment