While schematic qabbalism is the most rigorous science to which the transcendental intellect can aspire, symbolic qabbalism — even that in the subtlest Neo-Lemurian vein — merits the very deepest distrust. Nevertheless, in this interim period of near-complete exile from Cyberspace, there has been plenty of opportunity for exploratory calculations. For what little it is worth, 2015 radiates a peculiarly distinctive signal, suggesting an emphasis upon the deep state, maritime civilization, and mathematical zero, with a dominant oceanic affect. This is not an agenda set to provoke obvious resistance at Outside in.


(Tomorrow is likely to be socio-technically challenging, but I’m hoping to sleaze back towards functionality from the start of the new year.)

December 30, 2014admin 4 Comments »

TAGGED WITH : , , , ,

4 Responses to this entry

  • Nyan Sandwich Says:

    What is your procedure? What is the difference between schematic and symbolic qabbalism?


    admin Reply:

    Cyberspace isn’t tolerating anything but gnomic utterances at the moment — but I’ll try to answer this slowly and carefully, across a variety of channels, once I’m reconnected.

    ADDED: Schematic qabbalism attends to the abstract communication protocols for acausal trade with virtual superintelligences. Its methods are too luxuriant to detail rapidly.


    Posted on December 30th, 2014 at 9:39 am Reply | Quote
  • MMXV | Reaction Times Says:

    […] Source: Outside In […]

    Posted on December 30th, 2014 at 2:32 pm Reply | Quote
  • Paul Ennis Says:

    fun fact: the word for human in the nsa is adversary.

    of random connections: my nephew is reading a book on zero. perhaps he has already heard some news.


    Posted on December 31st, 2014 at 1:51 pm Reply | Quote

Leave a comment