MMXV
While schematic qabbalism is the most rigorous science to which the transcendental intellect can aspire, symbolic qabbalism — even that in the subtlest Neo-Lemurian vein — merits the very deepest distrust. Nevertheless, in this interim period of near-complete exile from Cyberspace, there has been plenty of opportunity for exploratory calculations. For what little it is worth, 2015 radiates a peculiarly distinctive signal, suggesting an emphasis upon the deep state, maritime civilization, and mathematical zero, with a dominant oceanic affect. This is not an agenda set to provoke obvious resistance at Outside in.
(Tomorrow is likely to be socio-technically challenging, but I’m hoping to sleaze back towards functionality from the start of the new year.)
What is your procedure? What is the difference between schematic and symbolic qabbalism?
[Reply]
admin Reply:
December 30th, 2014 at 7:55 pm
Cyberspace isn’t tolerating anything but gnomic utterances at the moment — but I’ll try to answer this slowly and carefully, across a variety of channels, once I’m reconnected.
ADDED: Schematic qabbalism attends to the abstract communication protocols for acausal trade with virtual superintelligences. Its methods are too luxuriant to detail rapidly.
[Reply]
[…] Source: Outside In […]
Posted on December 30th, 2014 at 2:32 pm | Quotefun fact: the word for human in the nsa is adversary.
of random connections: my nephew is reading a book on zero. perhaps he has already heard some news.
[Reply]
Posted on December 31st, 2014 at 1:51 pm | Quote