<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neoreaction (for dummies)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/</link>
	<description>Involvements with reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Techno-Commerce Enough? - Henry Dampier</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-157484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Techno-Commerce Enough? - Henry Dampier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 04:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-157484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] elements within the neoreactionary trichotomy tend to take pot-shots at others on opposing angles of the map. Most of the time, I try to stay out [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] elements within the neoreactionary trichotomy tend to take pot-shots at others on opposing angles of the map. Most of the time, I try to stay out [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSTalbert</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-132482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GSTalbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 02:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-132482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is some weird stuff man. I kind of like it though, got a wild vibe to it. I&#039;ll read on, I am intrigued. lol I don&#039;t know if you should take that as a complement or not...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is some weird stuff man. I kind of like it though, got a wild vibe to it. I&#8217;ll read on, I am intrigued. lol I don&#8217;t know if you should take that as a complement or not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NRx Should Favor Separatism: Scotland, Catalonia, et al &#171; A House With No Child</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-110856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NRx Should Favor Separatism: Scotland, Catalonia, et al &#171; A House With No Child]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-110856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Neoreaction should generally favor separatism and support separatist causes abroad. I&#8217;m aware that my assertion will stir controversy, so allow me to explain to my faithful readers why Neoreaction, and political philosophy enshrining efficiency and pragmatism, should cast their lot in with separatists everywhere. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Neoreaction should generally favor separatism and support separatist causes abroad. I&#8217;m aware that my assertion will stir controversy, so allow me to explain to my faithful readers why Neoreaction, and political philosophy enshrining efficiency and pragmatism, should cast their lot in with separatists everywhere. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Positive Cults of Personality &#124; spreadtheinfestation</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-91670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Positive Cults of Personality &#124; spreadtheinfestation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-91670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a reason this might sound reactionary – it is one of the leading neoreactionary bloggers’ definition of what unites reactionaries.  (No like literally – an interview with him called “Organisation [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a reason this might sound reactionary – it is one of the leading neoreactionary bloggers’ definition of what unites reactionaries.  (No like literally – an interview with him called “Organisation [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accelerationism: The New Prometheans &#8211; Part One &#124; alien ecologies</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-64820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Accelerationism: The New Prometheans &#8211; Part One &#124; alien ecologies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-64820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] This understanding of neoreaction – undoubtedly capturing its predominant sentiment – equates it with a radicalized Burkean conservatism, designed for an age in which almost everything has been lost. Since the progressive destruction of traditional society has been broadly accomplished, hanging on to what remains is no longer enough. It is necessary to go back, beyond the origin of Enlightenment, because Reason has failed the test of history. (Neoreaction for dummies). [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This understanding of neoreaction – undoubtedly capturing its predominant sentiment – equates it with a radicalized Burkean conservatism, designed for an age in which almost everything has been lost. Since the progressive destruction of traditional society has been broadly accomplished, hanging on to what remains is no longer enough. It is necessary to go back, beyond the origin of Enlightenment, because Reason has failed the test of history. (Neoreaction for dummies). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Talk about (to?) the Alt-right/Neo-reactionaries Part 1: What is the Alt-Right? &#124; Will Stamp&#039;d</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-55343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How to Talk about (to?) the Alt-right/Neo-reactionaries Part 1: What is the Alt-Right? &#124; Will Stamp&#039;d]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 23:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-55343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Nick Land charts three paths in neoreaction: traditional theonomists, ethno-nationalists, and [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Nick Land charts three paths in neoreaction: traditional theonomists, ethno-nationalists, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To Mayberry, Minerva, or the Matrix? &#124; The Ümlaut</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-34543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[To Mayberry, Minerva, or the Matrix? &#124; The Ümlaut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-34543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] more or less neatly to the various strains of thinking this, uh, unusually self-aware movement has identified. The technophiles, largely atheistic with an interest in artificial intelligence and the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] more or less neatly to the various strains of thinking this, uh, unusually self-aware movement has identified. The technophiles, largely atheistic with an interest in artificial intelligence and the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neoreactionary Canon &#124; More Right</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-33852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neoreactionary Canon &#124; More Right]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-33852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Neoreaction (for Dummies) [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Neoreaction (for Dummies) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Announcing: The Neoreactionary Canon! &#124; This Rough Beast</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-33438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Announcing: The Neoreactionary Canon! &#124; This Rough Beast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-33438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Neoreaction (for Dummies) [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Neoreaction (for Dummies) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 2013 Anti-Progress Report &#124; Radish</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/neoreaction-for-dummies/#comment-32091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The 2013 Anti-Progress Report &#124; Radish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 05:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=328#comment-32091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Nick Land relabels the trichotomy: theonomist, ethno-nationalist, and techno-commercialist. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Nick Land relabels the trichotomy: theonomist, ethno-nationalist, and techno-commercialist. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
