Look there was no system that was going to withstand the Boomers. They should have simply been killed.

And they still should, and I warrant will.

NOTHING can be given to Evil humans, especially spoilt selfish fantastically self absorbed still evil children, and expect it to turn out well.

There was no system save the camps that would have saved civilization from the Boomers.

I really think we should fix the problem of removing the Evil and Insane from Power – now that’s many lives work there [I mean many will DIE , not that we can take our time] and the first duty again is to remove the Evil and Insane from Power.

To prevent it from happening again is you know the work of the next generation.

There are no systems or Cultures where Evil meets Cowardice and Good prevails.

If you want to know how Evil was matched against Cowardice: Intellectuals.

CEO government is simply demotist government for the few, and at present the next quarter bonuses no matter what the long term ruin of the corpus [body]. Somehow we are to believe that demotism for the select few is better than demotism for the many.”

There’s something going on unsaid here in #NRx that I think needs to be part of the analysis: Culture Matters.

Culture, like other forms of social cohesion (religion), binds us in a different way that law does but also restricts our behaviors in ways laws can’t. A guilt culture for example will make you do the right thing even while no one is watching while a shame culture / formal law can only punish you when someone is watching & you can’t weasel your way out of it. Regulation & formal law isn’t enough you need a culture that supports things like high-trust, honestly, anti-cheating etc.

Law can only do so much, formal structures can only do so much. A guilt culture that limits your behavior even when no one is watching would help to keep CEO’s in 2014 honest even when the law isn’t watching.

Yes I know Japan is a shame culture and they have low crime etc. but I’m not trying to create a Grand Theory of Culture here, I’m just giving quick examples of familiar scenarios in the West.

If the Amish ran Wall Street (assuming their IQ’s were boosted & the learned how) would you have the problems we have now? Probably not, actually it would probably create a different set of problems but that’s because with grand complex structures often there are no solutions only trade-offs. For example, Scott Alexander made good points about race-to-the-bottom problems such as companies maximizing for profit will do better and the less they are constrained by law the better for them. So if slavery came back in fashion, companies that used slaves should have higher profits (I’m sure there are cases where this is not true).

“Mao himself made his Long March in a Litter, beheading 10,000 communists along the way.”

So he wasn’t all bad after all!

Yes indeed.

“They are too weak to say “This is what I want for me and mine” and are forced into arguing “This is better because of reason x, y, z, etc” with those who are not similar.”

Yes.

I’m also right that many in NRxn including some leading lights desire the Cathedral for themselves, and that this conversation takes place because as the stock of elites is WEAK, including the WASP’s putative successors [who can’t run anything of course and never could, other than trade and criminal enterprises] the stock is WEAK and they have completely lost control of their increasingly bizarre collection of feral or damaged pets.

[not admin, who has walked the talk of Exit and done just that, of course he wants to Transhumanize to Victory as well] .

God’s Blood, Gnon’s hammer. Say what you want. Can’t? Don’t think of rule and don’t offer advice.

Criticism of Progress welcome, Red Pill welcome, infecting Right-Overton and Libertarianism welcome.

Can Liberia be a “welfare state” if their leaders muster the political will?