But yes, it didn’t take me more than a few minutes to find where you were from. You come from Britanny. This is your old hometown, it’s sort of nice: http://www.villagesdefrance.fr/dept/dept_images/ph22_chatelaudren.jpg

This is the original settler:
http://gw.geneanet.org/monartque?lang=fr&p=bernard&n=laine+dit+laliberte
http://bergeroy.net/tng/getperson.php?personID=41792I&tree=BH
http://genealogie.familleboucher.ca/tng/getperson.php?personID=I8912&tree=boucher

First wife was already Canadian, a Dionne, a name that may ring a bell.

Trying to find information with google return this name very often, but no clear biography. Britanny ancestry is rarer among Canadians. Jacques Cartier was from Britanny, but the immigrants were mostly from Normandy and surrounding areas. But yes, you are one of the founding families of this place in Île-d’Orléans
http://tourisme.iledorleans.com/en/ile-d-orleans/founding-families-of-ile-d-orleans/

There are 300 founding families there and it is a key spot of the colony. So it is listed and your first ancestor is on a board in Île-d’Orléans as such. My family tree is on the Montreal side. Showed up a little earlier than yours in the very early days of the city in 1658. Montreal was meant to be a New-Jerusalem, it used a name we also used during the Crusades: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_(Crusader_castle) … Which, if you link to the Crusades, takes you back to this King of Jerusalem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldwin_I_of_Jerusalem … So Montreal is a reference to all of that, because we are bastards! The Mormons were way late in inventing a Jerusalem in America, we had done this a while before in the 17th century. Montreal in a bubble is that, very simple and the people who invaded the British isles, the people who went Crusading… maybe similar people who moved to America.

As I was saying, it is insanely easy for us to do family trees. Our cousins in France have no idea who their third ancestors are most of the time, we know who we come from in the XVIIth century, link is crystal clear. Records suck once you’re back in France, but our parish are crystal clear. Also, Canada was always for four centuries richer than France. I’m not talking capitalism version of wealth here. I’m talking a society that can have 12 children per family and never starve or lack any necessities. This is true wealth, true productivity, not a backwater, not India where they had perpetual Malthusian consequences to overbreeding. That’s ancien régime and lordships, worked better than liberalism, always will. It took a while for liberalism to destroy our ancien régime, it lasted until 1854, but the State could only steal all the money in the 20th century. I know it is very far-fetched to try and bring back the King, but there are a few who are trying and this is the closest path to a real Restoration, one that is way more likely than the Stuarts, it’s the Bourbons.

Anyway, now you can tell your family you are from Britanny and this is factual, nothing theoretical about our ancestors. They are easy to find. It doesn’t make us like Jews, not completely, just a certain subset of Canadians are similar to Ashkenazim very specifically, because they evolved similarly in certain circumstances. I also think Ashkenazim are basically Whites who evolved a certain way due to external circumstances, pressure from out-groups, same as Canadians. The IQ is not above average for generic non-mixed Westerners, but genetically we are the least obese in America, so definitely an advantage there.

It’s all a working theory, but I’m starting to make the links that do make sense to me. I think Leonard Cohen himself sort of understood that, that is why he always stood by us and have written Beautiful Loser even before he started composing songs. His only French song is A Wandering Canadian, which is a patriotic song that goes all the way back: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Un_Canadien_errant The son of Leonard Cohen is also perfectly French-speaking and his disciple like Rufus Wainwright and family are alll French-speaking and he sleeps with GW Bush daughter! Because he’s a fag, of course, a fabulous fag. So are we hostile to Jews? Not at all, the stupider ones are hostile to us, like Ezra Levant or more angry supremacists, not the smart ones like Leonard Cohen. I had a teacher who use to know Leonard Cohen when he was a bartender as a younger man. His songs resume him well, he was a crazy ladies man, but he ended up being screwed over by his wife when he went to California to become a Buddhist Monk. That’s why he had to return to the singing business at such old age, he was ripped off by his wife. But he likes Sainte-Kateri and our generic history. He’s not stupidly hostile to Catholics like “some people” who draw too quick conclusions. If there are Kings, you need a God as King of Kings, get with he program folks, the Jewish reactionary is the good half-pill, you need to draw whole conclusions. That was my biggest bug reading Moldbug lately… stop talking about the Catholics, it’s always a bad idea. The hierarchy is super simple otherwise: God-King-Men-Women-Children. This is structure of civilization, you don’t need to love God and King to submit, it’s just the theoretical framework of this hierarchy. Louis XIV is not Hitler, I can’t remember him ever opening concentration camps. The Pope is also not nor have he ever been Hitler. Have he ever been critical of Freemasons and Jews? Well duh, hello, have anyone not been? Does he run concentration camps? Nope. If all history of the world is just proto-fascism, maybe your history books need a revision. Because perhaps solisism does not only apply to women and this is something we understood a while ago.

Every generations since the boomers have lied about us… it’s a disgusting travesty. But this song, the Wandering Canadian, tells the truth. Canadians are a wandering people with a gigantic diaspora. This is the deeper truth, just don’t tell the immigrants who call themselves Canadians that or they call you Adrien Arcand. I think this can be true of some that goes in this path, they always end up leading up to the wrong conclusions. Of course, Adrien Arcand was completely bankrolled by the Conservative Party of Canada and ran quite a few newspapers before being sent to prison during the war. He’s the founding father of all Holocaust-Denialism. I mean, Ernst Zündel is his disciple. I did read Arcand, but not Zundel who sounds like a complete freak. Again, monomaniac obsession there that’s way worst than Hitler, his texts have been re-used non-stop ever since, kind of like Henri Ford, same type of character. I’ve discovered regarding the Ford dynasty that Henri Ford III converted to Catholicism. Kind of like Bro Conrad Black. Done the opposite thing than Mark Steyn, who went from being a Belgian-Irish Catholic, converted to be Anglican once he moved to England, converted to be a Baptist once he moved to America. That’s the official top tier Right? Not bad, always from Canada somehow. Of course, the Steyn note of Jewishness do rise back to the forefront even if he keeps defending Republicanism on way to Royalism. He enjoyed poking fun at me that I was a Subject of Her Majesty… I think he believed that would annoy me. We’ve been in a Monarchy since Clovis in the 5th century, think we’re used to the idea. We never had anything but Kingdoms since we stopped being Romans and turned Franks. The big difference is that we had the Kingdom of France, the other one is more “Universal Kingdom”, or “United Kingdom”, which can be a bit too similar to the universalism of the République Universelle. Like in this painting that resumes the whole problem with liberalism :
http://www.histoire-image.org/photo/zoom/lar6_sorrieu_005f.jpg

That’s the Utopia. Doesn’t work, we all know it, you can’t have a New World Order. If Glorious Revolution is denied. Then you need to roll back quite a few things. The problem do start with the creation of the Bank of London, it’s been a while. When you toll back the real things, you remember that Usury is considered wrong in the Bible and in Aristotle. So maybe it isn’t a proper way to run our civilization to have that. Jews use to play that role, as we knew that while this gave them temporal power, their soul would burn in hell. You can be a complete atheist and still see the internal logic here. This is why it has been stated over and over why Jews could not run a civilization. They run chaotic structure that do not produce the elegance of Gentiles creativity. It doesn’t make us or them evil, it is just not their best position as a group to try to govern a polity. There’s a reason why the Temple was burned by the Romans and why the Christians who were persecuted eventually rose to replace the Romans. Edward Gibbons already had it sort of wrong when he simplified it in his opus. There’s more to it than merely one culture destroying another. Then again, the Brits did draw some very bad conclusions about all that came after the Romans due to Protestantism. The very simple psych-history theory is that Martin Luther hated his Father, so he projected his hatred further up toward the Pope. It doesn’t take much once you “debunk” this hierarchy to collapse the rest along with it. So of course, Catholics and Orthodox created what we call the West of today. It will always be Christendom until someone take it over, but there is nothing around. Maybe between Nietzsche and Dostoyevsky, there’s a lot in common. Who is more right? The one who follow the notion of a Man-God or the one who believe humanity will rise to created a God-Man (Superman or Singularity?). Both are propositions that can be debated. I’ve been reading Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky and Darwin since I’m a teenager, I think there is value to variety. There is no way I can be anything else than a Catholic, for it is Throne and Altar. You lack one of the two, it’s too much power to the King or CEO not to have a CEO in the Sky who run all CEOs on Earth. Mainframe Urbit? Does Urbit speak to God? Is it 2001 A Space Odyssey? Stanley Kubrick too was Jewish, same as Charlie Chaplin (probably) and Groucho Marx. But of course, I think we’re all Marxists in that way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtMV44yoXZ0

But if Urbit is mainframe, I have ideas to sort out the internet too. Make sense, I’m not sure why Nick Land says pass the popcorn all of the time, but I founded the site called passthepopcorn which is the largest archive of movies online, all built through torrenting. I just got the right people in the right place and it worked. It is massively all automated with bots and scripts, sort of elegant in design and it recently reached 100,000 individual movies, which is potentially more than any other archives. I’d do this with a lot more things. I like organizing systems. So if Urbit was a real thing, I’d probably know a lot of what it should do and how it should do it. But it’s not a red pill, it would be to create The Matrix and hand out blue pills so people stop shooting at policemen and burn the whole world to “save it”. More orderly. Master and slave drives. It’s as the Canadian slogan go for “Peace, Order and No Government”. Can work, still need a God in the Matrix, otherwise you just have the motherboard without a Fatherland. Matrix is female only, too Jewish. Need a reboot. Enter the correct data. You need Patriots in a Patriarcal society that have a Pope, not just Matrix, but Patrix so to speak. Order, hierarchy. Moldbug was just partly correct, but the bugs in his system can easily be fixed. MoreRight also recently made the mistake to take Varg Vikerness seriously… No way! Don’t ever do that. 2001, can have it but check what happen in the end? Also Sprach Zarathustra, I read that when I was 13. Is it more lucid to imagine the Motherboard give birth to the Man-God? I can accept the possibility, I just believe in the wisdom of moderation and in the sexes needing to unite or else, we all die. God-King-Man-Woman-Children, learn the correct hierarchy, it doesn’t change, it’s civilization. When France kill the King, it’s the families killing their Father. The families of a nation are the children of the King (they submit, they are Subjects). When the children are poorly disciplined, you get the French Revolution. Then they kill babies in the name of Progress… otherwise known as Terrorism. This is my interpretation of Moldbug and I think I get a few things right. I am not certain about the details, I was never either a libertarian or a progressive. I had read most books that mattered by my 20’s, the rest just stick around in the back of your brain even when you’re a rambling idiot and probably mentally ill of course. The historical references are on our side. I have said way before discovering the NRx that we were living in the Dark Ages or maybe in the Blinding Light Ages, which is worst. Since the Quiet Revolution here, our revolutionaries have told us about the Grande Noirceur, the Great Darkness that existed prior to their revolution. I resume it thus, since 1960, we have the Great Lightness, for the prior 200,000 years, it was Great Darkness. Of course, I side with the darkness in this regard. Our Great Men were mostly from the Great Darkness era, let’s not fool ourselves, Progress have sucked hard. Liberalism have forced us to desegregate, we worked so hard to stay segregated, but Lightness blinded us.

Nick Land done a swell job grouping all these subatomic elements. There’s a lot of good truths, some just need precisions and proper apraisal from different angles. The whole Christianity mockery however, sorry a King needs a King of Kings. Not just motherboard and a programing language. What language does God speaks in?

There’s got to be a pre-existing symbol we can use. I like the Tidewater swords, but there is obvious regional bias at work and also it does not exactly look friendly.

Or: take two infinity symbols and stick them over each other to get a cross-looking thing. That looks vaguely and unidentifiably fash, but there’s plenty of symbolism in it, especially if you make it look particularly double-helical. The Cross of Gnon! But someone must have gotten there first — it’s too obvious.

But does having one logo fit with the times? Seems like modernism is over, and overtly signaling thede-affiliation is considered generally gauche. What we’d need then is a lot of symbols — once one gets marked as Satanic, there’s still a hundred more.

That would require a mechanism for generating recognizable symbols and whoops now we’re the Illuminati