<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numbo Zhongo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xenosystems.net/numbo-zhongo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/numbo-zhongo/</link>
	<description>Involvements with reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Y. Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/numbo-zhongo/#comment-10736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C. Y. Chen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1047#comment-10736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anecdotally, my Mandarin was (is) always quite awkward and had a strong southern accent, since I never had contact with any Chinese speakers other than my parents, who hail from Fuzhou.

Their accent generally made it very difficult for me to guess whether a syllable&#039;s initial was supposed to be alveolar or retroflex (e.g. s/sh, z/zh, c/ch) or if a final was /ŋ/ or /n/, which is a complete pain in the ass when trying to using pinyin.

I&#039;ve definitely heard emphasis on the different tones when southerners speak.  Maybe the fact that the Fuzhou dialect has seven tones facilitated that for my family.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anecdotally, my Mandarin was (is) always quite awkward and had a strong southern accent, since I never had contact with any Chinese speakers other than my parents, who hail from Fuzhou.</p>
<p>Their accent generally made it very difficult for me to guess whether a syllable&#8217;s initial was supposed to be alveolar or retroflex (e.g. s/sh, z/zh, c/ch) or if a final was /ŋ/ or /n/, which is a complete pain in the ass when trying to using pinyin.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve definitely heard emphasis on the different tones when southerners speak.  Maybe the fact that the Fuzhou dialect has seven tones facilitated that for my family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spandrell</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/numbo-zhongo/#comment-10730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spandrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1047#comment-10730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s recent, and an artifact of the half-assed imposition of Mandarin to the South.

4 and 10 are easily distinguishable in actual Shanghainese, as in most dialects.

I wonder people for whom Lazy Mandarin is their native language do mental calculation. Saying 44 must be a drag. I guess they really stress the tones. I know people from Taipei do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s recent, and an artifact of the half-assed imposition of Mandarin to the South.</p>
<p>4 and 10 are easily distinguishable in actual Shanghainese, as in most dialects.</p>
<p>I wonder people for whom Lazy Mandarin is their native language do mental calculation. Saying 44 must be a drag. I guess they really stress the tones. I know people from Taipei do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/numbo-zhongo/#comment-10714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1047#comment-10714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best, yes probably, beautifully logical, but marred by the whole si / shi near-homophony (a special killer with a Shanghainese accent).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best, yes probably, beautifully logical, but marred by the whole si / shi near-homophony (a special killer with a Shanghainese accent).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spandrell</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/numbo-zhongo/#comment-10712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spandrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1047#comment-10712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Japanese lacks plural too, but it doesn&#039;t have quite as many numerical idioms as Chinese.

There&#039;s the funny fact that interrogatives and undeterminates are identical. 

Several: 几个
How many?: 几个

Chinese has hands down the best numerical system of all human languages. No wonder they like to use it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japanese lacks plural too, but it doesn&#8217;t have quite as many numerical idioms as Chinese.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s the funny fact that interrogatives and undeterminates are identical. </p>
<p>Several: 几个<br />
How many?: 几个</p>
<p>Chinese has hands down the best numerical system of all human languages. No wonder they like to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/numbo-zhongo/#comment-10710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1047#comment-10710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are lots of plausible suggestions in the comments thread over there, and I suspect the &#039;true&#039; answer amalgamates several. Certainly, the fact that Chinese lacks plurals has to be one important factor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of plausible suggestions in the comments thread over there, and I suspect the &#8216;true&#8217; answer amalgamates several. Certainly, the fact that Chinese lacks plurals has to be one important factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handle</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/numbo-zhongo/#comment-10708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Handle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=1047#comment-10708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish I could get a clean copy of that memo - too bad NYT is reporting &lt;i&gt;on&lt;/i&gt; it, but not &lt;i&gt;with&lt;/i&gt; it.

I would guess that the Chinese government numbers things for the same reasons all gigantic, highly-organized bureaucracies, militaries, etc. obsessively number documents and everything.  For the sake of reference, organization, recall, data collection and analysis.  Aviation and Air Forces are notable for preferring their numeric designation to verbal nicknames (not true in the Navy and only sometimes in the Army, where there is a weakness for non-nonsensical acronyms).  High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle becomes HMMWV becomes &#039;Hum Vee&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could get a clean copy of that memo &#8211; too bad NYT is reporting <i>on</i> it, but not <i>with</i> it.</p>
<p>I would guess that the Chinese government numbers things for the same reasons all gigantic, highly-organized bureaucracies, militaries, etc. obsessively number documents and everything.  For the sake of reference, organization, recall, data collection and analysis.  Aviation and Air Forces are notable for preferring their numeric designation to verbal nicknames (not true in the Navy and only sometimes in the Army, where there is a weakness for non-nonsensical acronyms).  High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle becomes HMMWV becomes &#8216;Hum Vee&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
