Comments on: Owned http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/ Involvements with reality Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1 By: The Mafia, Endo-Imperialism, Endo-Colonialism And The Secular State | The New International Outlook http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-162158 Sun, 28 Dec 2014 16:47:57 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-162158 […] either Mafias will also be resorted to as in the case of post-Soviet Russia, or the development of private security and cryptographic ownership will be sufficiently developed for what will be in effect an nRX […]

]]> By: Lightning Round – 2014/11/19 | Free Northerner http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-140148 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 06:01:56 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-140148 […] A lack of formalism leads to totalitarianism. Related. […]

]]> By: SanguineEmpiricist http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-139999 Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:51:49 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-139999 I’ve seen you mention Ethereum. From a few video conferences I’ve been to where Tual has been presenting it seems like he was stalling and the smart contracts do not seem to be working as of yet, with many people attending the conferences having reservations. That was before this entire counterparty drama. I have a lot of hopes though and I’m going to keep checking.

Federal people are also doing investigative groundwork for bitcoin related _anything_. I know because I met two of them and got uncomfortable after 2-3 meetings and bailed out. They were a ‘husband and wife’ They called me once last july, but turned out to be a non-issue. So, there’s that as well.

There’s other procedural issues with it.. We can get the upside to technology as long as our base case can survive without it ie Aristocratic Egalitarianism. Governments based on technology are not robust to war/conflict/etc, but there is hope. How will they adapt to Urbit? What if they all fail? Not decent NRx risk management if you ask me.

I don’t really see how it’s scholastic. It’s definitely better than anything mentioned in discussion threads. I push this line of thought so hard because the other stuff is impoverished thought. In the meantime Jensen and Nicholas wade still have issues.

http://www.wired.com/2014/11/crypto-ipos/

]]> By: admin http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-139883 Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:40:36 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-139883 This all seems like arbitrary sign-shuffling in comparison to what Satoshi Nakamoto has done. What’s the point of this type of scholastic discussion, unless to influence policy or politics? — and that epoch is over. Property is being re-implemented in functional, decentralized code, making it rigorously intelligible for the first time in history. It’s time to start catching up.

]]> By: SanguineEmpiricist http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-139663 Tue, 18 Nov 2014 03:55:49 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-139663 Compare to

http://www.propertarianism.com/ideas/
http://www.propertarianism.com/2014/09/28/moral-foundations-as-property-rights/
http://www.propertarianism.com/2013/01/15/the-complete-definition-of-property-excerpt-from-propertarianism/

Not even close.

]]> By: admin http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-139599 Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:49:11 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-139599 I’m being sloppy, and treating an autonomized self-improving Pythia-capitalist Gödel machine as a definitive ‘finalization’ (from the human perspective).

]]> By: E. Antony Gray (@RiverC) http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-139555 Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:39:08 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-139555 no human formalization exhausts potentiality, for sure. I think formalizations that are as complete as possible over being as consistent as possible usually are superior; but Godel’s theorem suggests that completeness (and then I guess, finalization) eludes every formalization at LEAST inasmuch as the theory has to contend with the causes and ramifications of its own existence.

]]> By: Dark Psy-Ops http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-139265 Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:42:49 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-139265 There has been a Right Singularity the scale and seriousness of which is yet to be fully understood. The next month will continue with Malthussian scarcity and tech-comm secrecy, but soon enough the question of property will have my unimpeded attention. At which time any relentless leftward forces will self-dissipate or risk being locked in. A test is fine if one remembers there will be consequences unknown. I do hope somebody has been reading what has passed between myself and one other. It is the Great Filter specialised. Plus I’m new to this and have had a rough start. I’m not complaining. Peace is short, war is long. I fight for all of us and our freedom. Unity is needed, for in our trust is our survival. May Gnon have mercy on our souls.

Dionysus

p.s demand needn’t be Jacobin, the supply certainly isn’t.

]]> By: admin http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-138795 Sun, 16 Nov 2014 01:51:08 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-138795 Formalization is the history of capitalism. It’s not only possible, but demonstrated. The most you can plausibly claim is that formalization is not finalizable (and I might even agree with you about that — but probably not).

]]> By: Lesser Bull http://www.xenosystems.net/owned/#comment-138772 Sun, 16 Nov 2014 00:38:40 +0000 http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4111#comment-138772 Formalization is impossible.

]]>