According to him, Europe is screwed because of demographics, while the US is healthy because of demographics. He obscures the fact that Europe is still whiter than the US, and that the US’s demographic growth is coming from immigrant non-whites and that the majority of young children and newborns in the US are now non-white.

Regarding the visual trichotomy of the Dark Enlightenment, here is a great visual of the theonomists:

http://oi39.tinypic.com/2v2xzt0.jpg

This is being sent around on various email lists.

-

It is hopeless to get the females up in arms.

Up until it is raped, the feminine mind works like this:

“Foreign males are present. This must mean that my co-national males are unable to challenge the foreign males to natural duel and succeed. Therefore, it is imperative that I obtain the genes that are now not only demonstrating their dominance and permanence, but are likely carrying with them immunity to diseases that are co-evolved with these foreign males.”

When it is raped, the feminine mind works like this:

“None of my co-national males protected me from this. They’re just standing around brooding about it instead of dealing instant death to the rapists. This confirms my belief that the foreign males are dominant and that their genes are essential to the viability of my children.”

Since the patriarchal scaffolding holding up civilization has been dismantled, giving way to sub-Saharan African behavior patterns of serial (if not parallel) polygyny among “independent” females, the only hope for civilization is the introduction of religions like Islam that are not as far along the road to the loss of their patriarchal scaffolding.

Rush Limbaugh and the like aren’t exactly a part of the American MSM establishment, and when they do bring this topic up, they typically talk about “Muslim takeovers” in Europe, not America. The only time “Muslim takeover” rhetoric got popular was when some Muslims tried to build a mosque right across the street from the Twin Towers site. Otherwise, American talk radio rarely brings up Muslims. We have a Mexican “takeover” to worry about. (And I don’t watch a lot of Fox News, but when I do, the discussions aren’t about “Eurabia” so much as they are about the general danger of radicalization. And even Sean Hannity always goes out of his way to say “It’s only 1% of Muslims who are a threat” etc. etc.)

@Nicholas MacDonald

Steyn has been a broken record with his Eurabia meme for a decade now- one that doesn’t hold up to much demographic scrutiny and is based more on whatever scary, selective anecdotes he can come up with than anything that’s really reflective of a continent of half a billion people- I take him about as seriously on geopolitics as I take Gordon Chang- which is to say, not very, and if he’s right, it’s only because he’s a stopped clock that will inevitably gain some corroboration for his theory just by waiting long enough.

Well, isn’t his entire point about long-range demographic trends? By definition, time will prove him right, if in fact he is right.

And “selective anecdotes” is probably better framed as “geographic contingency.” I’m sure it’s easy to pooh-pooh Steyn’s thesis if you live in rural Norway or Cornwall. If you live in London, you’re probably paying a bit more attention.

What you’re saying about Steyn is precisely what the Left said about Mexican immigration for most of the 20th century. Even today, American Northeast Leftists deride immigration fears—well, sure, for them it’s easy because they live a thousand miles from the Mexican border in rural college towns like Ithaca, New York. I can see how the fears might not hit home for them. But look at the demographics of Tuscon or your average L.A. suburb, and you’ll realize that perhaps there’s something to all this long-range demographic trend nonsense . . . Whether or not you accept it depends in great part on where you look.