Quote note (#277)

Fernandez on the subsidence of security into the occult:

If America still mounts guard on the Wall, it must do so in secret. Recent events show that only acceptable way to provide the guard is with Special Forces and drones and spooks and PMCs. In a word, the West must be defended by things that are deniable and disposable.

Democracy ensures that grown-up government can only happen in secret.

(This was prompted by Fernandez, too, on basically the same topic.)

August 27, 2016admin 70 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Practicalities

TAGGED WITH : , , ,

70 Responses to this entry

  • Brett Stevens Says:

    Guess our shortage of donor organs is over then. Send the families back in Mexico a cheque for $10,000 and all should be good.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Are you working yourself towards becoming a comedian?

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 27th, 2016 at 3:58 pm Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    Grown-up government has been happening in secret for a long time.

    But as the people become more infantile,

    the Overlords grow

    ↑ ↑ ↑

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    how do people get infantile?could it be from secret overlording?

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Reportedly xenoestrogens are a cause.

    The Industrial Revolution is a double edged sword

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    It´s not entirely bad tho, not at all. Possibly a cause for the “long peace” of Western Europe for the past 70 years.

    But when you get sooo pseudoestrogenized that you start inviting craze-headed Tusken Raider sand people to just come up and rape and stab everybody,

    you´ve* ingested too much of the petrochemical “cool-aid.”

    (* your nation has.)

    I think maybe we should make an Aryan version of Islam, like drop the ass-up-in-the-air-face-down prayer type of thingies. Take over Islam, make women produce babies again, & colonize for Space Allah.

    1 Ar-Rahman (الرحمن) The All-Compassionate
    2 Ar-Rahim (الرحيم) The All-Merciful
    3 Al-Malik (الملك) The Absolute Ruler
    4 Al-Quddus (القدوس) The Pure One
    5 As-Salam (السلام) The Source of Peace
    6 Al-Mu’min (المؤمن) The Inspirer of Faith
    7 Al-Muhaymin (المهيمن) The Guardian
    8 Al-Aziz (العزيز) The Victorious
    9 Al-Jabbar (الجبار) The Compeller
    10 Al-Mutakabbir (المتكبر) The Greatest
    11 Al-Khaliq (الخالق) The Creator
    12 Al-Bari’ (البارئ) The Maker of Order
    13 Al-Musawwir (المصور) The Shaper of Beauty
    14 Al-Ghaffar (الغفار) The Forgiving
    15 Al-Qahhar (القهار) The Subduer
    16 Al-Wahhab (الوهاب) The Giver of All
    17 Ar-Razzaq (الرزاق) The Sustainer
    18 Al-Fattah (الفتاح) The Opener
    19 Al-`Alim (العليم) The Knower of All
    20 Al-Qabid (القابض) The Constrictor
    21 Al-Basit (الباسط) The Reliever
    22 Al-Khafid (الخافض) The Abaser
    23 Ar-Rafi (الرافع) The Exalter
    24 Al-Mu’izz (المعز) The Bestower of Honors
    25 Al-Mudhill (المذل) The Humiliator
    26 As-Sami (السميع) The Hearer of All
    27 Al-Basir (البصير) The Seer of All
    28 Al-Hakam (الحكم) The Judge
    29 Al-`Adl (العدل) The Just
    30 Al-Latif (اللطيف) The Subtle One
    31 Al-Khabir (الخبير) The All-Aware
    32 Al-Halim (الحليم) The Forbearing
    33 Al-Azim (العظيم) The Magnificent
    34 Al-Ghafur (الغفور) The Forgiver and Hider of Faults
    35 Ash-Shakur (الشكور) The Rewarder of Thankfulness
    36 Al-Ali (العلى) The Highest
    37 Al-Kabir (الكبير) The Greatest
    38 Al-Hafiz (الحفيظ) The Preserver
    39 Al-Muqit (المقيت) The Nourisher
    40 Al-Hasib (الحسيب) The Accounter
    41 Al-Jalil (الجليل) The Mighty
    42 Al-Karim (الكريم) The Generous
    43 Ar-Raqib (الرقيب) The Watchful One
    44 Al-Mujib (المجيب) The Responder to Prayer
    45 Al-Wasi (الواسع) The All-Comprehending
    46 Al-Hakim (الحكيم) The Perfectly Wise
    47 Al-Wadud (الودود) The Loving One
    48 Al-Majid (المجيد) The Majestic One
    49 Al-Ba’ith (الباعث) The Resurrector
    50 Ash-Shahid (الشهيد) The Witness
    51 Al-Haqq (الحق) The Truth
    52 Al-Wakil (الوكيل) The Trustee
    53 Al-Qawiyy (القوى) The Possessor of All Strength
    54 Al-Matin (المتين) The Forceful One
    55 Al-Waliyy (الولى) The Governor
    56 Al-Hamid (الحميد) The Praised One
    57 Al-Muhsi (المحصى) The Appraiser
    58 Al-Mubdi’ (المبدئ) The Originator
    59 Al-Mu’id (المعيد) The Restorer
    60 Al-Muhyi (المحيى) The Giver of Life
    61 Al-Mumit (المميت) The Taker of Life
    62 Al-Hayy (الحي) The Ever Living One
    63 Al-Qayyum (القيوم) The Self-Existing One
    64 Al-Wajid (الواجد) The Finder
    65 Al-Majid (الماجد) The Glorious
    66 Al-Wahid (الواحد) The Unique, The Single
    67 Al-Ahad (الاحد) The One, The Indivisible
    68 As-Samad (الصمد) The Satisfier of All Needs
    69 Al-Qadir (القادر) The All Powerful
    70 Al-Muqtadir (المقتدر) The Creator of All Power
    71 Al-Muqaddim (المقدم) The Expediter
    72 Al-Mu’akhkhir (المؤخر) The Delayer
    73 Al-Awwal (الأول) The First
    74 Al-Akhir (الأخر) The Last
    75 Az-Zahir (الظاهر) The Manifest One
    76 Al-Batin (الباطن) The Hidden One
    77 Al-Wali (الوالي) The Protecting Friend
    78 Al-Muta’ali (المتعالي) The Supreme One
    79 Al-Barr (البر) The Doer of Good
    80 At-Tawwab (التواب) The Guide to Repentance
    81 Al-Muntaqim (المنتقم) The Avenger
    82 Al-‘Afuww (العفو) The Forgiver
    83 Ar-Ra’uf (الرؤوف) The Clement
    84 Malik-al-Mulk (مالك الملك) The Owner of All
    85 Dhu-al-Jalal wa-al-Ikram (ذو الجلال و الإكرام) The Lord of Majesty and Bounty
    86 Al-Muqsit (المقسط) The Equitable One
    87 Al-Jami’ (الجامع) The Gatherer
    88 Al-Ghani (الغنى) The Rich One
    89 Al-Mughni (المغنى) The Enricher
    90 Al-Mani'(المانع) The Preventer of Harm
    91 Ad-Darr (الضار) The Creator of The Harmful
    92 An-Nafi’ (النافع) The Creator of Good
    93 An-Nur (النور) The Light
    94 Al-Hadi (الهادي) The Guide
    95 Al-Badi (البديع) The Originator
    96 Al-Baqi (الباقي) The Everlasting One
    97 Al-Warith (الوارث) The Inheritor of All
    98 Ar-Rashid (الرشيد) The Righteous Teacher
    99 As-Sabur (الصبور) The Patient One

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    Here’s a dark (by dark I mean nauseating, personally) thought-experiment: Why shouldn’t the West convert to Islam? Or more realistically, what is it exactly that aryan Hierarchist types (besides the glaring example of Myatt of course) are so averse to about adding Islam into our syncretism–a syncretism is what we’re working with now after all, since the dawn of Modernity, i.e. since the Enlightenment severed the contract between Antiquity and Christianity. Why not stir a pinch of Islam into our motley cocktail? Is it kneejerk or is there some basis? OR is it that we know subconsciously that they pose a True Threat, that tampering with them in any way would result in not our absorption of them but their absorption of us? Are we scared? Are our snowy viking knees knocking over these distant cousins of ours? I believe it would be Dionysian in the Euripidean sense for us to let Islam in…

    “In Euripides’ Bacchae we have inestimable testimony to what the encounter between the Greek genius and Dionysiac orgiasm may have been. Dionysus himself is the protagonist of the Bacchae, which is something unprecedented in ancient Greek drama. Outraged that his cult is still unrecognized in Greece, Dionysus arrives from Asia with a troop of maenads and stops at Thebes, his mother’s birthplace. The three daughters of King Cadmus deny that their sister Semele had been loved by Zeus and had given birth to a god. Dionysus smites them with “madness,” and his aunts, together with the other Theban women, rush away to the mountains, where they celebrate orgiastic rites. Pentheus, who had succeeded to the throne of his grandfather Cadmus, had forbidden the cult, and, despite the advice he had received, he persisted in his intransigence. Disguised as an officiant of his own cult, Dionysus is captured and imprisoned by Pentheus. But he escapes miraculously and even succeeds in persuading Pentheus to go and spy on the women during their orgiastic ceremonies. Discovered by the maenads, Pentheus is torn to pieces; his own mother, Agave, brings back his head in triumph, believing it to be the head of a lion.
    Whatever Euripides’ intention may have been when, at the end of his life, he wrote the Bacchae, this masterpiece of Greek tragedy is also the most important document concerning the Dionysiac cult… [O]ne of the lessons of the Bacchae was certainly this: that a god must not be rejected because he is considered “new.””

    Mircea Eliade, A History of Religious Ideas (Vol. I)

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    > Why not stir a pinch of Islam into our motley cocktail? Is it kneejerk or is there some basis?

    It´s kneejerk. Evola wrote that the traditional elite is supra-national, like the knights templar (and he was, admittedly, very fond of the SS), but by now it has to be supra-religious as well.

    Lower classes find division because of anything. It used to be that there were hostilities between small towns, for the youth at least. Or, say, sports teams, or music taste.
    The lower doesn´t know the deeper differentiators and thus makes use of random surface ones.

    Of course, the lower can be convinced of anything, as history has shown, so it´s a matter of packaging it right (Islam in this case, not Marlboro).

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    I like the gesture behind the idea of Gnon but it’s clearly a slapstick “G”od borne out of a postmodern irony that became exhausted with itself. We need a Faith that is rooted to the center of the earth of the piety of Islam and poetic-philosophic clarity of Heideggerianism. The contemporary elites conjured up this Prog Religion, we can do the same except ours will subordinate Equality to Hierarchy rather than vice versa. Something I don’t see conceded very often is that we are going to have to replace the Cathedral with a different Cathedral; there won’t be a transformation in form, only in content (i.e. to put it bluntly the libertarian children of Moldbug are pants-on-head retarded). Rabble-rouser Jonathan Bowden puts this point well:

    “The way to do it is to confront the left on their own ground where the forces of conservatism have largely been given up… and that is to confront political correctness which is the linguistic grammar of the contemporary left. You have a large swathe of opinion now from the center of conservatism parties like the Republicans all the way over to the far left and back again that morally are in agreement on politically correct matters… But you have to oppose political correctness in a manner which is seen to be morally efficacious if you are to attract into your ranks people other than the usual suspects and the people that are always going to be right-wing come no matter what. If you are to achieve large-scale social conversions to an extent that is required at this time and going forward into the 21st century you will need to do what the left did when they provided a grammar for their own sensibility. Political correctness is happy-clappy, quite tight-knit, encoded in rather puritanical ideals of what’s wrong and what’s right in a secular morality, and in some ways the right needs to create a political soundness–a political correctness–of its own. It needs to create a sort of “four legs good, two legs bad” Animal Farm scenario in reverse. It needs to think quite deeply about moral philosophy, which is where the left started their purging of the institutions. They decided a long time ago – the essence of our ideas: how can they be boiled down to a compost which is assimilable by enormously large and disparate numbers of people, and how can the right be ditched by making its own ideas appear archaic or authoritarian or old-fashioned or unpleasant or against the grain of the age or not nice to people or unduly exclusive and intolerant and so on.”

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    >we are going to have to replace the Cathedral with a different Cathedral

    This was obvious to me from the start. But I´m always a minority within a minority.

    Many of the scene aren´t top-tier perceivers.* It´s actually quite disappointing, mostly. But it´s very recent, still. When I was a WN (years ago) you can imagine how disappointing that was. So this is progress.

    A lot of autistic stuff (Anissimov, et al), but I would be interested in links to what some people think are some of the best articles aside from MM´s & Land´s.

    Typically, for me personally they write too much to get to the point.

    Somebody in 2014 here was making comments like that Katy Perry is more elite than NRx.

    >you have to oppose political correctness in a manner which is seen to be morally efficacious if you are to attract into your ranks people other than the usual suspects

    Yeah, man is always mytho-religious.

    Everything I would say here has been said before.

    >It needs to think quite deeply about moral philosophy, which is where the left started their purging of the institutions.

    Yes, it neets to adopt this. Xenosystems has some overlapping posts.

    But if we signal through old systems (‘old’ is not bad but neutral) exclusively we look like autists, or nostalgics. What needs to be done is not merely adopt but also adapt. I do look on Vaporwave, Synthwave, IDM & (the best of various) Metal genres, e.g., to be sort of counterparts to NRx. These are not at root bourgeois or sterile affairs.

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQHUmdiuQsk

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwGVtYwWZs8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjsrHPjmpnY

    What the circles around Myatt´s work tend to call those who perceive the world (and its artifacts) mundanely is the mundanes.

    If this is to be a civilization it needs its own mythology like any and every civilization has had. I think we´re seeing that re-appearing in the glitched spaces of the interweb.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm73YU2w-wM (Timothy Leary – William Gibson’s Neuromancer)

    PolarWashington Reply:

    You’re onto something lad.

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    @Son of Erik

    “I think maybe we should make an Aryan version of Islam, like drop the ass-up-in-the-air-face-down prayer type of thingies”

    THIS is crimethink. Void forbid the Muslims are right about anything! I’ve spoken with a handful of ancient and medieval philosophy scholars and they all shake their heads about Descartes. Muslims probably decapitated their Descartes and buried his cogito in the sand. Maybe for the best?

    My question is is it possible to have an Islam without the ass up face down thing? Is there even a problem with that? Being grateful to the Source five times a day. Sounds like the opposite of nihilism.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    In a way it looks like our only chance.

    We should fuse together Anglo-Sino Capitalism, Soviet Space Propaganda, Indo-European wizdom, and the potent, living & expanding force of Islam, the name of Allah Al-Wajid will help us find what we need.

    Abdul-Aziz ibn Myatt will have some materializations ready, and Abdalqadir as-Sufi as well. Google theirs to find the librarium.

    Our divininator (http://ayatalquran.com/random) gave us a verse:

    They rejoice because of favour from Allah and kindness, and that Allah wasteth not the wage of the believers.

    The Holy Quran – 3:171

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    >Allah wasteth not the wage of the believers.

    Straight up Capitalism.

    Posted on August 27th, 2016 at 4:06 pm Reply | Quote
  • vxxc2014 Says:

    Ah but it is acceptably Holy to Support the Troops and the Veterans.

    >Legitimacy.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 27th, 2016 at 5:57 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    allowing an ally to weaken is stupid.allowing your people to weaken is stupider.outsourcing your technology manufacture to your enemies to save a few dollars is retarded.Inviting the surviving niggers into your country after the war …….

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 27th, 2016 at 6:35 pm Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    I think it is good article within the scope of the question. when prevention and deterrence not working anymore only option left is preemption. first shoot ask questions later. it is official US military doctrine and Obamas is quite comfortable with it, he got “Presidential Policy Guidance” and “Procedures for Approving Direct Action … has been driving US policy since 2013” (Fernandez). within this legal framework US President can do great job and manage growing uncertainties very well, no doubts about that. with introduction of fuzzy logic paradigm AI can deal with uncertainties very well. end of explanatory politics, no need to worry about anything, AI is taking over.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 27th, 2016 at 6:50 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    Helen Mirren film “eye in the sky” is a very good movie and about this

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 27th, 2016 at 9:09 pm Reply | Quote
  • S.C. Hickman Says:

    What’s more fascinating is that the actual precedent set by the Obama administration was to hide democracy itself from its own constituents; all the rest followed…

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 27th, 2016 at 11:13 pm Reply | Quote
  • sobl Says:

    With the Left’s assault on police (domestic security), private police corps for smaller towns to even medium sized cities of 25-30K will be an avenue to chase for a similar dark twin. Cops in big cities have told me that the diversity scam is now just hiring black females for inclusiveness where they rock a desk job. Forcing this on smaller cities and towns might become too much of a burden fiscally so privatization will be attractive.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 28th, 2016 at 3:49 pm Reply | Quote
  • Aristocles Invictvs Says:

    Nick, I have an enquiry, sorry to be a bother; a while back I found an external link to an article on your Urban Future blog about Marx’s labour theory of value and Böhm von Bahwerks critique of it. It was an outstanding article and I would very much like to read it again! Thank you for any help in this regard.

    [Reply]

    D. Reply:

    Perhaps “Karl Marx and the Close of His System” by Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk? Link to PDF file in handle.

    [Reply]

    Aristocles Invictvs Reply:

    No, it was an article on a Marxist site, not a book.

    [Reply]

    Grotesque Body Reply:

    http://www.marxist.com/in-defence-of-ltv.htm

    ?

    Posted on August 28th, 2016 at 7:30 pm Reply | Quote
  • Uriel Alexis Says:

    crypto-wars arise (a fairly good chance for Dr. Gno to show up)

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Dr. Gno is always with us.

    [Reply]

    Uriel Alexis Reply:

    amen

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 29th, 2016 at 1:08 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    @

    @(N) G. Eiríksson Reply:
    August 30th, 2016 at 7:08 pm

    >we are going to have to replace the Cathedral with a different Cathedral

    I have been saying this forever or more precisely ‘the cathedral is brilliant it allows the illusion of democracy while elites do as they want, it can even make people act against instincts and self interest imagine how much better it will work when aligned with reality’ – we only need to take over and use the cathedral for good

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    I was walking through my university during freshman orientation a few nights ago and hundreds of blonde girls were laying on the grass and the ratkikes were playing rap song after rap song over the loud speakers–one assumes to get them to adjust to the winkwink equality of blacks. Alignment with reality for me wouldn’t necessarily be making the niggers walk the plank* but the above scenario would be all the swaggering apes being made to sit down like dogs and listen to classical music. Why is it the elites have to bring whites down? Why can’t they just bring browns up? Does it follow from this that they simply have a drive to destroy the higher? Or am I misreading the situation?

    *I’m in a generous mood

    I’ve been led to infer that our admin doesn’t really get perturbed by such things as this: https://goodbyeamericainaphoto.wordpress.com/2016/06/21/genepoolside/

    My first instinct is it’s because HE MUST BE A CRYPTO-MARXIST.

    Miscegenation is the squandering of high spirituality motivated by pity.

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    I guess youre too young they tried and tried and tried and tried but you cant fix stupid as they say in the meantime the whole sixties thing was degenerating the culture and it struck them that hey if you cant raise the bridge lower the water.Of course it keeps evolving theres a menace and malice to it now. you might get a kick out of the way africans have added some flava to college debating

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    That image gets me.

    African descended make good music. When people judge things by what X person likes as a tune, that stinks of pseudointellectuality. I happen to have an extremely diverse taste in music. I don´t care if it´s hip or not. Some people dislike music just because it´s popular, or with Africans. I´ve seen no evidence that what kind of music one may enjoy makes one superior or inferior. Yet people play these games, and fool themselves as it does. I´ve been in scenes, there are rules. “You cannot like this.” Too monkey tribe. All too human. Say what you want but people who are too antiliberal regarding such things tend to lose.

    Strictly from a nonhuman perspective racial mixtures are not about “purity” but about progressive adaptiveness. It seems quite advantageous to secure a Jewish mother, who´s Europid, white-skinned, but you get the bonus of the tribe along with it (your children do). Sort of like marrying into royalty, if you select a smart lineage.

    But it feels too alien to envision myself with African or Asian descended children.

    But some Jewesses would provide me with a blonde child, who might be indistinguishable from any Icelander or Swede.

    ▬ “Racially progressive tendencies in a race are typically modern sapiens features. In this context I mean neomorphic, new features, which are both balanced, versatile, under as much conditions as possible advantageous and efficient. The new feature must be generally advantageous or at least not disadvantageous, neutral, if considering as much factors as possible, to be called progressive. Usually this tendencies are on line with the general trends of Hominisation, f.e. decrease of prognathy, prominence of the upper jaw, changes in the position of the foramen magnum and the form and position of the parietal bone etc.
    Knußmann said that different races have different progressive features. For the Negrids he mentioned the full lips in the Grzimek Enzyklopädie.
    The dynamic of progressive types (Europids and Mongolids, with certain types being more progressive than the average of the race) replacing in prehistoric times more primitive variants was mentioned by v. Eickstedt (1963), Lundman (1952).
    Rough translation:
    “The other, even more progressive main race, the white race…”, from Lundman, Umriß der Rassenkunde in historischer Zeit, 1952, S. 51.
    “Very clear is the connection of races to the ontogenetic development: There are races, which retain the more childlike (paedomorphic) habitus (f.e. Palaemongolids, img 308 – look at the pictures posted in the phy. anthro. section from Knußmann), and such, which are more typical adult formed – or even overreaching (f.e. Nilotids, img 304)”.
    “The protuberance of the mucous membrane (lips) of Negrids is a phylogenetically progressive, whereas the strong prognathy is an archaic (primitive) feature.”
    Knußmann (see below) S. 407.
    “Highly specialised organisms or organs are being designated as phylogenetically progressive. Phylogenetic primitivity is the retaining of original, undifferentiated features. (very rough the (theoretical of primitivity) advantage is the potential for further specialisation in more directions…”
    – means: Primitives can develop (in more directions theoretically), Progressives already developed. If there new development is advantageous, there form is in comparison. Now my point is not everything new is progressive, insofar I use it like Eickstedt and Lundman, because only advantageous and versatile features are progressive, too one sided are overspecialised (took further potential away).
    “Original (“ancestral”) features are also called plesiomorphies, specialised “derived” as apomorphies.
    Knußmann, Vergleichende Biologie des Menschen, 2nd edition 1996, S. 268-269.”
    http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?11365-What-does-a-basic-racial-typology-describe-in-Europe
    http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?32578-Progressive-Primitive-Infantile

    As for recent socioeconomical “elites” they have succumbed to infrahuman vectors, which always exist as physics necessitate. Man is not a wholly rational or conscious creature. He is swept by vector winds in this great abyss.

    Cosmos a battlespace for VR lords of chaos and order.

    ‘Order’ meaning like when you and your mate go out for food and don´t get stabbed by a very alienated person who channels chaos to a greater degree than used to be the white norm.

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    Son of Erik,
    I can see that in your charac
    ter
    you got three battalions a’niggas in yo mental barracks
    Barack Obama did this to you and his puppetmaster jews
    you been imbued by a laser beam of white house panopticism
    creatin’ a schism makin’ you want yo daughter to want negro jism

    Fuck rap

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    No, frankly I wouldn´t care if rap didn´t exist. Or even music.

    But I used to hate African descended, with a passion. Didn´t make my life better, didn´t convince anyone (not long term), and didn´t change anything in the world. In fact, it made my convincing people that “I just want for whites, those that chose so, to have their own autonomy.” far weaker to them. I was saying I was merely a preservationist, I didn´t want the white race to go extinct, and it was going extinct; and then I mixed that with this teenage-angst-like “omg, the girls are looking up to these dancing niggas” like you are, and that got folks against me.

    Girls are just property. They are either ruled by a man, or they follow the vibes. Posting about “niggas” or getting vexed, stirred or perturbed by them isn´t going to change anything by itself. And if you make it about music, you´re surely gonna lose the rhetorical battle. Many normies will get “autonomy”, they will not get “I fucking hate Michael Jordan and dese niggas wit deir tunes.” The only things they´re good at, music and sports, and you´re going to argue about that with the race you want to save? People will think you´re the most autistic dork in the world if you will start saying like “Aryan classical music is superior. Don´t listen to that crap!” Nobody will fucking care except a few maladapted teenagers, and even more maladapted middle-aged White Nationalists & Neo-Nazis.

    In your teenagelike psyche you will probably project the uncomfortableness of this onto me. However, this has nothing to do with me. It´s just the modern western fact.

    Focus on the crime they do & the IQ. And don´t always try to be funny (it has to fit the audience). Or maybe you aren´t serious about any of this, not properly, but are just a mix of a guy with some active nihilism, but mostly passive (hence the halfbakedness and apparent insincerity everywhere).

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    You throw them a bone out of pity; their music sucks, admit it. I want to hear a freestyle rap from you or Michael about why you hate niggers. Come on, just let it all out.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    You´re neither as offensive nor as funny as you think.

    But no, I don´t pity no one.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    ▬ “Pity implies two very grave errors—errors which are utterly incompatible with the views of the universe above briefly indicated. The first error therein is an implicit assumption that something is wrong with the Universe… The second error is still greater since it involves the complex of the Ego. To pity another person implies that you are superior to him.”
    — A. Crowley, Liber AL vel Legis I:3

    ▬ “The wise man, the Ariya, is not a follower of systems, he does not recognise dogmas, and having penetrated the opinions current among the people and being indifferent in face of speculation, he leaves it to others, he remains calm among the agitated, he does not take part in the verbal battles of those who main­tain: “This only is the truth,” he does not consider himself equal to others, nor superior, nor inferior.”
    — Siddharta Gautama, 13. Suttanipāta, 4.5.4; 13.10-19.

    ▬ “A particular characteristic of the Aryan-ness of the original Buddhist teaching is the absence of those proselytizing manias that exist, almost without exception, in direct proportion to the plebeian and anti-aristocratic character of a belief. An Aryan mind has too much respect for other people, and its sense of its own dignity is too pronounced to allow it to impose its own ideas upon others, even when it knows that its ideas are correct. Accordingly, in the original cycle of Aryan civilizations, both Eastern and Western, there is not the smallest trace of divine figures being so con­cerned with mankind as to come near to pursuing them in order to gain their adher­ence and to “save” them. The so-called salvationist religions—the Erlösungsreligionen, in German—make their appearance both in Europe and Asia at a later date …”

    The common white “nationalist” is concerned about the pettiest things, he voices, and he voices, what he thinks is criticism — everything but actually do the things that would solve his problems. The Roman, the Norman, the aristocrat of whatever noble ancient people would have made him into a slave.

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    I’d rather be me than a dumb blonde like you who’s no fun. You let the Nietzschean child revert into middle age, much like Land. You damn bore.

    Dionysus for president
    Dionysus for Hitler
    Dionysus for starship commander

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    You have the soul of a woman.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Passive nihilist. Who complains about others not providing what he himself does not.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Blamer. Emotional wreck. No real individuated ‘I’.

    We have a saying in Iceland, “Many think they are me.” It refers to schizophrenia, where the soul communally blends in its identities with the one it accuses. “You are not doing [what I am not actually myself doing].”

    I predict your future as a shemale whore.

    Then you will have “daddies” to provide for you. What you need. Fun. Assfuck. Make you feel exalted. Only white daddies. Maybe schizophrenic other half which hate-loves negroes will get a big up too.

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    https://media.8ch.net/leftypol/src/1471432435812-1.png

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 30th, 2016 at 7:42 pm Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    George Soros: ‘I Am A God, I Created Everything’
    Posted on August 21, 2016 by Baxter Dmitry in News, US // Comments

    George Soros claims he is a god and “the creator of everything,” however the billionaire globalist also warns he is a “self-centred” god who believes “normal rules do not apply” to him.

    “I fancied myself as some kind of god …” he wrote. “If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.“

    When asked by Britain’s Independent newspaper to elaborate on that statement, Soros doubled down: “It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.“

    Since I began to live it out. Those unfamiliar with Soros would probably dismiss that claim as nothing more the typical blathering of an irrelevant madman. But those who have followed his career and sociopolitical endeavors realize that while he may be mad, he is a mad billionaire, and billionaires tend not to be irrelevant.

    Especially not mad billionaires with self-centred agendas who believe that normal rules don’t apply to themselves.

    Soros has learnt that with enormous reserves of unethically earnt money at his disposal he has the power to make the once unthinkable acceptable. His work as a self-professed “amoral” financial speculator has left millions in poverty when their national currencies were devaluated, and he channelled so much cash into moulding former Soviet republics to his liking that he has bragged that the former Soviet empire is now the “Soros Empire.”

    Ominously, he has now turned his amoral eye on the internal affairs of the United States. A high-profile megabucks donor to the Clinton campaign, it was recently exposed by WikiLeaks that Soros issued directives on foreign policy to Clinton when she was Secretary of State – instructions that she followed to the letter.

    His enormous donations to the American ruling class have earned him a seat in the shadow government, pulling puppet strings behind the scenes. So what does Soros think about the nation he immigrated to from his native Hungary in 1956? Today’s U.S., he writes in his latest book, “The Bubble of American Supremacy,” is a “threat to the world.” We have become a “supremacist” nation.

    Despite his reputation as an international philanthropist, Soros occasionally becomes candid about his real nature. “I am sort of a deus ex machina,” Soros told the New York Times in 1994. “I am something unnatural. I’m very comfortable with my public persona because it is one I have created for myself. It represents what I like to be as distinct from what I really am. You know, in my personal capacity I’m not actually a selfless philanthropic person. I’m very much self-centered.”

    Soros got to the point quicker when he explained the deepest secrets of his soul to biographer Michael Kaufman. “I am kind of a nut who wants to have an impact,” he said.

    But the globalist billionaire’s mad visions don’t end there.

    “Next to my fantasies about being God, I also have very strong fantasies of being mad,” Soros said on British TV. “In fact, my grandfather was actually paranoid. I have a lot of madness in my family. So far I have escaped it.“

    In his book “Soros on Soros,” he says: “I do not accept the rules imposed by others…. And in periods of regime change, the normal rules don’t apply.” Clearly, Soros considers himself to be someone who is able to determine when the “normal rules” should and should not apply.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 31st, 2016 at 5:25 am Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    >We need a Faith that is rooted to the center of the earth of the piety of Islam and poetic-philosophic clarity of Heideggerianism.

    Are you providing this?

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    Please do not try to shit test me, I am not gay. What is the meaning of life? (Serious question.)

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    That was a legit question, not a mere test. Tests are good tho, it refers to ‘testicles’ ‘testament’ ‘truth’.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Since I am not completely illuminated, there are dark spots on the sun, I think I might be engaging you because I pity you. I´ve not achieved planetary coldness yet.

    At least I´m not anymore an Anime Nazi perturbated by pictures of white girls.

    Meaning of life is to conquer the worlds for Space Allah / Dr. Gnon.

    That takes more than Dionysianism or Mussolinilike bravado.

    An Apollo-Dionysian starship commander.

    You can´t complain about “no fun” if you are someone who all sane enough people would reject: a someone who does what he complains about, and doesn´t do what he suggests.

    I think you are too young in the stirred sense (looks like you´re in your early twenties) or too insane (if you are close to 30 or over) to hang out with us.

    I say in the stirred sense because not everybody in their twenties are like this. They took out this angst in their teenage years.

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    “Meaning of life is to conquer the worlds for Space Allah / Dr. Gnon.”

    Cop-out.

    It’s all politics here, never the ontology and theology that UNDERLIES politics.

    Angst is good, it means you haven’t settled unsettlable questions.

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Angst =/= Inquisitiveness.

    This is not a cop-out, don´t be so goddamned Aspie. I do have years of e-mails regarding these matters, ‘the new god’, ‘the beyond-man’ (can´t say the U-word because it´s been fetishized).

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Meaning of life is to be the best you can be / become what you are. This is the same thing.

    I think people are addicted to verbosity, and miss the depths of simplex.

    Simplex sigillum veri indeed.

    They say coffee consumption created the modern “Enlightenment” and I think a lot of people´s brains are stuck in loops extravagantly looking for what is actually the most mundane thing.

    They ask me these questions, like you´ve asked, and complain they get “very ephemeral, 8-ball answers” while I am actually quoting e.g. the Vedas or the Tao-te Ching. I cannot help these people.

    I can relay the truth though that the subtle body is real. And that what every civilization ever has essentially reported, conforms to experiential modes beyond what your academic professor, your buddy or a journalist says is real or possible.

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    I’m working on it buddy. My research would be bolstered a bit by your answer, if you wouldn’t mind. It’s hilarious to me that on all these “neoreactionary reading lists” I see there’s no Plato or Heidegger and occasionally only a little Nietzsche. Cogs. Our very own admin wrote his dissertation on Heidegger; I’d like to get my hands on that…

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Fair enough. Yes, we are in agreement.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 31st, 2016 at 8:42 pm Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    all these “neoreactionary reading lists” I see there’s no Plato or Heidegger and occasionally only a little Nietzsche.

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    *Moldbug’s voice when he says AIACC* NRx is a populist movement.

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    WE IZ KANGZ

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    You suffer from alienation and thus you think NRx is a monolithic body.

    It´s the same with Leftists who think Capitalism is monolithic.

    And anti-Semites who think Jews are a movement.

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    Pomo no essences. Oh wait let me guess pomo has no essence.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    That´s not what I said.

    But ‘Jew’ is typically used to mean ‘anyone with Jewish enough ancestry.’

    We´re not living in the Middle Ages (I´m not saying this rhetorically) so if you mean ‘Jews’ as a metaphysical category you would be likelier to be understood if you stated it so.

    You were referring to NRx as a movement, not as a metaphysical category.

    I´ve already provided a definition of NRx as a metaphysical category from one of the first posts of this web-log.

    Why don´t you try a little humility for once? You have some good points, but I don´t know how much anyone but me is picking up on them because you mix in so much trolling and bratlike behavior, frankly.

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    Tell me about metaphysical Judaism, I noticed there has been a symptomatic silence about that.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    You know full well that it is described on other weblogs, such as Traditional Catholic ones.

    We are different individuals so we have different interests and focuses.

    Trying to bully people into a focus stinks of Hitler.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    10= AL-DAWLA AL-ISLAMIYA FI AL-IRAQ WA AL-SHAM
    10=1234
    10=361
    10=A
    10=A FANTABULOUS NIGHT TO MAKE ROMANCE
    10=A GOOD LIAR
    10=ABG
    10=ABORT SEQUENCE
    10=ABSTRACT MACHINES CORP.
    10=ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED
    10=ADAM

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    You are the Martin Luther King Jr. of Leif Eriksonism. The gods have abandoned you, that’s why you have come here.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Opposed to what? Where would I be?

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 31st, 2016 at 9:36 pm Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    Why is WN a 50 year failure? Because it´s Neo-Nazism lite, and Hitler was the most perturbated omega male white guy who got so angry that he fooled half a nation into that he was alpha, and of course lead everybody on a orgy of self-destruction, leaving half the continent a crater. That´s called possession by a chaos god.

    Before that dork, it was normal to be racist (except in France) and there were no running free Third Worlders in Europe.

    He was somebody who played his whole world right into his “enemy”´s hands. And in doing so brought on everything he feared and hated to a far greater global influence than it had before. His beloved Germany totally overcome by International Capitalists and Democrats and varieties of forces not especially concerned about some Germanic restoration.

    Right after Germanic Nationalism was magnified to explosive proportions, and then ultimately mostly terminated in a cleverly played out war & aftermath, was it as opportune as ever for everything the Nazis ever disliked to occupy Germania to a degree never seen before ever in known universal history.

    Pornography, “degenerate” music, Hollywood, tabloids, recreational drugs, and immigrants.

    [Reply]

    Posted on August 31st, 2016 at 9:49 pm Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    https://twitter.com/HakonRotmwrt/status/771166307387486209

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 1st, 2016 at 4:32 am Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    Individual usernamed Dick Wagner, is this you?

    http://imgur.com/a/SX9s3

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    Me would be

    Nietzsche’s Nietzsche

    Heidegger’s Nietzsche

    Bataille’s Nietzsche

    Strauss’ Nietzsche

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    What about Neetzsche´s Nietzsche?

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    What about wordplays involving memes being Last Man playthings?

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 1st, 2016 at 4:56 am Reply | Quote
  • Outliers (#21) Says:

    […] America waking up to the fact that diversity does not work. Leftism is parasitism. Democracy creates secret and deceptive government. Clarifying the alt right through two pillars: ethnic survival and self-determination. Realizing […]

    Posted on September 5th, 2016 at 2:08 am Reply | Quote

Leave a comment