Did you find the discussion regarding fairness/equality helpful in sorting?

What do you mean “ours”?

It’s “ours” in the sense that it is a reactionary document, representative of “our”
civilization, pre-liberalism.

In contrast, “your” ‘Murican documents are “theirs”, not “ours”. Liberal documents, written by liberals, enshrining liberal principles. They are of the enemy.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…”

The question was whether or not “our” civilization attempted to make things “fair” before the liberal rot set in. And unless you want to say the rot started in the 13th century, the answer is yes, as long as you define fairness carefully.

Agree with you about financial thieves. The term Baron couldn’t be more clear.

“The word baron comes from the Old French baron, from a Late Latin baro “man; servant, soldier, mercenary”.

It should now be clear that your rationalizing with regard to admin being ironic is incorrect.

Well… fair enough!

When we have actual nobility, as opposed to the most capable financial thieves, suppose we could consider different penalties.

The Magna Carta is a great document, but it’s not ours.

And the idea of different penalties in what will remain a multi-ethinic nation is not only anathema to us but fatal to any enterprise. It cannot be a matter of statute. Local Juries and Judges have quite enough flexibility to make any desired adjustments.

Freedom of association and the tossing of the entire Federal Register including the act itself, along with the New Deal managerial state solves so many problems.