How many progs were discredited by the collapse of the Soviet Union?

The left already proceeds as if race is real and the racial categories they use are exactly right. European, Asian, Black, Native American. Hispanic tends to mean the Native American of South and Central America with some southern European admixture, and it is a real genetic mapping that you would find as well.

The left uses race for affirmative action in universities and all across the economy, successfully in countless discrimination lawsuits, ‘minority’ programs, and a whole range of identity politics. Massive and powerful leftist organizations like la Raza and the NAACP with long and successful histories operate to advance their respective racial groups openly.

But Race is a social construct when the left wants it to be. I.e. whenever anyone on the right has anything to say about it.

Being a leftist means never having to be consistent. The left just takes what it wants and then creates truth as needed. Gay-as-innate never had a hint of genetics behind it and very little science and indeed identical twin studies suggested that environmental impacts were greater. No matter. No matter that starlets change orientations every hour. No matter that the concept of sexuality as a continuum had been the standard leftist position since the Kinsey days or that bisexuals were and are common. Instantly like a school of fish in perfect harmony the new line was adopted as perfect truth.

As far as transgenderism, there is not merely a gene for gender but a whole chromosome with tons of genes on it, and what most of those genes do is not even known. As far as I can tell, this scientific reality is not so much as a speed bump to the left on this topic.

Who the hell is Nicholas Wade anyway? James Watson, discoverer of Deoxyfuckinribonucleic Acid, is arguably the greatest living biologist and he took it so hard he probably still can’t sit down six and a half years later. Never, ever mess with the Church!

It might be an improvement.

Handle said: “That view has already been published many times in legal, political, philosophical, and social science journals. And it says that if these advantages or disadvantages are inborn, then they are even more unfair and unearned, and therefore it is even more just and proper and necessary for the government to intervene against what is merely good and bad luck, in order to ensure a vision of the equal dignity of mankind.”

Sounds like this could have some deeply disturbing totalitarian policy implications—w/ accelerationist consequences/feedbacks. Do you happen to have the references of said papers?