Sure, do the 1930s over again — maybe it will all come out right this time.

Let’s not get carried away here. Or worse, become overly concerned with broadcasting an image of moral hygiene. Marine Le Pen is a far cry from Hitler.

The Mikrozensus done in 2008 revealed that the number of children a German woman aged 40 to 75 had, was closely linked to her educational achievement.[7] In Western Germany the most educated women were the most likely to be childless. 26% of those groups stated they were childless, while only 16% of those having an intermediate education, and 11% of those having compulsory education stated the same. In Eastern Germany however, only 9% of the most educated women of that age group and only 7% of those who had an intermediary education were childless, while 12% of those having only compulsory education were childless.

The reason for that east-western difference is the fact that the GDR had an “educated mother scheme” and actively tried to encourage first births among the more educated. It did so by propagandizing the opinion that every educated woman should “present at least one child to socialism” and also by financially rewarding its more educated citizen to become parents. The government especially tried to persuade students to become parents while still in college and it was quite successful in doing so. In 1986 38% of all women, who were about to graduate from college, were mothers of at least one child and additional 14% were pregnant and 43% of all men, who were about to graduate from college, were fathers of at least one child. There was a sharp decline in the birth rate and especially in the birth rate of the educated after the fall of the Berlin wall. Nowadays only 5% of those about to graduate from college are parents.

The more educated a Western German mother aged 40 to 75 is, the less likely she is to have a big family.

Isn’t that interesting? The closer to the progressive consensus Germany gets, the more dysgenic the reproduction-patterns get. (Unless the policies of Satan were less eugenic than those of the Commies, but that doesn’t strike me as likely.)

But they may still be useful.

“Le Pen might prevent dysgenics from massive immigration, but will she prevent dysgenics from socialism”

I don’t like very much of FN’s program, but they have potential on the one issue that really matters. Any dysgenics from socialism absolutely pale in comparison to the dysgenics from mass immigration of the sort that is currently occurring.

It’s a difference of an order of magnitude. Low IQ Europeans in “socialist” countries aren’t really having all that many children either. There is research to suggest that fertility may actually be slightly eugenic (rather than dysgenic) in some of the Scandinavian countries. Jayman quotes a fertility rate of 1.9 for educated Danish women vs 2.0 for less educated Danish women here:

http://jaymans.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/a-success-story/

But even if we assume some dysgenics from socialism are occurring, it’s a rather slow process and it is difficult to imagine how anything can be done about it, until the whole thing ends.

On the other hand, HBD tells us that the dysgenic impact of the kind of mass immigration that is occurring in France is absolutely cataclysmic. To the point where there won’t be much worth saving if current trends continue for long enough.

And there may be some potential for change on this issue, although it’s a long shot.

So, you should be cheering for the victory of Ethno-Communism in Europe because it could dramatically alter the genetic stock that will be available in the future. In a few hundred years when progressivism has collapsed and techno-commercialism rules the world, techno-commercialist overlords might be able to do something useful with the current genetic stock of Europe. But they won’t be able to get much use out of the current genetic stock of say North Africa. 85 IQ hominids are likely to be pretty much obsolete. And it’s possible that the genetic stock of Europe will start looking a lot more like that of North Africa… if current trends continue.

Ethno-Communism may not be optimization for intelligence but it has the potential to dramatically reduce the destruction of existing forms of intelligence. And it’s happening right now.

The last was a White girl, about 1 9, a bit flabby but still pretty. The shootings had calmed her down enough so that she was no longer
screaming, “Racist pigs!” at the soldiers, but when the preparations for her hanging shortly thereafter awakened her to her own fate,
she became hysterical. Informed that she was about to pay the price for defiling her race by living with a Black lover, the girl wailed,
“But why me?”

As the rope was knotted around her neck, she blubbered out, “I was only doing what everyone else was. Why are you picking on me?
It’s not fair! What about Helen? She was sleeping with him too.” At this last outcry before the girl’s breath was cut off forever, one of
the other girls (presumably Helen) in the group of now-silent spectators on the lawn shrank back in terror.

Of course, no one answered the girl’s question, “Why me?” The answer is simply that her name happened to be on our list and
Helen’s didn’t. There’s nothing “fair” about that-or unfair either. The girl who was hanged deserved what she got. Helen probably
deserves the same fate-and she is undoubtedly suffering the torments of the damned now, in fear that she eventually will be found
out and forced to pay the price her friend did.

This little episode has taught me something about political terror. Its very arbitrariness and unpredictability are important aspects of its
effectiveness. There are a great many people in Helen’s situation, whose fear that lightning may strike them at any moment will keep
them walking on eggs.

The melancholy aspect of the episode is epitomized in the girl’s lament, “I was only doing what everyone else was.” That is a bit of an
exaggeration, but it is true enough that had others not set a bad example for her the girl probably would not have become a race-
criminal. She paid as much for the sins of others as for her own. Now I realize more than ever before how essential it is that we instill
in all our people a new moral basis, a new set of fundamental values, so that they will no longer be morally adrift like that unfortunate
girl was-and like the great majority of Americans today are.

This total lack of any healthy or natural morality was brought home to me again just before noon. We were hanging a group of about
40 land developers and real estate brokers outside the offices of the Los Angeles County Fair Housing Association. They had all
participated in a special program which made lower mortgage rates available for racially mixed families buying homes in
predominantly White neighborhoods. One of the realtors was a sturdy, handsome fellow of about 35 with a blond crew cut. He was
vehemently defending himself: “Hell, I never agreed with any of this race-mixing crap. It makes me sick to my stomach to see these
mixed families with their mongrel brats. But a man has to earn a living. I was told by the head building inspector in the county that it
would be a lot easier to avoid building-code violations for those realtors who went along with the special mortgage program.”

Without realizing it, he was telling us that a bigger income came before racial loyalty in his set of values-something which is
unfortunately true also of a great many who were not hanged today. Well, he made his choice freely, and he hardly deserves any
sympathy.

The soldiers didn’t argue with him, of course. When his turn came, he was jerked off his feet with the same impartiality they had
shown toward those who had accepted their fate in silence. They were under orders not to argue with anyone or to explain anything,
except a brief statement of the offense for which a person was being hanged. Not even the most convincing protestations of
innocence or that “there must be some mistake” caused them to hesitate for an instant. Certainly, we must have made some
mistakes today – mistaken identities, wrong addresses, false accusations-but once the executions began there was no admitting to
the possibility of mistakes. We deliberately created the image of inexorability in the public mind.

And apparently we were quite convincing. Our execution squads were hardly back in their barracks this afternoon when we began
receiving reports from all over the city of what appeared to be a sudden wave of murders and beatings. Corpses, most of them
showing stab wounds, were being found on sidewalks, in alleys, and in apartment-building hallways. A number of injured persons-
several hundred altogether-were also picked up on the streets by our patrols.

Although there were a few Blacks among these beating and stabbing victims, we quickly determined that the great majority of them
were Jews. All apparently were persons whom our execution squads had missed, but the citizenry had not.

Questioning of several Jews who had been beaten soon revealed that at least some of them had been hiding with Gentile families.
After our proclamations were posted, however, their protectors turned on them and drove them into the streets. Local vigilante groups
armed with knives and clubs had ferreted out others who had not even been on our lists.

So what is NRx anyway? Is it a circlejerk, is it another destined to fail right-wing political movement in a democracy?

Here: https://twitter.com/MikeAnissimov/status/472965056569675776

Even the New Deal is not “properly” leftist to him.
Tells you a lot, really.