<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard Reboot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/</link>
	<description>Involvements with reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C.</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-35066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-35066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;all my friends I met in elementary school&quot;

Correction: I met one in junior high.

And I&#039;d add that my paternal line is a long chain of unchurched heathens, due to being wilderness-dwellers too antisocial for organized religion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;all my friends I met in elementary school&#8221;</p>
<p>Correction: I met one in junior high.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;d add that my paternal line is a long chain of unchurched heathens, due to being wilderness-dwellers too antisocial for organized religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C.</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-35065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-35065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Keeps you busy and gives you hope which you sorely need.&quot;

How so? &quot;Community building&quot; involves meeting new people, which I find enormously taxing (all my friends I met in elementary school).

&quot;NAMs just don’t have the ability to kill all whites even if they wanted to.&quot;

Not yet, but eventually, as white populations shrink, NAM populations grow, and self-hating libs continue to prop up the latter, the NAM advantage in quantity will overcome any advantage in quality.

As to &quot;…if they have chaste women with long hair…&quot;, as a natural celibate, this isn&#039;t really a draw. In addition, with regard &quot;making babies&quot;, I have enough personal and family history with highly-heritable diseases that eugenics says I should &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; be having kids, even if I were interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Keeps you busy and gives you hope which you sorely need.&#8221;</p>
<p>How so? &#8220;Community building&#8221; involves meeting new people, which I find enormously taxing (all my friends I met in elementary school).</p>
<p>&#8220;NAMs just don’t have the ability to kill all whites even if they wanted to.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not yet, but eventually, as white populations shrink, NAM populations grow, and self-hating libs continue to prop up the latter, the NAM advantage in quantity will overcome any advantage in quality.</p>
<p>As to &#8220;…if they have chaste women with long hair…&#8221;, as a natural celibate, this isn&#8217;t really a draw. In addition, with regard &#8220;making babies&#8221;, I have enough personal and family history with highly-heritable diseases that eugenics says I should <em>not</em> be having kids, even if I were interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spandrell</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-34883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spandrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-34883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;“Community building is lots of fun”

How so?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Keeps you busy and gives you hope which you sorely need.

You have far-mode disease, in that you can&#039;t stop focusing on things you can&#039;t actually predict with any accuracy and won&#039;t even probably live long enough to verify. You have to reestablish contact with near mode, and stay there.

And anyway the &quot;white genocide&quot; is way over the top. NAMs just don&#039;t have the ability to kill all whites even if they wanted to. South America has been a mess for centuries; whites still rule supreme. So chill out.
And the best way to make sure that your dear race survives is by making babies! And to maximize that you should build or join a community which focuses in making lots of babies.

The ability to fake beliefs is not a given, it depends a lot in the motivation, expected results and peer pressure in a given community. Faking belief in progressivism probably triggers not only the bullshit sensors in your brain, it also triggers your sanctity of civilization sensors, disgust to homos, NAMs, feminists and brutalist art, etc. You might find a religious cult to have retarded beliefs, but if they have chaste women with long hair and pretty houses you might find it quite tolerable.

Anyway don&#039;t take my word for it, just give it some thinking. Life is about doing stuff, might as well keep busy doing something you think is good. Going online to make everyone pissed talking about how we&#039;re DOOMED, DOOMED I TELL YA is not good.


And please the whole point about the etymology of Reactionary is boring as fuck. We know, we know. You might as well go complain that Progressive ecologists who demand deindustralization are actually against progress! Welcome to polysemy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Community building is lots of fun”</p>
<p>How so?</p></blockquote>
<p>Keeps you busy and gives you hope which you sorely need.</p>
<p>You have far-mode disease, in that you can&#8217;t stop focusing on things you can&#8217;t actually predict with any accuracy and won&#8217;t even probably live long enough to verify. You have to reestablish contact with near mode, and stay there.</p>
<p>And anyway the &#8220;white genocide&#8221; is way over the top. NAMs just don&#8217;t have the ability to kill all whites even if they wanted to. South America has been a mess for centuries; whites still rule supreme. So chill out.<br />
And the best way to make sure that your dear race survives is by making babies! And to maximize that you should build or join a community which focuses in making lots of babies.</p>
<p>The ability to fake beliefs is not a given, it depends a lot in the motivation, expected results and peer pressure in a given community. Faking belief in progressivism probably triggers not only the bullshit sensors in your brain, it also triggers your sanctity of civilization sensors, disgust to homos, NAMs, feminists and brutalist art, etc. You might find a religious cult to have retarded beliefs, but if they have chaste women with long hair and pretty houses you might find it quite tolerable.</p>
<p>Anyway don&#8217;t take my word for it, just give it some thinking. Life is about doing stuff, might as well keep busy doing something you think is good. Going online to make everyone pissed talking about how we&#8217;re DOOMED, DOOMED I TELL YA is not good.</p>
<p>And please the whole point about the etymology of Reactionary is boring as fuck. We know, we know. You might as well go complain that Progressive ecologists who demand deindustralization are actually against progress! Welcome to polysemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C.</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-34872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-34872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Find a small Amish-ish religious group which might be self-sufficient after the Collapse.&quot;

I see at least three problems.

1.) First, this assumes that any such group will survive to and through the collapse. I think that, for example, the Amish&#039;s days are numbered. Consider how the media, with things like &quot;Amish Mafia&quot;, have been working to shift perception of the Amish and similar groups from &quot;quaint and funny&quot;, to dangerous, fanatical, and un-Diverse. Add in increasing chatter in legal circles about how Wisconsin v. Yoder was wrongly-decided and is ripe to be overturned; as well as the first steps being taken (&quot;Teddy&#039;s Law&quot; proposed in Ohio) towards restricting homeschooling (likely with an eye to eliminating it), I expect it&#039;s only a matter of time.

And even if they withstand that, the collapse means the current &quot;soft&quot; genocide of whites becoming hard, and given demographic trends, I expect the numerical superiority of the third-world hordes to be sufficiently large to make the extinction of whites likely.


2.) The Groucho problem: the question stands whether any such group worthy of joining would have one.


3.) Joining such groups means either sharing their beliefs or being able to effectively fake it; and if one could fake belief in Amish Christianity, then couldn&#039;t one fake belief in Progressivism instead, to much greater personal benefit?


And isn&#039;t all this dependent on the collapse occurring in our lifetimes? I fully expect the Cathedral to continue dominating and expanding, with consequent dysgenic breeding and consumption of irreplacable civilizational &quot;seed corn&quot;, until well after I&#039;m dead.


&quot;Community building is lots of fun&quot;

How so?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Find a small Amish-ish religious group which might be self-sufficient after the Collapse.&#8221;</p>
<p>I see at least three problems.</p>
<p>1.) First, this assumes that any such group will survive to and through the collapse. I think that, for example, the Amish&#8217;s days are numbered. Consider how the media, with things like &#8220;Amish Mafia&#8221;, have been working to shift perception of the Amish and similar groups from &#8220;quaint and funny&#8221;, to dangerous, fanatical, and un-Diverse. Add in increasing chatter in legal circles about how Wisconsin v. Yoder was wrongly-decided and is ripe to be overturned; as well as the first steps being taken (&#8220;Teddy&#8217;s Law&#8221; proposed in Ohio) towards restricting homeschooling (likely with an eye to eliminating it), I expect it&#8217;s only a matter of time.</p>
<p>And even if they withstand that, the collapse means the current &#8220;soft&#8221; genocide of whites becoming hard, and given demographic trends, I expect the numerical superiority of the third-world hordes to be sufficiently large to make the extinction of whites likely.</p>
<p>2.) The Groucho problem: the question stands whether any such group worthy of joining would have one.</p>
<p>3.) Joining such groups means either sharing their beliefs or being able to effectively fake it; and if one could fake belief in Amish Christianity, then couldn&#8217;t one fake belief in Progressivism instead, to much greater personal benefit?</p>
<p>And isn&#8217;t all this dependent on the collapse occurring in our lifetimes? I fully expect the Cathedral to continue dominating and expanding, with consequent dysgenic breeding and consumption of irreplacable civilizational &#8220;seed corn&#8221;, until well after I&#8217;m dead.</p>
<p>&#8220;Community building is lots of fun&#8221;</p>
<p>How so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-34855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alrenous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-34855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[0 is full, 1 is empty. Imagine grasping either. 0 is large, 1 is small. It allows you to strip an entire abstraction layer out of your thoughts. The meaning of the symbols is irrelevant, they become their shapes. 

See also &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouba/kiki_effect&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bouba/kiki&lt;/a&gt;. Why fight it when you can go with the flow?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0 is full, 1 is empty. Imagine grasping either. 0 is large, 1 is small. It allows you to strip an entire abstraction layer out of your thoughts. The meaning of the symbols is irrelevant, they become their shapes. </p>
<p>See also <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouba/kiki_effect" rel="nofollow">bouba/kiki</a>. Why fight it when you can go with the flow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VXXC</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-34847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VXXC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-34847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laying down and dying is best a private affair.  Ahem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laying down and dying is best a private affair.  Ahem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deogolwulf</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-34845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deogolwulf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-34845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Misunderstanding logical fallacies makes you stupider than if you had never heard of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Misunderstanding logical fallacies makes you stupider than if you had never heard of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deogolwulf</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-34844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deogolwulf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-34844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you interpret &lt;i&gt;not putting hope in technology&lt;/i&gt; as meaning &lt;i&gt;being without hope&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;being in despair&lt;/i&gt;, then it reveals where you have — absurdly — put all your hope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you interpret <i>not putting hope in technology</i> as meaning <i>being without hope</i>, <i>being in despair</i>, then it reveals where you have — absurdly — put all your hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James James</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-34842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-34842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;@Alrenous&lt;/strong&gt; &quot;Why is 1 intuitively ‘no’ and 0 intuitively ‘yes?’ This I can answer.&quot; 

Could you explain? I&#039;m capable of reading &quot;0&quot; as success and &quot;1&quot; as failure in one context (return values at a command prompt), but 0 as false and 1 as true when compiling truth tables / electronics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Alrenous</strong> &#8220;Why is 1 intuitively ‘no’ and 0 intuitively ‘yes?’ This I can answer.&#8221; </p>
<p>Could you explain? I&#8217;m capable of reading &#8220;0&#8221; as success and &#8220;1&#8221; as failure in one context (return values at a command prompt), but 0 as false and 1 as true when compiling truth tables / electronics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ademonos</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/reboot/#comment-34835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ademonos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=2128#comment-34835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it in this case, though? You might want to revisit your definitions of &#039;reactionary&#039;. Hint: reactionaries do not (or shouldn&#039;t, at least) like progress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it in this case, though? You might want to revisit your definitions of &#8216;reactionary&#8217;. Hint: reactionaries do not (or shouldn&#8217;t, at least) like progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
