Sentences (#90)

Mencken (cited here):

At the bottom of Puritanism one finds envy of the fellow who is having a better time in the world. At the bottom of democracy one finds the same thing. This is why all Puritans are democrats and all democrats are Puritans.

February 9, 2017admin 42 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Religion

TAGGED WITH : , , ,

42 Responses to this entry

  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    1517
    The beginning of the Reformation is signalled by Martin Luther posting his 95 theses on the door of the Palast Church in Wittenberg.

    1518
    Foundation of the Royal College of Physicians, the first scientific organization in Britain.

    1516
    Birth of Mary, daughter of Henry VIII. Publication of “Utopia” by Sir Thomas More. Birth of Gesner (1516-1565), naturalist and zoologist. Ariosto’s “Orlando Furioso” performed. Deaths of the artists Bellini (1428-1516) and Bosch (1450-1516).

    1577
    Dee commences his diary (entries in Stadius’ Ephemeris and later in Maginus’ Ephemerides coelestium motuum – now Bodleian Mss Ashmole 487 and 488). The diary continues to give an account of his life until 1601. Publication of Dee’s General and Rare Memorials Pertayning to the Perfect Art of Naviation (see Bodleian Ms Ashmole 1789, ff.50-115). This contains the first use of the phrase “British Empire”.

    1627
    New Atlantis is an incomplete utopian novel by Sir Francis Bacon

    ▬▬▬

    Milovan Djilas (1911 – 20 April 1995)), one of the best-known exposers of communism, stated in an interview for the German magazine Der Spiegel (also published in the Swedish daily newspaper Svenska Dagbladet, 13th April 1983) that he believed the idea of communism had evolved from the culture of the West, from Judaism, from the Utopian philosophy, from Christianity and the medieval sects. …
    When the Northern (and poorer) half of Sweden suffered from famine at the end of the nineteenth century, the Bishop of Harnosand refused to distribute supplies among the people lest they got the idea that they were entitled to anything for free; it was better the congregation starved to death. (Dagens Nyheter, 24th December 1989.)
    Communists are infamous for causing mass famine by confiscating all of the peasants’ grain. They nationalised the peasants’ land to make them dependent on the state. Both Christians and communists confiscated the lands and possessions of their most dangerous “enemies”.
    The Roman emperor Gaius Julius Caesar (100-44 B. C.) did the opposite by buying land himself and giving it away to his soldiers to make them independent of the state.
    In the 1920s, Soviet ideologues held up the “communist state” founded by Johannes Bockelson in Munster in 1534 as an example. A group of fanatical Anabaptists led by Johannes Bockelson seized power in Minister, Westphalia on the 23rd of February 1534, where they proclaimed the Miinster commune, also called “New Jerusalem”. This commune became the abode of extreme ruthlessness.
    Three days after the seizure of power, the first leader of the commune, Jan Matthijs, expelled all those who were not ready to accept their beliefs. Later, the leadership passed over to the baptised Jew, Johann Leiden, who proclaimed himself king of New Zion (Miinster), and the town council was replaced by a council of twelve apostles. They confiscated the property of the church and the wealth of those who had fled. They banned trade, enforced work duty and abolished money. Everything was to be owned collectively – the people were only allowed to keep their tools – all the produce was confiscated by the commune and polygamy was introduced. This community was intended to become the “thousand year reign of peace” (the Millennium). Evil reigned in Miinster for sixteen months before the Bishop’s troops arrived on the 25th of June 1535 and executed all the leaders of the commune. Later, the Baptists and the Mennonites arose from the ideology of the Anabaptists. The Anabaptists also took part in the peasant uprising and incited the poor to revolt in several cities in Germany and Holland.
    The Soviet propagandists were particularly impressed by the political terror, which was the basis of the Anabaptist tactics. Both Joseph Stalin and Felix Dzerzhinsky were to have been ordained as priests, and had examples at hand. In the 1930s, Stalin began to officially compare the communist party with the Teutonic Knights of the Sword (Fratres Militiae Christi) from the 13th century.
    Descriptions of similar events from an even earlier date can also be found. The Brothers of the Apostles, led by the fanatical Fra Dolcino, seized power in Vercelli, northern Italy, in the early 1300s. Only poverty seemed righteous to them, and so they killed every rich person in the city. The terrorist regime of the Brothers of the Apostles lasted three years, from 1304 to 1307. They did not achieve any form of social equality.
    The roots of communism can also be found in the book “The Prince”, written by Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) who was the secretary of the Council of Ten in the republic of Florence. The book presents techniques of cynical manipulation and falsehood to support an unlimited dictatorship. It was published after his death, in 1532.
    A Soviet joke goes: “The Christians only preached the advantages of poverty, the communists enforced them.”
    The similarities between the histories of communism and Christianity are sometimes shocking. Bolshevik leaders did not shy away from killing nine innocent people if the tenth victim would be a true opponent. Crusaders occupied the French town Beziers in the year 1208, and their leader, Arnold Amalric, a baptised Jew, gave an order typical of that time: “Kill everyone – God will recognise his own!”
    When the Cheka’s (political police’s) chief, Felix Dzerzhinsky reported to Lenin in the summer of 1918 that five hundred intellectuals (scientists and cultural figures) had been executed, Lenin became ecstatic.
    When Pope Gregory XIII learned that 60 000 Huguenots had been murdered as heretics on the 24th-26th of August 1572, he was similarly elated and held a great feast, conducted a church service, and even minted a new coin to celebrate the massacre. This information comes from Buchwald’s book “The History of the Church”.
    In 1198, the church established a commission to persecute and try heretics. This later developed into the Holy Inquisition. In 1483, Tomas Torquemada (1420-1498), a Marrano (baptised Jew), was appointed Grand Inquisitor of Castilia and Aragon. In 1492, he expelled all Jews who refused to become Marranos.
    Torquemada worked intensively for 18 years and burned people at the stake. He is said to have executed many children personally. Symbolic straw dolls were burned in lieu of those who had been charged in absentia. Many people were imprisoned for life, and Torquemada sent thousands to the galleys.
    This Grand Inquisitor made torture an efficient tool: certain parts of the body were burned, certain parts had nails hammered through them, certain chosen victims were flayed alive. In order to secure their possessions, he accused other Marranos of faking their allegiance to Christianity. Another Marrano, Isaac Abrabael, controlled Spanish finances at the time.
    In December 1917, a special commission for dealing with counterrevolutionaries was set up in Petrograd. This organisation was called the Cheka in Soviet Russia, and was especially infamous under its subsequent abbreviations – OGPU, NKVD, and lastly as the KGB.
    The Inquisition encouraged children to betray their “heretical” parents and married couples to hand each other in. Each informer was paid four silver marks. The Soviet officials encouraged a similar type of betrayal.
    There are still more similarities between institutions of the Bolsheviks, the Roman Catholic Church, and the freemasons. High church figures had commissars bearing letters authorising them to exercise the authority of their masters. Similar officials were used in connection with the so-called French revolution and also by the Bolsheviks.
    The spies used by the church and the Inquisition were called the Militia of Christ; the law-enforcement and reconnaissance organs of the communist dictators were called the People’s Militia. The Soviet system had a hierarchy of councils, or Soviets as they were known, of which only the highest, the Supreme Soviet, had the right of pardon – a system reminiscent of the Judaic kahal. …
    Both the communists and the Christians have practised a dreadful barbarism against opponents. After the crusaders reached the river Carnascio on the 23rd of March 1307, they imprisoned the leader of the Brothers of the Apostle, Fra Dolcino, after first destroying his army of a thousand men. He was horribly tortured and then executed on June 1st, 1307. For an entire day he was paraded through the streets of Vercelli in a wagon, whilst pieces of his body were ripped off with a pair of red-hot tongs. His shoulders apparently shuddered a little when they tore off his nose, but he had kept silent the rest of the time.
    Lenin and Stalin showed similar sadism when they liquidated their opponents.
    Both the Christians and the communists have knowingly employed criminals. In 1095, Pope Urban II Clermonti released murderers, thieves and other criminals so that they might take part in the crusade in 1096. On their way through Europe, these villains plundered all they could. (Mikhail Sheinman, “Paavstlus” / “The Papacy”, Tallinn, 1963, p. 32.) The Bolshevik leader Leon Trotsky released criminals to terrorise the population. Mao Zedong did the same.
    The religion of Marxism had roots in Christianity. As Bertrand Russell
    pointed out:
    Yahweh = dialectical Marxism.
    The Messiah = Marx.
    The Chosen ones = the proletariat.
    The church = the communist party.
    The Second Coming of Christ = the revolution.
    Hell = punishment of the capitalists.
    The millennium or thousand year reign of peace = communism.
    The Bolsheviks had their own ten commandments [planks] and, like the church, they also mocked their opponents.
    The totalitarianism of the church belongs to the past but if the church should ever regain its former power, its atrocities would probably be repeated. The Jesuit historian Luigi Ciccutini believed in 1950 that the church had the divine right to judge and intervene in any matter whatsoever. He claims that the church was justified in burning Filippo Giordano Bruno at the stake in February 1600.
    A similar danger awaits us if the communists (with the help of the financial elite) [e.g. Soros & BLM] should ever grow strong again. After all their atrocities, we should ignore their pretty slogans.
    One can characterise both Christianity and communism as extremely anti-cultural ideologies, both of which persecuted leading cultural figures. Both have impeded the free development of science. Due to the reactionary attitude of the church, many truths, scientific, religious and esoteric, have still not been accepted.
    One of the worst crimes of Christianity was the arson ordered by the patriarch Theophilus, which led to the complete destruction of the ancient world’s largest library in the Serapis temple of Alexandria in A. D. 391. The root of this crime was the church’s hatred and intolerance of knowledge springing from classical pagan Greco-Roman culture. Another example is the murder of the female philosopher and mathematician Hypatia in Alexandria in A. D. 415.
    The communists also burned books and persecuted cultural figures. They even prohibited the conductor’s profession because “the orchestras could play perfectly well without conductors”. Later, seeing that their orchestras could not manage without their leaders, the communists had to change their tune. [The Church banned music at festivals, marriages, etc.]
    Pope Leo X (1513-1521) believed it right and proper to use the “wonderful fairy tale about Jesus Christ which has given us so many advantages”, as he stood upon the festive board and raised his glass. (Henry T. Laurency, “Livskunskap Fyra”, Skovde, 1995, p. 179.)
    Moses Hess, one of the most important founders of communist ideology, believed communism to be a perfect lie to spread destruction with. (Moses Hess, “Correspondence” / “Briefwechsel”, The Hague, 1959.)
    ….
    Despite the fact that none were allowed to leave the Soviet communist party without retribution, it still collapsed when thousands of people began to leave this criminal institution in 1990. In August 1991, after the Communist party attempted to overthrow Gorbachev’s reforms, the Russian president Boris Yeltsin made the communist party illegal, just as the National Socialist (Nazi) Party was outlawed after the Second World War. Life itself forced them to repudiate their primitive and unreal dialectical materialism as an infallible dogma, to part with the “holy” book “Das Kapital”, and the “prophets” — Lenin, Mao, and other massmurderers. These worshippers of violence still have their “holy shrine” — Lenin’s Mausoleum — but sooner or later they will come to realise that their Messiah, Marx, is as dead as his ism.
    But the most troubling and challenging question still remains — will we be able to perceive the new incarnations of this evil? [Yes.]

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 9th, 2017 at 11:35 am Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    valid singular connection point, more then that a bit exaggerated. otherwise it is also would be possible to say: – because bottom of monkey and humans almost the same, all monkey are human and all humans are monkey. not all, just few, so exaggerated.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    >lowest common denominator equalism

    ‘What is the question now placed before society with the glib assurance which to me is most astonishing? That question is this: Is man an ape or an angel? I, my lord, I am on the side of the angels. I repudiate with indignation and abhorrence those new fangled theories.’

    Benjamin Disraeli, 1st Earl of Beaconsfield — took here an hyperstitional stance, to project us higher. Monkey may be our bottom, or worse than monkey indeed, but this is our future: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsIQ_kA77b4

    Angelique

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    A ga maeba, kuwashime yoinikeri
    Because I had danced, the beautiful lady was enchanted
    A ga maeba, terutsuki toyomunari
    Because I had danced, the shining moon echoed

    Toh kami, emi tame
    The distant god may give us the precious blessing!
    Toh kami, emi tame
    The distant god may give us the precious blessing!
    Toh kami, emi tame
    The distant god may give us the precious blessing!

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    HAarlem VEnison: — MacDonald’s analysis of Jews is extremely biased from the get-go. You could make the same argument about whites playing both sides. Moreover, It is inevitable that a class of people emerge who allocate material and psychosocial resources across national borders. Jews just happened to fall into this role. Moreover, they are neither monolithic nor homogenous. Moreover morever, if we stop objectifying and othering them, we could convince them to adjust their arrangements of the world such that we get are grievances addressed, and get equality which we currently are denied.

    Lastly, re: Spencer, I’ve only ever listened to a couple of his podcasts. That said, he is clearly blundering through the role that the MSM has ascribed to him, utterly clueless about what he’s doing, playign into their narrative. Flirting with fascism, admitting the futility of solving our grievances peacefully, and advocating ethnic cleansing are STOOPID things to say

    Yeah, but we can frame our entire struggle within the logic of reform Judaism (which is basically teh same as liberal, secular humanism, enlightenment values)
    Jews are allies waiting to be made. It’s no surprise that our closest allies in academia are Jews
    Hostem Populi replies:
    Basically the Moldbug argument.
    HAarlem VEnison: — Moldbug is mostly right on that point, but he is wrong in thinking that we have to do what the Jews did when their temples got destroyed, going underground and slowly, secretly taking control of the flow of information and capital, etc
    Hostem Populi: He tried to avoid the JQ, but he admitted that the Puritan memeplex co-opted them. I argue that the Puritan poision was just accelerated by them.
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    ▬ said Harlem Venison of https://acidright.wordpress.com/
    and https://twitter.com/hostempopuli
    ▬▬▬

    I, G. Eiríksson, would however in the current state of theory development transmit the following cognosations : Jews and Christians co-fertilised each other. Originally Christians were “Jews,” « Jewish Christians, also Hebrew Christians or Judeo-Christians, were the original members of the Jewish movement that later became Christianity. The split of early Christianity and Judaism took place during the first centuries of the Common Era ». (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Christian, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_of_early_Christianity_and_Judaism) Jews qua Judaism (aside from alchemists-mystics-occultists) however kept conservative until Protestants (Puritans, etc) fertililsed Cathedralisation/Modernisation in them : e.g. « Reform Judaism, also known as Liberal or Progressive Judaism. Originally formed in Germany as a reaction to modernity ». Cathedralised/Modernised  Jews, along with Protestants or, perhaps rather post-Protestants, experimented further, thus aitiologising Communisim.

    All are etiologised by feminist trends in the Catholic Church, such as the sentimentalisation cogenetic with the cult of Courtly Love in the 12th century, which itself is derived from the Semitic strain known as Islam : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtly_love#Andalusian_and_Islamic_influence

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 9th, 2017 at 11:50 am Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    Standard herd dynamics, except that in my view, they do not resent the “good time” but “good fortune” of others.

    [Reply]

    Son_of_olorus Reply:

    ~communism distilled, is it any wonder that in an attempt to bring down those who are superior to them by bringing about a new social organisation- that they make an inferior society compared to the previous one- they fear the great man, the virtuous man(in its classical def) because it puts them in contrast and everyone can see for what they are- so there is always this psychologically need of either becoming their anima, their conscious ideal of self or embrace the shadow and embrace the latter behavior- and usually this is taken and its easier on oneself- no need to think about ones shortcoming, no need to actually improve, therefore nothing great comes about-but they have to get rid of there betters so they are not reminded.

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 9th, 2017 at 11:56 am Reply | Quote
  • Alrenous Says:

    http://alrenous.blogspot.com/2016/06/philosophymagic-in-demotism.html

    Demotism is based on envy. […] Envy is what makes it go, but there’s no such thing as a sociological muffler.

    […]

    However, we are all equal if and only if we are all dead.

    [Reply]

    Son_of_olorus Reply:

    envy- is a psychological disposition and so influences behavior- i’ve always found NRx lacking in the psychology department- been on a jordan peterson roll recently – quite enlightening.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    psychology becoming cognitive science nowaday. the reason to stay away, is quite obviouse, all this science is politicised utter BS. what worring me (honestly) is that human intelligence becoming irrelevant and invisible in current reality. most people do not have any idea how huge advancement AI done for last 9 years. it.

    here is index of content from
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WITH UNCERTAINTY
    Deyi Li and Yi Du
    Tsinghua University Beijing, China 2008

    Chapter 3 On Uncertainties of Knowledge ………………………………………………..43
    3.1 On Randomness …………………………………………………………………………………43
    3.1.1 The Objectivity of Randomness ………………………………………………. 43
    3.1.2 The Beauty of Randomness………………………………………………………46
    3.2 On Fuzziness……………………………………………………………………………………..47
    3.2.1 The Objectivity of Fuzziness…………………………………………………….48
    3.2.2 The Beauty of Fuzziness ………………………………………………………….49
    3.3 Uncertainties in Natural Languages ……………………………………………………..51
    3.3.1 Languages as the Carrier of Human Knowledge…………………………51
    3.3.2 Uncertainties in Languages……………………………………………………….52
    3.4 Uncertainties in Commonsense Knowledge…………………………………………..54
    3.4.1 Common Understanding about Common Sense ………………………….54
    3.4.2 Relativity of Commonsense Knowledge …………………………………….55
    3.5 Other Uncertainties of Knowledge……………………………………………………….57
    3.5.1 Incompleteness of Knowledge…………………………………………………..57
    3.5.2 Incoordination of Knowledge ……………………………………………………58
    3.5.3 Impermanence of Knowledge……………………………………………………58
    References………………………………………………………………………………………………….60
    Chapter 4 Mathematical Foundation of AI with Uncertainty ……………………….61
    4.1 Probability Theory ……………………………………………………………………………..61
    4.1.1 Bayes’ Theorem ………………………………………………………………………62
    4.1.1.1 Relationship and Logical Operation
    of Random Event……………………………………………………….62
    4.1.1.2 Axiomization Definition of Probability ………………………..63
    4.1.1.3 Conditional Probability and Bayes’ Theorem………………..64
    4.1.2 Probability Distribution Function ………………………………………………65
    4.1.3 Normal Distribution …………………………………………………………………67
    4.1.3.1 The Definition and Properties
    of Normal Distribution ……………………………………………….67
    4.1.3.2 Multidimensional Normal Distribution …………………………69
    4.1.4 Laws of Large Numbers and Central Limit Theorem…………………..70
    4.1.4.1 Laws of Large Numbers……………………………………………..70
    4.1.4.2 Central Limit Theorem……………………………………………….71
    4.1.5 Power Law Distribution……………………………………………………………73
    4.1.6 Entropy…………………………………………………………………………………..74
    4.2 Fuzzy Set Theory……………………………………………………………………………….76
    4.2.1 Membership Degree and Membership Function………………………….76
    4.2.2 Decomposition Theorem and Expanded Principle……………………….78
    4.2.3 Fuzzy Relation ………………………………………………………………………..79
    4.2.4 Possibility Measure………………………………………………………………….81
    Rough Set Theory ………………………………………………………………………………81
    4.3.1 Imprecise Category and Rough Set……………………………………………82
    4.3.2 Characteristics of Rough Sets……………………………………………………84
    4.3.3 Rough Relations………………………………………………………………………86
    4.4 Chaos and Fractal……………………………………………………………………………….89
    4.4.1 Basic Characteristics of Chaos ………………………………………………….90
    4.4.2 Strange Attractors of Chaos………………………………………………………92
    4.4.3 Geometric Characteristics of Chaos and Fractal………………………….93
    4.5 Kernel Functions and Principal Curves…………………………………………………94
    4.5.1 Kernel Functions ……………………………………………………………………..94
    4.5.2 Support Vector Machine……………………………………………………………97
    4.5.3 Principal Curves…………………………………………………………………….100
    References………………………………………………………………………………………………..104
    Chapter 5 Qualitative and Quantitative Transform
    Model — Cloud Model ………………………………………………………….107
    5.1 Perspectives on the Study of AI with Uncertainty………………………………..107
    5.1.1 Multiple Perspectives on the Study
    of Human Intelligence ……………………………………………………………107
    5.1.2 The Importance of Concepts in Natural Languages …………………..110
    5.1.3 The Relationship between Randomness and Fuzziness
    in a Concept ………………………………………………………………………….110
    5.2 Representing Concepts Using Cloud Models……………………………………….112
    5.2.1 Cloud and Cloud Drop……………………………………………………………112
    5.2.2 Numerical Characteristics of Cloud …………………………………………113
    5.2.3 Types of Cloud Model ……………………………………………………………115
    5.3 Normal Cloud Generator …………………………………………………………………..118
    5.3.1 Forward Cloud Generator ……………………………………………………….118
    5.3.2 Contributions of Cloud Drops to a Concept ……………………………..123
    5.3.3 Understanding the Lunar Calendar’s Solar Terms
    through Cloud Models ……………………………………………………………124
    5.3.4 Backward Cloud Generator …………………………………………………….125
    5.3.5 Precision Analysis of Backward Cloud Generator……………………..132
    5.3.6 More on Understanding Normal Cloud Model………………………….133
    5.4 Mathematical Properties of Normal Cloud ………………………………………….138
    5.4.1 Statistical Analysis of the Cloud Drops’ Distribution…………………138
    5.4.2Statistical Analysis of the Cloud Drops’
    Certainty Degree ……………………………………………………………………140
    5.4.3 Expectation Curves of Normal Cloud ………………………………………142
    5.5 On the Pervasiveness of the Normal Cloud Model……………………………….144
    5.5.1 Pervasiveness of Normal Distribution ………………………………………144
    5.5.2 Pervasiveness of Bell Membership Function …………………………….145
    5.5.3 Significance of Normal Cloud…………………………………………………148
    References………………………………………………………………………………………………..150
    Chapter 6 Discovering Knowledge with Uncertainty
    through Methodologies in Physics …………………………………………..153
    6.1 From Perception of Physical World to Perception of Human Self …………153
    6.1.1 Expressing Concepts by Using Atom Models……………………………154
    6.1.2 Describing Interaction between Objects by Using Field …………….155
    6.1.3 Describing Hierarchical Structure of Knowledge
    by Using Granularity ……………………………………………………………..156
    6.2 Data Field………………………………………………………………………………………..158
    6.2.1 From Physical Field to Data Field …………………………………………..158
    6.2.2 Potential Field and Force Field of Data……………………………………160
    6.2.3 Influence Coefficient Optimization of Field Function ………………..172
    6.2.4 Data Field and Visual Thinking Simulation………………………………178
    6.3 Uncertainty in Concept Hierarchy………………………………………………………182
    6.3.1 Discretization of Continuous Data …………………………………………..183
    6.3.2 Virtual Pan Concept Tree………………………………………………………..186
    6.3.3 Climbing-Up Strategy and Algorithms……………………………………..188
    6.4 Knowledge Discovery State Space……………………………………………………..196
    6.4.1 Three Kinds of State Spaces……………………………………………………196
    6.4.2 State Space Transformation …………………………………………………….197
    6.4.3 Major Operations in State Space Transformation………………………199
    References………………………………………………………………………………………………..200
    Chapter 7 Data Mining for Discovering Knowledge with Uncertainty………..201
    7.1 Uncertainty in Data Mining……………………………………………………………….201
    7.1.1 Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery …………………………………..201
    7.1.2 Uncertainty in Data Mining Process ………………………………………..202
    7.1.3 Uncertainty in Discovered Knowledge……………………………………..204
    7.2 Classification and Clustering with Uncertainty…………………………………….205
    7.2.1 Cloud Classification ……………………………………………………………….206
    7.2.2 Clustering Based on Data Field……………………………………………….213
    7.2.3 Outlier Detection and Discovery Based on Data Field……………….238
    7.3 Discovery of Association Rules with Uncertainty ………………………………..244
    7.3.1 Reconsideration of the Traditional Association Rules ………………..244
    7.3.2 Association Rule Mining and Forecasting ………………………………..247
    7.4 Time Series Data Mining and Forecasting…………………………………………..253
    7.4.1 Time Series Data Mining Based on Cloud Models ……………………255
    7.4.2 Stock Data Forecasting …………………………………………………………..256
    References………………………………………………………………………………………………..269

    that is 2008, what is now nobody knows. it is like drowning in a swamp surrounded by skyscrapers. swamp is for us.

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 9th, 2017 at 12:07 pm Reply | Quote
  • collen ryan Says:

    So what exactly are George Soros Bill Clinton Bill Gates Lloyd Blankfein Prince Charles Meryl Streep Envious of?

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    They empathize with the envious and help close the gap between the high and the low.

    [Reply]

    vitis Reply:

    virtue

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 9th, 2017 at 3:57 pm Reply | Quote
  • vxxc2014 Says:

    Bullshit. Envy is not confined to any particular political system nor is envy only given vent in democracy.

    Democracy was the armed Infantry of the Greeks given 1 share of power for fighting. Since then to now Democracy is Infantry or Looting, in 2500 years none have found another way.

    We’re at the end of the looting-and it was democracy that gave us Brexit, Trump, Orban, Poland- even PUTIN and may give us LePen and even hope for Germany, Austria.

    Having said that – I’m not religious about politics. One system may be as good or bad as the others but this is what we have to work with and I’m practical. Increasingly and suddenly democracy is becoming practical as well.

    [Reply]

    Aeroguy Reply:

    I’m surprised you would conflate the governments of Sparta and Athens. Sparta was indeed ruled by infantry, but certainly not a democracy, Plato called it a Timocracy. It’s worth reviewing the general types of government from Plato’s point of view (from best to worst), Aristocracy, Timocracy, Oligarchy, Democracy, and Tyranny (thus why we are taught that the world is made up only of a sliding scale from Democracy to Tyranny). Also of note something you’ll probably find agreeable about Plato, he was less concerned with the structure of each gov rather focusing on the sort of Man each was ruled by. http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.9.viii.html

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Democracy was the armed Infantry of the Greeks given 1 share of power for fighting.

    People know that as military rule, nowadays. They know the system from the French Revolution as democracy.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_rule

    It´s best not to try to needlessly contravene. Incidentally, ‘demos’ derives from root ‘*da- “to divide” (see tide). — which is what ‘reactionaries’ pointed at the democrats as doing. See also schismatic behavior.

    In the end we always have different configurations of democracy-absolutism. Question is if we have the mandate from good fathers, spiritual or actual, or from women and utopianists-fantasists (Rousseau).

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Bible is called Holy because it has an image of human affairs which repeats itself.

    I.e. a rule who is rebelled against. I.e. Lucifer vs. God. « And there was war in Heaven … Michael and his angels fought …». And God won. Even in Heaven there is Gnon.

    So this is the traditional understanding of Heaven. Not unlike Ásatrú.

    The utopianist understanding of Heaven is that of placid peace.

    However if you study the eldest scripture of Buddhism, even

    there is combativeness. Struggle. For autonomy.

    « The “first degree of merit” corresponds to the “conversion”—similar to pabbajja, the “departure” of the ancient Buddhist teaching: a man turns from the outer world toward the inner world. The illuminated, extrasamsaric “I”* is here portrayed as a king to whom one declares allegiance. The second degree of merit is “service”-that is to say, faithfulness and loyalty to this inner sovereign. The third degree is “valor,” what one must show when confronting and combating all opposition to the king. Then there is the “merit of him who cooperates,” due to one who is not simply good at defense and fighting, but who is admitted to the positive government of the state. The final degree of merit: “beyond merit” or “merit that is not merit” (an expression to be understood in the same sense as “acting without acting”) is the degree of the king himself, whose nature one assumes. Here action ceases or, if you prefer, action is manifested in the form of nonaction, of spontaneity. The being and the law are here identical. »

    * This I is the I that I am in the Bible.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Jordan B. Peterson has videos explaining this understanding under titles like « Maps of Meaning: 8 Dwelling on Paradise (TVO) », » Maps of Meaning: 4 Games People Must Play (TVO) » Maps of Meaning: 9 Becoming a Self (TVO) » Maps of Meaning: 6 Submitting to Order (TVO).

    https://youtu.be/I8Xc2_FtpHI

    Kwisatz Haderach Reply:

    The Battle of Agincourt occured on 25 October 1415. It was to be at least four hundred years before the military power of the English yeoman became nominally convertible into a share of power (Reform Act 1832). I think it’s fair to say that the equivocation of fighting power needs some more work to explain that long gap.

    And, even if you believe that Orwell was right when he wrote “That rifle on the wall of the labourer’s cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy,” I think you’ll have to agree that rifles have gone the way of the longbow: they both still exist, and they both can put a hole in you just as they ever have, but neither are the engines of warfare in 2017.

    The history of warfighting technologies oscillates two ideal modes: power is concentrated into an elite cabal, and power is diffused throughout a population. But I believe that the advent of computers means that fighting power will never again oscillate back towards the yeoman.

    Who is to be master will be settled by the accumulation of capital and intellectual capital. Not by bravery, nobility, or any other romantic notion.

    [Reply]

    Aeroguy Reply:

    Oscillation towards elite is the very essence of making bravery and nobility matter. When you have an isolated professional elite class of warrior, and they’re the ones you need to win over to secure power as opposed to common citizens, demagogues start wearing uniforms. Lets not pretend that warmaking doesn’t involve being good at accumulating capital and managing intellectual capital. Indeed the high powered warrior is smarter than average, leading away from demagogues all together, and again further emphasizing a need of bravery and nobility from their leaders to command their respect.

    The easiest way to accumulate capital is to inherit it, second easiest to marry into it. But the way vast fortunes are concentrated in the first place isn’t typically by making fortunes but by seizing them with force (which comes in many flavors, conquest being only one of them).

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Envy is not confined to any particular political system nor is envy only given vent in democracy.

    Given that politics require as it were polemics, this is true.

    Since then to now Democracy is Infantry or Looting, in 2500 years none have found another way.

    This is an interesting democrato-absolutist view. It´s saying what has been said here very recently by a few citizens of the forum, 1) that government is absolute. 2) that all government is democratic in that it needs for people to obey/work (otherwise someone proverbial freemason-revolutionary will lead them to revolt. 3) that government is security & hierarchy or  there is comparative anarchy

    What it is saying especially different from the other comments is definition is military service for inclusion in the citizenry demos. I.e. military-State democracy. There is room for that in patchwork. It comes down to personal equation, or your patch.

    However as Haderach says : the democracy or absolutism is now of capital. But capital is in a sense quantified, i.e. numerified security. I.e. 10$ secures you a pack of beer. 10-100k secures you an AR-15 and a whole lot more. A flat. What have you.

    Security is capital and capital is security, widely defined. The difference from the past is that “modern man” doesn´t believe in reincarnation any more, nor an afterlife, nor even mere family legacy—so that´s why his people are dying. Plus all sorts of Alex Jones type’o’stuff that´s making u infertile. 😀

    Nihilism. Vain security. Security only for merely one´s own ass.

    Looking at power families, Bush dynasty, the other names, what have you, duPont they are beyond ephemeral because they invest not merely in chic hookers & coke lifestyle w/ no family, but exactly in family traditions of securing family transgenerationally ; which means to raise family in security as in them not being in threat from novel trends like whatever communist, hippie,  or fashion variation is going on for the day.

    If successful.

    Legacy is what men want. If you want race & civilization, obviously supporting family legacies or national legacies is absolute.

    Let´s be traditional here; Latin : nationem (nominative natio) “birth, origin; breed, stock, kind, species; race of people, tribe,” literally “that which has been born,” from natus, past participle of nasci “be born” (Old Latin gnasci; see genus).

    It´s not even neoreaction if it´s just techoprogressivism (which apparently just turns into thirdworldism-neoliberalism).

    You have to stand either side between that line : nation or communism. Japan and China are wise in this regard, the latter having early on disbanded actual communism & internationalism-proletarianism early on, like Stalin did to Russia. And Japan never having lost its sense of nation, compared to the other nations.

    Capital or civitas used to be defined with family or spiritual fatherhood. Was as late as Hegel.

    the post-Hegelians subverted that, and the result is Thirdworldism.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    TL;DR pre-Christian Tradition is transgenerational dynastic securitisation

    but it is passed down to and through “Christianity” from both Grecoroman & other Indoeuropean worlds ; and! Jewish worlds to the perimeter of modernity where-in these traditions started dissolving finally resulting in race-civilization death process.

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 9th, 2017 at 4:29 pm Reply | Quote
  • Xoth Says:

    Empirical evidence for the IQ shredder:

    Epidemiological studies suggest that educational attainment is affected by genetic variants. Results from recent genetic studies allow us to construct a score from a person’s genotypes that captures a portion of this genetic component. Using data from Iceland that include a substantial fraction of the population we show that individuals with high scores tend to have fewer children, mainly because they have children later in life. Consequently, the average score has been decreasing over time in the population. The rate of decrease is small per generation but marked on an evolutionary timescale. Another important observation is that the association between the score and fertility remains highly significant after adjusting for the educational attainment of the individuals.

    The effect is stronger for women and remains highly significant after adjusting for educational attainment.

    http://www.pnas.org/content/114/5/E727

    [Reply]

    Michael Rothblatt Reply:

    Ban schools. End child labor laws.Reinstitute patriarchy.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6k0FtZJg3E

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Patriarchy is automatic in patchwork.

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 9th, 2017 at 6:46 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    Frankly, to have any view other than that like of J.B. Peterson or Evola, or in worse case Guénon, is by now sub-intellectual if not retarded.

    While ‘reactionaries’ are bickering or even genially discussing the minutest differences between intra-protestant and intra-Catholic cults, our once 100% nation of Christian France is becoming close to 50% Muslim. There ain´t gonna be much “Feminism” there soon, or “technofuturism” (except as buyers of consumer goods from China. Simply, one Scientific nation, France, wiped off the map. Snatched).

    25% of French teenagers already identify as Muslim. http://takimag.com/article/le_grand_remplacement_steve_sailer#axzz4Y8qxMFaJ

    It´s obvious we have to consolidate around the most basic things: Patriarchy, Private Property, & white Progeny. Don´t care if ur pagan or protestant. Form intersectional/interdenominational communities, online and/or offline around these 3 essentials of sanity & life. Only thing that replaces a generation is another generation. Of actual children that grow up into people (adults) like you did.

    Don´t be arguing about no endless definitions, stick to the classic. Use an old dictionary, like from the 19th century or an etymological dictionary. Buy a Russian bride and move to some extremely conservative place, like places in Asia where they won´t be trying to hook your wife or daughter into hookup-culture. This shit will pass, don´t get caught in it. Pray to Kek, Gnon, or a wrathful stern god. Aryan Buddha. Don´t get caught in machismo mimesis or whining.

    ‘My principles are only those that, before the French Revolution, every well-born person considered sane and normal.’ — J. Evola.

    Incidentally, Peterson explaind that ‘paradise’ originally referred to walled-off place.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Of course being a good parent is #1, if you go into parenting. Otherwise your daughter is just gonna be sucking dick behind the local store, even in China or wherever, at 14 — because you were an asshole father.

    Peterson deals with that too.

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 9th, 2017 at 9:38 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    Hey Land buddy, you’re a cool dude, your nigga Churchill is right to say Germans are either praising you or jumping down your throat. What I wonder is why you think there’s no truth to the Hyperborean onslaught against you? You seem to think it’s only *real* when we praise you. What you are trying to do is weed out your competition through this operation. And frankly I’m not going to have it. Thiel, who is a German himself, wouldn’t have it either, but he is a fudgepacker so he is on your side, as is the AngloJew Mildbug. If there is any Justice left on this earth you three will be writing from a prison cell a la Gramsci but alas. I’m still a big fan of you guys–This is more respect than you can pay to the Hyperboreans–we’re larger than you, that’s why you want to kill us, snuff us out completely; You want to talk about envy you laughable coward hahahahahahahahahha You anglos and your Jew comrades are at one with the communist revolution, if we ever meet some day you will see how true this is by looking into my eyes.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    One might think the Character Dick Wagner is a Character played by Land to discredit soi-disant ‘Hyperboreans.’

    [Reply]

    admin Reply:

    That would be to exaggerate both my dramatic skills and my taste for slap-stick comedy.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    You two are sweatin’forshekels.txt

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Dualist antisemitism is strictly Christian-gnostic in origin.

    You´re hating the Jew inside,

    Wagner.

    Wagner Reply:

    http://imgur.com/BmhbfNJ

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    {Will God raise up an uber-theologian who provides a theological system so complete and so compelling, it draws various traditons together?}–a Rich Lusk in «Reclaiming Catholicity: Cosmic Catholicity»

    Btw. my old Gnostic Order of Thulean Tradition buddy George Sieg´s eassy » Infinite Regress into Self-Referential Horror–The Gnosis of the Victim » is a myst read.

    Having googled that now I see he employed or transmitted the concept « Anglo-purist » about Lovecraft´s dis-position ; towards non-germanics really.

    Oh yeah, I mentioned that eassay because it traces the horrific dualism of the other, no I mean the dualistic horror with the other to supposedly ( for all things are para-nousically supposed ) Aryan dwellers of the land of Iran.

    It is one of the finest documents I have come into contact with, altho I see more errors in it now opposed to when I was ~22 and saw none), so I would suggest Wagner up-date himself with that 7 of 9. If he had, he might have countered that dualist antisemitism is actually Aryan in origin, if one accepts without criticism Sieg´s transmittal, and further if one concluded that the Zoroastrian dualists were still Aryan except culturo-receptically (linguistically, etc), i.e. if the people that adopted that religion of the dualist Zoroaster were still of relatively pure race—if they hadn’t mixed with brownies?—which we do not actually know—the question is. Indeed like as John Hannon relays here from Blake, et al : « As a man is, so he sees. » I am a blonde Hyperborean Jew on an Atlantic seafaring island, indeed related (literally documented) to those who made the first known transatlantic voyage ; what do I see?

    For the Irania dwellers to get gnostico-puritano-kvetching schizophrenic—as is the trait of Semites?—both Islamic and Judeo-Christian, i.e. Christans, Muslims and Jews—and later the pseudo-nordic German Nazis who had been Judeo-Christians for 1.500 years before they mixed dualistic antisemitism with Fascism—: they had to have become mixed with that which they became as.

    However the Vedic Aryan´s disgust* with the brownies — “Blacks” — in India is a foundation anyway for that pure enough Aryans anyway were dualistic in turn to races. Who is not, after all? Even the “race-blind” are now antiwhite racists. Dualism is inherent to most human’s thinking. Only the very few can have a very nonschizophrenic viewpoint, and those in turn might seem quite shcizophrenic to the O so very dim-witted!

    I´ve come to enjoy a typographic error here and there, O so per-verted!

    * « Destruction of Cities :
    The Aryan gods are proudly presented by the Vedic “sages” as the destroyers of cities. Of these Indra, later considered an incarnation of the God Vishnu, is the prime culprit. Indra is called Puroha or Purandhara, ‘sacker of cities’ — [ History of Science and Technology in Ancient India — The Beginnings by D. Chattopadhyaya, Firma KLM Pvt. Ltd. Calcutta 1986, p.366 ] Indra overthrew 100 Puras made of stone ( asmanmayi ) for his worshipper Divodasa [RgV 4.30.20], evidently belonging to Sambara who is a Dasa (non-Aryan/demon) of the mountain [RgV 6.26.5] — [R.P. Chanda of the Indian Museum in Kolkata.]
    No regard was shown to the life of non-Aryans. An Aryan poet says,
    Ye mighty ones [ Asvins ] what do you do there;
    why do you stay there among the people who are held in high esteem through not offering sacrifices ; ignore them, destroy the life of the Panis

    — [RgV I.83.3]
    The famous Harappa hymn of the Rig Veda describes with praise Indra’s destruction of Harappa :
    In aid of Abhyavartin Cayamana, Indra destroyed the seed of Virasakha.
    ” At Hariyupiyah he smote the vanguard of the Vrcivans, and the rear fled frighted.

    — [Rg.V. XXVIII.5]
    This Hariyupiyah is likely to be the Harappa of the Indus valley.

    3.2 Dravidian Literature
    The date of 1500 BC corresponds to the end of a sangam period when invasions by barbarians occurred.

    4. Sociological
    4.1 Caste System
    The caste system is another ‘fossil’ of the Aryan conquest, with the lower and exterior castes representing the aboriginal inhabitants that managed to survive the Aryan slaughter. Exactly the same occurred in other parts of the world where one race has subjugated others, e.g. Latin America ( Iberians conquered Aboriginals ), U.S.A. ( Anglo-Saxons ruling over native and Afro-Americans ) etc. These include the Adivasis ( aboriginal tribals ), the Dalits ( semi-settled aboriginals ) and the Sudras ( the lowest caste ). However, some of the Sudras were imported under Muslim rule from Southern India.
    The caste system consists of several different varnas ( Sanskrit for “colors”), three of which were Aryan. The lowest caste, the Shudra, consists of aboriginals, as well as the exterior untouchable castes. [Cannibalism and witchcraft is still active in rural India today.]

    4.2 Sati and Child Marriage
    The Aryans introduced tremendous restrictions on the life of women, including sati and child marriage. According to Aryan “Hindu” (i.e. Vaishnavite) scriptures, a man must marry a maiden one-third his age.

    4.3 Cow-Worship
    Cow-worship is another feature introduced by the Aryans. This probably arose because the Aryans were nomads and hence required the cow.

    5. Theological
    5.1 Shiva and Shakti
    Siva is the god of the Dravidians. Vishnu is the god of the Aryans
    The star-calendar used by the Aryan-Vaishnavites today was adopted from the Semito-Dravidian Indus Valley civilization, since:
    It is not referred to in the Rig Veda or Avesta
    It was compiled when the Indus Valley was at its peak, before the Aryans came to India.
    The Indus people practiced astronomy because the streets are oriented towards the cardinal directions, presupposing the use of the sun-stick. A seal from Mohenjo-daro depicts an Indus deity with a star on either side of his head in the fashion of the Near East. Inanna-Ishtar, the goddess of love and war, for example, was associated with the planet Venus. [ A. Parpola, 1988-1994 ] This may have led to the cult of worshipping the planets, the astral religion of India.

    5.2 Fire Altars
    Fire altars occur late towards the Indus cities history. They are primitive in nature, constructed from material from the destroyed Indus cities.

    6. Global Aryan Invasions
    Aryans invaded several parts of the world, putting an end to various brilliant civilizations. Babylonia was destroyed by Kassites, Hittites and Mittani, Egypt was devastated by the Hyksos, and Minoan culture by the Dorians. »
    ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
    ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒

    Now back to the “Iranians” :

    — « The first Aryans to conceive of absolute horror, the Zoroastrian dualists of prehistoric Iran, found its origins in the Mother of Abomination, Drug, later known as Druj, whose name comprises both what we would know as a ‘drag-on’ and also what might best be conceived as a ‘simulation’, a corruption of reality, whether in the form of a strategic dissimulation, a false affirmation, or an outright physical blackening as of a decomposing corpse. The word is usually translated simply as ‘Lie’, and was also used in the context of betrayal, such as, of an oath, promise, or contract. Why these Aryans in Iran as the originators of a concept of intrusive, infested, parasitic horror, propagating itself upon and within a host innocent of its nature? The Druj, mother of all demons and of the Devil himself, originally an abstraction, a conceptual evil knowledge, the Angstful Mind, reaches out from her primordial, prehistoric Middle-Eastern domain to eventually rip herself free from the stomachs of Aryan astronauts in Geigeresque, cinematic form as the ‘alien’. Like the ‘alien Mother’, the Druj is horrifically and monstrously interstitial — She is fecund, yet death-producing; female, yet signified by masculine intrusiveness. She penetrates and violates like a rapist, yet she is an endless womb of darkness and depravity What, then, was the origin of this power — the power not of an ‘image’, but of a concept of parasitic, infectious disease- horror — over the cultural (and perhaps even philosophical) mind of the Zoroastrian Aryan, making him the very inventor of the concept of evil? The Aryans in Iran, unlike their Vedic peers and Lovecraft both, would not seem to have had obvious justification for elaborating a traditional ethnic xenophobia into full-blown moral paranoia. The Brahmins were faced with an indigenous population whose dominant genetic traits have been proven by history to be mightier than their Aryocentric anti-miscegenation law codes. In parallel, Lovecraft was driven from New York by the dominant, successful immigrant populations. As we know, he found this experience horrific, yet in contrast, any expected ‘horror’ on the part of the Brahmins for the dark non-Aryan people seems to have been notably absent in India [Huh? ]. Black Kali herself, whether an Aryan death goddess[?], as some claim, or the terrible indigenous mother herself [which she obviously is ; analogue with a jötunn anyway], inspires simultaneous awe and terror, but not horror. The mixing of castes and the Kali-yuga, inspired woe or detached sorrow in the pure Aryans — but not horror. The Aryans in Iran, by contrast, were apparently the sole inhabitants of a desert plateau, and thus without significant competition, their recessive traits secure until Arab invasions millennia later. Lest it be suggested that a lack of racial competition turned their conflict-obsessed, warlike selves against each other until the prophet Zoroaster invented his horrors merely as a foil to produce cultural unity, the reader should only need to be reminded of northern Europe, which occupied itself quite consistently in a constant state of unremitting tribal warfare throughout its entire history until it was Christianized, uninterrupted by anything like a gnosis of horror [this can´t be the case — G.], conceptual, racial, or otherwise. [You´re totally underestimating how mixed even the northern Germanics already were by the time they enter here-to known or antiracist Cathedral History. They had for a long time dwelt around ab”original” mongoloid Lapps and ‘eskimos’, whom they, some families, mixed with as can be seen especially in Iceland, but also Norway.] It can only be that, for reasons unknown (perhaps reasons sufficiently horrific that, as in the case of Great Cthulhu and the Lovecraftian Old Ones, it may be more wholesome not to know [pff]), the Aryans in Iran encountered, or believed themselves to have encountered, a threat perceived to be sufficiently difficult to distinguish from themselves[?] that it was, or might be, within [well of course]. 10

    The requisite condition for absolute horror is presented: inescapable dread, a factor which would produce constant terror — except that flight is not only impossible, but inconceivable [this is deathlike horror; why equate that with racial horror? It´s enough to e.g. see your daughter with a nigger to be deeply horrified, and that isn´t that related to “flight being impossible”, altho there has invaded an inescapable telegonic & spiritual taint]. Conceptual horror enshrined in philosophy was then born in Iran as the Mother of Abominations [I´m pretty sure the Mother of Abominations cult in India is older, and the Aryans disgust there altho I´ll there is doubt about ‘horror’. I think it comes down to the concept/experience of horror only materialising that much when tribes stop being conquering nomads]. It is no exaggeration to say that by the time the moral dualism of the Zoroastrians was fully cosmologically and performatively elaborated in the Vendidad, their book of ritual codes and taboos against the devils, their obsession with purity — the exaltation of themselves as potential victims of intrusive, penetrative violation by Druj and her ravenous children — had reached proportions so extreme that the same ritual fixations outside of an excusably cultural or religious context would now [supposedly] earn a diagnosis of paranoid-schizophrenia with combined obsessive-compulsive disorder, or worse. The Vendidad is a study in terror if not outright horror itself. Each ‘Fargard’, or chapter, recites repetitively and thoroughly the number —

    ( *10. Lovecraft himself speculated on a similar process involving fear of hidden, internal others in European tradition, writing in his classic study Supernatural Horror in Literature {NY: Dover, 1973), ‘Much of the power of Western horror-lore was undoubtedly due to the hidden but often suspected presence of a hideous cult of nocturnal worshipers whose strange customs were rooted in the most revolting fertility rites of immemorial antiquity. This secret religion, stealthily handed down among peasants for thousands of years despite the outward reign of Druidic, Greco-Roman, and Christian faiths in the regions involved, was marked by “Witches Sabbaths” [. ..] on Walpurgis Night and Hallowe’en, the traditional breeding-seasons of the goats and sheep and cattle; and became the source of vast riches of sorcery legend.’ )

    — of strokes with the punishment whip a transgressor is to receive for violating any of the minutiae of purity laws, concerned with everything from moral conduct to the compulsively precise handling of corpses in order to ensure that the community and the natural world remain undefiled by the naso-druj, the corpse-demon. Extreme infractions, such as exposure of corpses to water or fire, result in the transgressor being publicly flayed alive. Many interesting technicalities of the Zoroastrian hygiene obsession can be found in the Vendidad., such as the association of albinism with uncleanness, and the rule that physicians-in-training were to practice on those who worshipped the daevas so as to avoid accidentally killing the faithful. Male homosexuality is so abhorred that its practitioners are proclaimed in the Vendidad to be demons incarnate [like for the Aryans in India the riteless brownies were demons incarnate]. Sexual intercourse with a menstruating woman is an offense against purity worthy of death [this custom is btw. universal; seen in Africa e.g]. Eventually, for the Zoroastrians, any being of evil thoughts, or an evil mind, might be a vehicle for Druj. This does not only include representatives of any other creed whatsoever: even those who outwardly professed the Good Religion might secretly be endowed with the Lie. The incredible irony of Zoroastrianism is that the same Aryan trait of xenophobia which made the ancient Iranians amenable to this most paranoid of all world-views had to be abandoned in order for the Zoroastrian creed of absolute moral goodness in opposition to absolute moral evil to be adopted. Once the Aryans adopted the Zoroastrian religion, their enemies were not outsiders but any others (even unrecognizable others in their midst, like Drujic body-snatchers), who carried the Lie. Even, and especially, fellow Aryans — a notion inconceivable amongst any other Indo-European group, none of which had any difficulty either with feuding incessantly with each other indiscriminately, or with uniting easily against even more foreign outsiders. Yet the Iranians became the exception, and gave the world the first universalist moral philosophy, ultimately bequeathing it to the ancient Jews, who shared with the Indo-European ancestors of the Aryans a xenophobic racism, even while the Jews lacked those recessive genetic traits the preservation of which, as signifiers of purity, inspired a racialist concept amongst the Indo-Europeans forgotten aeons ago. [At least Jews apparently had the recessive math-intelligence genes.] »

    wew

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 10th, 2017 at 4:03 am Reply | Quote
  • Anonymous Says:

    If Puritanism, in its sundry international iterations, is to be regarded as the most destructive ideology in history, then undoubtedly Britons are “the” historical villains, followed, by a wide margin, by the French, then followed, again by a wide margin, by Ashkenazim, and then you have everyone else who participated. (Germans, a non-globally-evangelizing force, that is, a generally localized power, hardly make the villainy list at all; they a good boy who ain’t done do nuffin. Scandinavians are puritanical, but likewise, mostly keep their insanity to themselves, therefore mostly harmless) In short, the more Atlantean/less Hyperborean an ethnic group is, the more destruction it has inflicted on the human race via the deadliest international weltanschauung. Not sure Admin is willing to entertain this perfectly-logical conclusion.

    [Reply]

    admin Reply:

    I like paradox and complexity. It’s the only place thought comes from.

    [Reply]

    Boldmug Reply:

    A chink would call it a paradox, an Aristotelian would call it a contradiction. It really depends on whose side you’re on.

    [Reply]

    John Hannon Reply:

    “As a man is, so he sees.”

    – William Blake

    michael Reply:

    It’s like a tear in the hands of a western man
    Tell you about salt, carbon and water
    But a tear to a chinese man
    He’ll tell you about sadness and sorrow or the love of a man and
    a woman.

    I want to ride the tiger
    I want to sail through the risin’ sun for you and you
    We got something to learn from the other side
    Something to give, we got nothing to hide
    I want to ride the tiger.

    Black wants out of the streets
    Yellow wants the country
    Red wants the country back
    And white wants out of this world
    Sing – sing to the sky
    I want to ride the tiger
    I want to ride the tiger.

    Uriel Fiori Reply:

    The problem with Puritanism is when it forgets god is evil and angry, and thus preserves only the paranoia. Also, your humanism is showing.

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    Germans I hate Germans!
    germans kid of proto socialists, germans kinda proto puritains, germans kinda proto fascists, germans kinda celtic slaves. that said this whole puritans are the real elders of zion thng is a bit suspect coming from a jew, lets subtract all the jewish influence on western civilization over the past 150 years and see how toxic it is.Very hard to do that math. but its also kind of hard to understand how this sect thats known for being no fun and ultra conservative is the cause of this mess. It wasnt John milton that wrote the sitcom with the 7 year old tranny with the ball gag it was a jew. It was a jew who invented communism and jews that overthrew the tsar and it was jews that from the 1800s through today indoctrinate whites to leftism in our cities. And hey Im not even anti jew just a new yorker whos watched it happpen

    [Reply]

    Seth Largo Reply:

    Puritanism is a plague that infested a rat from the hinterlands that sadly made its way onto Atlantean ships.

    [Reply]

    Posted on February 10th, 2017 at 5:31 am Reply | Quote

Leave a comment