Shrink-Wrapped Schadenfreude

They’ve actually made it into a gift-pack:

The crying continued throughout the week. On the subway in New York City, sniffles punctuated heavy silence. Sickness or sadness? It was impossible to tell without staring. Friends confessed to each other they’d cried dozens of times. Foreigners living and working legally in America cried privately, cried together. The sadness came in waves. People said it felt like a death, like a breakup, like a national disaster. People checked in on each other. “Are you OK?” they’d ask, as though a relative had passed. […] Harrowing tales of crying continued into Friday, as Lena Dunham published an essay in Lenny Letter about how she was so distraught on election night, she broke into a hive that matched the hive of another woman in attendance at the Hillary Clinton rally, and how she cried for days after the election. The crying continued into the weekend. Saturday Night Live’s cold open ended with Kate MacKinnon, in character as Hillary Clinton tickling out Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah” on a piano, teary-eyed as she promised to fight on. …

ADDED: Complementary sarcastic gloating.

ADDED: And from the full-commies at Jacobin Mag (quite wittily): “Watching the results on Election Night was like what I’d imagine living in an eighties teen horror movie would be like — the summer camp air curdling into one of vague suspicion, as a strange dawning sensation of doom takes hold. Slaughter: Ohio, Florida, Michigan — all bloody and prone. Who will be picked off next? Pennsylvania? Wisconsin? Minnesota? Your state? The vote is coming from inside the house.”

November 17, 2016admin 92 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Humor

TAGGED WITH : , , , ,

92 Responses to this entry

  • Artxell Knaphni Says:

    Crying is good for you, it releases excess cadmium.
    Enjoying the tears of others, suggests the very sadomasochism characterising the resentment & consuming hatred of frustrated inferiority. I guess that’s all that’s left to those types.

    “According to a new memo compiling data from the election by a team of researchers including Oxford University professor Philip Howard, automated pro-Trump activity outnumbered automated pro-Hillary Clinton activity by a 5:1 ratio by Election Day. And many of those auto-Trumpkins were busy spewing lies and fake news.

    In a conversation with The Daily Beast, Howard described how the pro-Trump bot networks began to use pro-Clinton hashtags, injecting memes, links, and political messages into pro-Clinton circles. Like a virus, they essentially co-opted the opponent’s messaging and infiltrated her supporters. Using pro-Clinton hashtags like #ImWithHer and #uniteblue, memes describing Clinton as corrupt ricocheted across both blue and red feeds.”
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/11/17/how-pro-trump-twitter-bots-spread-fake-news.html

    [Reply]

    R. J. Moore II Reply:

    If you think empathy is a virtue you’re eugenics bait. Good luck trolling, leftard.

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    @R. J. Moore II

    Only the inferior require eugenics dreams as compensation for their peculiar conjunction of excessive ambitions & recessive abilities.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Since I am a word genius, I think eu-genics at root means good-genics.

    If there are methods that are failures, that don´t have good effects

    I don´t think those are eugenics. They are disgenics.

    smg Reply:

    You’re trying to shame people for being happy their side won & being better at meme warfare? You certainly don’t understand your audience, as is typical of your variety of sanctimonious priest. We don’t feel shame or pity or pain. That’s been bled out of us by decades of leeches like you. We won’t stop until we destroy you & your disgusting institutions & we won’t fight fair because we’re not easily controlled cucks.

    Now fuck right off.

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    @smg

    Being “better at meme warfare” & winning are not at all shameful, though victory through deception could be, if it can be counted as ‘victory’ at all?
    I’m not a politician or publicity hound, or priest for that matter, so consideration of audience doesn’t come into it. I don’t feel “shame or pity or pain”, either, just a mild sadness when observing needless stupidity.
    You only seek to destroy your own “disgusting institutions”, those which your kind imposed through genocide, on other peoples & other lands; which you actually leeched on, & continue to do so. That your kind engage in the same behaviour with each other, is no one else’s fault.
    You “won’t fight fair” because you’re inferior, & incapable of ‘winning’ otherwise.
    You’ve already destroyed yourselves, as I’ve said before, you are Occidental androids.
    I won’t say, ‘Go Fuck Yourself!’, because it seems that’s all you can do.

    [Reply]

    Ur-mail Reply:

    So elevated upon the moral high ground your brain may be starved for oxygen.

    bomag Reply:

    You only seek to destroy your own “disgusting institutions”, those which your kind imposed through genocide, on other peoples & other lands; which you actually leeched on, & continue to do so…
    You “won’t fight fair” because you’re inferior, & incapable of ‘winning’ otherwise

    Its not much of a genocide when Western science is allowing “other peoples” to breed beyond their carrying capacity, spill over their borders, then fill up and displace the creators of the things the Other copies and seeks.

    Was there even a war that we won? We “won” because the other side emulates our ways and products. We may ultimately lose because the other side is demanding to live amongst us as parasites.

    Waycis Reply:

    > You only seek to destroy your own “disgusting institutions”, those which your kind imposed through genocide, on other peoples & other lands;

    What genocide was that?

    >which you actually leeched on, & continue to do so.

    WE WUZ KANGZ UNTIL WHITEY CAME.

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    There’s 400 years of global genocides that can be googled.

    ‘Leechings’ by the multinational business interests (of white colonialism), that you lot, on Neoreactionary blogs, are now complaining about.

    Kings after, but with less wealth after leechings, economies destabilised.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    North American native tribes were genociding each other before whitey came.

    They found mass graves, some years ago.

    It´s famous that South American tribes did this, but the others did it too.

    ▬ « By counting a specific piece of bone from near the ear, researchers were able to identify 486 individuals – men, women and children – buried in the mass grave. Willey said the pile was notable for the high number of young men who were probably killed defending the village.
    “Instead of few adolescents, that very healthy time in the typical demographic profile, we see high numbers of adolescents – you know, people who should be in their prime,” he said.
    And while the ratio of men to women was roughly even, the males tend to skew younger while the women tended to be older. There is a distinct lack of young adult, or childbearing, women.
    Willey said there are two explanations for this. Either the young women were captured during the massacre and carried off, which is not uncommon during raids, or they were able to flee while the young men were being slaughtered.
    The skeletons found in the pit showed signs of terrible injuries. Of all the skulls found, 90 percent had cuts on the forehead, the telltale sign of scalping. A quarter of the skeletons showed knife wounds on the first vertebrae of the neck, which is consistent with a slit throat or decapitation. Of the complete skulls, 40 percent showed depression fractures left from blunt force trauma. Horrible head injuries could also be the reason why there aren’t more complete skulls, Willey said.
    As a final indignity, the bodies were obviously left to lie out in the open. And not for hours or days, but at least weeks. The smaller bones, like those in the hands and feet, went missing as the bodies decomposed. The remains also show the teeth marks from scavengers as they picked at the carcasses and chewed on the ends of long bones.
    Zimmerman said eventually someone returned to bury the remains and lit a fire on top of the pit. By radiocarbon dating the remains of that fire, archaeologists come up with the date of 1325, plus or minus 55 years. However, it’s impossible to tell how soon after the actual massacre the fire was lit, he said.
    Aside from the remains, archaeologists have been able to piece together considerable clues about how the attack itself happened.
    Zimmerman said there is evidence that Crow Creek was in the process of expanding, and the fortifications hadn’t caught up yet.
    The ditch seen today is actually the second of two such fortifications at the site. It does not have much village debris or artifacts in it, meaning it must have been newer. The Nebraska Historical Society found post holes along it, but not the brown stains decaying wooden beams would have left.
    That means the population had outgrown the old fortifications and were in the process of building new ones, so when the attack came, part of the village was exposed, he said.
    Andrew Clark, a senior archaeologist with the South Dakota State Historical Society, said, judging by raiding behavior of similar tribal groups around the world, the attack probably came during the night or early morning to maximize the surprise.
    Extrapolating from the example of modern warfare, specialists estimate the size of the attacking force would have to have been at least the same as the village population if not up to three times greater, he said.
    The attackers would have used the expected bows and arrows and knives, but also probably staffs and spears. From the trauma it’s possible they were employing war clubs as well. Though not as prevalent or specialized on the Plains compared to the southeast, it’s not unheard of.
    “Whether it was a club used specifically for war or if it was a hammer someone picked up we don’t really know, but it’s something along those lines,” he said.
    The evidence also might point to the motivation behind the violence, and it’s one of the most basic: survival.
    Clark said evidence from that time points to a harsh environment, with extended droughts and poor crop yields, meaning people were on edge and possibly desperate.
    “And that was the undertone for, not the cause of, the war, but may have led to it,” he said.
    Even the skeletons of the victims show signs of tough living. The skulls have cribra orbitalia, a pitting in the bone that appears around the eye socket and is associated with iron deficiency anemia. Either the people there were not getting enough iron, maybe from a lack of meat, or eating high amounts of foods that bind up iron, such as corn.
    Willey said that is not a common condition. The University of Tennessee has a collection of more than 1,500 Arikara skeletons, and cases of cribra orbitalia are rare among them, he said.
    Furthermore, the length of the villagers’ long bones – those in the legs and arms – are shorter than found in other sites, indicating either lack of nutrition or disease, Willey said.
    The archaeological record can tell many things about what might have led up to the massacre, but has left very little evidence about who may have actually carried it out. Aside from a few arrowheads, there is practically nothing to identify the attackers.
    Zimmerman said there are generally three theories about who they might have been. The first is that an outside group, unrelated to the culture, swept through and attacked the village on a raid.
    Clark said if this theory is correct the attackers probably came from present-day Iowa and returned home shortly thereafter. These people did not stay around after the massacre, but took their booty back with them. If that is the case, the lack of evidence might be evidence itself, he said.
    The second theory is that the Initial Coalescent culture, of which Crow Creek was a part, had displaced the Middle Missourian tradition, a Siouan-speaking people often identified as ancestors of the Mandan. In this telling the Middle Missourians returned from their lands near the North Dakota and South Dakota border to strike back at the newcomers moving into their old homeland.
    Willey points out that a flaw in this theory is the Middle Missourians by this time had access to the Knife River flint, a durable, widely used and easily identifiable material for making tools and weapons. However, none of the arrowheads found at Crow Creek were made of this flint.
    A third possibility is that Crow Creek was attacked by members of the same tribe from a neighboring village. With this theory the motivation is desperation, taking by force the resources of another village during an incredibly difficult time.
    While admitting the evidence is still circumstantial, Zimmerman is a proponent of the inter-tribal warfare theory. »

    Et cetera.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/9/crow-creek-massacre-in-1300s-remains-south-dakotas/

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    [G. Eiríksson]: “North American native tribes were genociding each other before whitey came.”

    {AK}; Interesting. I’m not saying that atrocity is exclusive to Europeans, but doing it in the name of Christian love, kindness, & charity, pretty much, & whilst I don’t know enough history to know about other exceptions, is.

    Good mysticism on the other comments, btw, the bits I’ve seen in the email notifications. I’d join in, but in the middle of stuff.

    Waycis Reply:

    >There’s 400 years of global genocides that can be googled.

    You won’t list any examples. By the way, unless you can demonstrate there was indeed a plot to genocide a certain group as opposed to say, a plague thinning the herd (as in the case of the Redskins) then don’t bother listing it.

    >‘Leechings’ by the multinational business interests (of white colonialism), that you lot, on Neoreactionary blogs, are now complaining about.

    >Whining about muh big business keeping down Pajeet and Tyrone

    Here we see the Leftoid in action. Next you’ll be saying that the lack of contributions by Niggers to the actual sciences is from White Privilege.

    >Kings after, but with less wealth after leechings, economies destabilised.

    Actually, it’s more that hordes of 90 and lower IQ Shitskins aren’t capable of running a modern country.

    Anyway, I’m sure you’re either a Shitskin, Yellow, or Jew hopping on the Blame Whitey train.

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    [Ur-mail]: “So elevated upon the moral high ground your brain may be starved for oxygen.”

    {AK}: Or it could be that you lot are suffering from oxygen toxicity, mixed with the stink of a simplistic moral contrarianism you’re unable to think through.

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    [bomag]: “Its not much of a genocide when Western science is allowing “other
    peoples” to breed beyond their carrying capacity, spill over their
    borders, then fill up and displace the creators of the things the Other
    copies and seeks.

    Was there even a war that we won? We “won” because the other side
    emulates our ways and products. We may ultimately lose because the
    other side is demanding to live amongst us as parasites.”

    {AK}: Too many questionable assumptions.

    “other peoples”, obscures a lot, such as genocides.
    If you’re talking about the USA, the USA could be seen as a ‘productive parasite’.

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    [Waycis]: “You won’t list any examples. By the way, unless you can demonstrate there was indeed a plot to genocide a certain group as opposed to say, a plague thinning the herd (as in the case of the Redskins) then don’t bother listing it.”

    {AK}: I’m not interested in trying to convince you. It’s well known & corroborated history.
    Incidentally, your criteria invalidates all claims of ‘white genocide’ by the ‘Alternative Right’.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    [Waycis]: “Whining about muh big business keeping down Pajeet and Tyrone”

    {AK}: I said: “that you lot, on Neoreactionary & ‘Alternative Right’ blogs,” are now “complaining about multinational business interests (of white colonialism)”.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    [Waycis]: “Here we see the Leftoid in action. Next you’ll be saying that the lack of contributions by Niggers to the actual sciences is from White Privilege.”

    {AK}: No, I wouldn’t say that, because it’s premise concerning contributional lack is not true.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    [Waycis]: “Actually, it’s more that hordes of 90 and lower IQ Shitskins aren’t capable of running a modern country.”

    {AK}: Who else is capable? If you think anyone is or ever was, why the ‘whinings’ of ‘Neoreaction’ & the ‘Alternative Right’?
    Name one ‘Modern’ country or system that was self-sufficient, not having to ‘leech’ off, or exploit, others?
    You think that you understand what Modernity is? But you don’t.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    [Waycis]: “Anyway, I’m sure you’re either a Shitskin, Yellow, or Jew hopping on the Blame Whitey train.”

    {AK}: My dermatic chromatics is not the colour of dry dog shit, lol.
    I’m not ‘blaming’ anyone on the basis of ethnicity, but on the basis of actions.
    The inferior are usually sure about things; like religious fundamentalists, they don’t think.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Oh come on laddies! I quite enjoy Mr. Knaphni ´s commentismus.

    — And empathy is a virtus — ask MacNamara!

    In fact ask good ‘ol Angleton.

    O boy, o boy!

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    “So, when Domitius said to Crassus the orator, Did not you weep for the death of the lamprey you kept in your fish pond? – Did not you, said Crassus to him again, bury three wives without ever shedding a tear?” – Plutarch, On the Intelligence of Animals.

    [Reply]

    frank Reply:

    “If you kill your enemies, you lose.”
    How is it like to live in one’s own ass? Well, I guess, one upside is, you don’t pay rent.

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    [frank]: “”If you kill your enemies, you lose.” How is it like to live in one’s own ass? Well, I guess, one upside is, you don’t pay rent.”

    {AK}: Are you saying you do “pay rent”?

    [Reply]

    Daniel Chieh Reply:

    I love liberal tears 😀

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    Daniel Chieh commented: “I love liberal tears :D”

    {AK}: Do they love you, though?

    [Reply]

    Cryptogenic Reply:

    Millenials, aka Boomers 2.0, are the generation that snap their fingers rather than clap their hands because loud sounds trigger them. They’re relentlessly cruel and vindictive (cf. Vox Day’s “SJW’s Always Lie” and Anonymous Conservative’s analyses of atrophied amygdala and r-type behavior).

    You’re fucking right I’m goading as many into suicidal ideation as possible.

    [Reply]

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    [Cryptogenic]: “Millenials, aka Boomers 2.0, are the generation that snap their fingers rather than clap their hands because loud sounds trigger them. They’re relentlessly cruel and vindictive (cf. Vox Day’s “SJW’s Always Lie” and Anonymous Conservative’s analyses of atrophied amygdala and r-type behavior).
    You’re fucking right I’m goading as many into suicidal ideation as possible.”

    {AK}: You’re trying to goad “SJWs” into being suicide bombers? Because we’ve seen where that sort of ‘ideation’ leads, haven’t we?
    There’s that Heidegger-Nietzsche thing about the ‘Will’, read ‘Occidental Will’, willing nihilistic destruction, rather than not ‘will’.
    In a way, a lot of the competing identity players on the US political scene, seem to be fundamentalists of this ‘willing’ sort. ‘Left’ or ‘Right’, it’s a merry-go-round of mutual resentments. Who has the worst ‘forked tongue’, though?

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 10:04 am Reply | Quote
  • darkreformation101 Says:

    Mass Madness. However, it provides plenty of material to discredit democracy.

    The problem is getting both sides to come to an agreement to terminate democracy and replace it with something else.

    Perhaps, the schelling point is simply divorce — separation into separate communities.

    Opportunities but also risks with this.

    The main risk (domestically) is that the leftist communities will want to undermine, invade and destroy rival communities. The parasite needs its prey.

    The opportunity is that the left gets its rope to hang itself.

    I was reading Leddhin’s Leftism last night, and he quoted someone that said what I have always thought…..basically in a democracy there is no real way the right can stop the left they can only wait for it to collapse. This was my judgment after looking at Mao’s China and the Soviet Union. The problem for the West is, however, the strategy of importing Dalits and Helots. That to me changes the dynamics.

    Following on from Leddhin, I have a question for people here.

    Should we categorise the Nazi party as a left or right phenomenon?

    Leddhin thinks it is on the left. Moldbug thinks it is mostly on the right but with significant elements of leftism.

    I think Moldbug understates just how “left” the Nazi episode was. However, there are divergences. My judgment, as of this moment (I’m planning to engage some primary sources), is that the Nazis were a phenomenon of modernity: a working out of historical, theological and political consequences that had been brewing for hundreds of years. Nevethless, I think the Nazis were (to quote Michael Burleigh) a “political religion”. In many ways, something like early Islam, a synthesis of many things but with new elements.

    Thought?

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    No, buddy you want to keep Democracy — and to be the Deep State actor that pulls the Dark Reformation Strings behind the thousand times 1000 layered curtain.

    Enlighten the populace, anarcho-capitalist education in schools!

    Decentralized media, guaranteed by the

    dark guardsman, Lord

    Autismus.

    [Reply]

    R. J. Moore II Reply:

    Nazis are a movement of counter-revolutionary fake revolutionaries and genuine socialists. It is, if anything, a centrist group, albeit a Satanic one.
    Real fascism is genuinely right wing but pretends to be leftist.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    “A true revolutionary” would do what?

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    I thought you said there were no “trues.”

    Or is that just Christianity?

    [Reply]

    bomag Reply:

    Should we categorise the Nazi party as a left or right phenomenon?

    The whole era that birthed the Nazis was the ascendancy of Leftism perfecting their rule. Modern communication and record keeping allowed more complete control of the population than ever before, and there was a record of success by central governments in building railroads, highways, stringing electric and telegraph cable, building canals, etc. Thus, in the Low countries, the Nazis just plastered posters telling all the Jews to report to such and such a place, and the people did, because the authorities had had a good record of doing things in the people’s interest. Leftism perfected!

    Even today, I’ll wander over to the usual lefty sites and ask why we should support all this gov’t spending and regulation, and I’ll be bombarded by people telling me I should worship all the wonderful police and fire protection, the clean environment, the protection from big business harvesting my body for sodomy rituals, etc.

    So, yeah, like you said, “a working out of historical, theological and political consequences that had been brewing for hundreds of years”. But what did in the National Socialists was their too-explicit extermination policies. It’s okay if you are subtle enough, like today’s American Left, hauling in Mexicans, Somalis, and various Asian groups as fast as they can, setting them up in growing enclaves where they can fly their flag and vote their ethnic interests. But the N. Socialists boiled the frog too fast.

    [Reply]

    R. J. Moore II Reply:

    Actually I think it was their military jingoism that did the Nazis in. Though Russia probably intended to invade them and England is largely to blame for WW2, the Germans most likely could have avoided war and saved their independence of they hadn’t been obsessed with petty revanchist bullshit. It’s not like “Germany” had any right to control any of its land, since it was stolen from the Princes by a war mongering thug to begin with. Hitler was a fuckup.

    [Reply]

    bomag Reply:

    Hitler was a fuckup.

    I like the story that near the end of the war, the British general staff got reports that they now had enough assets in place to consider a plot to assassinate Hitler. They said no; Hitler had shown himself to be such a bad tactician that anyone else would be better and prolong the war.

    Prior to WWII, winning a war was a reliable way to success. But the biggest losers in WWII, Germany and Japan, went on to economic success beyond any of their rivals. The end of warfare, in some way? I can’t think of a particular country-on-country war that can be counted as a success since WWII.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Maybe it was because circa all the machos died in the war.

    Bruno Cariou* interestingly links Feminism

    and Homo Economicus….

    ( * aka Evola as he is.

    https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/evola_as_he_is/info )

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 10:10 am Reply | Quote
  • cyborg_nomade Says:

    it’s wondrous that, if Hillary had won, we could expect to be on the brink of civil war, but now that Trump won, all we see is a river of tears.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 10:14 am Reply | Quote
  • Maz Says:

    After November 8, I’ve been wondering if there is such a thing as too much schadenfreude. The data so far suggest that the answer is “no”.

    [Reply]

    frank Reply:

    Too much shadenfreude makes my mind jittery. All this salt makes me long for tranquil times. Donald was right, I’m sick of winning.

    [Reply]

    Untrue Neutral Reply:

    But he’s just going to say, sorry, we have to win more

    [Reply]

    R. J. Moore II Reply:

    Why don’t you just stop consuming medi? WTF is it with people and their inability to stop masturbating with electronics?

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 10:33 am Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    Forsaking pessimism at this juncture is disgraceful. I ain’t celebratin’ nuffin till the earth is in the hands of an aristocracy.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    But it already is ….

    [Reply]

    Daniel Chieh Reply:

    In the hands of good aristocracy.

    [Reply]

    R. J. Moore II Reply:

    The idea that good people can fix this is nonsense. The system of bureaucracy and centralized states cannot be fixed, not by anyone. It has to be destroyed.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    History would show that it always returns. Even that it cannot be destroyed.

    R. J. Moore II Reply:

    The price of liberty is eternal vigilance. People that aren’t willing to do that can die for all I care.
    Ans the centralized managerial state is a very modern phenomenon that shows signs of disintegrating already. Just because elites and politics may exist doesn’t mean they’re ‘public’ states based on popular sovereignty and acting primarily through paid executive hires.
    The Roman Empire’s officials usually had no salary, and it was basically an alliance of city states. The Holy Roman Empire was a militarized anarcho-Federalism.
    Treating political orders as roughly equivalent is sheer madness. There is more difference between the political organization of stepped nomads and 17th century England than between the Soviet Union and Switzerland.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    I see your point. So you, like Evola, are a man against the bourgeoisification of the world, which is all but complete by now.

    I too loathe some of bourgeois morals, the Feminist aspect of them, mostly.

    Because of men now being unwitting or declared Feminists,

    they do not know what they do, and the Mullies

    outbreed us, year by year, until we

    are naught but none —

    a gone folk.

    Cryptogenic Reply:

    I think the difference between high time preference anti-democratic pessimism and just having fun pouring salt in a weeping gash is understood, at least here.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 11:34 am Reply | Quote
  • Unknown128 Says:

    The left seems to take victory for granted and sees even defeat in a skirmish and temporary setbacks as disasters. In truth nothing has changed and the train to leftist singularity in which trigender things enjoy bestiality in public places and your put in reeducation camps for objecting to it is still rolling on. No previous republican could do as much as slow it down and I am surprised that neoreactionaries who actualy know how the system works seem to suddenly put hope into Trump.

    The left still controlls all the commanding hights from which they can shoot down any initiative of Trump even if he actualy had the aim to radicaly change Amricas course which I doubt he does. The lefts vengence will be terrible!

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Yeah dude a terrible dread has been creeping into me since he won. But where the danger is also grows the saving power. The left’s back-lash will hopefully spawn an equal and opposite Reaction. #Grosse Politik

    Badiou’s call for a violent revolution is the tastiest of morsels.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 11:48 am Reply | Quote
  • GoingPro Says:

    Thought XS was in recall based on Cathedral self-annihilation.

    What happens way past decentralization?

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 12:51 pm Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    There is no possible coexistence with the Left because what they desire from society is entirely different from what a sane person wants.

    It just took 227 years for that to become visible to anything but the right-side tail of the bell curve.

    [Reply]

    Capitalist Reply:

    I like your work elsewhere. But it seems like you’re a broken record when you comment here, “The Left are insane and evil and bad for the world” may very well be true, but repeating basically the same comment seems kind of weird from somebody like you. The fact that you make this comment on almost every blog post, often one of the very first people to comment on them, is interesting.

    I humbly ask that you step up your commenting game. I will try to as well.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 1:59 pm Reply | Quote
  • R. J. Moore II Says:

    There is no possible coexistence with the Left because what they desire from society is entirely different from what a sane person wants.
    It just took 227 years for that to become visible to anything but the right-side tail of the bell curve.
    [Reply]

    I don’t think your one-note analysis is of the left is either accurate or useful. The problems of modern society have more to do with the masses and centralization than political ideology. Most people have none of consequence. And the Establishment is not leftist. It’s Establishment.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Benefit of a centralized data bank, is that we know what people are doing! Thus we can predict their behavior further, and keep them docile and working, and out of real trouble.

    It´s a brave new world now, my sir!

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 2:29 pm Reply | Quote
  • Shoshana Says:

    I miss the old days when whining and wailing were despised, and silent tears were saved for truly poignant moments like a death of ones closest relative.

    [Reply]

    Erebus Reply:

    In the old days, we had a culture of dignity. Preceding that, we had a culture of honor and arete. Today, we have a culture of puerile victimhood. In cultures that have remained honor or dignity based, whining and wailing are still despised. Men of the West who still possess honor and dignity also utterly despise this modern culture of victimhood. It is one of the most insidious products of the Cathedral.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    The days of warriorhood are gone, until ye start driving out Muslims or taking up their religious-approved (& apparently Feminist-approved) mode of masculinity over women.

    [Reply]

    bomag Reply:

    We seem to have trouble with the balance here: the modern, urban, Cathedral life trains the responsible to be female; thus only the irresponsible are macho males who breed and fight.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Macho males step in instead of masculine males, when the masculine males are none (they´ve been pseudoestrogenized). This leaves the field only for nu-males and macho-males.

    Actual masculinity isn´t as cartoonish. Still, What am I saying? Macho Russians won WW2. But only because the Germans were led by a maniac who was hardly stoically masculine.

    There´s a difference between a macho Spanjol aramada, a Bonapartism, and a proper world dominating force that lasts centuries.

    Non Angli, sed angeli!

    « Indeed, the Greek orator Dio of Prusa noted that the Greek ideal of beauty was a Nordic one. The Greeks, he said, admired the blond Achilles, but thought that the barbarian Trojan Hector, was black-haired. [Günther (1956).]

    In his “Argonautica,” the Greek poet Apollonius Rhodius, describes the hero Jason, and all fifty of the Argonauts, as blond-haired. [Sieglin (1935).]

    When the heroine Electra, in Euripides’ play of that name, finds a lock of her brother Orestes’ hair, on the grave of their father Agamemnon, she can tell that it is his hair, because of its distinctive blond color. [Ridgeway (1909).]

    The poet Bacchylides said that the women of Sparta were blonde, and Dicaearchus said much the same thing about the women of Thebes. [Gunther (1956).]

    For the Greeks, the most beautiful woman who ever lived, Helen, was a blond, as were those mythical men such as Adonis, who were famed for their handsomeness. [Sieglin (1935).]

    One of the most complete studies ever undertaken of racial types in Ancient Hellas was done by the American anthropologist J. L. Angel, who performed an extensive survey of all ancient Greek crania.

    Angel (1944), calculated that during the Classical period of Greek history (650-150 BC), 27% of the Greek population had been predominantly Nordic in type.

    This is perfectly in line with other observations, which have determined that the Hellenic population consisted of two, possibly three elements initially: Nordics, Mediterraneans and Alpine types. Only later were non-European elements introduced, mainly through the importation of slaves.

    Angel observed that prior to the Classical period, the Nordic element had been larger, and that after it, the element in question had declined. [Angel (1943; 1944; 1945; 1946a, b, c.] Angel (1971), also noted that the immigrant Indo-Europeans, were of Nordic subrace.

    Peterson (1974), studied portrait busts of famous ancient Greek personages, and concluded that the aristocracies of Hellas were a product of closely interbreeding, Eupatrid clans. These clans were mostly Nordic in type, being largely descended from the Indo-European invaders.

    The study of Greek literature which Sieglin (1935) performed, has demonstrated that many individuals in the elites of ancient Greece, had blond or red hair. For instance, Alcibiades, Alexander the Great, Critias, Demetrius of Phalerum, King Lysimachus, Ptolemy II, Philadelphus and King Pyrrhus, were all fair-haired individuals. Dionysius I, the ruler of Syracuse, had blond hair and freckles, whilst the Athenian playwright Euripides, also had a fair and freckled complexion. [Gunther (1956).]

    In the 4th Century AD, the Jewish physician Adamantios, described what he called the “true Greek” – or where the “Hellenic race has been kept pure” as follows:

    “Wherever the Hellenic and Ionic race has been kept pure, we see proper tall men of fairly broad and straight build, neatly made, of fairly light skin and blond; the flesh is rather firm, the limbs straight, the extremities well made. The head is of middling size, and moves very easily; the neck is strong, the hair somewhat fair, and soft, and a little curly; the face is rectangular, the lips narrow, the nose straight, and the eyes bright, piercing, and full of light; for of all nations the Greek has the fairest eyes.” [Günther (1927) 157.]

    This quote is interesting as it shows that even then – some 800 years after the end of Hellenic Classical period – some Nordic Greek elements had survived. These elements can, of course, still be seen today as well, although much reduced in numbers.

    For more literary descriptions of pigmentation in ancient Greek poetry and prose, as well as craniological evidence, the following works are recommended: De Lapouge (1899), Jax (1933), Myres (1930), Reche (1936) and Ridgeway (1901). »

    Also look at the recent discovery of how the ancient Greek statues were actually colored! http://www.google.com/search?q=ancient+greek+statues+color

    And, to link with the new thread: « In ancient Greece, it seems, a small penis was the sought-after look for the alpha male.

    “Greeks associated small and non-erect penises with moderation, which was one of the key virtues that formed their view of ideal masculinity,” explains classics professor Andrew Lear, who has taught at Harvard, Columbia and NYU and runs tours focused on gay history. “There is the contrast between the small, non-erect penises of ideal men (heroes, gods, nude athletes etc) and the over-size, erect penises of Satyrs (mythic half-goat-men, who are drunkards and wildly lustful) and various non-ideal men. Decrepit, elderly men, for instance, often have large penises.”

    Similar ideas are reflected in ancient Greek literature, says Lear. For example, in Aristophanes’ Clouds a large penis is listed alongside a “pallid complexion,” a “narrow chest,” and “great lewdness” as one of the characteristics of un-athletic and dishonorable Athenian youths.

    Only grotesque, foolish men who were ruled by lust and sexual urges had large penises in ancient Greece. Art history blogger Ellen Oredsson notes on her site that statues of the era emphasized balance and idealism.

    “The ideal Greek man was rational, intellectual and authoritative,” she wrote. “He may still have had a lot of sex, but this was unrelated to his penis size, and his small penis allowed him to remain coolly logical.”

    There are several theories as to why the “ideal” penis size developed from small in ancient Greece to large today. Lear suggests that perhaps the rise of porn, or an ideological push to subject men to the same body shaming that women typically face, are behind the modern emphasis on having a large penis.

    But Lear adds that in both societies, ideas about penis size are completely “unrelated to reality or aesthetics.” Contrary to popular myth, there’s no clear evidence that a large penis correlates with sexual satisfaction. »

    There were done studies in the 1900´s of genitalia and criminality.

    http://www.xenosystems.net/quote-note-304/#comment-298183

    You think this is all? Think again!

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 3:39 pm Reply | Quote
  • Xoth Says:

    But just look at the virtue of all those tears, spiraling, spiraling ever upward!

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 4:11 pm Reply | Quote
  • Jeffrey Singer Says:

    The Angelic Doctor has something to say on this topic:

    http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2016/11/can-schadenfreude-be-virtuous.html

    Enjoy the tears, guilt free my Catholic friends!

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    The little christian devil.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 17th, 2016 at 5:33 pm Reply | Quote
  • Melanie L'Heuremaudit Says:

    Students at University of Massachusetts, Amherst, are staging a week-long “SHIT-IN”

    until their demands for GENDER-NEUTRAL facilities are met

    This Shit-In is taking place at Whitmore Administration building, which activists have nicknamed QUEERMORE

    Organizers have provided an online sign-up form for supporters to stake out specific times and locations, giving them the option of stating whether they prefer to be ALONE in a stall or to share one with “OTHER SITTERS.”

    In addition, students are DEMANDING that the University hire a professor for the WGSS [Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Department] who is an expert in the field of critical TRANSMISOGNY from an INTERSECTIONAL perspective

    https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=8409

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    I support this.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 18th, 2016 at 2:35 am Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    not everybody crying on the Left, Zizek got a plan already: – “we need to get those white trash on our side, we cant win elections without them”. Sweet dreams.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Keep us updated, SVErshov!

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer”

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 18th, 2016 at 2:38 am Reply | Quote
  • Grahf Says:

    Feel’s good man

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi5HrlKSAOQ

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Shadilay!

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    really need some polishing. Kek cannot be a rebelion of ‘falsely imposed’ or any other kind of order, bacause chaos imposed by Kel is a total and permanent. Any persived order is mental delusion. Problem here is that chaos cannot be easily conceptualized, if at all.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    chaos is merely an apparition of another order.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 18th, 2016 at 6:42 am Reply | Quote
  • tsk Says:

    Fascism bathing in liberal tears is the only proven path.

    It is dumb to claim that fash is a less potent force for the roll-back of leftism than the existence of Lee Kwan Yew’s over-hyped (yet obscure) multiracial citystate on a rock-island in bumfuck, Oceania.

    Singapore is going to die. It is being slowly swallowed by the surrounding culture and gene pool. Singaporeans are childless and effete. It’s a blip.

    Trump himself isn’t an actual fascist, but the demoralization of the Cathedral by his fascist aesthetics and attitude of “fuck your feelings” is enabling anti-demotists all over the planet. The simple fact is, fascism works, and it’s (so far) the only model proven to work.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    >>Singapore is going to die. It is being slowly swallowed by the surrounding culture and gene pool. Singaporeans are childless and effete.

    Oops.

    [Reply]

    tsk Reply:

    Oops?

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    An interjection, used to express acknowledgment of something gone wrong. In this case it refers to the description that >>Singapore is going to die. It is being slowly swallowed by the surrounding culture and gene pool. Singaporeans are childless and effete.”

    Apparently people sort of die out without the cult of motherhood subordinated to the cult of fatherhood.

    Terra patrum. Are you a patriot?

    SVErshov Reply:

    it is really does no matter if fash is proven path, or not, for small islandic nations simply there is no other path. in my POV anarchistic India is much better in many respects.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 18th, 2016 at 9:25 am Reply | Quote
  • kimcarsons Says:

    The “left” vilifications on this post seems so skewed. It must be an American thing. The left running out of steam and becoming merely the combination of identity politics & liberalism. But liberalism if anywhere surely is on the right – private property as the marker and maker of social identity.
    The European left, not the faux left leaders, but left thinkers, still hold onto ideas of universalism,
    emancipation, equality. Fine to play the Nietzche aristocratic card against the left. But here on this post it seems like a bitter feud with the alt-right and the faux-left.

    And surely it’s uncontested fact : all states are born from an originary violence. which begat All
    the institutional foundations ; whether left or right its pretty arbitrary if your one of the first inhabitants.

    And Victimhood; no state is more adept at it than the Jewish State, which literally enforces Victimhood thru its ideological and repressive state apparatuses

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    >>whether left or right its pretty arbitrary if your one of the first inhabitants.”

    w0t´s that m8?

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    NTZSCH = YHWH

    Aristocracy is the straight line, the goal.

    Blessed is the peak, for it shall inherit the earth.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    The meek shall inherit the earth. «Norse mjukr “soft, pliant, gentle,” from Proto-Germanic *meukaz (source also of Gothic muka-modei “humility,” Dutch muik “soft”), of uncertain origin, perhaps from PIE *meug- “slippery, slimy.”»

    What´s the sound that frogs make?

    And they turn into

    princes.

    Altho girls are physically soft, and slimy, and are inheriting the earth now.

    Princes turn into « kings — a late Old English contraction of cyning “king, ruler” (also used as a title), from Proto-Germanic *kuningaz (source also of Dutch koning, Old Norse konungr, Danish konge, Old Saxon and Old High German kuning, Middle High German künic, German König). From Proto-Germanic *kuningaz. From Pre-Germanic *ǵn̥h₁yom, from Proto-Indo-European *ǵenh₁- ‎(“to beget, to give birth”). »

    Funnily, the secret etymology of konungur is ‘woman young’. As Óðin rides with his valkyres and Þór dresses as a woman for a mission.

    Both have completed the alchemical marriage

    and become the androgyny.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Lao Tzu contra hardness, Daodejing chapters 36, 76, 78

    We need to subordinate softness to the service of hardness.

    Recall the section of Zarathustra N quotes at the end of Twilight of the Idols.

    Charles de Gaulle pinned Germany’s WWI defeat on the Nietzscheanism of its generals. They lacked “measure”. Megalomaniacs with unhinged wills to power, Promethean filth. An elite ceases to be elite when it loses its humility. Wu wei entails the subordination of the will to an Olympian aristocracy; Immanentism is Satanism, and hubris is a boobytrap laid by the prankster gods for entertainment.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    The brain is soft, but it moves the hard bones.

    The subtle rules the dense.

    😘

    Wagner Reply:

    >😘
    >too soft

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    “The direct and the indirect lead on to each other in turn. It is like moving in a circle—you never come to an end. Who can exhaust the possibilities of their combination? “

    Wagner Reply:

    Land’s mom

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    It´s funny how the token Negro is at the back doing the drummish beating, while the blondes are at the front. It signals a new dawn.

    Hail LOL Yah, in nomini Neetzsche

    in nomini Pepe, Kek, 4 ever

    Gnonianity,

    amen: https://youtu.be/LRP8d7hhpoQ

    the externalization of hierarchy.

    we´re all nigger kangz now

    under a black sun

    Wagner Reply:

    “Philosophical research is and remains atheism, which is why philosophy can
    allow itself ‘the arrogance of thinking.’ Not only will it allow itself as much;
    this arrogance is the inner necessity of philosophy and its true strength. Precisely
    in this atheism philosophy becomes what a great man once called the
    ‘joyful science.’” (Heidemama)

    At the end of the Antichrist NTZSCH commands “Priests are not to be reasoned with, they are to be locked up” and goes on to explicitly count philosophers as priests. The arrogance of philosophy is justified by the terms of atheism, but what of the terms of theism? H is silent about that here.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Atheism is nothing but a senseless affair. A pretension, a closing off to oneself. A denial.

    Nothing is more pathetic than a man in denial.

    « Theos, word-forming element meaning “god, gods, God,” from comb. form of Greek theos “god,” from PIE root *dhes-, root of words applied to various religious concepts, such as Latin feriae “holidays,” festus “festive,” fanum “temple.” »

    Men always erect temples, to one god or another.

    Artxell Knaphni Reply:

    The inner truth of Neoreaction is always already conceived of as ‘inferiority’, not as one inferiority amongst others, but as the essence of Inferiority itself. Its origin is elsewhere, always already elsewhere, as the governing horizon of its totality of innovated responsibility. Called to this necessary source, Neoreaction walks only along erring paths (holzwegen), never reaching this horizon, beyond which it cannot think.

    (“Neoreaction Does Not Think”, ch.5 of “Nota Nostradami”, Martin Heidegger; 1967: p.56)

    Wagner Reply:

    *Neoreaction autodeconstructs*

    Hallelujah indeed.

    Posted on November 18th, 2016 at 1:48 pm Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    Left is in desparate move to consolidate intellectual resources. here is the text of letter which been sent to leading Leftist intellectual few days ago.

    “Hello,

    I am writing this email to follow up on a series of suggestions that I have made to a number of people in the department concerning the recent election. If you are receiving this email, it is because I think I have a good sense of your political persuasions and that you are the people that need to be reached. If there is anyone not on this email list who you think might be interested in the proposals I am about to make, please let me know or contact them yourself. Furthermore, I am not on social media and so I am not sure whether this is a new proposal that no one else has made yet, or if I am simply out of the loop. If the latter, please let me know.

    Many people have suggested that we start taking some action. This email is a first step in that direction. The reason I am emailing all of you is to propose that we meet sometime in the near future to discuss and try to start some form of collective action group. There is a tremendous amount of discontent at this moment and I think that the thing to do immediately is to tap into that discontent and start mobilizing. I also believe that if we don’t start doing something now there is a great danger that apathy will begin to set in and people will begin reconciling themselves to this nightmare and become complacent. That would be a horrendous mistake. In the past I have spent some time doing volunteer work for some left wing organizations. I know that many of you have done, and continue to do, the same. I propose that we discuss the possibility of trying to coordinate these separate efforts. Moreover, I know from my own personal experience volunteering that I am weak. The same is also true for many of you. For this reason, I think it is extremely important to begin working together and to provide one another with mutual support and to try and hold each other accountable. The thing for us to do now is to begin to organize and support opposition groups to put as much pressure as possible on the incoming administration and mitigate as much of the damage as we can.

    Finally, I am very much aware that we are all different kinds of leftists. But at a time like this, we need to be unified more than ever, and so I hope we can set aside our differences for the purposes of fighting to prevent as many destructive actions as possible.

    If you agree with this proposal, then let’s start figuring out a time and place to meet and discuss. Let’

    [Reply]

    bomag Reply:

    I think it is extremely important to begin working together and to provide one another with mutual support and to try and hold each other accountable. The thing for us to do now is to begin to organize and support opposition groups to put as much pressure as possible on the incoming administration and mitigate as much of the damage as we can.

    Yes, yes: a hierarchical militaristic structure that will enforce ideological purity with martial ruthlessness.

    Let the good times roll.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 18th, 2016 at 5:44 pm Reply | Quote
  • Waycis Says:

    And Obama didn’t condemn the chimpingout. Go figure an Anti-White mulatto born to a dysfunctional family would be so salty.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 18th, 2016 at 6:05 pm Reply | Quote

Leave a comment