Look at precolonial Africa. Dahomey was an actual viable imperialist power, subjugating its neighbouring former-independent entities — until the French, of course, acted (ostensibly) in defense of oppressed Cotonou. Gary “War Nerd” Brecher further elaborates on how, elsewhere, the supremacy of the Tutsi race keeps being shortchanged — in our days — by European defense of Hutus, militarily less developed.

Border conflict, of course, is usually about natural resources, very unironically the plague of Black Africa. Natural borders should arise either of bloody wars that we let happen so we see emerge regional dominant powers, or a wielding of power in terms of setting borders for economic interest, not for race. No modern state is monoracial, after all.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/01/08/Govt-offers-new-approach-to-classroom-discipline

What you propose is entering into a partnership with a known sociopath ala Heath Ledgers Joker.

You can’t get good out of these creatures, only Harm.

Progs = HARM as motive, MALICE as method, DECEIT as Modus Operandi.

Form a corporation that would run for office in third world hellholes. It would offer to run everything from top to bottom in the state, setting up a independent judiciary etc. It would be a for profit venture: deliver good government for a percentage of GDP. Form a virtual state (shadow government) and then offer services.

We can’t fully address the young country’s failures with more peacekeepers or a power-sharing deal. Here’s why Washington should launch a joint venture with Juba.

It’s a “joint-venture”, mind you.

Does that mean the colonial power gets to share half of the government profits?

which is to say, the true ‘progressive’ has also never existed, only a range of increasingly unvirtuous beings.