Comments on: Suicidal Libertarianism (Part D’oh)

By: Whither go Techno-Commercialism? | Count Nothingface

Whither go Techno-Commercialism? | Count Nothingface — Tue, 11 Mar 2014 06:30:20 +0000

[…] a policy were implemented in America, libertarian principles would have no hope of surviving its demographic impacts. Murray Rothbard, an otherwise brilliant economist, has an infamous piece on ownership of children […]

By: 3.9 Anarcho-Tyranny | Radish

3.9 Anarcho-Tyranny | Radish — Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:54:03 +0000

[…] definitive appraisal: Caplan is arguing that “any attempt to live under a regime that is anything other than the […]

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 04 Sep 2013 05:09:34 +0000

The natives don’t give a fig about liberty either, or haven’t you noticed?

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 04 Sep 2013 05:08:21 +0000

You do know what Maoism entails, right?

Of course you will just define libertarianism, Maoism and conservatism any way you like to bolster your hyperbole. Yawn.

By: Toddy Cat

Toddy Cat — Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:45:55 +0000

Actually, libertarians are a kind of progressive. While not Maoists, they are closer to Maoists than they are to actual conservatives and reactionaries.

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:12:24 +0000

Yes, but you didn’t throw up in your mouth did you? That was a bit of bluster. Believe it or not I am not an adherent of open-borders anymore than you are, sir!

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:09:39 +0000

No, Caplan is not a Maoist or any kind of progressive. Spend five minutes researching the guy before you say something else stupid.

By: lq3429

lq3429 — Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:56:23 +0000

This is senseless, but what it has to do with libertarianism is a mystery. Caplan sounds like a Maoist, or an adherent of Pol Pot. His ideas seem to be the exact opposite of libertarianism. Perhaps it is a not-to-subtle “progressive” attempt to infiltrate and undermine libertarianism with Maoist ideas?

By: tz

tz — Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:37:30 +0000

This is a sore spot for me. Libertarians seem to be on average really stupid. They can’t convince educated American neighbors of “the non aggression” principle even when it would be in the interest of their neighbors to adopt the view. You aren’t going to convince a foreign socialist.

Liberty is rare and precious and needs to be aggressively defended. Each person must defend every right of every other person or it will fail.

How is adding to your hard won land of freedom – paid for in large amounts of treasure, blood and sorrow, a large population of people who not only will refuse to defend your rights, but worse, actively find ways to violate them going to work out?

The only people the borders should be open to is to people who are equally concerned with defending rights as the natives. And those natives who cease to be defenders should be encouraged to find another country.

By: admin

admin — Sun, 14 Jul 2013 23:01:35 +0000

Effective Inc. got its name by carefully selecting its employees, rather than having them randomly mainlined into it.