<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Outside in &#187; Horizons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xenosystems.net/tag/horizons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xenosystems.net</link>
	<description>Involvements with reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 01:26:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Salience Preference</title>
		<link>http://www.xenosystems.net/salience-preference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xenosystems.net/salience-preference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 01:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discriminations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horizons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenosystems.net/?p=4008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time preference and provincialism are both special cases of salience preference. &#8212; Gate Of Heavens (@GateOfHeavens) October 31, 2014 On the assumption that most reactionary-types will want to refuse the idea of an integrated &#8216;salience preference&#8217; &#8212; what is the counter-argument? (I&#8217;m also wondering whether ethico-political humanism &#8212; in its restrictive rather than expansive usage [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Time preference and provincialism are both special cases of salience preference.</p>
<p>&mdash; Gate Of Heavens (@GateOfHeavens) <a href="https://twitter.com/GateOfHeavens/status/528325425877876736">October 31, 2014</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>On the assumption that most reactionary-types will want to refuse the idea of an integrated &#8216;salience preference&#8217; &#8212; what is the counter-argument? (I&#8217;m also wondering whether ethico-political humanism &#8212; in its restrictive rather than expansive usage &#8212; can be bound into the same super-syndrome.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xenosystems.net/salience-preference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
