It just keeps coming.
There have been suggestions it’s a parody, but my guess is that they really are this demented. Hard as it is to imagine, it doesn’t sound like mad barking to them. (They’ve been spoiled.)
The ADL has put together a helpful paranoid psychosis handbook, or “Hate Symbols Database”.
If you ever doubted that Neo-Nazi qabbalism is a dog’s breakfast, give it a skim. (They don’t even know how to count.)
Terrifyingly enough, “23” is in it, but only as a hand sign (phew!). Raw hate numerals include 1, 2, 12, 13, 14, 18, 28, 38, 43, 83, and 88, before reaching triple digits. Also beware ominous letter combinations such as “AB”. In fact, alphanumerics in general seem prone to evil, and are probably best avoided.
Are we missing something?
Submit a Hate Symbol to ADL at email@example.com
“This is just sour grapes because they missed 333, isn’t it?”
“You got me.”
Prominent opponent of white nationalism chalked-in to speak at Berkeley, so (of course) this happens.
The Left, as pretty much everyone now recognizes, is a fascism factory.
ADDED: Sailer’s coverage. “Seriously, what % of the political violence in the U.S. over the last 18 months has been from Trump’s side of the spectrum and what % from the respectable side? […] 5% vs. 95%? […] 2% vs. 98%? […] I resist the 1% vs. 99% ratio as improbable (although, admittedly, possible).”
I like to pride myself on having a very low opinion of people, but even I’m sometimes surprised by how idiotic they are …
(Empirical-realist, and punchy.)
Apparently we’re already in the next phase:
To call Trumpism fascist is to suggest that it demands from us a unique response. We can deploy the “fascism” moniker to Trump’s ascendance by recognizing features like selective populism, nationalism, racism, traditionalism, the deployment of Newspeak and disregard for reasoned debate. The reason we should use the term is because, taken together, these aspects of Trumpism are not well combated or contained by standard liberal appeals to reason. It is constitutive of its fascism that it demands a different sort of opposition.
I doubt whether they’ve thought this through, but don’t let that get in the way of progress.
Final level unlocked.
(There’s been some concern about this site soaking up visitor information, so if that’s the sort of thing that worries you, take care.)
ADDED: Here‘s the introduction page.
Yes, it’s a ‘Moron bites’ that I’ve lazily twitter-packaged. Here‘s the almost incomprehensibly dismal source.
Have to plug in a link to this (at Columbia) for history’s sake.
“We have edited this post, because the original tone of the post was inappropriate for the severity of its content.”
The comment thread turns into a dark irony envelopment exercise some time before its end. (Digressive sub-question: When was it exactly that irony become exclusively and bitingly right-wing?)
ADDED: “The Dark Enlightenment doesn’t even have good memes.”
(I haven’t listened to it. Tracey’s description is enough.)
From ThinkProgress (surprisingly!):
The belief in the genetic predisposition of qualities like intelligence are [sic] a hallmark of white nationalism.
So, just to begin with, the entire discipline of genetics is now classified as ‘white nationalist’ by these lunatics. A cynical liar, a pitiful ignoramus, or an abominable racist — choose one. No wonder these creatures are losing so badly.