Posts Tagged ‘Reaction’

Twitter cuts (#79)

Embedded citation: “I don’t have any interest in turning back the clock because I don’t believe it can be done. You can only observe and describe.” — Houellebecq

Anything not dealing with ratchets is wishing modernity away, rather than engaging it.

August 21, 2016admin 31 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Practicalities
TAGGED WITH : , ,

Sentences (#49)

Douthat:

The liberal sees that conservatives were foolish to imagine Iraq remade as a democracy; the conservative sees that liberals were foolish to imagine Europe remade as a post-national utopia with its borders open to the Muslim world. But only the reactionary sees both.

(Admitted here as a single sentence, which it should have been.)

April 24, 2016admin 21 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Sentences
TAGGED WITH : , ,

Twitter cuts (#47)

Just using this as a link-transporter:


This isn’t meant to be snarky — both writers are XS favorites.

January 28, 2016admin 49 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Neoreaction
TAGGED WITH : , , ,

Populism II

David Frum does a good job at explaining why the new populist upsurge isn’t an intrinsically rightist phenomenon:

They aren’t necessarily superconservative. They often don’t think in ideological terms at all. But they do strongly feel that life in this country used to be better for people like them—and they want that older country back.

Continue Reading

December 30, 2015admin 39 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Pass the popcorn
TAGGED WITH : , , , ,

#HRx

The basic tenets of Heroic Reaction:

— Moldbug is over-rated.
— Capitalism needs to be brought under control.
— The errors of fascism are dwarfed by those of libertarianism.
— White racial community is the core.
— ‘Atomization’ is a serious problem.
— Answers are already easily available, so over-thinking is unhelpful, and even seriously pathological.

Unlike #NRx, #HRx is primarily a political movement. Its theoretical appetite is modest, since it has faith that everything it truly needs can be retrieved — more-or-less straightforwardly — from the folkish past.

Among the many myriads confusedly aligned with ‘Neoreaction’, a number have already expressed an explicit interest in abandoning this odd cult for a bolder, brasher, more politically dynamic successor, stripped of techno-commercial Vulcanism, race-treachery, and intellectual circumlocution. Far more would join the exodus (from #NRx) if energetically led. Others would pour in from elsewhere. All #HRx still requires is a commander. Then it could be huge.

From the moment #HRx is born, the scale of (apparent) #NRx would shrink dramatically. That is an outcome, I suspect, that could be endured among the remnant with serene stoicism.

ADDED: Brett Stevens has some thoughtful commentary. (See also below.)

April 11, 2015admin 109 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Ideology
TAGGED WITH : , , ,

Twitter cuts (#15)

Attending the #HRx flotation comes this gem:

April 6, 2015admin 8 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Slogans
TAGGED WITH : , , ,

Twitter cuts (#9)

With no idea how long this is going to last …


… I’m seizing it as an opportunity to grab some stuff.

Depersonalization is a goal worth striving for, with the corollary that good sense should be appreciated in itself. These remarks are exceptionally sensible:

Continue Reading

February 17, 2015admin 31 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Neoreaction
TAGGED WITH : , , , ,

Quote note (#144)

Pete Dushenski on the reactionary case for Bitcoin, the lead up:

Gold balanced the forces of the world. As such, no matter where you went, gold was transferable to the local currency. Whether you were in France or Florence, your gold was good. In fact, if you weren’t in your own backyard, using your own community’s debt instruments, gold was basically the only thing that was accepted. So whether you wanted to buy a copy of the Bible, fight a foreign war, or build a palace, you needed gold.

Then came The Revolution: replacing the Monarch, the Church, and generally anything good by instituting “reforms” and encouraging “progress” in the name of “the people.” At first, the sheer number of supporters of constitutional democracy was sufficient to establish this social experiment. Eventually, however, sheer numbers would prove insufficient. Why? Because this “new” system failed on every account to educate its supporters on the essential matters of politics and economics, leaving them intellectually high and dry and prone to the exact golden calves that the Church and Monarch were protecting them from. As a result, after experiencing a bit of lifestyle creep, an newfound and ever-growing sense of entitlement began to take root. And oh did those roots grow deep.

The roots grew so deep that the electorate began knocking on democracy’s door, demanding more and more. Where once they were thankful for their new liberties and freedoms, they soon found themselves adrift at sea, lost and without cause. To unyoke this infinite expansion of wants from the finite, gold-bound resources of the state, the Revolutionaries had no choice but to take hold of the money supply of their nations, wresting it from the grasp of sound money and all the goodness and balance it had fostered. This was the only way to keep up the ruse and placate the electorate. So they instituted Central Banking at a scale never before seen. …

(The whole thing is glorious, including — in the original — footnotes.)

January 14, 2015admin 36 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Political economy
TAGGED WITH : , , ,

Twitter cuts (#6)

Amplified when read as a follow up to #4, this piece of jiu jitsu by VXXC is a great way to invigorate some running debates (even if it can’t be embedded normally because of the ridiculous privacy option activated on his account):

Strangely so called Reactionaries coming to Fences marked Republic, Constitution, United States wish to obliterate these walls utterly. (9:09 AM, 7 January 2015.)

January 8, 2015admin 22 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Political economy
TAGGED WITH : , , , ,

Twitter cuts (#4)

This surely deserves immortalization:

January 5, 2015admin 16 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Sentences
TAGGED WITH : , ,