Which really means the Rule of Scholars. Thomas Edison had all of 3 months of formal education. Among many things he basically invented R&D, which is where many brainacs now receive livelihood from…Ye would have destroyed his mind with pyschotropic drugs in school. If he evaded your snares you’d certainly make sure he had no career. Nor Einstein.

Rule of Scholars is Ruin. Fearing the People the Smart have used their gifts to deceive, their rule is degrading and insane. It is a projection of their guilt and fears, their loathing for their victims they can still see.

No Rulers in History every pumped pornography and drugs at their subjects for instance.

For they know they cannot hold this Wolf by the Throat once the Wolf realizes it’s situation, and their terror of the people’s just retribution over the obscene plunders and experiments of the Smart drives them to ever more delierium.

The Smart cannot rule, and this is ancient.

Moreover our people will no longer be slaves, this is what some and probably enough are saying.

Rifle Trumps Brain.

Won’t play Rock, Paper, Scissors. We have that now too.

[and don’t tell me to get over self, if you’d be a Tyrant]

I don’t think people will enjoy the actual anarchy without the tyranny. Whatever else we have an effective police force, fairly effective borders, an effective military for defending the nation, pretty effective utilities. This is not a defense of the the current state, which is for sale to all plunderers foreign and domestic, it’s own elites being dedicated to the propostion that all about us is evil and must perish from the earth – a perishing they profit from…we are going in all the wrong ways.

However I can make a defense for the resilience of our inheritance and how we are yet organized due to that inheritance.

Our elites hate the people. Anti-Majority government is bad by definition for most.

We should however consider where this King would come from…I mean where he went to school…and so on. He would be the Elites unbound by custom and our still extant liberties.

Also, this inspires me to finish putting together the academic-style journal. It’s too easy to build a case against neoreaction when cherry-picking from blogposts—we all let our guard down sometime, slip into hyperbole, or say things that we don’t quite mean because we know our readers understand the larger context. A quarterly “best of” journal will filter the wheat from the chafe, providing a best-case defense of neoreactionary ideas.