Comments on: Timing

By: VXXC

VXXC — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:07:42 +0000

@Hearst,

SKYNET achieves consciousness. That is to say AI appears. The next step in evolution and sought as quest by Transhumanists. That’s the goal.

By: Mark Warburton

Mark Warburton — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:58:53 +0000

A techno-singularity?

By: Hearst

Hearst — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:48:40 +0000

I tried to look it up, but can someone tell what a “techno-intelligence catastrophe” is?

By: Hearst

Hearst — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:59:23 +0000

The proper role of the Monarch is the people’s protector. He/she organizes the defenses against outside threats, but also acts as a check on the internal elites. Today these “internal elites” tend to be transnational in loyalty committed to commerce and global government with them at the top of the pyramid (with us profane goyim chiseled to fit as bricks in the lower part of the pyramid).

By: The Anti-Gnostic

The Anti-Gnostic — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:56:10 +0000

Along those lines, I sometimes wonder if that’s the Deep State reason for keeping so many combat troops well overseas, where they can’t threaten the government and can’t defend the southern border with Mexico.

By: bob sykes

bob sykes — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:14:49 +0000

Don’t we already have a semi-hereditary oligarchy? And hasn’t the oligarchy created the tools needed for a dictatorship?

The oligarchy is flooding the country with Mexicans who come from and want a socialist state. They are also used to obeying a ruling class. So, I would expect that at some point amnesty gives the communist/socialist Democrat Party a permanent majority. The we will have the typical South American populist state like Venezuela or Argentina. In both those countries the government has popular support for its policies. But then, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Franco etc all led popular movements and had popular support.

By: VXXC

VXXC — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:05:25 +0000

A military coup as normally understood isn’t possible.

Because the Fyrd system of Saxon militia still quite exists both formally and informally.

Because the Administration down to the very police and Military is Jeffersonian, that is to say distributed to lowest practical level.

Because that is a moral bar so high it’s impossible to conceive of it being successfully passed.
No we don’t just obey orders, no we’re not in it just for the check. Sacred Oath is Trump.

Because the Regular Military is structured in the personnel system so as to make a coup nearly impossible, even if you had followers there is no leader. And no followers.

Because seizing Washington only gains you Washington.

By: VXXC

VXXC — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:58:13 +0000

@Lana

Yep. Just as soon as NeoLiberal Shock Therapy steals the real wealth – to pay off the paper debts – we’ll have an Aristocracy. Actually an Oligarchy, but at least the Demos will be well and proper crushed. It’s not just Regina Penny Red, it’s Lord Bieber.

And can’t say you didn’t ask for it.

By: admin

admin — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 05:15:24 +0000

I agree on all points. (It would be fascinating to see how Michael Anissimov would respond to them.)

By: The Anti-Gnostic

The Anti-Gnostic — Wed, 12 Feb 2014 04:10:53 +0000

An actual KING?

Of course not. I’m frankly not sure America could have a king even if Americans wanted one.

In the first place, WHO would be King? The bloodlines are hopelessly tangled, if not completely corrupted by intervening democratic acts.

In the second place, who would ordain the American king? The Lutheran-Missouri Synod? The Mormon Tabernacle? Oprah? Joel O’Steen? Archbishop Jose’ Gomez?

In the third place, a king is the head of an ancestral family who owns his people’s land and the apparatus of their State in allodial title. America has no ancestral people. All competing public claims to the American territory would have to be completely extinguished, and the dial reset to Zero, for an extremely forceful and powerful individual to lay claim to the land and State for the purpose of bequeathing it to his posterity.

America may get a military coup but monarchy–very, very doubtful.