Twitter cuts (#138)

Discuss.

(Relevant.)

June 28, 2017admin 106 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Lunatics

TAGGED WITH : , , ,

106 Responses to this entry

  • Daniel Chieh Says:

    In the end, the God-Emperor will be the first AI that has mastered natural language.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    Already in use in call centers. People in off shore call centers losing job.

    [Reply]

    nydwracu Reply:

    I’ve never had a call with a call-center AI go any other direction than “OK, you stupid machine, boot me to a human ASAP”. They have voice recognition solved well enough to allow simple voice navigation, but the only technological innovation beyond that that I’ve seen is that some of them will put you on the line with a human if you swear at them enough.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    more like the AI will be plural and will arise close enough together and be competing AI and it will be a long time before we grant them autonomy yeah i know to an AI groupie that a oxymoron but its whats going to happen. So like the printing press and the colt or internet and bitcoin if you prefer AI may end up being distributed defense.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    AI will be competing in who can connect with other AIs

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    AI and A consciousness are different and Im AC skeptic. states are already trying to control who will get to use AI as a weapon that process defeats itself as it encourages distribution by all sorts of actors,The cathedral could certainly still win Im pessimistic on NRX hopes the empire will be handed to them because theyre such clever wags, the empire will fight and if they are defeated its going to be by the mob not NRX or capitalists or socialists the pure type of either are now as forbidden as ethnats and theocrats it CapSoc or bust with the cathedral. The mob is not going to reassemble itself into NRX.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    The mob is not going to reassemble itself into NRX.

    lol

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 2:22 pm Reply | Quote
  • Lotus Says:

    “There is something of the charlatan in anyone who triumphs in any realm whatever.” – Cioran

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 2:27 pm Reply | Quote
  • Orthodox Says:

    How many famous communists were elected to high office in the United States? I know that number is smaller than the number of communists who got blacklisted, it may even be smaller than the number of communists who were executed by the State.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    only if we let communists define communist comrade. As we all have been told there is no true communist.

    [Reply]

    nydwracu Reply:

    If you let Communists define “communist”, surely they have to at least give you Vito Marcantonio.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 2:31 pm Reply | Quote
  • Temmy Says:

    Every radical movement has an open party and a shadow party. Its the shadow party that gets the work done because they get themselves into positions of influence while hiding in plain sight,

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 2:34 pm Reply | Quote
  • August Hurtel Says:

    True, but too vague. It is statistically true.

    Since good governance is simple, good leaders tend to have a much lower profile than, well, any modern politician.

    And it’s easier to pull off some serious meme magic if you don’t have to worry about your employer or immediate family finding out.

    So again, too vague. I want to solve the IQ shredder problem. The meme’s are funny, but we are still circling the drain here…

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 2:40 pm Reply | Quote
  • AureliusMoner Says:

    Indeed, our greatest potential leaders have not yet dared to lead…

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    but when some others risk all to prepare the way for them to emerge safely they will – typical millennial faggotry not a man in the entire generation.

    [Reply]

    A.B. Prosper Reply:

    I see it as more of a risk/reward problem, no one wants to lead because the risk/reward ratio is off.

    Its not worth the gains to take over so much work when an imperial standard of living can be had for a fraction of the effort. A few million US is enough for more luxury than most imagine and the best of everything and accumulating such a fortune is easy compared to “being a leader’ and getting anywhere

    Normally one does this kind of thing for ones tribe but no one yet has a tribe capable of that kind of thing, the nation state is yet too strong and people are far too atomized as of yet., The US isn’t fully a low/no trust society but its on the express train to that hell and we already simply don’t trust other people nearly enough to follow

    While the Left as an insatiable thirst for dominance, they are also highly chaos driven and facing an increasingly angry opposition as well, sop nothing there.

    the Right reactionaries being actually conservative don’t want to rule anyway but to roll back in a small state but socially conservative direction . This can’t be done with boots on necks so no leaders/

    If/when the current chaos problem spirals too far out of control and the collapse happens smaller polities will spring up and the necessity to tribe up will make people want to lead.

    It won’t be President of the United States though but leader of the city state of San Francisco county or the like. If we are very lucky there will still be a large state but no promises

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 3:34 pm Reply | Quote
  • Dark Reformation101 Says:

    Why might they be anonymous though?

    Threats to life and career are the obvious answer.

    That can be answered with one simple solution:

    Money.

    The reason why Donald Trump was able to even try to do what he did was because he was wealthy.

    So, perhaps it is an investment problem.

    If capital can reach the relevant entrepreneurs, then you would see a difference. That is my initial hypothesis anyway.

    James Burnham in Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom outlines the characteristics of Ruling Elites and those people who push themselves into the Elite.

    He lists the following characteristics:

    1: They possess a tremendous capacity for hard work.

    2: They have high confidence and are extremely driven.

    3: They possess intuitive understanding of individual human psychology and are skilled in motivating a group of humans via charisma. This charisma, in the political sphere, presents as either unhinged fanaticism or the demonstration of a deeply sincere moral commitment.

    There are other characteristics……

    At the moment, further right ideas are probably only really understood by “nerds” or “owls”.

    Change happens with a lion get’s his pawns on some book, document or encounters some charismatic “owl” or “foxy-owl” and understands the potential.

    The lion then roars, and slowly all the other tigers, and foxes and owls flock to the lion.

    EKL In Liberty or Equality writes:


    Among modern authors the theme of the “charismatic leader,” as distinguished from the strictly non-democratic ruler, has been dealt with by Max Weber.Yet he was far from being alone in delineating and characterizing this contemporary phenomenon in connection with democratic demands. Others have successfully analyzed these populistic dictators, Burckhardt’s terribles simplificateurs, the “handsome fellows with the talents of non-commissioned officers”—a truly remarkable prophecy (but not quite as accurate as it seems; Hitler was never a non-commissioned officer, only a Gefreiter—lance corporal or p.f.c).

    These nineteenth and early twentieth century vistas were not basically new. Aristotle knew only too well that the tyrants have to come—as stalwart defenders of the lower classes against wealthy, unpopular minorities (aristocrats, plutocrats, etc.). These tyrants have to be “regular fellows” (“ordinary, decent chaps”), and, as we have repeatedly emphasized, of the “leading” rather than the “ruling” type. In this as in many other respects they fit completely into the democratic pattern—as President Eliot of Harvard would have been forced to admit. President Wilson’s definition of a democratic leader is, actually, identical with that of a totalitarian dictator. The difference is in degree.

    Not only Hitler but perhaps even Antonio Conselheiro, the half mad “counsellor” of the ecstatic backwoods revolutionaries in Brazil, were not simply personifications of the masses and hence “born leaders.” Involuntarily one is reminded of Goethe’s description of the “daimonic man” in the course of history:

    The demoniacal element has the most terrifying aspects if it is strongly represented in a human being. I have had during my life-time the occasion to observe several such men, partly from a distance, partly close to. These men are not always exceptional either in intellectual capacities or in talents, and rarely in kindness. Yet they emanate a frightening magnetic force and exert an incredible power over all creatures and even over the elements. Who can tell how far such influence will extend? All the united moral forces are powerless against them, and the more intelligent part of humanity tries in vain to unmask them as simpletons or frauds; the masses are attracted by them. Seldom or never can one find several men of that type as contemporaries, and nothing is able to overpower them except the Universe itself, against which they have picked their fight. And it may well have been from such observations and remarks that that terrible sentence found its origin: Nemo contra deum nisi deus ipse.

    The reference to the masses, who feel attracted to these leaders although the more intelligent people reject them, is highly revealing. Finally, especially dangerous is the influence exercised by “the demoniac” as formulated by Goethe on Burckhardt’s “awful simplifiers” preaching what Henri Hauser called fausses idées claires. The result of that is only too often Irving Babbitt’s “efficient megalomaniac” who—in the words of Burke—wants to “improve the mystery of murder.””

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    Look it always come down to superior force and “teh people” always have it. In white nations they use it judiciously, and will put up with a lot of bad management being undertaking regime change.But the degree of mismanagement is only part of the calculus they do, How aware how many of them are about the incompetence, how much information they get about the possibility of better management if the change can be shown to be less costly than assumed if an alternative emerges who is surely better if the current leaders are worse than incompetent in ways to make them loathsome beyond mere reason. how well a consensus is emerging or at least a winning coalition, In short at some point the people will throw their ability to be more violent than the current state can be behind someone if the cost benefit works.

    Today we have a almost even split on the verge of hopen warfare regardless the cost, this has been simmering since the american revolution and its exports, its been hard to understand what was going on or how it would develop, people who might be on one side today may have been on another side at different points in the evolution its not even accurate to try and define what constituted a side thats been continuous, things began to change and its taken 200 years to begin to understand the implications some say it will take another 100 for DNA and AI to weigh in.I dont think the people are going to wait much longer.Some of the issues are clear enough to almost enough that there will be war. That state of ready to go to war will conjure a leader. It might not actually go to a war, the emergence of the leader who correctly intuits the readiness of one side to go to war signals to the other side its time to go to war or back down. the other side is usually overconfident in its legacy position until the very end.Trump is John the Baptist, his head may end up on Salome’s plate but he prepareth the way for The One.

    Its hard to predict the way a war will play out and certainly the aftermath teh people may not get what they thought they were getting. But one way to estimate is to look at the various strands that are coalescing as the willing this is also a gauge of how close the time is. An example would be that there are groups in various parts of the world who are beginning to coordinate even though they are aware they hold some fundamental difference many respects.this is annoying to purists but we are fighting puritains

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 4:37 pm Reply | Quote
  • 4p0llo YoungFreudians Says:

    The mark of a leader is the willingness to submit to the heat-death of the society ripping apart the ligaments and still being able to run the 400 meter.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 5:45 pm Reply | Quote
  • Michael Rothblatt Says:

    Anonymouses are not much better thought. They might not be charlatans, but they do tend to be even bigger lunatics.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 6:22 pm Reply | Quote
  • August Hurtel Says:

    I was reading something on Bitcoin being accepted in Japan, and I also know there’s a lot of Chinese miners- and a lot of Chinese vacationing in Japan nowadays.

    So that led me to wonder, was Bitcoin the result of a lone actor? Or a state trying to get out of the mess it’s in playing the modern fiat game? I wouldn’t say that definitively, but I can see the potential for Japan here, even if there was no government sanction.

    China has been trying to compete with the dollar, but it seems a lot like fighting the last war rather than looking ahead. Additionally, the open competition has led to friction with the U.S.G. Friction a smaller country wouldn’t want.

    So, It would make sense to play it anonymously.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    Bitcoins popularised in Japan by Fatty Mark, biggest btc scamer who run first bitcoin/usd exchange.

    [Reply]

    Hegemonizing Swarm Reply:

    Creating Bitcoin pseudonymously was the right thing to do – “Ethereum Founder Vitalik Buterin presumed dead in a car crash” is what happens otherwise. Only a rumor and it was enough to crash the market, but the reason this rumor worked so well is because it is easy to imagine it real.
    True Names (as Vernor Vinge imagined in 1981) give too much power to your enemies.

    This risk itself already selects chest-pounding, careless buffoons for those publicly in power, especially that dare to promote unpopular ideas.

    No surprise that in modern times, public politicians, even elected ones, are effectively figureheads. The real decision-making happens in the shadow. Not anonymous, but not easy to pinpoint either. By sake of being a well-known person, they can be subtly manipulated, by threat of ruining their reputation by revealing real or fake information, or even violence.

    An anonymous leader that can control technology for critical infrastructure such as markets and logistics (especially when everything is swarming with autonomous drones) could also work. Urbit for president? (More paranoid: how do we know this isn’t already the case – Petya attack shows how vulnerable everything is. A small group can control, hold hostage, essentially all computer systems in the world, if they find vulnerabilities and use them wisely.)

    The most difficult part is “how to get the *right* anonymous leaders in charge”. It’s not like voting will do any good here. With anonymous leaders, the struggle for power happens entirely outside the public view, outside public control. Cyber-war in service of meme-war.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 6:42 pm Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    Correct, but in a very broad sense, observation. Fact is that in any specialised group of people (political party, sect) percentage of people with seriouse mental deviations always higher then in general population.

    Right perhaps is capable to attrack more crazies, then left. Because been crazy on the right kind of cool, while been crazy of the left is just that. Nowadays even 8 year old think been a normi ain’t cool.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 8:35 pm Reply | Quote
  • Kwisatz Haderach Says:

    Pax is hilarious. I would love to have beers with him.

    He’s a much better representative for the alt-right than Cernovich or various other egotistical borderline sociopath “namefags”.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 28th, 2017 at 9:32 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    Anoniminity is a thing of Revolutionaries.

    Maybe Reactionaries too.

    Not Romans

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    The breakdown of the agrarian model that rooted the people, caused by expanded oportunity and development of distributed power that weakened states and empowered individuals is the sea change. these changes caused by technological developments distributed information capitalism and socialism and were embraced by states as well changed the game. cities breed anonymity so does the tech of a press in your pamphleteers cellar and a gun in every house. already mid sized states china and russia are using these tools to challenge USG. Trump to bypass the fourth estate,The author is correct. you either go with this flow attempting to manage it or you double down and start killing anyone who steps out of line hoping you can regain control over tech. we live in interesting times.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 12:00 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    A lunatic is someone like Marx, who lets lunar spirit run with him wild (luna reflects the sun and is a “symbol” of reflective thought). The same can be said for many other Marxists or “post-Marxists” (Economicists in general). Feminists, and Reflectionists.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 1:23 am Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    The alt-right/”Moldbuggism” certainly would be paltrier if Land didn’t come out of the racist closet and legislate in his own name – a name, one notices, rather Cathedral-approved judging by the recentness of his firing. Monkeys only believe in democratically-founded status, and when they believe, they *believe*, what can you do. It still hasn’t dawned on the Cathedral just how much of a background (read: subcutaneous) impact his “Support” has had the last few years on subversive thinking – well, I’m sure there have been plenty of rooms filled with cigar smoke and plutocrats frothy-mouthed debating the Land Problem… *10 minutes spent in intense anxiety about the thought of being gulagged – “gulogged out” – by one of these–gentlemen, OR LADIES OR BOTH* You set the example, Land. It’s possible you have also set some genuinely evil thoughts in motion (I mean evil not in the good sense); if your conscience ever grits its yellowing teeth (as you amusingly described old Kant) consider that wiser men than you have tossed the dice and at greater stakes:

    “To play the great play—to stake the existence of humanity, in order perhaps to attain something higher than the survival of the race.”

    “The decision. There will have to be countless sacrifices [Opfer]. An experiment.”

    “Vivisection—that is the point of departure! Many are now becoming conscious of the fact that it is going to hurt many beings if knowledge is going to occur! As if it has ever been different! And what pain!! Cowardly feeble rabble!” (from the Zarathustra period)

    Like I’ve said before, Land is screwed. His non-anonymity ruins his philosophizing.

    “What is transcendental to academic debate is submission to socio-economic power” Land foresaw in 1992. And here he is a 50 something year old man wondering if his embittered “E”xit to Shinghow excludes his own mind from socio-economic power. What a fuckin laugh. Yes Land, you and your family need to get plastic surgery and on a witness protection program, there are plenty of clandestine, gook-filled jungles, I’m sure you’ll manage.

    What is transcendental to Xenosystemic debate is submission to socio-economic power.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    While youre right land and moldbug would have more alure if anan they are not on the radar of the deep state and they are certainly not the future.They would simply be more interesting.
    we are already submitted to socio economic power the commies and capitalist merged in the 80s. whats going on now is there followers are only beginning to notice and notice the implications.and neither side is amused in fact just about everyone is unhappy about something and they are beginning to explore common causes.
    deep state is too engrossed in putting the finishing touches on the cathedral to notice bit players, they are more worried about players like china and russia and trump, they are only barely beginning to see the connection that go from their bigger nemesis to their smaller nemesis. Its highly doubtful NRX or any one idea is going to emerge, oh there will be distributed power but its really unlikely land and moldbug will like what it looks like. For a new order to emerge there must be a war, Land and moldbug or whovever wanted to claim their philosophy would have to “become worthy” by ceasing to be a faggot nerd sperg and wage a hot war and seize power and impose their vision, these faggots think they are going to blog the world they want into existence pure unadulterated faggotry.Much liklier to degenerate into neo medeival times ethstates will be popular thugstates Im sure also the cathedral will try to defend some of the east coast to keep from the guillotine.
    Like it or not there is a problem with capitalism as well as socialism. There are never going to be enough capitalists to defend it, the first rule of making a deal is that if you always win it all no one wants to deal with you anymore nothing in it for them. The people who have been supporting capitalism for the capitalists white men are beginning to see they are never winning.This is a big problem and they and others are also noticing capitalism destroys cultures civilizations people nations religions etc and leaves porn addiction and iphones instead some are questiong if zuck for president is such a great idea.Nick and jewbug thnk its nifty as a white male and conservative i cant support that party.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    His non-anonymity ruins his philosophizing.

    I had contemplated the same for me, before I went named. I knew that people are suckers and will ignore logic just because who said it (shoot the messanger) because they’re all too human.

    That’s the ultimate human stupidity, to ignore truth just because who said them.

    But there are protocols for that for the higher of us. Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send, someone said. I think it was like one of the guys who designed the Internet.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 1:48 am Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    Rothsteinberg here

    We control the U.S. government and have for decades and this is the reason America is forced to fight wars all over the globe for our profit

    We financed the Fed Reserve as well as WWI and WWII…

    WWIII has been ongoing since 1950.

    Land isn’t screwed, nor does he need plastic surgery or Witness Protection

    All he needs to do is work for us, do what we tell him to do, and we’ll protect him

    Rothsteinberg: I got a job for you.

    Land: Uh, well, if the pay’s right, and it’s legal, I’ll do it.

    Rothsteinberg: It’s not strictly legal.

    Land: [Thinks for a second] Well, if the pay’s right, I’ll do it.

    Rothsteinberg: You got yourself a deal

    See, that’s how simple it is. Why complicate life?

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    Land already works for you jewboy who you think youre fooling the entire jewbug project is a red gefilta fish to head off the next holocaust

    [Reply]

    Claire Colebrook Reply:

    Rothsteinberg here

    Oy vey, aren’t you glad Churchill and company made Europe safe for Africans?

    [Reply]

    Claire Colebrook Reply:

    Rothsteinberg here

    To be clear, Land doesn’t work for us.

    He tried to infiltrate one of our masked secret society meetings once, without an invitation and without the password.

    All of us arrived in chaffeured limousines, and he arrived in a Taxi

    Here’s how it happened.

    (In the video, Land is played by Tom Cruise):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_b-zpSnoHs

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 2:33 am Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    I have valued anonymity since the early 1990s for another reason: when you are a public figure, and you have a market to promote, you become immediately compromised in what you can say. We need more who are able to tell a radical truth in its many forms, and this requires opening up Nietzschean and Aurelian issues which are going to be taboo in a democratic society.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    I gave up the tax deduction to not register my daughter at birth with a social security number.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 2:59 am Reply | Quote
  • Peter A. Taylor Says:

    I plead nolo contendere.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 5:12 am Reply | Quote
  • Donald Trump Says:

    so what, are we not going to hang out in the bar with lots of babes and clink glasses while celebrating the dark enlightenment? i was really hoping this thing might become a source of famous illustriousness soon, I’m getting tired of the dank, disgusting sewers of internet thought crime centers.

    sooner or later jimmy fallon and stephen colbert won’t be relevant anymore, and it will be clear. PewDiePie is one example of a new youth symbol who has shown that we don’t care what Stephen Colbert says anymore, nor the hobgoblins.

    that said – really frankly my prediction is none right now. it would seem as though there is a widespread acceptance that something different is upon all, yet there is a sort of silent folding taking place. personally if it was once divisiveness in the extreme, i think that division has only gone underground. one cannot any longer pretend as though the fox is not a fox, or pretend that the fox is indeed some kind of oaf. the particles of this present are so misshapen as to suggest simulations which – if we consider the computational power of the mainframe of the past – we see that actually with more computing power there can be greater sophistication in the output of the input. confusion is no longer simply something to sort through – it is in fact the end result of every moment. it is the basic grounding of the future. to attempt to sort through confusion is simply to bring upon the mind something of constant (for the time being) malnourishment. for that reason I suggest to embrace the present confusion. expect complexity. try to enjoy it.

    confused existence is preferable to certain destruction.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    ‘confused existence is preferable to certain destruction.’

    What if we DO have both at the same time, try to enjoy?

    [Reply]

    Bruce Arney Reply:

    Coming out of anonymity may put one’s facial characteristics on the radar of armed drones hovering about. The software exists to hack into one’s car while driving at a high rate of speed and suddenly causing a hairpin turn into oblivion.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 9:19 am Reply | Quote
  • vxxc2014 Says:

    Only Academics or wanna be Academics would celebrate someone losing their job.

    Best of luck and actually I’m sure will ‘land’ somewhere.

    As to anonymity and its virtues,or vices the point is proven above…

    there are other reasons. Strife will reveal strife’s leaders not debates.

    When it turns to shit the quiet one will be quiet as he’s fixing to cut some fence, follow him when he starts cuttin the fence…. to paraphrase what we say.

    Trump of course meets all the requirements above including the demon lover of the masses etc, he just doesn’t meet the intellectuals bar [of jealously].

    One of the reasons the bums are holding over is of course the state has enormous payouts to it’s supporters.
    The masses in America get paid to vote Democrat, the elites take America for Trillions in loot per year.
    So something will have to become more important than money. Like survival.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    its quickening, its hour come round at last

    [Reply]

    vxxc2014 Reply:

    Colleen you realize we Irish will probably be rebelling as long as there’s any memory of Ireland and the Irish right?

    Good thing it happens to be useful in the present.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    Sadly VXXC Only Irish Americans seem to still carry the warlord gene the Irish have been infected with the european malaise, Sinn Fein is pro nigger immigration big time, ironic huh..Scotland celts are doing no better, worse really because more welfare money. The english celts picts whatever are still the weak chinned badtooth scum they always have been.
    only really see backbone in eastern europe.The problem is I see this in north Idaho too now, they have no experience of other people so when Californians move in and begin leftism they dont know whats happening. it seems reasonable bike paths, not burning crosses, etc. Its not until youre completely done like in NYC where I grew up that you know whats happening, seen it before.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    I propose calling them cademics. Missing the A.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    > Cathdemics

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 11:44 am Reply | Quote
  • spandrell Says:

    No kidding.

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 3:03 pm Reply | Quote
  • Should The Real Right Remain Underground? Says:

    […] Land over at Outside In cited a tweet by Pax Dickinson about the nature of anonymity in reality-based movements like the Alt […]

    Posted on June 29th, 2017 at 3:06 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    “Zwar denke ich Vieles mit der allerklarsten Überzeugung, was ich niemals den Mut haben werde zu sagen, niemals aber werde ich etwas sagen, was ich nicht denke.” – Kant, letter to Mendelssohn

    “And this we do also: we have consultations, which of the inventions and experiences which we have discovered shall be published, and which not: and take all an oath of secrecy, for the concealing of those which we think fit to keep secret: though some of those we do reveal sometimes to the state, and some not.” – Bacon, New Atlantis

    [Reply]

    Posted on June 30th, 2017 at 7:50 pm Reply | Quote
  • r0s3nst0ck Says:

    -_- tfw you defend nick land to your lib buddies but you’re actually just interpretting nick land visciously for your own purposes and have to parse out which is nick land samefagging or not and you are actually jewish and are in fact trying to control your own personal media

    hi nick, know this isn’t an approvable comment, i hope to make one one day :^)

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 1st, 2017 at 12:45 am Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    Discuss, yes. Land is a noble monkey but he is still a monkey. He is worried that anonymous truth-telling is encroaching on his, land, well, why do you think they call him Land? Above he is indicating, or as rabblemind sqwuaks it, signaling, “I was a lunatic you see?! I was crazy to do that. I’ma edgy teen not a crypto-marxist accelerationist” to distract us from the fact that his physiology only reaches to a certain extent, and only gropes at rather than grasps the grapes of truth. It’s a Deleuzian century indeed, some of us will make it out alive, some won’t.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    My problem with land in particular is his solutions to Cathedral ism seem to be harder faster. Its dressed up in pro capitalism talk which makes my conservative legs tingle but the things i actually dislike get worse. Which makes you start thinking about those things and their causes. And you realize only some of them are actually caused by socialism, in fact id give my left arm to only be worrying about the collapse of fiat from debt again. and of course being a red pill you have already seen its not so much socialism as racial socialism and the race bit is 91% of the problem. also thanks to the new right you get that whats behind this is not organized niggers or organized proles demanding free shit, but organized billionaires and their matrix. But then you have to follow the money right? I mean even the legacy commies have followed the money, theres no doubt the commies and their niggers and the billionaires are causing the problems I mean sure denmark could probably have a better GDP without their old school socialism but thats the least of my problem today that was my problem in the 70s reading atlas shrugged.Even the most virulent form of white socialism you recover from a full blown collapse in a decade. niggerization is forever.So the moldy jew gets this idea about perverse incentives and dresses it up in a clever series of pamphlets actually designed to appeal to lefty spergs.And his solution comes down to just give the capitalists absolute power over the world and they will tend it like their own little garden of eden.Well Land loves this because it accelerates his own pet scifi theories. But does it actually solve the problem most of us were trying to solve? Well that would depend on which bits of Cathedralism bother you most. what problems are you trying to solve. Since moldy is the orthodoxy he says demotism is perverting the incentive for good government and capitalism would be an excellent incentive.then Land gets all maniacal about scifi capitalism. But the thesis they make undermines their theory. if the cathedral is a mind control matrix we need redpilling from then how are these mind controlled proles such a threat? is it really the AFLCIO and Mother Jones behind the cathedral?Why didnt they install Bernie?
    Ill tell you why Bernie is a communist that didnt get the memo. commies and capitalists hit a wall and merged into racial capitalist aka globalism, this is why moldbugs ideas resonate. But if capitalists built the matrix and profit from it then is the solution to give them more power? We are supposed to beleive i guess that if we freed them from the “commies” they were forced to deal with they would act better.That they dont really like this idea of one world multculturalism enabled by calling whites racists and any states that balk terrorists its just that the commies hold all the demotist cards and will release the mobs if they dont comply. Oh we are in a matrix all right and moldbugianism is one of the levels. Its the level that leads people who have noticed a few things back into the grid.It says yeah you noticed too huh, dont worry the best idea is to do nothing the capitalists have it under control and the evil commies will die in the end and you will be knighted a dark lord- heres a secret decoder ring.Oh and trust the Jews they are the good guys.So dont get all low class and racist about this invasion by niggers when you are a dark lord you will get your own Island and those White Jocks who used to call you nerd will be your slaves

    [Reply]

    Garr Reply:

    Notes from Brooklyn, for a fellow Brooklynite: (1) so far this year I’ve caught four mice in glue traps in my apartment. A Mexican employee in the Chinese-owned hardware store down the Avenue from me explained to me that you just throw out the mouse+glue trap when a mouse gets stuck in one, but I drown the mouse first in a bucket if it’s still alive (by turning the glue-tray outside-down in the water with the mouse under it), so that a mammal won’t have to die of thirst; (2) I’ve begun to walk out into the street to avoid pit bulls and conflict with their walkers; the Puerto Ricans or Dominicans in my neighborhood love pit bulls; (3) while on the one hand the passing of groups of three or more Black teenagers is a frequent anxiety-causing event, given their unpredictability, on the other hand Black men often make friendly remarks to me about my long beard; (4) Arabs males like to walk around in large groups, as Blacks do; this is troubling; (5) SWPLs aren’t friendly, but are quiet and won’t assault you; (6) Chinese people (from southern China I think) are as loud as Blacks, and talk over each other in the same way, but won’t assault you; (7) pretty Chinese girls aren’t at all afraid of being assaulted; in fact, women generally don’t seem to be afraid of anything — they walk around alone in sexy clothes after dark looking into their phones; (8) there seems to be a high rate of autism among Boro Park Hassidim; the Crown Heights Lubavitchers, on the other hand, are lean and tough, perhaps resembling the Sicilians of the 1950s (but I wouldn’t really know); (9) on the subway train, women from every ethnic group just stare into their phones, which makes them all the same.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    That sounds pretty accurate, once you have lived and worked with minorities a few decades you will be able to understand their gibberish as well as the kings english and can play a game i like which is see if you can walk an entire block full of niggers without hearing or seeing something so outrageous that you wouldnt hear from white mouths in twenty years or more. so far Ive never failed usually within 1/4 block to see or hear something so uncivilized i can honestly say if i walked forever in the white world Ide never hear or see that ever again.Growing up in the lower east side the niggers were a minority and puerto ricans and dominicans were the dominant scum, all ny kids know niggers are more dangerous but its not until you really live among them that you get just how much lower down the evolutionary scale they are from a hispanic.

    swpls will nod and smile at every nigger they pass and look right through every fellow white, The women are rreally sttupid to dress that way they get raped a lot coming home drunk from bars in the gentrifying neighborhoods but wont report it.Someone needs to invent an app called girlfriend material that uses social recognition to tag mudsharks it shouldnt be explicit or they will martyr themselves just it should be known guys will do this.

    collen ryan Reply:

    example

    “Refugees May Be Germany’s “next economic miracle,” says Daimler boss

    15/09/2015

    The huge influx of refugees and migrants into Germany could turn out to be the foundation for the country’s next economic miracle, according to the head of one of its major carmakers.

    Far from being a danger, immigration presented an opportunity, he said – referring to Germany’s postwar boom to which millions of “guest workers” contributed. …”

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    I thought it had come to light in mainstream media that immigrants have not been an economic “miracle”?

    Posted on July 2nd, 2017 at 4:02 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    Even the most virulent form of white socialism you recover from a full blown collapse in a decade. niggerization is forever.

    Planetary solid truth.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Except something will maybe evolve out of the primordial nigger soup eventually.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 2nd, 2017 at 5:42 pm Reply | Quote
  • Myron Gaines Says:

    It doesn’t even select for leaders, it selects for entrepreneurs who want to sell ebooks and kratom pills.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 2nd, 2017 at 5:55 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    Dear Equalist jews,

    We reactionaries sorrowfully understand that on some level we have failed to carry out the humanist project. Freedom has been subordinated in our hierarchy of values to truth or being, whichever you prefer. This is a cancellation of freedom not for the sake of truth or being but for the Above Of freedom/truth/being. There is a sacrifice here but it is a sacrifice that had to be made.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Explain.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    are you saying you support the amount of truth realistically supported by truth but no more.This is a difficult problem, great freedom has been one of our strengths and is now a weakness. It seems a lot of these strengths of ours dont survive exp[osure to the outside or rapidly dercline on a curve at a certain amount of exposure.If this tendency is genetic which I think it is you are correct its hackable but its also difficult to simply eradicate. i would want to know more about how it might be put back into balance.Obviously I suspect its cultural counterweight that stresses the we ness of the us ness, I could be wrong that might just look like the handiest tool, its such a fucking handy tool,apes just ge we vs them.And there does seem to be a lot of “I” will ally with “them” because “we” wont let “me” have “my” way.I think in a healthy society that train of thought is not in the realm of possibility. Its difficult to control these things with law alone, the exceptions one wants to make are best handled with a good cop bad cop between law and culture._ maybe its tricky. I do know youre going to have a really tough sell getting guys like me to submit to a king,

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    correction …the amount of freedom realistically supported by truth….

    why cant we edit %^$#@

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    It is tricky, for one because, to even entertain this kind of thinking requires a freedom that is unfastened from the existing certified truth/being which subordinates truth/being to freedom, so I refute myself on some level by relegating freedom. It isn’t exclusively *what* the Cathedral indoctrinates in us that spurs our aversion, but *that* it indoctrinates us, i.e. controls us, renders us unfree. This is the more or less subterranean libertarianism of the alt-right/NRx–in this sense we’re not rightists but negations of leftists. On one hand our stomach turns at the sight of a blue-haired gender-degenerate and we have the instinct to want to reform them, to make them unfree — on the other hand we value the freedom to see through the Judith Buttler propaganda that trains these circus freaks to believe they belong anywhere but in a circus. This is why I have several times noted that the new right is the froth at the top of leftism rather than diametrically opposed to it (as the psychological lifeworld appears to the actors of both camps). We have opened and we have opened openness; the next phase of the telos is closedness. Most of us on the right are degenerates, albeit self-hating ones, like the lion rather than the child of the three metamorphoses of Zarathustra. 70 something years of relativist education and you think we squeaked by without being infected by the pox of poz? heh. The notion that freedom is not the highest will necessarily appear absurd to us. Will it appear absurd 70 years after the Moldbuggian Napoleon drains the swamp and sets in motion a new education program? Or will we do the same thing again? Will we revolt against the relegation of freedom, even if freedom is not good, beautiful or true? There is a level of autonomy accessible to some with a certain physiology, (I don’t claim to be one of them, I’m Nietzsche’s puppet for the most part). Are you Mike, if you sodomize married women? I’m a bit jealous so I know I can’t be much better. Have you ever considered that high-IQ Mikes might deserve the gulag, for universalizing freedom because freedom works for them, even if it doesn’t for many others? This is the problem with Irigaray for instance, who is a woman who can perhaps handle freedom herself but powerfully advocates freedom for women who perhaps can’t handle it. The masses should be made to believe in something similar to the categorical imperative; anyone who can reach higher plateaus of moral understanding can and should. The starting-point certainly shouldn’t be radical skepticism (this being the repercussion of Equalism) – leave wondering for the aristocrats and fear of the lord for the people. Freethinking for the latter leads down one nihilistic road or other. The enlightenment project is going on the historical blooper highlight reel of the future.

    Wagner Reply:

    “As Nietzsche has also taught us, it is already a mark of decadence to be a resolute enemy of decadence.” — Stanley Rosen

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    This is the more or less subterranean libertarianism of the alt-right/NRx–in this sense we’re not rightists but negations of leftists. On one hand our stomach turns at the sight of a blue-haired gender-degenerate and we have the instinct to want to reform them, to make them unfree — on the other hand we value the freedom to see through the Judith Buttler propaganda that trains these circus freaks to believe they belong anywhere but in a circus. This is why I have several times noted that the new right is the froth at the top of leftism rather than diametrically opposed to it

    Subtle point. Obvious when it is pointed out. Most of the “right” ain’t right.

    Lot of pseudo-rightists around Land.

    collen ryan Reply:

    yes yes yes
    Its why I think white nationalism and culture will help.One of our problems is its difficult to culturally punish our own in a multicultural society so we resort to legalism that’s limited and insufficient or unlimited an totalitarian.The closer we are in ability and taste the less strict we will have to be and the better our higher souls will bear the yoke of civilization.

    Yes i certainly thinkI ought to be flogged for a lot of things Ive done, I plead recovering alcoholic child of the 60s70s as mitigating circumstances.But its not just me Id probably want to find a way to wink at Oscar Wild or Alan Turings degeneracy. I think we used to do this a sort of dont ask dont tell but dont force us to have to enforce the law. Its certainly not an equalist system and thats why it was deconstructed. Systems like this relyon honor if lords start using it to rape their chambermaids it breaks down. I used to ask how does NRX patriarchy differ from Islamic Patriarchy;is it like euro Patriarchy of a certain time and place-explain. never got an answer because then Land and faggots would have to admit they are patriarchs which might interfere with tenure or something.The answer is probably similar to the Oscar wld problem, we dont allow our peers to stone their women its just not the done thing even if she has no legal standing I dont know if we could do it it requires an extremely strong culture and at this point it would require that all classes were able to maintain a level of control that only the upper class once could. We have come close and i think we could if we didnt have problems like niggers and jews filing lawsuits.We had correlatives to white privilege things like duty, honor paternalism etc these unwritten laws were never the less internalized for instance i was taught people like us dont file lawsuits, its just not done. I was told I must leave the world a better place, That i had to put my children before my self.you cant write laws for these things but if everyone used lawsuits like niggers do as retirement plans then we would collapse, at the same time if we outlawed lawsuits we would collapse. forgive me for mentioning the scoundrel revolutionaries but the american founders were pretty clear this thing wasnt going to work on laws alone.

    Im on an anti capitalist kick this month, I never thought i could actually criticize capitalism until Land even then only his robot capitalists. But I always knew it doesnt just run itself no matter how much my sperg side wishes it could, culture is again probably the only way to mitigate it. laws end up socializing it, beating your employees is not the done thing selling pornagraphy is betyond the pale fomenting class animosity is – well you get it. To do this I think you need a sense of family in a nation, theres a natural hierarchy and its respected because our betters are cultivating us the are paternalistic Land want jewboy zuckerberg to run the show because he was clever enough to steal facebook from some wasps who couldnt imagine anyone would be so uncouth. In a well run nation zuck would have understood while he might legally get away with it he wouldnt survive culturally no one would use the service of such a vulgar jew instead he thinks he can be president- boy is he in for a surprise, we may not be my grandfathers nation but we are a long way from electing zuck still.

    One of my first problems with moldbug/land was exit. there’s no where to exit anymore even if the cathedral were of a mind to not take it as a rebuke worthy of a missile launch. Theres simply no where to go we have allowed zucks to give guns and booze to the indians the world over and our nations are chock full. And this is a big problem for euroman exit has always been a safety valve for that over developed independence. One of my explanations for cathedral insanity is they simply realized the world was too small and hadnt the stomach to eliminate the other races.so a police state was their humanitarian solution frankl;y i vote genocide. Even so but we might end up at this point again if Crispr is hard and we don’t control our growth. I for one think we dont need more white people just fewer non white people

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 3rd, 2017 at 12:31 am Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    ▬ Now, my suggestion is that the “other self” of Odin – the self to whom he sacrifices himself – is the Germanic equivalent of Shiva. But who is Shiva? To repeat, Rudra (Odin, I maintain) is “the fierce, active, manifest personification of destruction,” while Shiva is the “transcendent peaceful aspect of the disintegrating tendency.” Shiva is the dynamic source of all being – not “Brahman,” a static one beyond all opposites (as in Vedanta), but an eternally self-generating, self-perpetuating arche; a horn of plenty. While Rudra might be represented as the sun, the manifest source of life, Shiva is the black sun behind the sun. He is the deity Jung identified as Abraxas, “the eternal sucking gorge of the void.” He is the personification of what Schopenhauer called will, and Nietzsche called will to power. He is the deity of life and death rolled into one, for life arises from death; creation from destruction. All that exists is an expression of Shiva’s abundance. Shiva is the Absolute, comprising all aspects of existence, which unfold themselves in an eternal harmony of conflict, mutually supporting, and mutually canceling. The whole itself – Shiva himself – creates itself through a perpetual self-overcoming. Shiva has been represented through various sorts of images, but the most notorious is the lingam or phallus (another one-eyed god). »

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 3rd, 2017 at 5:05 am Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    Rothsteinberg here

    Well, it looks like you stupid goyim have figured out that this whole Russian conspiracy theory we’ve been promoting is a complete lie

    We’ve been saying 24/7 for almost a year that Russians hacked the election, that Trump was a Russian agent, etc, and of course none of this is true.

    We REALLY wanted that war in Syria, to help ISIS overthrow Assad, but this will have to wait

    So what? Win some, you lose some. Let’s move on.

    This Russia story was the first time in history we ever lied! It won’t happen again.

    Cross my heart, so don’t start questioning other things, such as the pivotal Jewish role in fomenting both World Wars, (((Bolshevism)))…. (including its financing), the 9/11 attacks, various wars in the Middle East and the white genocide project and destruction of White lands through mass Third World immigration (and this is a far from exhaustive catalogue).

    As long as we can prevent goyim knowing then we should be safe, and we don’t need to shut it down, or pack our bags and get the hell out before we end up in a camp.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 3rd, 2017 at 1:18 pm Reply | Quote
  • collen ryan Says:

    Recently I again commented that the cost of diversity is staggering that we could have moveed mars into near earth orbit and terraformed it for what divershitty has cost, I said the welfare redistribution is a mere fraction of the cost. heres is a mere fraction of a fraction simply the cost of the pavement ape from the tax system

    POSTED BY VD @ 6/30/2017 11:00:00 AM MAILING LIST SIGNUP 84 COMMENTS
    The cost of Black America
    If you are a white American, over the course of your lifetime the federal government will, on average and on your behalf, transfer $384,109 of your wealth and income to a single black individual.

    According to the data derived from the 2014 federal budget, the average annual net tax/benefit broke down as follows:
    White: -$2,795
    Black: +$10,016
    Over the course of an average 79-year lifespan, a white individual contributes a net $220,805 to the system, whereas over the course of an average 75-year lifespan, a black individual receives a net $751,200. However, since there are 4.6 times more whites than blacks in the USA, the black share has to be divided among the various contributors to sort out a one-to-one comparison.

    So, the net cost to the average White American of the average Black American is $384,109. Married? That’s $768,218. Got 2 kids? That’s $1,536,436. 4 kids? Now we’re talking $2,304,654 lifetime.

    Diversity is expensive. Now you understand why you won’t have much of an inheritance to leave to your children. Do you really think it’s worth it? And then, those natural conservatives to the south, the Hispanics, will surely improve the situation, right? After all, immigration helps the economy! Well, not so much.
    Hispanic: +7,298
    In fact, because there are more Hispanics in the USA than Blacks, Hispanics are already a bigger cumulative net drain on the economy, $411,950,000,000 to $389,710,000,000. Needless to say, the ongoing demographic change from a predominantly white society to a less productive, less white one can be expected to have even more serious negative effects on the long-term economic prospects of the United States that it already has.

    To quote the original author: “The negative fiscal impact of blacks and hispanics is significant. All of this discussion of a “national debt” and “deficit” is primarily of function of blacks and hispanics. Without them, we would be running budget surpluses today, even when keeping the military the same size.”

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    This is dedicated to nick land former marxist who now wishes to be subjugated by capitalist robots instead of human socialists whatever hes a bottom, but he might be concerned with where all the capital is accelerating to and of course the above is just federal and the stats where run by naive libertarians so naively optimistic.the big money is the lost opportunity of white geniuses like Land becoming apologists for multiculturalism and of course the costs of having niggers and towelheads doing work they can fathom while nick is keeping down the white privilege

    [Reply]

    Claire Colebrook Reply:

    So we have to give them $2,304,654 over our lifetime

    But look on the bright side, look what we get in return:

    Live broadcasts of obese transsexual negroes twerking in their underwear on public mass transit, surrounded by fawning journalists, in the midst of a dilapidated urban hellscape.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    Whats really telling is despite these massive transfers of wealth and power they are still just baRELY ABOVE APE LEVEL.

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o64Fz-KW1Dk&feature=youtu.be

    [Reply]

    Claire Colebrook Reply:

    Rothsteinberg here

    I laughed so hard watching my pets and their EBT cards, that I actually spit up some coffee, into my rotten banana-like, downward curving “toucan” beak, and all the way out, back into my mouth again

    Posted on July 3rd, 2017 at 4:36 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    I was looking up info on Ægyptan God, Set, and came upon this:

    ▬» Sign-language was from the beginning a substitution of similars for the purpose of expression by primitive or pre-verbal Man, who followed the animals in making audible sounds accompanied and emphasised by human gestures. The same system of thought and mode of utterance were continued in mythography and totemism. Renouf says the Scarabeus was “an object of worship in Egypt”, as a symbol of divinity. But this is the modern error. If there was a God, and the Beetle was his symbol, obviously it was the divinity that was the object of worship, not the symbol: not the zootype. Ptah, we know, was that divinity, with the Beetle as a type; and those who read the types were worshippers of the God and not of his symbolic dung-beetle which was honoured as a sign of transformation. When told that the Egyptians were worshippers of the “Bee”, the “Mantis”, and the “Grasshopper”, we recall the words of Hor-Apollo, who says that when the Egyptians would symbolise a mystic and one of the Initiated they delineate a Grasshopper because the insect does not utter sounds with its mouth, but makes a chirping by means of its spine. (B. 2, 55.) The grasshopper, then, which uttered a voice that did not come from its mouth, was a living type of superhuman power. And being an image of mystery and superhuman power, it was also considered a fitting symbol of Kagn, the Bushman Creator, or Great Spirit of creative mystery. Moreover, the grasshopper made his music and revealed his mystery in dancing; and the religious mysteries of Kagn were performed with dancing or in the grasshopper’s dance. Thus the Initiates in the mysteries of the Mantis are identical with the Egyptian Mystae symbolised by the grasshopper; and the dancing probably goes back to the time when pre-verbal man was an imitator of the grasshopper, which was a primitive type of mystery, like the transforming frog and the self-interring tortoise. There is a religious sect still extant in England who are known as the “Jumpers”, and their saltatory exercises still identify them with the leaping “Grasshoppers” and the “praying Mantis” in the [Page 11] mysteries of old. They still “dance that dance”. The “Moon belongs to the Mantis”, say the Bushmen, which goes to show that the Mantis was not only a Lunar type as the leaper round the horizon, but on account of its power of transformation; and this again suggests the reason why the Mantis should be the zootype of the Mystae who transformed in trance, as well as leaped and danced in the mysteries. The Frog and Grasshopper were earlier leapers than the Hare. These also were figures of the Moon that leaped up in a fresh place every night. It was this leaping up of the light that was imitated in the dances of the Africans who jumped for joy at the appearance of the New Moon which they celebrated in the monthly dance, as did the Congo Negroes and other denizens of the dark Continent who danced the primitive mysteries and dramatized them in their dances.The Leapers were the Dancers, and the leaping Mantis, the Grasshopper, the Frog, the Hare, were amongst the pre-human prototypes.

    The frog is still known in popular weather-wisdom as the prophesier of Rain. As such, it must have been of vastly more importance in the burning lands of Inner Africa, and there is reason to suppose that Hekat, the Consort of Khnum, the King of Frogs, was frog-headed, as the prophetess, or foreteller, on this ground of natural fact. Erman says the “great men of the South,” the “Privy Councillors of the royal orders were almost always invested – I know not why – with the office of Prophet of the frog-headed Goddess Hekat”. (Life in ancient Egypt, page 82. English Translation). The Frog was a prophet of rain in some countries, and of spring-time in others.In Egypt it was the prophet of the Inundation, hence Hekat was a Consort of Khnum, the Lord of Inundation, and King of the Frogs. Hekat was also the Seer by Night in the Moon, as well as the crier for the waters and foreteller of their coming. From her, as Seer in the dark, we may derive the names of the Witch as the Hexe, the Hag, the Hagedisse; and also that of the dark Goddess Hecate, the sender of dreams. As prophesier of rain, or of the Inundation, it was the herald of new life to the land of Egypt, and this would be one reason for its relationship to the Resurrection. But, in making its transformation from the tadpole state to that of the frog, it was the figure of a still more important natural fact. This, in the Mythology, was applied to the transformation and renewal of the Moon, and to the transformation of the Mortal into an Immortal in the Eschatology, a type of Ptah, who in one form is portrayed as the frog-headed God.Lamps have been found in Egypt with the frog upon the upper part, and one is known which has the legend , [Greek script missing] “I am the Resurrection.” (Lanzone, Dizionario, page 853; Budge, The Mummy, page 266) – In this figure the lamp is equivalent for the rising Sun, and the frog upon it is the type of Ptah, who in his solar character was the Resurrection and the life in the Mythology before the image passed into the Eschatology, and the God who rose again as Solar became the Light of the World in a Spiritual sense. The frog was a type of transformation, and the Frog-headed Ptah made his transformation in Amenta to rise again as the opener of the Nether Earth. And as he represented the Sun in Amenta, the frog, like the cynocephalus of Memphis (Rit., Ch. 42) was imaged as Golden. Thus we find the Sun in the lower Earth of two depicted in the Golden Frog, and, as stated by John Bell, the Lamas had an idea that the earth rested on a Golden Frog, and that when the Frog stretched out its foot there was an Earthquake. (“A Journey from St. Petersburgh to Pekin in the year 1719.” Pinkerton’s Voyages,v.7, page, 369) Here the frog beneath the earth, like the Tortoise, is Egyptian, and as such we can learn what fact in nature was represented by it as a zootype of Ptah in the Nether World called the Earth of Eternity, where the typical tadpole that swam the waters made its transformation into the frog that stretched itself out and set foot on land. »

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 3rd, 2017 at 11:23 pm Reply | Quote
  • collen ryan Says:

    @collen ryan

    yeah Im pretty sure that video was shot in my brooklyn hood and i got to say its my experience three times a day watching the niggers in fron of me on line with their $6 red bull and cheeze doodles and babymamas ebt card.
    Garr
    theres another game I play related to the first its called spot the black man picking up the tab. so far I have never ever seen a black guy pay for anything the woman with him was having either she pays they go afrikana or he pays then gives her her card back

    [Reply]

    Garr Reply:

    Yeah, but I meant that Black guys are frequently actually friendly to me in an unsolicited way, and it’s a nice thing. Maybe it’s because they can tell that I’m off-the-wall-ADHD and pretty much all Black males are off-the-wall-ADHD. It’s really easy to start up a friendly exchange with a Black male once you’ve figured out that he’s not inclined to assault you. And it has to be a guy who’s momentarily on his own; they morph into constituents of dangerous collective entities when there are three or more walking together, and you can’t talk to either member of a pair because then you’re applying to be part of a dangerous threesome, which would be simultaneously boring and exhausting. (I’ve replied to your friend Viking’s query about “flipping” at Jim’s site.)

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    despite my rhetoric not all blacks are subhuman just enough to make it all hopeless.Im a big guy and a nyc street kid so I get on really well with all minorities i can get away with anything short of smacking them randomly. at work its mostly blacks and spanish under me and they really like me despite my politics because im not afraid of them and Im not overly nice to them in fact I demand the hell out of them which no one does and they respect me for my honestly a few have taken to calling me dad, I have tried to teach them my trade and things like how to buy a house and raise a child its pretty much as you might expect but they appreciate the effort rather than the low expectation from libs.Theres three black guys ive worked with that are really outstanding people older guys my age all three have sons in prison for murder, I also have a black neighbor across te street whos son is out after a murder convixtion and a neighbor to my right who grandson is in for murder those are also good blacks. If i didnt look like a viking i could actually pass for a black or hispanic if i wanted to i know them well enough after 60 years close contact. and all I can say is I get more pessimistic every year and am beyond hope they must be chipped and shipped back to africa

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 3rd, 2017 at 11:42 pm Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    @ Garr or Collen Ryan

    Is Jim still blathering on about how Nazis are the real socialists, as if the only crisis we’re facing is an economic one?

    [Reply]

    Garr Reply:

    Claire, Jim doesn’t blather, he intones. I don’t recall him using the modifier “the real”; he does, however, object to the “socialism” part of “National Socialism”. Hitler ended up objecting to that part of National Socialism too — this is why he got rid of Rohm and the Strassers, I believe.

    [Reply]

    Claire Colebrook Reply:

    Garr,

    All right, intones rather than blathers

    Fair enough.

    Rohm was kept in his cell at Stadelheim prison for a couple of days after the initial arrest.

    Finally on July 1st a gun with a single bullet was placed in his cell and he was told he had ten minutes to shoot himself before the guards did it for him – to which he replied that if Hitler wanted him dead he could come and shoot him himself.

    After the alloted time was up Michael Lippert and Theodor Eicke returned to the cell where they unloaded their revolvers into Rohm who was standing bare-chested in defiance.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 4th, 2017 at 5:17 am Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    “The centrifugal forces do not flee the center forever, but approach it once again, only to retreat from it yet again: such is the nature of the violent oscillations that overwhelm an individual so long as he seeks only his own center and is incapable of seeing the circle of which he himself is a part; for if these oscillations overwhelm him, it is because each one of them corresponds to an individual other than the one he believes himself to be, from the point of view of the unlocatable center.

    As a result, identity is essentially fortuitous, and a series of individualities must be undergone by each of these oscillations, so that as a consequence the fortuitousness of this or that particular individual will render all of them necessary”

    Pierre Klossowski (Nietzsche et le cercle vicieux)

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    you know thats reminiscent ot the chaos equation

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 4th, 2017 at 5:18 am Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    The command “love your enemies!” had to be invented by the Jews, the best haters there have ever been… ––Nietzsche, Daybreak, section 377.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 4th, 2017 at 1:35 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    Here is how (((Leo Strauss))) lays out the venerable goy Immanuel’s ethical test. Maybe some of his tribesmen will take note:

    “The test – well, take a simple case of immorality. A man who embezzles money because he needs it… Now what does he do? What should he do, according to Kant? He should say, wholly regardless of the positive law which forbids that–he should say, is this–my present intention to embezzle money–compatible with a universal law commanding everyone to embezzle money when he believes he needs money? And then I see I didn’t mean that. I only want to make a little exception for me on this particular occasion. That is for Kant the root of immorality: to regard yourself, your present immoral action, as a little exception which has no meaning.”

    And while we’re at it let’s connect this ethical test up with another statement made by (((Strauss))):

    “Political freedom, and especially that political freedom that justifies itself by the pursuit of human excellence, is not a gift of heaven; it becomes actual only through the efforts of many generations, and its preservation always requires the highest degree of vigilance. The probability that all human societies should be capable of genuine freedom at the same time is exceedingly small. For all precious things are exceedingly rare. An open or all-comprehensive society would consist of many societies which are on vastly different levels of political maturity, and the chances are overwhelming that the lower societies would drag down the higher ones. An open or all-comprehensive society will exist on a lower level of humanity than a closed society, which, through generations, has made a supreme effort toward human perfection. The prospects for the existence of a good society are therefore greater if there is a multitude of independent societies than if there is only one independent society.”

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    But why not schizophrenically wiggle our antennas (Freudians, yes) to another reality tunnel using old Kant’s universal morality against the arch-enemy of the Jews, the great beast, Adolf Hitler:

    “The test – well, take a simple case of immorality. A man who gasses the kikes because he needs to… Now what does he do? What should he do, according to Kant? He should say, wholly regardless of the positive law which forbids that–he should say, is this–my present intention to gas the kikes–compatible with a universal law commanding everyone to gas the kikes when he believes he needs to gas them? And then I see I didn’t mean that. I only want to make a little exception for me on this particular occasion. That is for Kant the root of immorality: to regard yourself, your present immoral action, as a little exception which has no meaning.”

    So if we were to admit that Kant’s thought experiment conveys a grain of insight, namely that Hitler and “the Germans”–which in the present-day has extended to “and the Europeans/whites”–committed an immorality in genociding the Jews, would it then follow that Hitler, the Germans, et al. owe a debt to the surviving Jews? This debt being in the form of levelling “white” civilization and not Israel? Wiping a people out is pretty cold (admin might disagree on my word-choice). Or is Kant wrong? Rather is he right, but not right enough? If he is indeed not right enough wouldn’t it then possibly follow that, while it may be “cold” of the Jews to lite-genocide whites, it’s right but “not right enough” that coldness is a bad thing?

    Motivation is a lot of what it comes down to. Were Hitler and the Germans *ressentimental* toward the Jews (as the standard Cathedral account goes)? If they were could we then fairly wonder if the Jews are repeating ressentiment toward “the Germans” (whites)? It’s up in the air, not scratched into a stone tablet, whether the Nazis were “doing God’s work”, as is the case with the status of the grand-political activities of our current human husbandrists (who have physio-historically proven to indulge in the dirty vice of “love of one’s own”). On the other hand, whites aren’t exactly rosy-cheeked Kantians. Rome was founded on sacrifice and America was founded on sacrifice–and that’s not to mention mother England whose notorious “utilitarianism” has physio-historically stooped to a subhumanity beneath african savagery. What, you don’t think that Artxell Knaphni sometimes has a point?

    [Reply]

    Garr Reply:

    Wouldn’t the relevant supposed universal law be more like “everyone shall contribute to the complete destruction of a group that he believes to be very harmful to his own group”? (“The kikes” just seems to be too specific for “universal” legislation.) Maybe the “believes” should be modified by “reasonably”?: “Everyone shall contribute to the complete destruction of a group that he reasonably believes to be very harmful to his own group”. And, if we suppose that the Nazis would have preferred a Zionist to an exterminationist Solution, we might even have “everyone shall contribute to the complete destruction of a group that he believes to be very harmful to his own group, unless this currently very harmful group can be rendered not very harmful in some other way.” This hypothetical universal law wouldn’t justify an attempt by anyone to destroy the Germans, as far as I can see, because the Germans can’t reasonably be seen as being very harmful to any group.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    A mischling fell into my trap, excellent.

    Garr Reply:

    Sheesh — I thought I was going to have an interesting conversation with a thoughtful person. Yes, my father’s Jewish. You have a good memory.
    I’m currently rereading the first volume of the World as Will and Representation, having read the second volume for the first time earlier this year. I’d enjoy discussing Schopenhauer with you — I take it that this is something that would interest you.
    “A mischling fell into my trap” reminds me of a certain scene from Pulp Fiction. That’s really not my thing — but blog-comments-sections really do have an uncomfortable likeness to anonymous homo pickup scenes. They’re very weird; we need to visualize the entities with which we interact, and here the entities appear to consist in arrangements of letters on a screen, such as “Wagner”. Any description of ourselves that we might offer could be fictional.
    “A mischling fell into my trap” does actually make me feel bad, not because I’m ashamed to be half-Jewish but because of the depersonalizing, belittling group-assignment. (But why should you believe this? Maybe I’m making it up. You can’t see my facial expressions. Do I even have a face?) On the other hand, I’m not real to you — just letters arranged on a screen. And maybe you like making people feel bad.
    You might wonder why I’d want to converse with people who represent themselves as Against My Group. It’s because I feel a connection with a certain personality-type that’s over-represented among Thoughtful Haters — people who are on a weird endless intellectual Trip.

    Wagner Reply:

    Do you take this for a “safe space”? Even the vulgus is beginning to catch a scent in the wind of the evidence of tyranny in your people’s inability to take a joke. I throw myself and my people in the flames and you and yours in too and lo! you materialize and apologize For Your Group, almost as if you’re genetically predisposed to against your will. Where are the Weiningers? No Jewish holocaust deniers. You can’t laugh at yourselves. Oy vey, we kinda deserved it, maybe we should learn our lesson from our fallen flaxen eurobros so we don’t repeat the same mistake!

    collen ryan Reply:

    I do think jews should be encouraged to learn about reaction, alt right , etc first hand besides the fact they are behind it, like most normies t will do them some good even if they are not redpilled they will see others are it will force engagement with reality and will at least slightly change the conversation.If we want to make a case against jews living among us then we should do it politely and intelligently. I actually think the most promising path out of this death spin is if we convert jews, the only other way is going to come much later and will have to be bloodier and might never happen or happen too late. however i dont really have much hope jews are going to convert in any numbers to effect a reversal of leftism and multiculturalism, but if they did put as much effort into white nationalism as they do anti white globalism it would be a game changer. I know you guys will slam me for saying it, but these are desperate times grasping at long shots. If I were a jew i would be thinking ts only a matter of time before this anti soros zuckerberg wall street shit turns into holocaust 2.0 and i might think id rather be a converso than an israeli

    Wagner Reply:

    The false-converso factor can help account for Garr’s “Everyone shall contribute to the complete destruction of a group that he reasonably believes to be very harmful to his own group” imperative. If they are known to change on the outside but remain the same leveling leftist on the inside it follows that it is reasonable to believe they are harmful to the group. Sheerly being a Jew around Christians kills the faith of the Christians. It’s not a good mixture. NRx is crypto-antisemitic in the sense that it’s futurism “discounts” Jewish traditionalism. You think the Ubermensch or AI is going to follow Jewish practices?

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Wagner, I think you might be projecting on Garr.

    glass of juice Reply:

    Relax there, Wagner. As a full Jew, I agree with your position that we the Jews deserve complete absolute extermination at the hands of superior Germans like yourself. But if you are willing to sacrifice your one and only Folk just to stick it to us, that is, willing to commit WHITE GENOCIDE just so we’re dead as well, then you’re a gay homosexual faggot. A philosophaggot, to be precise.

    I mean, come on. Would you smash a hammer into your son’s WHITE skull (the skeleton is literally white. Get the joke?) based on the knowledge that somewhere, someone has done the same to his own kike-tyke? Would you behead your own beloved wife with a rusty knife, smiling at the realization that the same fate has been meted out to some stinkin’ kikess? If you’ve answered “yes” to both questions, then I’m sorry but I’ll have to find some trick to make you look Jewish on the day of the rope, and make myself look gentile, so I could hang you “like a Christmas stocking” to death rather than vice versa. Just kidding: I’ll never look gentile. So I guess it’ll be both of us going to Hell, then.

    (Is that how “humor” is supposed to work?)

    Get this through your not-enough-of-a-goyishekopf: it is ONLY us Jews who deserve total extermination, having our DNA erased from the gene pool, and our accursed memory blotted out from the pages of history. Whites do not — do not! — deserve that. Least of all do Germans deserve extermination, since they are the best ethnicity and if I’m lucky, I’ll be reincarnated as one after jumping “head-long” into the crematorium.

    Are we clear?

    glass of juice Reply:

    Even your phrase “false converso” reeks of cuckoldry, since it presupposes the hypothetical existence of the “true converso”. Forget it, Wag. There are no good Jews. Even the ones who commit suicide are selfish, because they could instead go to a synagogue or kike-kindergarten and exterminate a whole bunch before blowing their own brains out. Just killing your own self is cowardice in face of insurmountable adversity, right?

    There are no good Jews. I’m a Jew and I desperately, urgently want to be gassed as a kike, together with my entire close and extended family, by Pepe-smirking nazis. Does that make me good? No. Because you can’t compromise. This is total war, and it entails total extermination. No “but.” I must be exterminated.

    Enough with the “kiddie gloves.” The JP is a Medical Problem. Yes – medical. We need Hitlerist doctors, preferably Hitlerist surgeons whose heart isn’t prone to be bleeding, IYKWIM. Must have the doctor. Call the doctor! *A cloud appears, St. Mengele alights down from it* What’s that? Holy Saint Mengele proposes to kill the Jews by way of medical malpractice. First, Jews should be forced to accept the treatment of white doctors. (Friendship ended with ethnic nepotism – now racial diversity is my best friend) Then, the alt-right must ensure that the white — and in 2027, that would mean crypto-nazi, as such — doctors perform, how shall I put it, some very “unorthodox” practices on their Jewish patients. My visual imagination may not be high — since I’m a kike — but I can vividly imagine some forms of mutilation that can be particularly amusing if, oopsie daisy, they are inflicted upon my own vile nation.

    In short, I want *every* white doctor to be doctor Mengele. Just think of all the possibilities! So many creative ways to punish us shekel-schnorrers. Some say that “Hitler was a cuck” since he was too mild on the JQ. Yes, but that’s not going far enough. I believe that Himmler and the rest of the Reich-Saints have been quite the softies, too. They should have made it policy as early as 1933 that Jewish patients in hospitals are all “fair game” as far as “whacky” experimentation or sadism-relief go. Turn fruits into vegetables? Turn matzo into bread!

    Bread!

    Posted on July 4th, 2017 at 2:21 pm Reply | Quote
  • collen ryan Says:

    https://vimeo.com/220617165

    when white guys have to live under bridges because niggers are running their countries and they dont want to kill niggers this is what it looks like.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 4th, 2017 at 8:04 pm Reply | Quote
  • Claire Colebrook Says:

    Nice work trapping a mischling but I think this one is friends with Collen

    as long as he’s not planning to marry a Geltungsjude, you should let him go free

    Or ask Collen what to do

    [Reply]

    collen ryan Reply:

    Garrs alright wtf most of reaction and alt right is jews kekek didnt i read the daily shoah was actually jews gotta admit they are some funny fuckers just wish theyde go back to making fun of the niggers and leave us poor white guys alone for a while.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 4th, 2017 at 8:10 pm Reply | Quote
  • Mathias Says:

    everything is harder once you’re living shut up inside yourself harried destitute full of memories I’m not taking this trip for nothing

    I’m not curling up like a dog on this seat for nothing, I’m going to save something I’m going to save myself despite the world that persists in going forward laboriously at the speed of a handcar operated by a man with one arm, blindly a train at night in a tunnel the dark even denser I had to sleep for a bit,

    if only I had a watch, I just have a telephone, it’s in my jacket hanging on the hook, but if I take it out I’ll be tempted to see if I have any messages and to send one

    always this passion for writing into the distance, sending signs into the ether like smoke signals gestures with no object arms hands stretching out to nothingness

    to whom could I send a message, from this prepaid phone that I took care to get a tramp to purchase for me in return for a big tip, as luck would have it he had an identity card and wasn’t too wasted, the seller didn’t cause any trouble

    I left my apartment dropped off a few things at my mother’s sold my books in bulk to a bookseller at the Porte de Clignancourt took three or four things

    as I was sorting through things I of course came across some photos, I saw Andrija again in his over-sized uniform, Marianne in Venice, Sashka at twenty in Leningrad, La Risiera in Trieste, the square chin of Globocnik, Gerbens’s mustache, I took everything

    and I can say that everything I own is above me in a slightly scaled-down bag, next to the little briefcase that’s going to the Vatican and that I plan to hand over as soon as I reach Rome

    then tonight in my room at the Plaza on the Via del Corso I’ll go drink at the hotel bar until it closes

    and tomorrow morning I’ll take a bath buy myself a new suit I’ll be another man I’ll call myself Sashka

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 5th, 2017 at 2:23 am Reply | Quote
  • collen ryan Says:

    @
    @wag and garr too I suppose

    I cant help but think your pessimism is warranted because WW2 was not the first time they were expelled it was like the 20th one struggles to understand why such an intelligent people couldn’t discern such a clear pattern between certain behaviors and expulsion;unless they are genetically unable to.To have quadrupled down on the behavior that caused the holocaust in of all places the nation that saved them from complete extinction boggles the mind. You know whats good good the Jews? to stop asking that question in adopted countries.Because youre right implied in NRX Land to the contrary is the knowledge that multiculturalism is always and everywhere doomed While one like myself could make a special pleading for jews because they are genetically and culturally linked closely with us,in fairness one also ha to note one of the most pernicious impediments to multiculturalism succeeding is average IQ whether higher or lower it makes civilization near impossible.And Jews or at least some have an extreme high average IQ.White nations have a mid IQ average but probably because of other traits we have been successful enough to have large enough populations that we have a fairly large high IQ fraction population which is attractive to jews and other races cog elites, so we serve as a brain drain maybe IQ shredder, though I think we shred our competitors IQs more than our own and net win that game ,if not for the fact that it costs us the allegiance of our own and our adopted cog elites. well that cost is only a disadvantage for old codgers like me who still think of this as a nation of white people rather than the speartip of the new world order. In short If Jews were going to stop being outsiders they would have done it in america post ww2, they would have risen up and murdered their cultural marxist professors, commie spies, and various agitators. They would have been the most conservative of americans.They would have stayed out of the professions that they are traditionally purged from, stayed out of civil rights,politics, media, international finance,NGOs and the types of law that can be used against a culture,But they didnt in fact they deliberately targeted these and other levers of power. Im sure only a fraction were scheming to seize control, and only half were thinking to one degree or another it was good for the jews, the rest were minding their own business but couldnt help favoring their group a bit.
    This is an important question because its likely to rise again if we survive long enough in an even more virulent form with east asians who though dont have as high an intellectual edge its high enough and they will come in much greater numbers than the jews.A lot of jews discussing this will say and (griffe du lion says the math confirms) “oh but we obeyed the law the rules you made we earned half the power and half the wealth fairly” In other words they didnt conspire racially to help each other but autonomously acquired it individually.Thats not been my experience living in new york city what lets say its true. It doesnt matter a nation can not have another people ruling it.This shouldn’t be hard to understand its intolerable.Nations that have tried it always regretted it.I stand with the niggers to be free of colonialism, if euros or asians want africa they should have the decency to wipe the niggers off the face of the continent. BTW Im all for this in fact Im all for wiping all non whites out of the universe and any aliens we find out there as well kepping only DNA samples or small ecoparks well guarded.
    It seems everyone jew and non jew seemsto have a hard time understanding this simple premise. I think maybe its because we are so alike in many ways. Try magining that the east asians in white nations owned half the wealth and controlled half the power, were the dominant force in international finance media law politics etc.Imagine chnese pretty much controlled the universities and media and controlled what american thought about everything from foreign policy to sexual relations would you think that was a good idea just because they didn’t break any laws getting there? Well I wouldnt,The capitalists as a whole seem also to have hijacked the nations of the world for this globalist project and seem to care little about the consequences to the european people and culture, they too may have broken no laws and Im opposed to that even if it turned out they were all wasps and catholics.I want my peoples capitalists to be hegemonic in world trade I just dont wantthem destroying white people nations and civilization in the process its immaterial if they broke no laws there should have been a law and obviously they manipulated the situation because no one would have voted for jews or capitalists to rule us, if a king had allowed such a thing he would have been overthrown, democracy is designed to diffuse power in such a way its impossible to overthrow and pointless to try its a hydra and we are one of its heads so we resign ourselves to nihilism.Thats the problem with democracy not that the voterrs get free shit only the niggers who dont vote get free shit the voters pay for thefree shit so the capitalists dont have to.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 5th, 2017 at 12:26 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    http://www.gornahoor.net/ owner, Cologero, has all comments in moderation. He’s a charlatan if there ever was one. He’ll make statements like “Romans were moderns” and then hide one’s reply to it if it does not suit his agenda.

    I might have it as a for-life hobby to expose the errors of this man, which he has mostly called upon himself by being the woman he is.

    He’s continually posted his misreading of Evola, and other authors, for over a decade in cyber-space and often been taken to the task, but never lowering his Ego no matter how indefensible his claims.

    Yet me makes claim to the Hyperborean, the Nordic and what not. He’s a relatively brown “Italian” living in Florida.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 5th, 2017 at 9:32 pm Reply | Quote
  • Jophiel Says:

    Definitely motherfucking lunatics [I know, I know – language!]. That’s just what it takes to jump the GATE. Now to build a bridge – Death from Above, as Heidegger might say if he were an hermetic assassin.

    But what do I know? The world got scary, so I split. Maybe the whole world itself is a god that split. I could put myself together again, so perhaps I can do the same for the world? As the character J.D. Salinger says on the satiric cartoon Bojack Horseman “Hollywoo Stars and Celebrties: What Do They Know? Do They (R) K now Things?? Let’s Find Out!”

    [The al t-right: if you’re not already insane, It’ll drive you insane. How insane? “I know how to build God” kind of insane. Not sure I’m not still dreaming, but the Google clay-I tells me I’m sane.]

    Shall we? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIi57zhDl78

    The next you won’t know It is I – but you might dream it.

    [Reply]

    Posted on July 13th, 2017 at 7:01 pm Reply | Quote

Leave a comment