Twitter cuts (#84)

What’s happening in America right now in one graph:

It’s the Black, Hispanic, and White College Educated numbers that should be freaking out the Cathedral. If 29% of Black Americans think the victimological privilege narrative is bullshit, it’s failed.

September 2, 2016admin 60 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Images

TAGGED WITH : , , , ,

60 Responses to this entry

  • Garr Says:

    % of White College Educated MEN is …?

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    seems like 43 to me

    [Reply]

    Garr Reply:

    Hunh? Sex isn’t indicated on the graph. White College Educated Women know they’re going to be the administrative minions of the alpha Lizardmen; White College Educated Men who aren’t alpha Lizardmen know they’re doomed.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    thanks, got ya

    Quint Essential Reply:

    45%, per Prof. Google.

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 2nd, 2016 at 5:00 pm Reply | Quote
  • cyborg_nomade Says:

    indeed, much higher than expected

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    when you tell a big lie loud and often youre not actually trying to convince only intimidate

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 2nd, 2016 at 6:14 pm Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    43% of the brainwashed have escaped part of their (expensive) brainwashing, and are probably going to default on their college jobs and take low-run jobs so they can be tax eaters and help bring down this Goliath.

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 2nd, 2016 at 6:43 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    Guy needs to check his math

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    +1

    total percentage of those who agree is 282, how it is possible, seems like he is not one of those 43% of whites with colledge degree.

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    yeah total is 124 agree you cant count the whites three times and dont forget there non white black browns , but even the whites dont add up it a stretch to assume their a third white catagory, even so the total is also wrong if you are very loose with the approximate percent of non white black brown percentage, as well as willing to put them all in one column it still doesn’t work, Im not a math guy [well im a 8th grade education] but one glance and i could see this is wrong. innumeracy

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    well, then answer this one simple question, how all americans can fit into 49 percentage. no need to be professor of maths, to know that all americans must be 100%.

    michael Reply:

    its 49 agree 49 disagree which is close let say 2% couldn’t speak english.But if you add the two types of whites you get 109- 88 = 197 /= 98.5 again close but the proportion would be 54.5-44 which is wrong. and if you add the blacks whites and browns you get 124-171 and this time divide by three? you are again close to 98 [41.3- 57] but even farther off of the 49-49 even if you add in all the non english speakers.whats annoying is its so obviously off with no explanation is it assumed people cant even add any more or that its not important that it add up or is it actually possible no one notices this anymore.its actually quite common i see it all the time

    [Reply]

    Quint Essential Reply:

    Proportions, michael. The numbers are unrelateable to each other unless we know what proportion of respondents were of each type. You can’t assume that 50% of whites are college educated, and 50% are working class.

    Quint Essential Reply:

    Simple explanation for why those numbers don’t always add up. They aren’t the only numbers.

    Also, it’s surveys. Most people who fill out surveys are functionally retarded anyway.

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    people who read them too apparently quant

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    agree, humans are not perfect yet.
    so, how robot’s surveys would be different then

    q : do you think all people are stupid
    a : model generation 3 yes 100%, model generatio 4 yes 100%

    isnt it boring and a bit totalitarian?

    [Reply]

    Quint Essential Reply:

    Why would robots need to do surveys? Just upload data to a server, let someone else sort through it.

    SVErshov Reply:

    sure, they can do that, but question is not how, but what would be that plausible inference. how significant would appears to robots all those differences.

    Quint Essential Reply:

    Think about why humans do surveys. A way to gauge public opinion, willingness to jump through hoops, measure support. Weaknesses being that it takes time, both to analyse and fill out.

    Why would robots want to do any of that? They can link to each other, even across vast distances (via internets), and transmit huge amounts of data in seconds. When you can do that, why bother with a survey?

    michael Reply:

    quint that may be missing info and i account for the 2% none of the aboves seems to hold which makes it more puzzling, Whats reported has to be internally consistent to be useful, it is possible they didnt poll a statistically likely percentage of each race no one say they did but what they report has to be consistent with their total to be meaningful, similarly you cant break whites into working and college then report a total of all whites thats not consistent without explanation.

    [Reply]

    Quint Essential Reply:

    What’s a “statistically likely” percentage? It certainly isnt 33% for each race, that would be absurd. Same with working class whites vs college educated whites. (Incidentally, about 30% of non hispanic whites have at least a four year degree. For fun, 0.3*43 + 0.7*66 = 59.1, which is pretty close to 57%, so either they’re using slightly different numbers, or there’s a third, smaller category, non-working class, with no degree, presumably.)

    We are just seeing a picture, presumably one that appears right at the top of the survey results. If you really burn to know that the numbers are consistent, check out the source to find the racial proportions. They probably explain it later on in the report anyway.

    NRK Reply:

    Bait? Here? Lovely…

    [Reply]

    Quint Essential Reply:

    I don’t think it’s bait, I think michael hasn’t had any formal statistical training. I think he’s being genuine about not knowing how it works.

    [Reply]

    NRK Reply:

    You think so? Oh well, [insert condescending comment about WN and intelligence optimization], but at least Shvershov is surely taking the piss/trying to participate in bait he doesn’t quite realize isn’t bait, right?

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Maybe you were baited into the bait as the bait.

    Quint Essential Reply:

    That is not bait which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons even bait may die.
    Kynes has gone bait-ive.
    This. Is. Bait-a!
    The Pattern demands the Bait.
    It occurs to me that our bait may depend upon our baiting of one another.
    I was thinking, “So I’m Bait, am I? What nonsense!” But at least I’ll be able to make people read my posts now.
    Bait or perish, now as ever, is GNON’s inexorable imperative.
    And Lo, for the Earth was empty of Bait, and void. And Prudence was all over the Face of the Deep(Net). And We said: ‘Lets make these fuckers Dance.”
    We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the bait; the real tragedy is when men are afraid to bait.

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    All Your Bait Are Belong To Us.

    Said Patrick Baitman, abaiting the time of the Cathedral. The Cathedral being baited into a Neon-Cathedral.

    Itself a singular bait for the Singularity. Baiting itself into itself. The bait at the end of time. Hooked into the line o’ every man. Abaiting its time, to become the man beyond time. The space bait. Allah´s gnonian gate.

    https://youtu.be/dH7zOX5PrVw
    https://youtu.be/ekYlRhALiRQ

    Abaitor! Master and servant in unity
    At one with the abyss
    when in your
    bait I
    abide

    One bait to bait them all, and in the darkness bait them

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    How many layers of bait are you on my dude?

    [Reply]

    NRK Reply:

    The bait that can be baited is not the eternal bait.

    Posted on September 2nd, 2016 at 6:55 pm Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    ▬ “Belarus is “alt-right”. It’s essentially purely white. It has low crime and a clean capital city. Everyone there is openly racist – the idea of different races is simply an obvious fact to all of them. The moral failings of women are not ignored or excused, and divorce, over all, favors men. People are expected to marry young and have children. Out of wedlock birth is frowned upon. There are protectionist tariffs and strict, strictly enforced immigration laws. Nationalist sentiment is high. There is an idea of buying Belarusian goods to support Belarusian business.

    But despite all this, Belarus is a terrible place. There must be some other necessary condition for goodness in a society. I argue it is a terrible place primarily due to poor governance. Bribery is commonplace. The regulatory burden makes Washcorp look like Galt’s Gulch. People are miserable, absolutely miserable. Nobody smiles, poverty is rampant, alcoholism is the normal state of things, fertility is lower than white America, and suicide is higher than white America (#2 worldwide! http://www.suicide.org/international-suicide-statistics.html).

    I’m completely in favor of interests over principles. But it is not in my interests to live in a country like Belarus. What is so fantastic about neoreaction is that its ideas allow it to simultaneously comprehend the vileness of the Cathedral and the vileness of Lukashenko’s government.”
    — Kwisatz Haderach Reply:
    August 27th, 2016 at 3:12 am

    One might subsume that a WN/Alt-R state would become like this (if it were to leave out para-NRx types).

    [Reply]

    Kwisatz Haderach Reply:

    There are many possible explanations for why it sucks to be Belarusian in Belarus, but prole alt-right is so ignorant of the past and the present that it doesn’t even understand that Belarus is a problem that it needs to try to explain.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    You are damn right about that. Is anyone going to tell me that the homes of the majority these WN are in perfect order?

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Or just even in order.

    michael Reply:

    Kwiz i would think the explanation is simple

    they have been over run and taken over constantly over the past 1000 years at least.they are a tiny genetic pool in a crossroads
    they went through the agricultural industrial and information revolutions under tsarist peasant soviet systems and its aftermath and still carry that lag which is exacerbated by their geographical isolation and land locked from the hot spots.Its like asking why does massachusetts have a higher IQ than Idaho.magic dirt ? no it was settled by high IQ people who attracted more and more its a brain drain on the world ,
    What seems obvious is their a strong correlation between high IQ nations and stupidity and suicide, the sweet spot seems to be somewhere between belarus and germany. I dont think its unreasonable to propose its the very things that have made some successful that is also their undoing.So how smart is that really if the greatest minds of christendom vote to fucked to death by niggers brilliant

    [Reply]

    Kwisatz Haderach Reply:

    Ok, you’ve started to answer the dilemma by acknowledging that “white” is an insufficiently nuanced concept. That’s what I was driving at. I suggest you pull on that thread some more and see where it leads you.

    To start off, you’ve written many comments here bashing IQ and those here who you see as fixated on IQ. It’s surprising to me that you now are using IQ to explain Belarus, but I understand the temptation, since IQ really is an extremely powerful explanatory tool.

    But to restate the argument – Belarusians have extremely white skin, do not subscribe to cultural marxism, and have a lot of nationalistic feeling, but their country isn’t a nice place to live. You and I agree that IQ has something to do with that. How much? Their national IQ is estimated to be 97 by Lynn, who as far as I know the only one who’s attempted to compile statistics that are validly comparable across nations. (Conducting original research to establish valid norms for different national aptitude tests, etc). 97. Think about that. US Whites are closer to 101 by his estimates. The average difference in IQ between US whites and Belarusian whites is 4 points. This is as large of a difference as the difference between US Whites and Han Chinese (4 points). It is approximately as large as the difference between Chinese and Jews (4 points).

    However, I think there is a lot more going on beyond IQ here. Belarus is east of the Hajnal line. I think this makes a decisive difference. Belarus did not live under the system of bipartite manorialism that characterized Western Europe throughout the middle ages. [https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/tag/bipartite-manorialism], [https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2016/03/02/family-types-in-eastern-europe-1500-1900/]. I think hbd chick’s theory of population viscosity might be necessary here.

    I’m not going to rise to the bait with respect to your last sentence. Suffice it to say that I think your theory of “smart people -> crazy ideas -> self annihilation” is really bad. It is not the greatest minds of Christendom that have voted for white genocide. It is not the greatest minds of Germany that form Angela Merkel’s base of support. It is in the feels-n-signalling demo of the average German soccer mom and boring nice guy dad who voted Merkel into power. Meanwhile, many of the western world’s smartest people are hard at work combating the white genocide of the soccer mom crowd. If you want somebody to blame, start at the median voter. It’s demoralizing and counterproductive to wail on high IQ people for not having already solved the problem. “Hurry up and fix it, Poindexter! You suck! Fight or die little man! Niggers! Niggers! Niggers!”. It’s dumb, michael. Why are you doing it? What kind of reaction are you hoping to get? You’re really lowering the tone and there’s no compensatory anything coming out of your posts these days. You’re just short-circuiting into a kind of racially-oriented Tourette’s syndrome. You are not striking an image of a battle-ready lieutenant. If it ever does come to war, a better man that you will be my leader.

    Hey, if you want to go to war, why don’t you start by advancing an actual strategy or tactic that has even a remote chance of succeeding? Admin has already challenged you and VXXC to do that and you’ve replied with silence. That’s weak sauce. You have no plan, no hope of victory through might of arms. So why are you yelling at us for your lack of a plan? Why is it our job to come up with a plan to achieve your goal?

    michael Reply:

    quiz I seem to have triggered you Im sorry, yes youre observation is accurate The race question last christmas became quite personal and i have dispensed with the niceties. Enjoy the luxury of your innocence.
    And its also true I have a bit of a axe to grind on the IQ question which is ironic since IQ/HBD was for me like so many of us a catalyst to change our thinking. And truth be told I still put great stock in it even as I lose faith in my own abilities, Im not really suggesting we would be better led by the low IQ. Im reacting to a sense I have that this blog and perhaps DE is turning what I keep referring to as Elysium, admins transhumanism has this master race thing that gets to me, And the whole nrx zen detachment thing, again I get dont just do something sit there, but the worlds is actually burning real actual people are going to suffer and die its going to be orders of magnitude worse than the gulag archipelago and I think some of you guys are smart enough to help stop it.
    And I think a few broad assertions by MM is what stops that. First I see no possible exit that will even last whats left of my life let alone my children and grandchildens.Second I dont believe intelligent people couldn’t find a way to remove the Soros clinton Gates crowd from power, But I think yesterday wouldn’t have been too soon. Third as i said I disagree I dont believe the feely soccer mom is responsible, I think soccer moms are basically good people and not even stupid, i think it too the concerted effort of exceptionally intelligent people working multi generationally to manipulate soccer moms.I actually think people with that much IQ cant really help but try and take over the world, Im not on that level but i definitely control my corner of the world with machiavellian determination. Part of lands brave new world seems to imply we could do without [assuming im invited which i guess i blew that] the bottom 95% of the population I dont think this is possible or would be enjoyable The state of the proletariat is mostly due in my opinion to poor management. And as I keep saying soccer moms are not voting for free shit they are voting to give free shit to others, This was the best the commies could get after 50 – 150 -500 years? of propaganda from prole whites, and then only from about 40% of prole whites. so they import low IQ mobs. So Im sorry I think yarvin is wrong that democracy is the virus its only one of many hosts religion class and race rivalry and as you point out manipulating genetic traits/ emotions evolved for different purposes. Im not arguing this because i love democracy but because Im more concerned with actually stopping whats about to happen than confirming the bias of my little high IQ internet club. Yes I loved MM but he might be a bit wrong. If hes wrong then we needn’t do nothing while waiting for a collapse thats never going to be allowed to happen.I dont know if you have seen my little other theories but regarding democracy i have suggested that if say soccer moms had to choose between AP courses for Buffy and Hiram and daycare for crack mothers without being allowed to borrow. Then liberalism would disappear overnight. its formalism with democracy. no representation without taxation, you cant vote if you dont contribute, and you cant vote to spend other generations imagined taxes by borrowing leftis dies.I say his is important because I think the idea of convincing westerners to live under monarchy etc is just well its so incredibly ridiculous i cant even …But a balanced budget amendment and incremental formalism is possible maybe we need a real life ragnar daneskold to crash the future market first but bright guys can do that. Also I dont buy the hajinal line to the extent its bandied about as the master race, yeah sure in way we are the master race you too with your 60% northern italian mitochondrial DNA LOL. But I think its more about first mover advantage , the roman greek byzantine and american empires all fall outside of the line, you really think there would be a renaissance without what it was renewing. I dont know it sounds to me like some are pretending 80% of ‘whites’ are indistinguishable from africans. Thats a lot of human capital I would not dispense with if on the verge of collapse particularly when its those very countries most resistant to the virus.It may come to VXXC type of fighting very soon but I think theres still a chance to beat them intelectually, not blogging imagine youre a tiny country like israel or russia and you need to defeat the cathedral it could be done. Im too old and dumb but I know it could be done. Failing that and for better or worse if it comes down to it WNs have a hook into a primal instinct whos time is right for leverage, it neednt be their outcome we are smarter and could pwn them using the leverage temporarily at least in the sense that civilization would have to be based on a lot more than whiteness, but its certainly a good place to start.Land can have china i dont they will let him live once they no longer need to please the USG but thats his gamble.

    [Reply]

    (N) G. Eiríksson Reply:

    I don´t think Haderach was triggered. I think he was quite sensible.

    Don´t mistake machoness for masculinity.

    The former is feminine.

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    Erikson isn’t a fan of that toxic masculinity.

    Michael’s fist just plummeted in from the Outside and busted kwisatz in the chops.

    “And I think a few broad assertions by MM is what stops that.”

    It’s an appeal to authority, an acceptance of His Word on faith. MM is a great rhetorician, i.e. preacher, but he is a participant in the telos of Hyper-Puritanical Asceticism, the will to cleanliness at any price.

    Posted on September 3rd, 2016 at 5:11 am Reply | Quote
  • Quint Essential Says:

    http://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/PRRI-Brookings-2016-Immigration-survey-report.pdf

    The full report, if anyone is interested. Some other interesting stuff in it as well.

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 3rd, 2016 at 7:11 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    @michael
    you guys are fucked up first i already said a hundred times im not a wn i just happen to think they are correct that the basis for any civilized and efficient society is a homogenous race and it doesnt hurt ours rocks.
    two i prefaced my comment by saying im an 8 grade non math guy so yeah no statistical training.
    However i dont need regression analysis for this.
    I have already conceded its not just possible but certain some things were left out at the very least all the samples are 2 % short and we know thats not quite enough to cover the none of the aboves. however youre not paying attention you didnt follow my math or argument or play with the numbers yourself. they dont add up and no not in the algebraic way youre talking about
    I said its reasonable to expect that to be internally consistent

    [Reply]

    Quint Essential Reply:

    Total Sample 2,607
    Male 1,119
    Female 1,488
    Democrat 948
    Independent 888
    Republican 676
    Tea Party 183
    Trump supporter 390
    Clinton supporter 709
    White, non-Hispanic 1,858
    Black, non-Hispanic 285
    Hispanic 258
    White working class 744
    White college educated 822
    High school degree or less 601
    Some college 907
    College degree 642
    Post-graduate degree 457
    Age 18-29 403
    30-49 772
    50-64 801
    65+ 631
    White evangelical Protestant 430
    White mainline Protestant 521
    Black Protestant 219
    Catholic 515
    White Catholic 370
    Hispanic Catholic 103
    Religiously unaffiliated 496
    Registered voters 2,185

    Here’s your missing numbers michael. You shouldn’t get stuck now, I hope. Remember that there’s a third category of white that don’t have a statistic in the image.

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    Sorry I must be blind i only see the two in the original post white working class and white college educated. Are you seriously suggesting the various high school and college levels levels are a third category? Hey why not throw in the religions as well?Do the math college boy add whatever other catagory you want to the working or educated catagories and make the numbers work Im not going to bother because i can see at a glance its nowhere close, it wouldnt make sense and and youre not interested in anything but being a smartass.

    [Reply]

    Quint Essential Reply:

    If you direct your attention to some of the numbers there:

    White, non-Hispanic: 1858
    White, working class: 744
    White, college educated: 822

    Now, I know you can add, michael, and dat don’ add up.

    You think I get my kicks by being a smartass here? I saw you scratching your head over it, and I thought it would be nice to help ya.

    NRK Reply:

    How do you even manage being a race realist when you don’t understand how statistics work, wouldn’t that be important?
    Also, notice how it isn’t 2% for every group, and and also how “none of the above” isn’t even listed so it probably wasn’t an option in the survey.

    More general question, are there obvious neocameralist strategies against shitposting?

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    statistics are not the issue im aware how holding effects statistics its what made me a conservative and race realist in the 70s, whats being discussed is simple math by one person who has done it and another who is guessing the other guy is statistically wrong.

    [Reply]

    NRK Reply:

    Oh Michael, my bottomless well of confusion and delight, just what are you trying to say? Who are those two guys you’re talking about?

    Quint Essential Reply:

    Cladistically wrong, my friend. (The other way makes no sense anyway).

    michael Reply:

    Im talking about quant and myself
    this isnt some Bayesian thing,Take the simpler case the whites, the whites need to add up and divide up simple. so now even with the rest of this info they still dont, and even if they did it would mean they were purposefully misleading with their headings.

    What other category of white is on the list that it would make sense to infer or to add to either the category working class or educated? None; the distinction is being made to imply working class is not college educated, [BTW i dont know which is funnier, that blue collar workers don’t have degrees or that college boys dont have jobs]

    Nevertheless to assume its reasonable to assume behind the scenes whats happening is. – “oh no we included some college degreed blue collar guys in working class not college educated” or ” we included people with some college in working class because ‘when the weekend at the college doesnt turn out like you planned’ youre going to end up working class regardless the trust fund”

    and its not reasonable to assume when you list the three catagories of race that make up 95% of the population you dont mention that BTW we had this wierd sample and 8% of the people we polled were white so basically the entire point of our little poll is meaningless. What would be reasonable is to put an asterisk and say the three races dont add up to 100 because there are 5% none of the above which we didnt include because our poll made their samples to small to be reliable. But they dont do that even in the data quant put up there no asian amerindian jew whatever.But that was beside my point i gave you all the 2% that seems to be misiing and offerd to let you add it all in the column to help it add up i even offered to let you pretend its 5% and they all voted the same way but it still wont add up now i offer you can take any of the info he posted and arrange it so it works with the original post. but youde rather snark at the plumber

    But thats not

    [Reply]

    NRK Reply:

    and its not reasonable to assume when you list the three catagories of race that make up 95% of the population you dont mention that BTW we had this wierd sample and 8% of the people we polled were white so basically the entire point of our little poll is meaningless.

    OK I don’t really know what you did there but it isn’t the math.

    Quint Essential Reply:

    The race question: I assume that the survey respondents were given four categories: White, Black, Hispanic, Other.

    Note that the “Some College” has no racial descriptor. It includes all respondents with some college, no just white.

    Your digression on Working class versus College educated is just that, a digression. Respondents self selected whether they were Working class, college educated, or Other.

    The Other/None of Above category also makes sense considering how the category was not analysed.

    Though they haven’t mentioned such a category, I’d guess they assumed readers would figure it out.

    Some mathematics below here:

    Total 2607
    White, non-Hispanic 1,858
    Black, non-Hispanic 285
    Hispanic 258

    (1858/2607)*57 + (285/2607)*29 + (258/2607)*38 = 47.55. Close to the 49% in the original picture. We can assume that the other 206 lean liberal, as they’re most likely to be arabs, asians, or jews.

    For fun, let us exclude those 206 that were given no category.

    (1858/2401)*57 + (285/2401)*29 + (258/2401)*38 = 51.64

    Interesting. The other cohort leaned very heavily liberal (to see the extent, consider the calculation below).

    (51.64*(2401/2607) 47.55 -49)*(-2607/206) = 18.35 percent think discrimination against whites is bad yadda yadda.

    Posted on September 4th, 2016 at 12:27 am Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    here is link (from last chaos patch) to debate related to statistics between Deborah Mayo and William M. Briggs

    Limits of falsifiability
    http://wmbriggs.com/post/19545/

    while, it is not easy to get to the core of that discussion, it is easy to stay away from use of statistical methods for firecasting of human systems all together. there is number of better prediction tools available. (exactly what robots do)

    Statistical ways to deal with uncertainties been over exploited to make sily, deceptive statements. I’m not buying into pretend to justify use of statistic due to complexities of human systems. Complex systems can be reduced to simple models without any loses in prediction accuracity.

    from practical point of view perhaps it is time to consider liquidation of all bankrupt pseudo-sciences. anyway time is clicking I’m sure dissolution would not be violent.

    from philosophical perspective if we can accept uncertainty as an objective property of physical world, then why not just leave it to what it is.

    [Reply]

    NRK Reply:

    Interesting, but I don’t see how it applies to the survey in question – are there yet better tools for mapping people’s opinions than asking them? Probably, but but can such tools function on the basis of anything other than statistics? Maybe I just lack imagination.

    from philosophical perspective if we can accept uncertainty as an objective property of physical world, then why not just leave it to what it is.

    We still live there.

    [Reply]

    Anon Reply:

    >are there yet better tools for mapping people’s opinions than asking them?

    Revealed preferences.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    you call it life?

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 4th, 2016 at 7:59 am Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    @michael
    And BTw from a plumber perspective Bayesian analysis is just a mixing valve on a primary secondary pumping system whatever goes into the tee must come out of the tee buth flow btu and velocity

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 4th, 2016 at 5:28 pm Reply | Quote
  • Outliers (#21) Says:

    […] Global economic collapse joins the convergence of catastrophes. America waking up to the fact that diversity does not work. Leftism is parasitism. Democracy creates secret and deceptive government. Clarifying the alt right […]

    Posted on September 5th, 2016 at 2:07 am Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    @michael
    you seem to miss my point yeah it a digression but its the digression a reasonable person will conclude without a caveat.I didnt say some college meant whites i said theres no catagory that tells us what these mystery whites are even when we dig which a reasonable person wouldnt because its clearly implied whites fall into one of two categories.Just like its implied that if you list the three races that make up 95% of the nation that should not leave vote totals that need more than 5% to account for without an explanation. These little graphs for magazines are supposed to be for someone to use at a glance accurately not spend an hour going through the data and still not finding the answer. because otherwise they are deceptive in this case im pleased by the deception but that’s beside the point. as you conclude the graph is misleading, yeah we knew the jews arabs and asians were liberals

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 5th, 2016 at 5:28 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wency Says:

    I have to question these numbers. The 29% for blacks in particular does not ring true.

    For whites, the numbers are plausible. It suggests that this belief is held among a subset of college-educated Republicans and among nearly all blue-collar Republicans, along with some much smaller proportion of blue-collar white Democrats.

    It’s possible that some people interpret the question to mean, “Yeah, there are LGBT white Americans and women being discriminated against every day.”

    Or, “Sure, every time a white man is discriminated against for his race, which is almost never, it’s as bad as an equivalent discrimination against a black man, which happens constantly everywhere.”

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 6th, 2016 at 12:48 pm Reply | Quote
  • (N) G. Eiríksson Says:

    To the cucklord who thinks racism is not real: http://imgur.com/gallery/3WWf7

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 7th, 2016 at 3:30 am Reply | Quote

Leave a comment