Twitter cuts (#96)

Contrarian, definitely. But — on reflection — it’s not unimaginable. (Even if the average murderer is less gifted than his victim, the maths could go through.)

October 24, 2016admin 46 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Discriminations

TAGGED WITH : , , ,

46 Responses to this entry

  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    Murder is certainly a very evolutionary act (within limits) — it definites what survives, i.e. “the people with this trait [e.g. thieving] get murdered more often, so it´s less likely their genes pass on”. It´s not necessarily eugenic: e.g the Negro Africans murdering of White (Europid) Africans, it´s hard to see the eugenics of that, or e.g. of Pol Pot´s actions.

    The eugenicity of murder depends on by who for what.

    Typically, it´s smarter to have people work.

    Need all hands on deck,

    to get off this rock.

    [Reply]

    Alrenous Reply:

    Need all hands on deck,

    to get off this rock.
    On the contrary, some 90% of the species is holding everyone back.

    Regarding Negroes vs. Caucasians, I said ‘murder’ not ‘murders.’ I consider the institution as a whole, in various times and places, rather than individual acts.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    ▬ “A ternary computer (also called trinary computer) is a computer that uses ternary logic (three possible values) instead of the more common binary logic (two possible values) in its calculations.

    One early calculating machine, built by Thomas Fowler entirely from wood in 1840, operated in balanced ternary. The first modern, electronic ternary computer Setun was built in 1958 in the Soviet Union at the Moscow State University by Nikolay Brusentsov, and it had notable advantages over the binary computers which eventually replaced it, such as lower electricity consumption and lower production cost.”

    [Reply]

    michael Reply:

    blacks murdering whites is not eugenic for our species it works for theirs just fine. intelligence does not equal survival, survival equals survival. getting off this rock because sun will die in 5 billion years LMAOROTF not a black problem, getting off this rock because high IQ white idiots may find ways to cut 5 billions years off end times? thats a white problem. no whites no problem still got 5 billion years to invent dugout space canoe.RedtailedHawks wont hunt squirrels unless trained to from eyas or as a hail mary just before dying of starvation. Hawkes know a chewed off claw from the attempt is likely a death sentence.Theres a lot of definitions of murder quiz reminds us of pinkers execution theory that turned whites into beta cucks does that really count, does stupid murder in post modern cities count or are we talking killing the guy you find on the trail and taking his horse and gun. any murder has a butterfly effect does it acrue to the perp is the question does it have a predictable effect is the question. one less mouth to feed is always true on a macro level random murder is hit or miss. Pinkers is a better thought si the killing of all those alphas really what allowed a more complicated civilization and is it the an Achilles heel now.

    [Reply]

    Axel Reply:

    Yes, but the death penalty is more eugenic.

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 12:38 pm Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    Legalize murder.

    In my experience, people rarely murder without a cause, and most of those causes involve affirmative not defensive acts.

    However, the problem with murder is that if it were legal, it would be an economically more efficient act than negotiation, which could have silly consequences.

    Right now, not enough people are exiled for being inept, inefficient, idiotic, etc. and so murder is tempting like a sexual fantasy.

    Anyone who has not idly thought about purging the species with fire has no soul.

    [Reply]

    Uriel Alexis Reply:

    putting a price tag on murder seems to be more to the point (it links economic productivity to the elimination of undesirables, all the while allowing for human-hunting to become a profitable activity).

    [Reply]

    Alrenous Reply:

    Saga Iceland. Murder was punished by weregild.

    Result: folk with few friends or family were murdered more or less at will, since the weregild was unnecessary, culling those particularly poor at coordination.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Funny, I had thought of inserting into this thread documents on kulling.

    Since I still sort of have the tab open: Culling And The Code Of Kindred Honour.

    michael Reply:

    which leads to what socialism? so murders dysgenic. meanwhile in another shire they murder all the alphas again leads to multiculturalism. what’s going on here, high IQ societies get revenge of the nerds syndromes slave morality kill all the alphas and then die because they cant defend more aggressive groups

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    yeah, your argument works it happened in Cambodia

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    What makes you guys think you two wouldn´t be murdered for your opinions?

    [Reply]

    Uriel Alexis Reply:

    effective insurance.

    [Reply]

    GC Reply:

    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.

    Alrenous Reply:

    it would be an economically more efficient act

    Classic game theory error – you didn’t do the feedbacks. (By classic I mean, “don’t feel bad,” even mainstream game theory stands at this halfway point on the prisoner’s dilemma.)

    Murdering someone instead of negotiating with them dramatically enhances your risk of being murdered in turn, so it’s not efficient. Rather, an armed society is a polite society – whether it’s legal to use them or not.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Legalise drugs and murder

    Black amps tear the sky
    Ten million late to die
    Losers bang your head tonight
    Come fanatics, hear our cry

    Legalise drugs and murder

    Get high kneel to the riff
    This world makes us sick
    Listen man, we are the night
    Raise them now, bongs and knives

    Legalise drugs and murder
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

    [2. Murder & Madness]

    I hear the night calling it knows my name,
    I hear the night screaming summoned again.
    My need My lust for vengeance, black wings of hate,
    My wrath at last has reason, legions awake!

    And when the night calls,
    We rise, we kill.
    Our covens grow in darkness,
    Nurtured by weed and pills.

    Rise, Rise,
    Legions of Hatred.
    Rise, Rise,
    Legions of Hatred.
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    https://youtu.be/Jzem_-At6F4?t=21m50s

    HAIL GNON ABENON !

    Jzem_-At6F4

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 1:54 pm Reply | Quote
  • Heraker Says:

    Why would it matter whether the killer is more or less gifted than his victim? As long as the victim is on the left side of the bell curve it’ eugenic, no? I assume that most murder is low-quality people killing other low quality people, in which case it’s two birds with one self-inflicted stone as one man dies and the other goes to prison where he can’t breed.

    Anyhow this just seems like a restatement of ‘civilisation is dysgenic’, given that the first rule of any civilisation is that you don’t go around killing people.

    [Reply]

    Alrenous Reply:

    Ironically a tribal clan is one of the few settings murder is probably dysgenic, since it’s either envy-driven or done via ridiculous 10v1 ambushes.

    [Reply]

    ArchonAlarion Reply:

    You have never heard of comparative advantage, have you?

    [Reply]

    Heraker Reply:

    Of course I’ve heard of it—they’ve been blaring it from the rooftops for decades. It goes something like this: ‘they do the jobs that we don’t want to do‘.

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 2:29 pm Reply | Quote
  • Cryptogenic Says:

    I haven’t got the source on hand, but somewhere in “Revolt Against the Modern World” Evola recounts how certain members of English nobility enjoyed the right of manslaughter until a surprisingly late date.

    Otherwise, these are my extreme INTJ thoughts: http://youtu.be/MlyBNSD_RiY

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    http://i.imgur.com/6ef5H07.jpg
    (A rare Pepe)

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 4:01 pm Reply | Quote
  • grey enlightenment Says:

    the only way it would work would be from some extreme consequentialist perspective whereby the murders somehow have a eugenic effect on civilization

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 4:31 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    Less gifted at what?Yeah we all know but its a bias, intelligence is not the only survival tool in some ways it more a survival tool optimizer and violence is the biggest tool in the survival toolbox. Why are smart people getting killed by the less gifted, maybe cause theyre stupid fucking cucks?

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 4:43 pm Reply | Quote
  • michael Says:

    @michael
    If we are to believe the neo inactionary theory that the cathedral elite are not evil, rather only misguided religious zealots, then its pretty clear the stupid and violent have the better evolutionary strategy and will inherit the earth-very soon if the not stopped. If the cathedral elites are,as the alt Reich seems to believe evil geniuses, then the alt Reich is correct the elites must be outsmarted and killed before the stupid are stopped one way or another.

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 4:49 pm Reply | Quote
  • Kwisatz Haderach Says:

    One of Pinker’s theses in Better Angels of Our Nature is that homicide, particularly state sponsored execution, was one of the primary mechanisms that pressured western populations into becoming more peaceful and less violent. Back in the day, it was an even sharper signal than what we’re getting out of Chicago ground zero.

    (Can you imagine making a heroic exertion of emotional and fiscal resources in order to SAVE one of those gangbangers?. “It took us twelve hours in surgery and I missed my daughter’s birthday party, but we managed not only to save your life, but also one of your gonads. You should be able to reproduce normally, Jamal! You’re going to be ok! *beaming smile*).

    Side note: I think we should drop the word eugenic from casual speech. It’s a question-begging word. Eugenic for what? Instead of saying eugenic, just say the what.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    ▬> “I think we should drop the word eugenic from casual speech. It’s a question-begging word. Eugenic for what? Instead of saying eugenic, just say the what.”

    What is most important for life on earth is not confusing: to spread life off this planet, and even out of this solar system (the sun will eventually explode), and/or engineer the universe for its survival.

    Obviously survival is the most basic process of life.

    The word ‘survive’ itself means living.

    Life, does living. That´s what life does.

    So eugenic means what aids this purpose.

    Men contest on that. But that is a part of evolution (see «Red Queen», 1993). Nature is an arm´s race, as well as a co operation.

    http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v12/n4/box/nrmicro3236_BX1.html

    [Reply]

    Kwisatz Haderach Reply:

    See? So many potential discussions are elided by the word eugenic. I’m sure that other writers have a different understanding of the term. For admin, it seems that eugenic is practically synonymous with “intelligence-producing”.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Exactly.

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 5:09 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    speaking of Pinker; a video of NN Taleb “trashing” Pinker was dropped into one of my chats yesterday. he does not only call him an entertainer but more importantly (apparently) shews that the Pinker´s mathology is not worked right.

    «The Randomness of Correlation and its Hacking by Bigdataists» Published on Oct 22, 2016.

    ▬ „[Pinker] doesn´t know that sample mean is different from real mean.”

    https://youtu.be/yUooqL47akM

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 6:08 pm Reply | Quote
  • G. Eiríksson Says:

    ▬ “For them we´re clear. They see right through, all the stupid and murderous things that we do. Or would like to.” Space Jews”

    https://youtu.be/B1UUgAmNMw0

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 6:31 pm Reply | Quote
  • uncle joe Says:

    NRs are obsessed with eugenics. So if this is true, shouldn’t they be trying to increase the number of murders? But somehow I don’t see that plan catching on.

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 6:55 pm Reply | Quote
  • Uncle Saturday Says:

    Even? Moar liek especially. Intelligence is dysgenic.

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    What about the Intelligence of Murder?

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 24th, 2016 at 8:20 pm Reply | Quote
  • Melanie L'Heuremaudit Says:

    Here kitty kitty

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iH-isyCo4fE

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    Dick Wagner, you´re off with the nihil-trash again.

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    You think Melanie is me? Again, you have no nose for tempo. Are you sure your ancestors didn’t play kissy kissy goo goo in igloos with eskimos? That would explain some things about you. Japcraps have been nuked into degeneracy, I wouldn’t associate with them–though somehow I don’t think their tentacle porn innovation would be out of favor here per se.

    [Reply]

    Dick Wagner Reply:

    “A social revision engine is not a chat board. If it degenerates into a chat board, it is dead. The world has no shortage of chat boards. It may even have an excess. Resartus is designed to complement Wikipedia – a remarkably valuable and useful service, though untrustworthy in general and often malignantly deceptive on controversial issues. Think of it as Wikipedia for controversial material and (perhaps eventually) original research, and you won’t be too far off.” – MM

    If it degenerates into a chat board, it is dead.

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    The chats are not what they seem.

    Posted on October 26th, 2016 at 2:07 am Reply | Quote
  • Melanie L'Heuremaudit Says:

    I’m not Dick Wagner

    My name is Melanie

    Here, maybe this film clip from Hong Kong will make up for the “nihil-trash” I posted before:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAH-0GKvIrM

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    — this is(n´t) as nihilistic — but it´s liberal trash.

    patriots don´t have girls work in public.

    and they don´t hit on them.

    they have them 1

    ass igned

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 26th, 2016 at 5:32 pm Reply | Quote
  • Melanie L'Heuremaudit Says:

    “If it degenerates into a chat board, it is dead.”

    The day that happens I’ll open a Futurist Bar, and offer everyone drinks of blood.

    The blood drinkers will be entertained by a mocking and philosophical tapeworm that plays the flute.

    Nothing but real blood? By the glass, raw, certified by hospitals…from that very morning.

    Aortic blood, fetal blood, hymenal blood, blood of the executed.

    For all tastes!

    [Reply]

    G. Eiríksson Reply:

    the follies of youth

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 26th, 2016 at 7:17 pm Reply | Quote
  • Melanie L'Heuremaudit Says:

    free drinks (blood of the executed) for Alt Reichers who tell how they became red-pilled on the JQ

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 26th, 2016 at 8:45 pm Reply | Quote
  • This Week in Reaction (2016/10/30) - Social Matter Says:

    […] Land has a pretty funny twitter cut from Alrenous. I don’t think it quite amounts to advocacy. Land also passes his 3,000,000th visit. Social […]

    Posted on November 2nd, 2016 at 8:49 am Reply | Quote

Leave a comment