Ultra-Calvinism II

The XS Inner Council doesn’t get as much time to study hardcore Ultra-Calvinist Theonomy as it would like, but Rushdoony’s Politics of Guilt and Pity (full-text available free online) is looking truly awesome so far. A couple of early snippets:

The reality of man apart from Christ is guilt and masochism. And guilt and masochism involve an unshakeable inner slavery which governs the total life of the non-Christian. The politics of the anti-christian will thus inescapably be the politics of guilt. In the politics of guilt, man is perpetually drained in his social energy and cultural activity by his over-riding sense of guilt and his masochistic activity. He will progressively demand of the state a redemptive role. What he cannot do personally, i.e., to save himself, he demands that the state do for him, so that the state, as man enlarged, becomes the human savior of man. The politics of guilt, therefore, is not directed, as the Christian politics of liberty, to the creation of godly justice and order, but to the creation of a redeeming order, a saving state. Guilt must be projected, therefore, on all those who oppose this new order and new age. And, because the salvation is mythical, and the enslavement real, the hatred of life and of innocence grows, and with it grows the urge to mass destruction.

[…]

In the modern state, in the name of democracy, there is the increasing pandering to guilt and to the hatred felt by the guilty for the innocent and for the successful. This then is the full triumph of the politics of guilt and its open enthronement. For the politics of guilt, the order of the day is mass destruction. […] Sentimental humanism asserts that man’s basic need is love, more specifically, a passive need to be loved. Thus, man is seen as a passive creature whose basic problem is not a will to evil but an absence of love, so that a positive agency must be created to supply man’s needs. The result is the totalitarian caretaker state. Man, being passive, needs an active agency in his life, and this agency the welfare state provides.

[…]

In guilt cultures, the individual deals directly and personally with the inner warfare. Man, burdened with a sense of guilt and unable to enjoy life, confesses his sin, as does the man in a shame culture, but he pleads guilty to the lesser crime. With a fine sensitivity, he dredges up minor offenses to prove the refinement of his conscience in order to escape his capital offense against God. He may trouble himself over a stolen pencil while ignoring his open or veiled warfare against God. In the United States, as the nation has departed progressively from God, it has indulged progressively in a “debunking” of its history, in a general confession of many past faults, some often imagined. The hypocrisy of such confessions is striking: by confessing the “sins” of past generations, the present scholar or generation thereby implies its own superior virtues and its innocence of those sins. By the fact of such “debunking” or confession, it confesses also, very modestly, that wisdom is now born to us and is among us, so that confession again becomes a vehicle of pride.

[…]

What man cannot do, i.e., to cleanse himself of sin or to make atonement to God for sin, God does for man. Men, being wholly God’s creation, cannot be active towards God; his relationship is derivative and passive. Man’s will is not autonomous, nor is man creative in relationship to God. Hence, since God is God, the relationship between man and God is wholly a part of the eternal decree and wholly determined by the triune God.

[…]

Today, millions of Negroes, joined by millions of slave whites, are demanding that the federal government become their slave-master and provide them with security and care. Slavery is a welfare economy; private ownership is a privately maintained welfare economy, and it is not economically a sound unit of operation. Under state ownership, slavery, a social security structure, is a welfare economy which lacks the necessity for successful operation which the private owner must maintain. The private owner must make a profit somewhere; Alexander H. Stephens made it in law and supported his slaves thereby. The slave-owning state survives instead by progressive confiscation until the nation is destroyed. […] … Slavery remains, however, a legitimate way of life, but a lower way of life. Slavery offers certain penalties as well as certain advantages. Objectively, the penalty is the surrender of liberty. Subjectively, the slave does not see the surrender of freedom as a penalty, since he desires escape from freedom. Even as a timid and fearful child dreads the dark, so does the slave mind fear liberty: it is full of the terrors of the unknown. As a result, the slave mind clings to statist or state slavery, cradle-to-grave welfare care, as a fearful child clings to his mother. The advantage of slavery is precisely this, security in the master or in the state. Socialism is thus a slave state, created by the demands of slaves for a master.

[…]

Hell is a witness to the fact that a God of justice is on the throne of the universe. When people insist that they cannot believe in hell they are saying that they refuse to believe that justice has any right to exist. The denial of hell means that justice has been replaced by the total tolerance of evil, and this tolerance of evil is disguised as love. This doctrine of love involves a hatred of God and justice and an overt or covert love of evil.

November 12, 2015admin 27 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Religion

TAGGED WITH : ,

27 Responses to this entry

  • Ultra-Calvinism II | Neoreactive Says:

    […] By admin […]

    Posted on November 12th, 2015 at 2:00 pm Reply | Quote
  • Orthodox Says:

    White guilt, aka white privilege, is the unwashable sin. You can never be un-white, unless you’re dead.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 12th, 2015 at 3:31 pm Reply | Quote
  • Ultra-Calvinism II | Reaction Times Says:

    […] Source: Outside In […]

    Posted on November 12th, 2015 at 6:43 pm Reply | Quote
  • ashv Says:

    Glad you’ve dug this deep. When I discovered Moldbug, one of my first thoughts was “Hey, this sounds like it overlaps a lot with Rushdoony and friends.”

    [Reply]

    wenshuang Reply:

    The last thing I need is a longer reading list. But great find, he’s new to me.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 12th, 2015 at 7:17 pm Reply | Quote
  • Exfernal Says:

    Interesting that for him there is no distinction between a non-Christian and anti-Christian, apparently.

    [Reply]

    Grotesque Body Reply:

    No Universalist worth his salt recognises plurality.

    [Reply]

    Exfernal Reply:

    I read it as “If you are not with us, you are against us”.

    [Reply]

    nydwracu Reply:

    Well, yeah. What were you expecting?

    [Reply]

    Exfernal Reply:

    Less simplemindedness.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 13th, 2015 at 12:34 am Reply | Quote
  • neovictorian23 Says:

    The Politics od Guilt and Pity was published by Craig Press in Nutley, New Jersey. That is, of course, George Dorn’s home town.

    Coincidence? I think not.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 13th, 2015 at 1:15 am Reply | Quote
  • SVErshov Says:

    “The slave-owning state survives instead by progressive confiscation until the nation is destroyed.”

    correct observation, I live in small country population of 1.5 mln. after democratic election earlier this year, newly elected government went on confiscation rally, they absorbed private insurance company, private bank, biggest private hospital and many more busineses and private real eastates. All these been destroyed literally.

    [Reply]

    Son of Olorus Reply:

    Is this Latvia by any chance? where the president is a member of the green party or what i would like to call them, the watermelon party–green on the outside and deep communist red in the inside.

    [Reply]

    SVErshov Reply:

    … Mauritius, it is in Africa.

    [Reply]

    Seth Reply:

    Start a blog. International perspectives are extremely valuable.

    Posted on November 13th, 2015 at 1:11 pm Reply | Quote
  • This Week in Reaction (2015/11/15) | The Reactivity Place Says:

    […] Nick Land is warming up to Calvinism. At least sufficiently severe strands of it. […]

    Posted on November 17th, 2015 at 10:09 pm Reply | Quote
  • Brett Stevens Says:

    In guilt cultures, the individual deals directly and personally with the inner warfare. Man, burdened with a sense of guilt and unable to enjoy life, confesses his sin, as does the man in a shame culture, but he pleads guilty to the lesser crime. With a fine sensitivity, he dredges up minor offenses to prove the refinement of his conscience in order to escape his capital offense against God.

    Our ancestors would hold that there is one crime, solipsism/hubris, and that all who attempt to rise above their station are guilty of it.

    [Reply]

    Posted on November 22nd, 2015 at 8:40 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    One of the nastiest paw-swipes possible:

    We look at blank-slatists the way most look at creationists.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Notice in the environs the I’ll term them “Lobotomite Gang” tries to refract what I say into something that jives with the anglo-jewish Order. Lots of clever people, I’m sure they’re somewhat effective, sadly. I just try to give you a “patchwork” idea so you can take a gander of what’s outside the box. I’m treated like Dugin however, they always-already disavow patchwork. Only what the Order approves of is allowed in the City. So they have to deflect what I say into unreality. There’s no doubt what they do they consider just – who isn’t like that? – unfortunately my sense, take it or leave it, is that they’re more “Creationist” than they’ll admit to themselves. More Monotheistic too. They don’t like differing viewpoints.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Nice encapsulation from Evola

    https://imgur.com/a/yUheNMi

    “wound up in Siberia” eh? Where’s ours? Alaska? That’s where people like “Stevie Colburt” are going.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    We need to create our own priesthood. This is the kind of book that would be good to study:

    https://imgur.com/a/3rNZaPF

    White-haired wizards of the right are the peaks of humanity.

    In an essay of his from the 30s I happened upon earlier I saw the phrase out of context, “the worst rabble of Europe” which incited 30-50 wild HA’s from me… can probably count on one hand how many people would ever write such a blasphemy in our demotic times.

    Posted on September 16th, 2019 at 10:25 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    With NW euros there is a machiavellianism that ranges from conscious to unconscious. I’m sure even with the wizards it’s to a degree unconscious but in most of the population it’s nearly fully unconscious. The reasons they offer for ethnic replacement are rationalizations of their messianic complex of self-sacrifice. What we’re witnessing is this playing out on the macro-scale as species-sacrifice.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    You know what? I was going to correct my typo and say

    *subspecies-sacrifice

    Maybe that was an unconscious slip on my part tho. Calling the races subspecies does have an obfuscatory effect that meshes well with our secular “everyone is One in God” attitude. Hell I’m willing to call the different races different species. The historically literate species and the historically illiterate species. Then there are subspecies within those two groups. That’s what’s at stake here, that’s what’s being sacrificed. You don’t think that justifies my frequent warmongering (for which I’ll probably eventually end up in a prison cell over)? The illiterates tend not to be capable of abstract thought, that’s what I mean when I say they can only talk about nothing.

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Cross-breeding abstract thought out of them, ✝️-breeding abstract thought out of themselves!… *eyes alight, Dugin beams malevolently*

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    “Jihad is our path and death in the path of God is our noblest desire..!”

    Lots of ways to sublimate the God-passion. You’re nothing, God is everything, therefore sacrifice yourself if need be.

    The question always returns to “What is the nature of God?”, God being that which demands our sacrifice if need be. The archetypal nihilist in my mind is someone who sits and watches TV all day. God is dead in their reality-world because they don’t have any ideals to aspire to, they certainly don’t believe in something so strongly that they’d travel to a foreign country and detonate a suicide bomb in the service of it.

    So what is the nature of God? Progs have an idea of what the nature of God is, though they wouldn’t call it “God”, Muslims have an idea of what the nature of God is, though they wouldn’t call it “God” either. So what is God beneath the surface of these cultural manifestations? Do some cultures get the nature of God wrong?

    My idea of God is that we’re always supposed to ascend beyond to more knowledge. I don’t know what the nature of God is, that’s mysterious. A spiraling dialectic upward to a point of light that is too bright to see?

    Progs and Muslims aren’t exactly into the “God is more knowledge” idea- the opposite, if anything. Is the nature of God to them “maintain ignorance”? This entire blog seems to be a sign that points in that direction.

    [Reply]

    Posted on September 18th, 2019 at 12:39 pm Reply | Quote
  • Wagner Says:

    I see philosophy as an aggressive form of religion. Step one, isolate what people find sacred. Step two, question whether what is thought of as sacred is actually sacred. Almost always there is something idolatrous about the worship of it.

    The most common form of idolatry is not practicing philosophy, i.e. letting idolatry be worshiped.

    Questioning sacred concepts is an attempt to smuggle in theism. It’s the conscious decision to move closer to Absolute Truth. No, we’ll never get to it. We can get closer. Believing that “there is no closer” is a form of idolatry. “It’s difficult, it irritates people” is a form of idolatry. Seeing idolatry and doing nothing about it makes you an idolater. This is the root of all the world’s problems, you don’t want to be part of the root of all the world’s problems.

    “Who are you calling a Puritan? You’re the damn Puritan!” So, am I wrong?

    [Reply]

    Wagner Reply:

    Consider this again in this context

    https://imgur.com/a/GO4p7Oh

    If you had to guess, do you think the EU, the Bilderbergers, our senators, social scientists, etc. worship these as idols OR do they question each other about them? Heh no you’re not cynical, that’s just the truth- for the most part they take all these values for granted as sacred. And the EU wonders why the Brits are saying 👋 No philosophy! False religion!

    From Dugin’s 👽 perspective, the US rules the world and the UK is the US’s island, essentially. So that’s not just any statement made to the EU. “What’s the worst that could possibly happen?” That. Hence why Land and I expect others to follow.

    [Reply]

    Posted on October 11th, 2019 at 2:37 pm Reply | Quote

Leave a comment