This is weird.

If Nick wants to, he can delete the above post, and this comment tree.

This just proves that there are a lot more of us out there than we think – and the internet allows us to find each other and communicate our heretical views to a wider audience. *I* knew plenty about psychometrics and behavior genetics years before I ever knew such a thing as “HBD” ever existed. I don’t have any political agenda, and I try not to distort the facts to corroborate my own biases.

For Pete’s sake, I actively read literature that calls for the mass institutionalization and overt oppression of people like me. What does that tell you? If you want to make a logical case for the dissolution of liberal democracy, or the re-establishment of a feudal state, that’s fine with me. Just try not to sound like a deranged idiot while you’re at it. (This comment is directed toward nobody in particular, but toward the entire “Dark Enlightenment” community at large. And yes, I too have cognitive biases that ought to be challenged.)

On that note… Every single time I find somebody out there who has heard of Cochran’s gay germ theory and understands why it’s the best one supported by all the evidence, I smile deep down inside. So far I haven’t found anyone IRL, but I’ve find quite a few while browsing the internet.

Uhhh, Jesus Christ. *slowly backs away from screen*

Let’s just say that’s not exactly my sort of thing. Does he even read HBD blogs? That’s scary.

I tried registering it as a gmail address – unfortunately, somebody’s already taken it, which is quite odd. Maybe that’s him.

And no, I don’t believe in eugenics. People can’t be herded like cattle.

Although I was raised on pokemon, I guess.

I don’t think he has any idea at all about what the Dark Enlightenment stands for, though.