Comments on: White Fright

By: Scope | Laofmoonster

Scope | Laofmoonster — Tue, 13 May 2014 02:58:02 +0000

[…] Progressivism is a form of Americanism, and Americanism originates from WASPs*, who take the trend of Western European Whiteness (as described by HBDChick) to its furthest extent. Confronting this reality creates an uncomfortable mental tension, which in other reactionary spheres is often dissipated by Blaming the Jew. (The extent of Jewish participation in the Cathedral has been well covered, so I will not rehash it.) White Nationalism denies its own heritage. As Nick Land notes: […]

By: admin

admin — Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:38:56 +0000

@ Contemplationist — FWIW I strongly concur: tolerated disparate impact is quite enough (but apparently outside the Overton Window for the foreseeable future). It has the added advantage of being workable, which racially-specific legal status simply isn’t.

By: admin

admin — Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:16:36 +0000

Seems to me that’s a superior model. If it can work in a 90% African-ancestry society, it can work anywhere, can’t it? (Its destruction was clearly exogenous.)

By: James A. Donald

James A. Donald — Sun, 06 Apr 2014 08:03:07 +0000

What about Rhodesia

“Equal rights for all civilized men”

So a black man in Rhodesia could earn equal rights – but most did not.

So the law treated uncivilized men differently – disparate impact, rather than explicitly race conscious policies, but all men were not equal before the law.

By: Contemplationist

Contemplationist — Sun, 06 Apr 2014 05:04:59 +0000

What about Rhodesia?
Isn’t disparate impact enough?

By: admin

admin — Thu, 03 Apr 2014 04:49:47 +0000

“… after WWII, Progressives were desperate to distinguish themselves from fascists, something that is exceedingly hard to do in terms of economic policy.” — Acute.

By: James A. Donald

James A. Donald — Thu, 03 Apr 2014 03:13:23 +0000

"Jim Crow does not lead to peace."

What then do you propose instead of Jim Crow? Kill them all? Return to slavery? Deport them all to Africa? The reason no one has ever practiced race blind policies, is that race blind policies are seriously disastrous.

By: JPOutlook

JPOutlook — Thu, 03 Apr 2014 03:06:55 +0000

“Izak”

Man, even if you don’t go through those links that I posted in a reply now awaiting moderation, there is one more point I’d like to refute. That is that the strength of the argument or the “teeth” if you will, comes from using the U.N.’s terminology for genocide. Actually, that’s incorrect. The real bite comes from pointing out the contradictions with a bit of humour and victimology thrown in for good measure. If you haven’t read the full Mantra recently it’s worth it.

J.P.O.

By: JPOutlook

JPOutlook — Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:59:04 +0000

@VXXC Haha, that's approximately correct. But, needn't be so rough as not all of our people are capable of thinking racially.

By: JPOutlook

JPOutlook — Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:54:48 +0000

The anti-whites are the ones pushing the genocide. This is important rhetoric, even if the theory is too acerbic for schmoozing dialogue. The propaganda machine is the most effective counter-attack and “They’re killing us” is the most dramatic message. This should be self-evident hopefully, but then again I am starting to wonder why more people haven’t done their own investigation into the reasoning and source of all of this pro-white propaganda. For myself, I’ve been consistent in spreading the Mantra but it is somewhat shallow intellectually, so after a bit of activism I’m normally back into the Neo-Reaction world.

No, when you are on the battlefield for propaganda you are not answering the enemies question as to who it is forcing the genocide. That is a well developed and described “no-no” of the B.U.G.S. community and it’s called tailgating… So, those pushing the genocide are simply anti-whites… But, if you want some sort of theory, since this is a pro-white friendly environment I’ll recommend something I ran into the other day, looking at the way the Cathedral sends forth the anti-whites. http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-peoples-of-europe/

If you want to see white people with balls, saying “No” and fighting back in this memetic warfare, I’d recommend doing some work with B.U.G.S. and here’s another link that describes why “White Nationalism” is not the right terminology.

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/07/20/white-nationalist-or-pro-white/

“Izak”, you’ll see the comment section for that article is closed and that’s because “Bob” is the coach who wants to see people commenting on the recent articles…

Best regards,

J.P.O.